About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Limbaugh tells caller who can't afford $6,000 to treat broken wrist: "Well, you shouldn't have broken your wrist"

August 20, 2009 4:00 pm ET

From the August 20 broadcast of The Rush Limbaugh Show:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Also says health care prices will come down if we "[g]et the government out of it, get the government and their stupid regulations, get the government out of Medicare."

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by snoopy (August 20, 2009 4:02 pm ET)
      16 2
      Right wing christianity at it's finest!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by NiceguyEddie (August 20, 2009 4:59 pm ET)
        3  
        Can I go break his wrist now? Please? I know liberals tend towards non-violnece / pacifism but would anyone really condmen me at this point? Can I give him a good hard does of good old fascioned conservatism?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by princeofwheels (August 20, 2009 4:03 pm ET)
      5 1
      By the way Rush, exactly why did you "need" those ear implants? You shouldn't have "overdone it".
      I know, Rush was just kidding...thank God none of his ex-wives kidded with him. Can you imagine? NO.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Max Credits (August 20, 2009 4:12 pm ET)
        11 1
        Joke or not, that's literally the best advice and solution that his party's got for the healthcare crisis.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by princeofwheels (August 20, 2009 4:30 pm ET)
          9  
          And it was well-thought out and discussed in the drunk tank, I mean think tank of the Republican heirarcy.

          How about that Tom Ridge exposed the fearmongering of Bush/Cheney?
          Breaking news.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Max Credits (August 20, 2009 4:46 pm ET)
            6  
            Unreal. The more we learn of what the prior administration did, the more ridiculous the whines of "socialism" become today.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by NiceguyEddie (August 20, 2009 5:00 pm ET)
        3  
        Yeah, but you know... addiction is a disease when your a right-wing radio talk show host. It's only a moral failing if you're... well... NOT.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by dmp079 (August 20, 2009 4:23 pm ET)
         
      I am shocked that when Rush told this guy that he should not have not broken his wrist the man laughed! WTF was that call all about??? I think Rush throwed his voice to make himself the caller. That call was weird!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by NiceguyEddie (August 21, 2009 8:07 am ET)
           
        That's what happens! These guys (Liimbaugh fans) are so blind, so mindless, so utterly brainwashed that they can laugh even when abject cruelty is slung there way, making fun of of completely screwed they are, all in defense of the very system that screwed them! Hey - at least it's not socialist! ANYTHING to avoid realizing that they've been voting for the wrong party and embracing the wrong philsophy most of their adult lives!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (August 20, 2009 4:28 pm ET)
      6  
      I fdon't remember this portly man telling Ann Coulter she shouldn't have broken her jaw ??
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (August 20, 2009 4:36 pm ET)
        1  
        Who broke Ann Coulter's jaw?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by wolf kotenberg (August 20, 2009 4:51 pm ET)
          1  
          http://www.oregonlive.com/idahosportugal/index.ssf/2008/11/ann_coulters_jaw_broken_and_wi.html
          Report Abuse
    • Author by temphandle albatross13deciphers (August 20, 2009 4:33 pm ET)
      3  
      Maybe the caller should have asked if he could bum an oxycontin off of him...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by highliter (August 20, 2009 4:50 pm ET)
      3 12
      It was a frigging joke! He and the caller laughed. Holy crap MMFA is really stretching for this one.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by vysotsky (August 20, 2009 5:03 pm ET)
        4 2
        For the record, the caller laughed. Rush didn't.

        But I agree, it is a joke. It's a sick joke, and it is the ideal conservative healthcare plan: health care for the rich, homemade splints for the poor. You're absolutely right. It's a joke. A joke on Americans. And it's what Limbaugh actually proposes. His position is that healthcare is no different than a Rolls Royce: if you're wealthy, you can afford it.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by pete592 (August 20, 2009 5:09 pm ET)
          4 1
          i.e. "Pay Or Die"

          That's their health care plan.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by foghornleghorn (August 20, 2009 7:17 pm ET)
            2  
            Pay or Die

