About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Focus group backfire! Guest tells Hannity protesters are "getting bad information from Fox News"

August 13, 2009 11:43 pm ET

From the August 13 edition of Fox News' Hannity:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by IRONY 101 (August 13, 2009 11:46 pm ET)
      23 4
      Zing...! Hey, Sean, get out into the real world. Thinking people elected Barack Obama...not the ignorant meat heads who watch FOX News and are incapable of telling fact from fiction.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (August 13, 2009 11:51 pm ET)
        15 5
        BTW, Sean, I shall refrain from calling your noble protesters un-America...ignorant, racist, cowardly fools is probably a better description.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by ReasonAndResolve (August 13, 2009 11:56 pm ET)
          19 4
          I will say the same thing that Pelosi said (and which has been consistently misrepresented): It is un-American to interfere with the free speech of others.

          Someone needs to tell Sean that his rights end where mine begin.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by markbfoot199 (August 14, 2009 11:46 am ET)
              6
            http://www.breitbart.tv/06-flashback-pelosi-tells-anti-war-protesters-im-a-fan-of-disruptors/
            Report Abuse
        • Author by snoopy (August 14, 2009 12:05 am ET)
          17 5
          It's just unfortunate we have to refer to racists, fascists and fundamentalists as "fellow americans".
          Report Abuse
          • Author by IRONY 101 (August 14, 2009 12:08 am ET)
            22 5
            They are Republicans (or "Conservatives!") first...and Americans second.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by princeofwheels (August 14, 2009 12:43 am ET)
              13 3
              And they are even confused but those terms.

              Sean, start a Conservative Party..free the Republicans
              Report Abuse
            • Author by bintx (August 14, 2009 10:07 am ET)
              6  
              They are not conservatives.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by markbfoot199 (August 14, 2009 11:47 am ET)
                6
              Irony, please explain.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by The_Cat (August 15, 2009 11:14 am ET)
                6  
                The simple explanation of Irony101's remarks is this, markbfoot199: They would rather their party succeed, even at the cost of the entire nation.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by mikehuck1976 (August 15, 2009 1:45 pm ET)
                5  
                Also explain to mark which programs from FDR are still running today. Also explain that Arabs were involved in the advancement of mathematics. Also explain that McVeigh was not a Democrat. Also...the list goes on and on. He needs alot of explanations.
                Report Abuse
          • Author by princeofwheels (August 14, 2009 12:53 am ET)
            16 3
            I'll bet the Con Talk shows won't have this guy on their programs all day and night like the Screamers are put on.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by mjh (August 14, 2009 12:46 am ET)
        17 3
        "Zing...! Hey, Sean, get out into the real world." -IRONY 101

        ROFL -- this was more proof that, for the Fox Comedy Channel, unscripted focus groups and unedited live interviews are NOT their friend.



        Report Abuse
        • Author by princeofwheels (August 14, 2009 12:52 am ET)
          15 1
          As we have all stated, Seannie cannot appear in public and have a discussion with anyone. He just isn't smart enough. Tomorrow night, he'll probably have Morris, Coulter and The Criminal Colonel on for support. This was not one of his best moments in the sun. His ignorance showed.
          Or is it a concert night...his fans will give him support while he takes their cash.
          For being a non-profit group, he sure gives a lot of tickets away. Shouldn't they sell those.
          And the IRS should find out if he donates his time and uses these concert "appearance" fees as a write-off. He says he donates a lot to this concert stuff. Is it his appearance or real money?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by eb (August 14, 2009 12:02 pm ET)
            6  
            I wonder how Sean H. would react to someone disrupting his little meeting. Anywone who realizes that they were duped by fox news might actually get a bit irate when reality sinks in. Imagine the backlash that might cause! Instead these righty pundits and their ditto-fans have so much invested in conservative talking points that they react in anger to anyone challenge the worldview that has been spoon fed to them all these years. Obama must be evil. Government can only distroy, liberals are nazi....

