Morning Joe continues to falsely claim that Pelosi and Hoyer called protestors "un-American"
August 18, 2009 8:26 am ET
From the August 18 edition of MSNBC's Morning Joe:
Expand All
Expand 1st Level
Collapse All
-
Barnes: "Obama ought to recognize that the science" of climate change "is in dispute"
November 25, 2009 6:47 pm ET -
Beck: "Progressives have built up this wall of separation between church and state, and it's nonsense"
November 25, 2009 5:49 pm ET -
-
-
-
Beck: "The real goal of the progressive movement" is "control of your life"
November 25, 2009 5:13 pm ET
-
The other right-wing media mogul you should worry about
by Jamison Foser - November 25, 2009 -
Palin's book and Obama's bow: a media week to forget
by Eric Boehlert - November 23, 2009 -
Media Matters: The Palin chronicles
by Simon Maloy - November 20, 2009
|
|
||
Connect & Share
© 2009 Media Matters for America. All rights reserved.
  |
||
PHOENIX – About a dozen people carrying guns, including one with a military-style rifle, milled among protesters outside the convention center where President Barack Obama was giving a speech Monday — the latest incident in which protesters have openly displayed firearms near the president.us_obama_protesters_guns
Just imagine the fake outrage if a brown person showed up with a rifle to an herr dubyah event.
Reminds me of the double think from Xians when they get caught with their rhetoric in the gutter: we hate the sin, but love the sinner.
This is 2009.. Not the wild west!
These are the same fools who are stocking up on ammo for the "revolution".
PASS PUBLIC OPTION!!!!
GREED & GLUTTONY & SELFISHNESS ARE EVIL!
call the protesters, "unamerican," is that she called those who
disrupt meetings, by that epithet, and not the protesters, but
it is the protesters who she claims are disrupting the meetings.
Therefore, she is calling the protesters, "unamerican." I
would also point out that in 2006, she said that she liked
disrupters, when they were on her side and were protesting
George W. Bush.
Good. There's hope for you.
but i do take plesure [sic] in the right is doing what the left has done for so many years is orginize [sic] screamers to shout down and intimidate the other side.
You and others have been asked to prove this point before, and you keep coming up empty. Why is that?
p.s. Is there no shift key on your keyboard? Your misspellings intimate that you're none too bright, but no capitalization means you're also lazy. If you want to be taken seriously, fix things up.
(It was all about Jodie Foster, remember?)
you all either turn a blind eye or you say well we were right and thats why we did that. guess what the other side feels the same.
i heard this morning on steph miller how bad the astroturfers were and in the same sentence endorse a callers call to orginize a million person protest for single payer healthcare. and i don't give a rats for your elitist snobery on my typing style.
We call you types 'chickenhawks'.
I'm 45, and my IQ is 134. Ready to compare?
and have never seen a television or read a news report.
Wrong, obviously.
how about the vienam war protestors acted. people bused from all over the country to protest vietnam, iraq and so many anti bush rallys its to many to count. code pink ans seiu make a lot of noise.
Were you intoxicated when you typed this, or are you like this all the time?
you all either turn a blind eye or you say well we were right and thats why we did that. guess what the other side feels the same.
Frankly, I don't care if the "other side" feels the same when they can't back up their convictions with facts, like we do.
i heard this morning on steph miller how bad the astroturfers were and in the same sentence endorse a callers call to orginize a million person protest for single payer healthcare.
And what's wrong with that? No one said protests in and of themselves were a problem. The mini-mobs are into shutting down discourse entirely, and are showing signs of becoming violent.
and i don't give a rats for your elitist snobery on my typing style.
It's not just your "typing" style, it's your thinking style. It shows you're lazy, disorganized, and not altogether very bright. Why you want to expose yourself that way beats me.
Stop lying. It's not funny.
i had no idea i was up against someone so smart.
There are plenty of people on these boards that are smarter than I am, which makes you look even more foolish by comparison.
how can i ever blog again. a 134 IQ. man thats tough to beat. so if i had a IQ of 135 does that mean you are wrong and i am right.
No, and I never said anything of the sort, of course.
i'm 53 so i'm older and wiser?
No, just older. Reagan was old and was dumb as a brick. G.W. never got any wiser with his years, either.
don't know. code pink says all US military are criminals. are those facts or opinion or wrong.
It's wrong (if they actually said any such thing--a link would be helpful). Naturally, I don't agree with it.
i don't like the screamers at the town hall meetings anymore than you, its just that i have seen it so many times on the other side it makes you all a bit hypocritical thats all.
And I asked for examples, and you couldn't provide them. It's over and done with, craig. You took your turn at bat and struck out. There's no use arguing about it, just walk back to the dugout and wait for next time.
And try to absorb a little education in the meantime. It would do you a world of good.
What major leftist wallets can be seen spending millions to organize and ship protesters time and again to disrupt serious conservative meetings?
When and where?
protesters as, "unamerican," is that she was saying that
those who disrupted meetings were, "unamerican," and not
the protesters. Howevwer, it is the protesters who she is
accusing of disrupting the meetings, so she is calling the
protesters, "unamerican." By the way, in 2006 she said that
she liked, "disrupters," when they were protesting against
George W.Bush