O'Reilly, Cavuto discuss their curious definition of "moral obligation"
August 20, 2009 8:35 pm ET
From the August 20 edition of Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor:
Expand All
Expand 1st Level
Collapse All
-
Barnes: "Obama ought to recognize that the science" of climate change "is in dispute"
November 25, 2009 6:47 pm ET -
Beck: "Progressives have built up this wall of separation between church and state, and it's nonsense"
November 25, 2009 5:49 pm ET -
-
-
-
Beck: "The real goal of the progressive movement" is "control of your life"
November 25, 2009 5:13 pm ET
-
The other right-wing media mogul you should worry about
by Jamison Foser - November 25, 2009 -
Palin's book and Obama's bow: a media week to forget
by Eric Boehlert - November 23, 2009 -
Media Matters: The Palin chronicles
by Simon Maloy - November 20, 2009
|
|
||
Connect & Share
© 2009 Media Matters for America. All rights reserved.
  |
||
Watch the phlegm, it'll do a number on your moniker...
"His moral obligation to protect our financial way of life"
I really wasn't aware that my snarky comment required such a response, but there you go... You asked me to provide the passage, so I did. In fact, believe it or not, the thing that I was referencing was actually, you know, IN the segment to which I was responding.
As for the other comments, I'm not exactly sure as to what they are responding.
Curious, these morals...
Democrats and Independents are "fighting" to insure those "un-insured" people in their districts, cities, towns, counties, and states by supporting the HealthCare Reform Bill. What are the Republicans doing but saying "NO"?
To see Republicans standing TALL and FIRM as they say "NO" to something really plays well to Americans. 'Moral obligation' should be what EVERY Politician should WANT for EVERY one of their Constituents (those that have, those that don't) in this wonderful country of our's called America. When did MONEY become more important than HUMANS (AMERICANS) Republicans? Hmmm, is this still America or what? Hmmm.
Funny (not haha) but they used to insist it WASN'T zero-sum.
Of course that is your equation, neither Cavuto nor O'Reilly said that. Typical, libs making things up again.
Zero-Sum Economics and the Political Left
Promethean Capitalism Part Thirteen
The Economic Zero-Sum Fallacy
Michelle Obama’s Zero Sum Economy
Google: economic zero-sum [search term]
You are reiterating what you already said on your own news show. Though, truth be told people do learn by rote.
This health care bill will likely SAVE money in the future. People have a stomach ache and will go and see a doctor get the meds required and be fine. If they have to pay, they are likely going to wait until it is worse and then it is more expensive. I guess the term you have to spend money to make/save money doesn't permeate his mind.