            I could envision a genuine reaction to Sean's little town hall focus group that could be quite disruptive. Ultimately no one appreciated being duped. I doubt Sean would consider such a disruption patriotic expression of God given rights.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by markbfoot199 (August 14, 2009 11:44 am ET)
          1 12
          I guess Sean should do like Obama and only hand pick people to attend and then give them questions to ask. Oh, have you hear about Shelia Jackson Lee in Texas, busted with a Fake Doc Plant.
          Or how about Acron busing in protesters to a town hall, at least Sean had real folks with real questions. Just sad that some have not read the bill.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by eb (August 14, 2009 12:03 pm ET)
            7  
            W BUSH DID THIS ALL THE TIME!!! Rigged townhall events
            Report Abuse
            • Author by newzhound (August 14, 2009 12:13 pm ET)
              6  
              eb: Much worse, President Bush's handlers screened members of the US military. They had to qualify to be backdrops for his photo ops. And remember the planted questions brouhaha?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by mjh (August 14, 2009 3:59 pm ET)
                6  

                Much worse, President Bush's handlers screened members of the US military. They had to qualify to be backdrops for his photo ops.


                And if there weren't enough to make the cut, no big -- they simply recycled those that did:

                [http://www1.cs.columbia.edu/~aaron/images/screenshots/whatever-med.jpg]

                Report Abuse
          • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (August 14, 2009 1:49 pm ET)
            6  
            Hard to argue with all of that evidence, Markbfoot. By which I mean, stuff you heard and repeated.

            Report Abuse
          • Author by manofmystique (August 14, 2009 2:58 pm ET)
            4  
            Real folks? No these are people who can't think for themselves, otherwise they would know that the medicare they want to keep is run by the goverment.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by mustardman (August 13, 2009 11:50 pm ET)
      19 1
      Dough! Guess that is the last time they do this without pre-screening the audience for sufficient ignorance!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by kim7nikk (August 14, 2009 4:24 am ET)
          4
        Talk about ignorance he has these meetings often.
        I am a conservative willing to come to a liberal forum, I wonder how many of you would actually be willing to go to a Conservative forum.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by fairliberal (August 14, 2009 12:02 am ET)
      2 33
      The more important fact to emerge from the meeting was that the majority were Obama supporters but most were disatisfied with Obama's presidency so far.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by TheKidFromKountyMeath (August 14, 2009 12:04 am ET)
        20 3
        Because he's TOO MODERATE, you idiot.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (August 14, 2009 12:06 am ET)
        25 2
        I am disappointed with Obama as well...for not just steamrolling the obstrctionist Republicans in Congress.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by fawltylogic (August 14, 2009 1:10 am ET)
          16 1
          And the few obstructionist Dems too.

          Obama is not willing (so far at least) to fight the fights over the issues he campaigned on. And the Democratic congress is too greedy and cowardly to do it for him.

          All in all, the Dems have power, but no willingness to use it on the issues on which they have been elected.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by all your eyes (August 14, 2009 8:50 am ET)
            10 1
            It's early yet. Obama's laying in the weeds, waiting to strike. He doesn't want to overplay his hand too early in the game. Be patient. He has a lot of clout on Capitol Hill, when push comes to shove, because those congressmen (and women) will need him come Nov. 2010.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by kfraz43 (August 14, 2009 10:10 am ET)
              5  
              I predict that September will be a punch in the mouth for repubs. I have no doubt that the Dem war room is not only helping congress deal with the town halls, but is also shaping the HCR issue and perhaps even working on a final House bill to have ready as soon as the session starts...
              Report Abuse
              • Author by kingsley72 (August 14, 2009 11:36 am ET)
                4  
                let's hope so, because so far as a dem and obama supporter, I too am disappointed with this waste of time he undertook with attempting bipartisan consensus. Repubs on the hill are not interested in helping the nation, or their constituents, but just themselves. As to this Faux news focus group, priceless.
                btw, Hannity is a disgrace
                Report Abuse
              • Author by mjh (August 14, 2009 11:48 am ET)
                6  
                August hasn't exactly been smooth sailing for them: despite their best efforts {i.e., calling her racist}, Sonia Sotomayor is a SC Justice . . . plus, the DJIA went above 9K for the first time in more than a year, a sign that the recovery may be beginning . . .
                Report Abuse
            • Author by newzhound (August 14, 2009 12:18 pm ET)
              7  
              Precisely! President Obama knows how to get things done.