            I'm going to use that one (and will credit you, of course)
            Report Abuse
            • Author by pete592 (August 20, 2009 7:37 pm ET)
              1  
              I heard it from Thom Hartmann, actually. I think it's brilliant.
              Report Abuse
        • Author by highliter (August 20, 2009 5:11 pm ET)
          2 8
          You missed the point entirely. He was saying if you got the government completely out of healthcare it wouldn’t be so expensive and therefore you wouldn’t have to be rich to afford it.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Scotty Johnson Sr. (August 20, 2009 5:30 pm ET)
            3  
            Why are your supposedly original comments laced with unicode characters? That usually only happens when copy and paste from somewhere else.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by highliter (August 20, 2009 5:37 pm ET)
              1 10
              You are an Idiot! Ignore the substance of the post and go off on some wild “supposedly original” conspiracy theory.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Scotty Johnson Sr. (August 20, 2009 7:35 pm ET)
                   
                conspiracy theory
                You did it again. Since the gibberish makes about as much sense as the actual decipherable English in your post, I guess we don't mind.
                Report Abuse
          • Author by vysotsky (August 20, 2009 5:49 pm ET)
            1  
            No, I got the point. You and Limbaugh are simply wrong.

            Getting the government "completely out of healthcare" would mean, for starters, disbanding the FDA. Even if that would reduce the cost of medical treatment and pharmaceuticals, quality and reliability of care would still be directly and almost linearly related to price in the best case scenario. The poor will certainly have access to medicine, but it will be the kind that the bottom of the market regulates for itself. Imagine the "supplements" that you see in gas stations marketed to people who need to stay awake all night, only now that's what your entire pharmacy looks like. A person who needs a top of the line, scientifically tested drug but happens to be poor will have to settle for "Doc Limbaugh's EIB Almost Antibiotic Tonic -- Tested in Hannity Labs".

            In your ideal, exclusively private market driven healthcare system, this caller will indeed have access to treatment for his broken wrist: just like a trucker today has a choice between diet pills and Dr. Zippy's Keep On Truckin' pills.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by dr. matt (August 20, 2009 6:05 pm ET)
            4 1
            if you got the government completely out of healthcare it wouldn’t be so expensive


            Prove it
            Report Abuse
            • Author by highliter (August 21, 2009 9:48 am ET)
                5
              Prove that it wont!
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Scotty Johnson Sr. (August 21, 2009 2:45 pm ET)
                1  
                Ah, it was your assertion. You have the burden of proof.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by highliter (August 21, 2009 3:05 pm ET)
                    2
                  Scotty you are an idiot you offer nothing. It is the democrat’s assertion that the government plan will save money even though the CBO says it will ADD to the deficit. SO if the Dems dont have to prove it neither do I.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Scotty Johnson Sr. (August 22, 2009 4:12 am ET)
                       
                    SO if the Dems dont have to prove it neither do I.
                    They didn't post it on this board. You did. We get it, you can't prove it. We hear you loud and clear.

                    By the way, calling me an "idiot" proves your own idiocy. What's your IQ? I'll tell you mine, if you tell me yours!
                    Report Abuse
          • Author by foghornleghorn (August 20, 2009 7:18 pm ET)
            4  
            And, as usual his point was wrong.

            Private insurers had their chance. They blew it. Time for the non-profit government to take over.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by robyn20094113 (August 21, 2009 3:06 am ET)
              1  
              Time for the non-profit government to take over.
              Amen to that. First they can start with stopping the nearly 18 billion dollars the government gives to the insurance companies free and clear every year.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by pete592 (August 20, 2009 9:32 pm ET)
            1  
            Double digit increases in health care costs are all the fault of the government? It has absolutely nothing to do with insurance companies reaping enormous profits and paying CEO's exorbitant salaries while denying care?

            This is a system where there are people who cannot buy insurance if they wanted to. Have you ever heard of uncompensated care? That's the cost that gets passed on to everyone else when the uninsured receive emergency care and cannot pay for it.

            Limbaugh's point is ludicrous, and you're a fool for believing it.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by pete592 (August 20, 2009 9:39 pm ET)
            1  
            Is it the government that's telling insurance companies to deny benefits because of a pre-existing condition?
            Report Abuse
          • Author by bintx (August 21, 2009 10:22 am ET)
               
            Well, he may have been saying it, but it's not true. Private insurance companies are gouging their insureds right and left.

