Stoddard, Baier agree that reconciliation "used to be called the nuclear option"
August 19, 2009 8:45 pm ET
From the August 19 edition of Fox News' Special Report with Bret Baier:
Previously:
CNN joins Fox News in falsely comparing reconciliation process to "nuclear option"
Sammon falsely compares budget reconciliation process to threat of "nuclear option"
Morris redefines use of budget reconciliation process as "the so-called nuclear option"
Second night in a row: Hannity adopts Morris' redefinition of "nuclear option"











The other right-wing media mogul you should worry about
Palin's book and Obama's bow: a media week to forget
Media Matters: The Palin chronicles



Or, basically, exactly what they have done so far this session of Congress.
In U.S. politics, the "nuclear option" is an attempt by a majority of the United States Senate to end a filibuster by majority vote, as opposed to 60 senators voting to end a filibuster. Although it is not provided for in the formal rules of the Senate, the procedure is the subject of a 1957 parliamentary opinion and has been used on several occasions since. The term was coined by Senator Trent Lott (Republican of Mississippi) in 2005.[1]
The maneuver was brought to prominence in 2005 when then-Majority Leader Bill Frist (Republican of Tennessee) threatened its use to end Democratic-led filibusters of judicial nominees submitted by President George W. Bush. In response to this threat, Democrats threatened to shut down the Senate and prevent consideration of all routine and legislative Senate business. The ultimate confrontation was prevented by the Gang of 14, a group of seven Democratic and seven Republican Senators, all of whom agreed to oppose the nuclear option and oppose filibusters of judicial nominees, except in extraordinary circumstances.
These people are so clueless!!!!!!!!!!
It is NOT a nuclear option. Filibustering EVERYTHING is thwarting the majority that won the election and is obstructionism.
Bill Frist and the GOP used to call out the Dems for any filibuster during the Bush years.
Well is the Dem leadership in calling out these obstructionist in the GOP??