              Remember when some Democrats wanted to not let Sen. Joe Lieberman caucus with them in the Senate? And President Obama said lay off - let him in? He didn't want to let Lieberman go on tv and play the victim. And who has heard a peep from Lieberman since?

              The final week of the Senate session there were all those news stories about how there would not be more cash for clunkers - the Republicans were going to again be the Abominable No Men and block it. There just wasn't enough time before Recess (recess, indeed!).

              President Obama got it done.

              He's serious about working together and bipartianship. And if there is one lesson from these Recess Riots its that we need that more than ever.

              In the end, if the GOP won't participate, then President Obama will do it without them. But he's giving them all the time he can - and they continue to make themselves out to be the fools they are in the process.

              I predict the Democrats with return to the Senate and House in September very angry - and ready to get the job done.

              Bottom Line: Never, never underestimate Barack Obama!
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (August 14, 2009 2:14 pm ET)
                5  
                Newzhound, I've been a bit frustrated by Obama and the dems not seeming to use their power as much as they could, but as I'm watching the MSM more lately, a few things are becoming clear;

                I think some average Americans are starting to catch on to the fact that there's a lot of money trying to shoot down reform, and they're getting a lot of misinformation.

                I've seen hysterical screams of "Just say No!!" to healthcare turn to "Slow down!!". Some of this is BS, the natural conservative reaction to a world that's changing too quickly for them. "slow down" means "stop!" sometimes, but I think in the middle are some who are receptive to getting some facts.

                There's also the matter of consequences bigger than the political. These screeching teabaggers and mental cases we see are (hopefully) a very small minority, but within this fringe are a few nuts who are close to snapping, as evidenced by the recent surge in right wing domestic terrorist acts.

                I'm not saying that the sort of extremist who is going to shoot up an abortion clinic or sneak into a town hall with a gun is ever going to be affected by reasonable discussion of the issues, but maybe if they can be eased out of panic mode, if they can realize that they are not well supported by a significant group of Americans, they may be less emboldened as delusional nuts seem to be when they imagine popular support.

                As a poster says below, in response to Beck's advertisers wising up;

                ..we are now calling all these companies and letting them know, there are more of us, then [sic] you.

                I'm not saying that Markfoot is one of these terrorists, just noting the mindset. Note how often Rush or Fox's phony ratings are mentioned by cons in these threads, how often they need to chant that they're a majority, just as Hannity needs to repeat that Fox tells the truth.

                It's all about groupthink,and constantly convincing themselves that what they believe is popular, and therefore, right.

                Report Abuse
              • Author by mjh (August 14, 2009 4:06 pm ET)
                4  
                Remember when some Democrats wanted to not let Sen. Joe Lieberman caucus with them in the Senate? And President Obama said lay off - let him in? He didn't want to let Lieberman go on tv and play the victim. And who has heard a peep from Lieberman since?



                That, and Obama was waiting for the drama in Minnesota to play itself out.

                Harry Reid put up with Lieberman because he needed him to maintain the slim majority the Dems had -- now that the soap opera in MN is over and the Dems have a veto/filibuster - proof majority, Reid and Obama can give Joe Republican a well-deserved kick to the curb . . .

                Report Abuse
        • Author by kim7nikk (August 14, 2009 4:25 am ET)
          1 1
          If he did that then the dems would lose Congress in 2010.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by fawltylogic (August 15, 2009 2:50 am ET)
            3  
            That's what Democrats ALWAYS say: "If we carry out the issues we won elections on, we will lose the next election". It has never made any sense, and it doesn't now either.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by kim7nikk (August 16, 2009 4:12 am ET)
                 
              Look at what happened in 1994, Bill Clinton won the election making the Democrats think that they had a mandate, they went to far. Newt. came in took both houses of Congress with "The Contract With America", convince the President to go along with Newt's agenda by balancing the budget and a host of other things. Billy tried to take credit but if you read history every positive thing that was accomplished was part of The Contract With America.
              Report Abuse
      • Author by dr. matt (August 14, 2009 12:19 am ET)
        17 2
        Again, only a teabagging hick would be shocked that an Obama supporter is at an Obama event. Are you really that dense?