            Health care should NOT be a marketable product. If you want to talk about "death panels," you need to be talking about the folks at United Health Care, Blue Cross/Blue Shield, etc., whose job it is to try to find a reason to deny expensive health care. Happens all the time. People are denied necessary health care simply because it would damage an insurance company's bottom line. That's just wrong.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by renato (August 20, 2009 5:10 pm ET)
        5 2
        It was not a joke. It's the epitome of Republican philosophy: survival of the richest, the devil take the hindmost.

        AKA Social Darwinism.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by fantagor (August 20, 2009 5:13 pm ET)
        3 2
        Rush didn't laugh, the caller did, and Rush follow this up by blaming the cost on the GOVERNMENT, when the government has no control over what hospitals and doctors charge for their services. That is left to the devices of the market Rush bleats on and on in favor of, like a bloated windup toy from hell.

        Randy
        Report Abuse
        • Author by highliter (August 20, 2009 5:42 pm ET)
          2 4
          Wrong again Medicare and Medicaid, Tri-Care, tell the doctors what they will pay. FYI they pay crap maybe 20% of what the doctor bills. So in order to try and make up the other 80% they charge more to Insurance Companies who do not get the luxury of telling the hospital what they will take.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Old_Benjamin (August 20, 2009 6:09 pm ET)
            4 1
            Insurance Companies who do not get the luxury of telling the hospital what they will take.


            I think you are wrong...

            Commercial insurers or other purchasers of health care services usually negotiate discounts with health care facilities on behalf of the patients they represent.

            http://www.hospitalconsumerassist.com/qa.htm
            Report Abuse
            • Author by highliter (August 21, 2009 9:41 am ET)
                3
              Yes Hospitals do negotiate with insures however if they do not like what an insurer pays they will simple stop taking that companies insurance. With the government options there are no negotiations just the government saying here you will take this and like it. Becsue if you don’t take Medicare Medicaid, Tr-Care ect.. You do not qualify for government grants for research facility improvement ect…
              Report Abuse
              • Author by vysotsky (August 21, 2009 10:26 am ET)
                2  
                "Yes Hospitals do negotiate with insures however if they do not like what an insurer pays they will simple stop taking that companies insurance."

                And I assume you think that's fair, yes? If the hospital doesn't like the deal, it walks away.

                "With the government options there are no negotiations just the government saying here you will take this and like it. Becsue if you don’t take Medicare Medicaid, Tr-Care ect.. You do not qualify for government grants for research facility improvement ect…"

                And why is this unfair? If the hospital doesn't like the deal, it walks away.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by bintx (August 21, 2009 10:28 am ET)
                1  
                You are still incorrect. I've never seen any hospital or doctor refuse to take an insurance company. When given the choice of taken a "naked" patient or accepting that patient's insurance company . . . the insurance company wins out.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by highliter (August 21, 2009 10:59 am ET)
                    5
                  There are many Doctors offices that don’t take certain insurance. I Work in Medical Billing for the United State Army There are many hospitals and doctors offices that don’t take our insurance. And even if they do take out of network insurers they will bill the patient for the rest.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by bintx (August 21, 2009 12:00 pm ET)
                    2  
                    Like I said, just being a secretary in the medical billing department doesn't make you knowledgeable about insurance.

                    Your post below regarding automobile insurance shows your lack of knowledge regarding insurance procedures.

                    I've worked in insurance defense litigation for almost 25 years . . . I daresay I've probably had much, much, much more experience in this field than you.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by Scotty Johnson Sr. (August 21, 2009 2:51 pm ET)
                         
                      I've worked in insurance defense litigation for almost 25 years . . . I daresay I've probably had much, much, much more experience in this field than you.
                      Falling back on credentials is something people often do when they've lost the argument. It's the old, "My opinion counts more because of my status/job/education" tactic. I'm glad you trumped this pathetic tactic.