        Report Abuse
      • Author by mjh (August 14, 2009 12:25 am ET)
        17 3
        "The more important fact to emerge from the meeting was that the majority were Obama supporters but most were disatisfied with Obama's presidency so far."- FAILliberal


        More important than the fact they were complaining about misinformation from the "fair and balanced" channel.

        Welcome to Planet Wingnut.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by mustardman (August 14, 2009 12:47 am ET)
        11  
        You fail!
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (August 14, 2009 7:33 am ET)
        5 2
        The most mundane fact to emerge from this thread is that Commode Boy got it wrong yet again.

        (I call failliberal "Commode Boy" because he called Keith Olbermann "Bathtub Boy" in one of his many ignorant posts, and since turnabout is fair play, I named him after something else found in a bathroom.)
        Report Abuse
      • Author by manofmystique (August 14, 2009 9:40 am ET)
        7 1
        A MUST READ:

        How can people support a man for President and watch the other Party and media do everything in their power to undermine, obstruct and deny all the things he ran his campaign on, and claim they are disappointed in HIM? How in the hell can you be disappointed in the man who is trying to do his job, knowing sore losers (opposition) want him to “fail”. Not only do they want him to fail, but they are doing everything to ensure that happens. People wake up; this is part of a plan, a plan to turn the American people against him. Think for yourself.
        There is no reason to be disappointed in Obama, no; you should be disappointed in those who are spitting on democracy. The American people have spoken and they rejected the ideas and policies of those who are trying to hurt the President.
        It is inexcusable to see all of the lying and misrepresentation by Republicans, conservatives, Fox News and most of the media and not know it is a diabolical plan to bring down this president.
        If they stood by and let Bush do what he did to ruin this country, they could allow this president to clean up the mess and carry out all the things he campaigned on.
        It’s a shame, but the America people are too gullible at best and stupid at worse.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (August 14, 2009 10:11 am ET)
        7 1
        You really aren't very bright, are you? The Obama voters who are dissatisfied are dissatisfied because he isn't, in their opinions, being progressive enough. He's far too moderate for their tastes.

        I wasn't an Obama supporter, but I hoped that he would do a better job than the jackonkey who held that office for the past 8 years. So far, he's done well in some regards, not so well in others, but this ridiculously hateful, racist rhetoric being pushed by Fox, Rush, et al, and their blind followers who NEVER research the lies they are being fed on Fox is just that, ridiculous. He has done NOTHING to deserve the hate that these people are ginning up against him.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Bronwyn (August 16, 2009 1:33 am ET)
        1  
        Fairliberal, why do you hate honest Americans?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mescal (August 16, 2009 3:02 am ET)
          2  
          It's actually written into her contract with the Faux News Channel.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by jstarr99 (August 14, 2009 12:15 am ET)
      3  
      LOL!!! Fixed News gets called out by REAL Americans. Reps better take notice that clear thinking voters know BS politics when they see it.....
      Report Abuse
    • Author by snoopy (August 14, 2009 12:16 am ET)
      12 1
      SMITH: But Grassley’s sort of taking credit for all these town halls, right?

      CAMERON: Yeah, that’s right. Well, he’s the top Republican on the Senate Finance Committee, the one of five committees yet to pass a bill. And he says all of the delay caused by his collaboration and willingness to negotiate slowed this process and there by created the August vacation town halls that we’re now in the midst of. The idea being all of the voices of dissent wouldn’t have been heard had he not been part of the negotiating process.


      Oh oh, another thread starts to unwind in the manufactured event...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by snoopy (August 14, 2009 12:23 am ET)
      14 1
      OT, but Beck lost 4 more sponsors because of his hate speech!

      **UPDATE: On Thursday, ConAgra, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis and RadioShack all backed out of sponsoring Glenn Beck's programs, according to a media advisory.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Rasta Farian (August 14, 2009 12:45 am ET)
        12 1
        Great! Keep that petition going:

        http://colorofchange.org/beck/
        Report Abuse
        • Author by markbfoot199 (August 14, 2009 11:57 am ET)
          1 10
          ColorofChange, founded by a White House Czar, so in a nut shell the White house is helping stop freespeech. Yes, you all calling the advertisers is a way to stop free speech, but you as you are seeing more and more are hearing about what you are doing, and in return we are now calling all these companies and letting them know, there are more of us, then you.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by eb (August 14, 2009 12:14 pm ET)
            9  
            No one is taking away beck's free speech. He might loose his sponsors who, as undemocratic corporate entities, are required to place shareholders before all others. Cold heartless business decisions is what they make (I thought this was better than constitutional representative government based decision making for all you libertarian conservatives).

            The worse thing that can happen is Beck looses his distribution network and his (until now)unchallenged access to hours of mass media. Beck might return to being just any other guy with a bunch of opinions. Constitutionally protected opinions nonetheless.

            Besides if Beck goes a new right wing ignorantist will pop up to offer entertainment and enlightment. There seems to be no end to them.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by Brabantio (August 14, 2009 12:40 pm ET)
            6 1
            So if there were some wild-eyed, irresponsible liberal influencing the public discourse through a couple of million viewers? We're talking commentary along the lines of "Bush is a traitor, a Nazi, the devil, complicit in 9/11, deserves to be assassinated..." Let's say that the overwhelming majority of those questioned about this person think he should be taken off the air. Does "free speech" really protect that person from being fired from his job? How about if his viewership is dropping? Does that compromise his "rights"?

            Bear in mind, this is purely hypothetical. I'm not saying that Beck said those specific things, I'm wondering how far that principle extends. Also along these lines, do you believe that if you go off on a rant about how your boss's wife is a whore in front of everyone at the Christmas party, do you think "free speech" protects your job? If not, then how is one employee different from another?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by mjboldt (August 15, 2009 8:57 pm ET)
                 
              If you read the 1st Amendment to the Constitution it states that congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech... You don't have the freedom to say what you want in the workplace or at employer sponsored events. The 1st Amendment only protects your free speech from the government.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by kim7nikk (August 16, 2009 4:25 am ET)
                 
              Air-America tried to do exactly what you proposed(Al Frankin was on the channel) and it has been a dismal failure. It can not sustain itself in a free market society but if the Dems. get what they want then that will be the only talk allowed on the radio.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by mjh (August 14, 2009 1:28 pm ET)
            5  
            Yes, you all calling the advertisers is a way to stop free speech . . .
            - markfootinmouth


            Yeah, I was wondering how long it would be before the first wingnut apologist pulled the "we're taking away Beck's freedom of speech" card.

            Wingnuts love to scream about freedom of speech, free markets, and free elections . . . 'til the results of any one of them wind up biting 'em in the a$$ -- then they scream "regulation" . . .
            Report Abuse
      • Author by princeofwheels (August 14, 2009 12:48 am ET)
        9  
        When will they start rallying around the BeckBoy. The poor victim will be out there demanding his free speech rights. And the lame brains that follow him will repeat that on every talk show. To which each host should say, "Beck has his free speech. And the advertisers have their right to spend their money."
        All the nickel and dime Radio Talkers will start making waves but their owners may tell them that Beck is on his own.
        We can only hope.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by pete592 (August 14, 2009 1:19 am ET)
          9  
          I, too, am wondering when Becky's shell is going to crack on the sponsorship issue. He's bound to burst into a tearful First Amendment argument sooner or later.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by mjh (August 14, 2009 1:43 am ET)
          9 1
          Exactly. These neoKKKon wingnuts are forever screaming about "the free market" and "freedom of speech."

          They don't seem to realize that, as much as Glenda has the freedom to spout whatever nonsense he wants, others have the EQUAL right to call him on it.