                      One thing about him, he certainly puts the 'high' in highliter.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by highliter (August 21, 2009 3:26 pm ET)
                          2
                        LOL you are such a idiot hes on your side and you just say slamed him.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by Scotty Johnson Sr. (August 22, 2009 4:13 am ET)
                             
                          you just say slamed[sic] him
                          Actually, I "slamed" you, but you are too dense to realize it.
                          Report Abuse
                  • Author by Scotty Johnson Sr. (August 21, 2009 2:47 pm ET)
                       
                    There are many Doctors offices that don’t take certain insurance.
                    I think these weird characters in your posts are a cry for help. They are the blogging equivalent of Tourette's syndrome.
                    Report Abuse
          • Author by bintx (August 21, 2009 10:26 am ET)
               
            Are you KIDDING me? I spend a great deal of my day reviewing medical records and billings. I'm looking at a bill right now for $17,412.70 BC/BS paid $3,637.00. The patient paid nothing. The remainder was "adjusted" with the comment "per contractual agreement."

            If you don't know what you're talking about, you shouldn't be spouting off about it. All major insurance companies have contractual agreements with hospitals, doctors, etc., and they TELL the hospitals, doctors, etc., exactly what they will pay.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by cyb1851 (August 21, 2009 10:39 am ET)
                 
              What you are outlining here is exactly the problem. These additional costs, or billings, that aren't covered by the insurer are then rolled into the costs for other goods and services.

              That's why a box of tissues, or a single baby's diaper, are often tagged with a cost of $75 to $100 at a hospital.

              It's all a scam.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by highliter (August 21, 2009 11:10 am ET)
              1 3
              Again that is completely different BC/BS negotiates its contracts with its in network providers for its billing amount. If a hospital doesn’t like it the simply will not take BC/BS and will not take BC/BS patients unless they agree to pay the difference. Medicare, Medicaid, Tri-Care don’t give you a choice you will take their patients and you will take what they say and you will not bill the patient or you lose your public funding. I know for a fact that hospitals perform multiple tests on Medicare patients just so they can break even on treatment for said patients. This is the Field that I work in so I suggest you stop SPOUTING OFF.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by highliter (August 21, 2009 11:10 am ET)
              1 3
              Again that is completely different BC/BS negotiates its contracts with its in network providers for its billing amount. If a hospital doesn’t like it the simply will not take BC/BS and will not take BC/BS patients unless they agree to pay the difference. Medicare, Medicaid, Tri-Care don’t give you a choice you will take their patients and you will take what they say and you will not bill the patient or you lose your public funding. I know for a fact that hospitals perform multiple tests on Medicare patients just so they can break even on treatment for said patients. This is the Field that I work in so I suggest you stop SPOUTING OFF.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by bintx (August 21, 2009 11:57 am ET)
                2 1
                Sorry, highliter, but I've been working in insurance defense litigation for almost 25 years. Just being a secretary in an insurance office doesn't make you an expert in the insurance industry. I'll say again, if you don't know what you are talking about, you might want to keep quiet.

                Your post below regarding automobile insurance gave you away. You have very little concept of how the insurance industry really works.


                Report Abuse
                • Author by highliter (August 21, 2009 12:19 pm ET)
                    2
                  I’ll admit I don’t know much about car insurance as I work in the Health Insurance Field. I am not a secretary and I don’t work in an insurance office although I don’t know what would be wrong with that my Administrative Assistant is very knowledgeable. You sound like a typical liberal elitist.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by vysotsky (August 21, 2009 2:03 pm ET)
                       
                    bintx wasn't saying that there's anything wrong with being a secretary in an insurance office. It's honorable work. What's not honorable is acting as if you know something when you don't -- as you just admitted to doing.

                    (By the way, you may want to ask your administrative assistant to proofread your comments before you click on "save".)
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by highliter (August 21, 2009 2:59 pm ET)
                        1
                      LOL Trust me I do I am terrible at grammar all my Memorandums and other correspondence are heavily proofread, but its a little out of her job description to proof my blogs. FYI I admitted to not knowing much about AUTO insurance, I deal with medical insurance issues all day so I would consider myself a expert when it come to how MEDICAL insurance operates. Furthermore how the hell do you know what someone else was saying? To me using the phrase JUST being a secretary sounds elitist. The word JUST is very unnecessary. FYI no one uses the title of secretary anymore either. Damm Trolls
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by vysotsky (August 21, 2009 4:29 pm ET)
                        1  
                        "Furthermore how the hell do you know what someone else was saying?"