          And, as much as the free market determines how many viewers Becky gets, the free market also determines whether or not advertisers will continue to support him when he spouts nonsense that offends people.

          Just like when Don Imus lost his show briefly after the "nappy headed hoes" flap -- the wingnuts thought his freedom of speech was being infringed upon; it wasn't -- he lost his show when advertisers pulled their sponsorship.

          And if the same thing happens to Glenda -- congratulations, wingnuts . . . you just got a lesson in the free market.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by kim7nikk (August 14, 2009 4:29 am ET)
              2
            I am glad to see that you libs are finally beginning to understand and appreciate the free market.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (August 14, 2009 7:37 am ET)
            8 2
            Just like when Don Imus lost his show briefly after the "nappy headed hoes" flap
            Imus is on some farm channel now, from 3-6am Eastern time.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by smarshall1432997 (August 14, 2009 8:30 am ET)
              6  
              Imus was telling Sean Hannity last week that he will be back on regular cable tv soon, LOL. When we heard this we thought that Imus and FoxNews Channel were testing the waters to see what viewers would say about Imus coming to FoxNews Channel maybe to replace Glenn Beck. Hmmm.

              Well, with advertisers pulling away from Glenn Beck's Show it maybe a long wait for Imus to join FoxNews Channel even with Sean Hannity's stamp of approval. Great comment above, thanks.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by bintx (August 14, 2009 10:16 am ET)
                4  
                Imus is in talks with the Fox Business Channel for a simulcast. He's got a bigger audience if he stays on RFD-TV. Fox doesn't want Imus . . . he will say whatever he wants when he wants. He calls stupid, stupid . . . he's no respecter of the letter in the ().
                Report Abuse
            • Author by wolf kotenberg (August 14, 2009 5:27 pm ET)
                 
              no west coast trips this year. I will keep an eye on the schedule.
              W
              Report Abuse
        • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (August 14, 2009 7:35 am ET)
          8 1
          When will they start rallying around the BeckBoy. The poor victim will be out there demanding his free speech rights.
          Beck's speech isn't free. It's sold, bought, and paid for.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Lizinbklyn (August 14, 2009 12:01 pm ET)
            2 1
            On 8/13/09 Jon Stewart showed an 18-month old video of Beck saying:

            "We got the best health care system in the world."

            Gee, I thought Glenn said the other day 'we are bordering on eugenics'?

            Flip or flop?
            Report Abuse
        • Author by kim7nikk (August 16, 2009 4:29 am ET)
             
          You guys don't get it. Beck is number three on the radio. Hannity is number two and Rush is number one. There isn't a liberal talk show host in site. There just is no market for liberals, they always run out of ideas. People get tired of all of the liberals hatred.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by months23included (August 14, 2009 6:23 pm ET)
        2  
        yes i have started a petition and sent letters to sponsers of glenn beck and now hes losing them.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by kim7nikk (August 16, 2009 4:20 am ET)
           
        I canceled my insurance with GEICO because they pulled out.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by LIBERTY OR DEATH (August 14, 2009 12:26 am ET)
      4 4
      This focus group was fixed same old fox shame on them.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by bnurse9786 (August 14, 2009 12:53 am ET)
      3  
      WOW, who let that guy in? Some body is going to get fired.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by fawltylogic (August 14, 2009 1:16 am ET)
      14 3
      Man in crowd: "They're getting bad information from Fox News"
      Hannity: "No no, they're getting the truth from Fox News"

      Did anyone else think it seemed like even Hannity was a little embarrassed and unconvinced of what he was saying there?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mjh (August 14, 2009 1:46 am ET)
        10  
        Yeah -- that was a "deer in the headlights" moment for Insanity . . .
        Report Abuse
      • Author by kim7nikk (August 14, 2009 4:30 am ET)
          2
        Wishful thinking.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mescal (August 16, 2009 3:04 am ET)
          1 1
          Hey, even sociopaths like Insanity can be embarrassed when their propaganda hits an unexpected speed bump.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by smarshall1432997 (August 14, 2009 8:34 am ET)
        6  
        Fox 'reports' and you 'decide'. Sean Hannity should remember this, LOL.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (August 14, 2009 1:57 pm ET)
          5  
          Fox 'reports' and you 'decide'. Sean Hannity should remember this..