                        Actually I know exactly what someone else was saying because I can hear -- or in this case, read. I just don't know with certainty what anyone else was thinking, and neither do you. But I don't think it's outrageous for me to claim that I "know what someone else was saying".

                        For instance, you said: "Im assuming that the drunk driver didn't have motor vehicle insurance. Otherwise you post is just plain BS." Now, I have no idea what you actually thought when you wrote that, but what you wrote suggests that you know enough about motor vehicle insurance to dismiss someone else's position as "just plain BS." I'm not claiming to read your mind, I'm just reading what you wrote. And what you wrote is undermined by your later admission that you don't actually know much about auto insurance.
                        Report Abuse
      • Author by PurpleState (August 20, 2009 6:25 pm ET)
        2  
        Here is the thing about comedy and radio punditry:

        They don't go hand in hand.

        If someone known for usually trying to tell the "truth" about politics suddenly drops a joke cloaked in his message, how are we to take his words as comedy? If someone is dearly trying to tell the public the evils of the new administration and the opposite party, where is the "laugh!" sign when he attempts comedy?

        When people who are normally serious tell a joke, it usually bombs or comes out as sounding like sincerity.

        When people who are normally funny try to be serious, it usually comes out as unintentional comedy.

        And I certainly didn't hear Rush laughing.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by John Paradox (August 20, 2009 5:41 pm ET)
      3  
      Listen VERY carefully to the caller at the start.....

      FU
      Report Abuse
    • Author by PurpleState (August 20, 2009 6:14 pm ET)
      1  
      I love how the caller laughs at Limbaugh as if it were comedy.

      It's too bad Limbaugh was serious...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by nwhiker747 (August 20, 2009 9:44 pm ET)
        1
      This is so lame - all you who believe that Rush was serious are even more lame. He made a joke people. He used sarcasm. And then he went on to make his point. Move on, there is nothing here.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by maneggs (August 20, 2009 11:03 pm ET)
      1  
      This is what happens when he decides not to lie. He just sounds like an idiot. "You shouldn't have broken your wrist" Yeah, health care costs nothing if YOU DON'T NEED IT. "It costs so much because you're not paying for it" Wait... what?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by tman418 (August 21, 2009 12:50 am ET)
         
      Maybe I shouldn't have gotten into a head-on collision with a drunk driver who was driving the wrong way on the highway so that I wouldn't have had to pay for physical therapy on my right knee and MRIs and just about everything else that goes with it.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by highliter (August 21, 2009 9:46 am ET)
          6
        Im assuming that the drunk driver didn’t have motor vehicle insurance. Otherwise you post is just plain BS. Maybe he just couldn’t afford it maybe the government should provide motor vehicle insurance to. While we’re at it I don’t like paying for insurance on my house either I think the government should cover that to.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (August 21, 2009 10:35 am ET)
          3  
          You really have no idea how insurance works at all, do you? As a general rule, automobile insurance does not pay medical bills for injured parties. They pay lump sum settlements at the END of treatment. There are usually med pay and PIP [on your own policy] provisions, but those amounts are usually very limited. In order to get to the other person's policy, one has to go through the claims process. Unless the injuries are very extreme and there is no question of liability at all, most insurance companies require the injured party to have completed treatment before they will pay out on a claim. This could take several months or even a year or so. In the meantime, the injured party has to pay for his/her own medical bills. The other problem is, depending upon your state's laws, the minimum policy limits required. In many cases, the cost of treatment/damages exceeds the amount of coverage available. Minimum policy limit drivers are usually judgment proof, so you get what you get.

          Like I said above, if you don't know what you're talking about, you shouldn't try . . . makes you look foolish.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by tman418 (August 21, 2009 12:46 pm ET)
            1  
            I never complained about my car insurance or the other driver's insurance paying for medical bills. I just got a collections letter from the radiology department at the hospital, and I had to deal with a lot of hassling between both my car insurance and health insurance (because that's what my car insurance company instructed me to do).

            Why should we have to deal with all this red tape that's ALREADY occuring with our "highly efficient" private health care system?

            I understand just how insurance works, and I really don't like it. If you like it, fine. You don't have to sign up for the public option.

            Also, the point of my post was to apply Rush Limbaugh's logic to any other health situation. People get injured all the time, people get sick all the time, and no one should go broke because of it. Did I go broke because of this car accident? No, but I could have without insurance, or would have had to wait a long time to get reimbursed, or just not get treatment. It wasn't my fault the drunk driver was going the wrong way.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by myne (August 21, 2009 3:12 am ET)
      3  
      Hi Americans, I'm an Australian.

      I invite you to have a browse around our health system.
      http://medicare.gov.au/about/index.jsp

      I break my arm, I go to hospital and get a cast.
      Cost? No idea. Dont care. Not my problem. I pay my tax, and the major things are dealt with.

      What about a cold? Ok, that's a little different.
      I probably have swine flu at the moment. I saw a doctor yesterday.
      Medicare covers a fixed dollar cost for a general practitioner visit. It may be based on time. I honestly didnt pay much attention.
      It's $27. I paid 60$. He also ordered a test to confirm swine flu. $0 extra cost.
      In a week or so I will recieve a cheque from Medicare for %27. The difference is called the "gap". You can get private insurance for the gap.
      Specialists get a higher government contribution than GP's.
      Doctors are not paid pittance.
      For the fans of the free market, the system isnt entirely government run either. It is run as a single entity insurance corporation.
      The market still decides the prices. There are plenty of private doctors, specialists, even hospitals.

      I know someone who at 17yo had a liver transplant. $300,000 paid for by Medicare. His family paid nothing but taxes.

      Drugs.
      We have the PBS Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme.
      Under that, the government negotiates bulk prices with pharmacy companies. In order to sell in our market, there are some drugs that are heavily discounted. It's fairly complicated, but it means that there is a large core of the drugs that are most used and needed that are quite affordable. If you dont earn enough, a healthcare card will entitle you to most of them at $5.30.
      If you spend more than $1264 per year on medication, you can also claim compensation.

      Bear in mind that these prices are relative to the Australian economy. A 60$ doctors appointment might be cheap or expensive in the USA. But for someone on the median wage (me ~50k) it's fair.

      From what an outside observer can see, the entire US system is broken. People should be treated for problems, not asked if they can afford it. Doctors should be allowed to treat, and not worried about the huge cost of liability insurance.
      Honestly, take a look at our system. I've linked the site.
      It's government run. It works for the most part.

      Nothing's perfect, but I can tell you, noone here worries about health costs.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by JimmyFartpants (August 21, 2009 11:43 am ET)
        1
      I think Rush is an idiot, but c'mon people, he was joking.

      There's nothing to see here. Move along.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by phreddy (August 21, 2009 4:41 pm ET)
      1  
      After 5 plus years of being misdiagnosed as 'stressed out' which cost me literally EVERYTHING a medical student finally diagnosed a broken jaw joint disc. I went from happy healthy employed to being told I was nuts, lost over $300K in pay/pensions and am reduced to BEGGING for disability to pay for corrective surgery and living on food stamps in an uninsulated shack on relative's property in Oregon. So many docs refused to consider alternatives and lawyers refused to even review the case. All the 'free' Lyrica and antidepressants I can eat BUT I must pay for pain pills which have doubled in cost over 6 months and I cannot even afford 'luxuries' such as soap, toilet paper, etc let alone any more pain pills. So corrective surgery will cost 5-10K but they want cash up front, some lawyer who has NEVER seen me will decide if I get benefits, I have the IRS and medical bills going to collection with threats and the docs tell me 'not to stress'. At this rate we don't need 'death panels' we already have this in the guise of denial of services and if any of the whores in CONgress think their 'reform' is so good then why do they NOT jump on board as well? Because like ALL 'government reform' we the taxpayers will be screwed over yet again. All I EVER wanted was to be treated so I could go back to work but instead am being forced to commit suicide when the pain becomes too much. I just hope I live long enough to see the start of the second American Revolution because that is EXACTLY where our political leader's actions are taking us.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by The_Cat (August 21, 2009 5:17 pm ET)
      1  
      ==RUSH LIMBAUGH==
      (because compassion is wrong)
      Report Abuse