          And when somebody decides wrong, you report a little more loudly that you're telling them the truth!
          Report Abuse
      • Author by manofmystique (August 14, 2009 9:51 am ET)
        7  
        Of course Klanninty is "unconvinced", in fact, he knows Fox News coverage of Obama is a show of lies and smears.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by months23included (August 14, 2009 6:29 pm ET)
        4  
        fox wouldn't know the truth if in bit them in the but.fox comedy hour or fox fixed news take your pick they are all retarded
        Report Abuse
    • Author by andrea_m_taylor5058 (August 14, 2009 5:24 am ET)
      1  
      I would like to give Sean Hannity a piece of my mind.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by rwmacdonald2091 (August 14, 2009 6:29 am ET)
      10 1
      Don't you just hate it your screening procedures don't work ?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by blk-in-alabam (August 14, 2009 7:59 am ET)
      8  
      Somebody's in trouble.this show was not an accident.Sean Hannity has quietly lost many sponsors.Stuff like this is not going to help the damage has been done.You can heal a wound,and forget where it was.But the things you say you cannot put back in your mouth,this is too little,too late.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by wolf kotenberg (August 14, 2009 9:01 am ET)
        7  
        Yeah this guy kinda looks like joe-the-plumber so they felt safe during the pre show....
        Report Abuse
    • Author by manofmystique (August 14, 2009 9:43 am ET)
      6  
      Here's a man who seem to think for himself...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mocha59 (August 14, 2009 10:54 am ET)
      4  
      Perfect. I am sharing this on twitter and facebook now...along with the information about the 2 court rulings Fox News has won. These court rulings made it very clear that fox news CAN lie and misinform their viewing audience. Yes, that's right, Fox News SUCCESSFULLY argued IN COURT (2003/2009) that they lie & misinform their audience. So, maybe those that aren't completely brainwashed yet, will hear FROM Fox News that FOX NEWS lies and misinforms them and they fight to keep that right...and those viewers will wake up. This knowledge alone should be pushed any and every way we can, IMHO.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by ayele17foli4121 (August 14, 2009 11:03 am ET)
      3  
      Greeeeeaaaaaaaaaat Job. For once, people are willing to step up to the plate and call things they way they are.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Romario (August 14, 2009 11:16 am ET)
      5  
      Ooops!! Hannity's plan backfired..LOL!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Mixty (August 14, 2009 1:56 pm ET)
      5 1
      Man in crowd: "They're getting bad information from Fox News"
      Hannity: "No no, they're getting the truth from Fox News"


      I cheered when this happened. Would like to see this entire episode.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by IllinoisMom (August 14, 2009 8:10 pm ET)
           
        Here it is;
        http://www.foxnews.com/video2/video08.html?maven_referralObject=8164377&maven_referralPlaylistId=&sRevUrl=http://www.foxnews.com/

        A bit different when it's shown uncut.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Vincenzo (August 15, 2009 12:24 am ET)
          4  
          A town hall from bizzaro world. Hanny as usual leads the show in the direction that everything this admin does is wrong. Ignore anything that interferes with that agenda.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by kim7nikk (August 16, 2009 4:04 am ET)
           
        It is on Hannity.com and there are actually 2parts to it I think everyone should watch it. It did not go down the way that MM shows. MM leaves out a lot of the conversation. It would change most peoples mind about what actually transpired.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by staticnz (August 14, 2009 11:20 pm ET)
         
      Abort! Abort! Slander failed! Truth leaking out of town hall participants!

      Quick Hannity, back into the slander cave!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by antihannity2009 (August 16, 2009 2:40 am ET)
         
      I guess Fox forgot to censor that guy. Nice going Sean!

      Fox probably found 2 of those people on the street and the rest work for them. Seas will think twice about having another focus group.

      I like how Seas carries around with him pieces of paper to make him "appear" to be smart but all they have are RNC talking points on them and whatever lies he's made up.
      Report Abuse