About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Limbaugh: Obama "declaring war against the CIA"; administration "doing the bidding of terrorists"

August 25, 2009 1:06 pm ET

From the August 25 edition of Premiere Radio Networks' The Rush Limbaugh Show:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Max Credits (August 25, 2009 1:24 pm ET)
         
      How is this not treason?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by New Frontier (August 25, 2009 1:30 pm ET)
         
      Limbaugh has declared war against the U.S. government, just like the terrorists who he supports every day on his show. Limbaugh is stoking rage among his dittoheads so that they will eliminate Obama by force.

      You see, it's fun to play the Limbaugh game where you just make s#!+ up in order to destroy a person's character.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by blueline99 (August 25, 2009 1:38 pm ET)
        1
      How about the CIA declared war against the constitution.

      Why is it that Black water and 800 other Hessian-like private agencies are employed by the CIA? The simple answer is so that they do no fall under the rule of law and are unaccountable.

      It would be one thing if all this craziness was effective, like we were in a Tom Clancy novel, but the last 8 years of fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq has certainly demonstrated that this private army has not been effective at all.

      Who benefits? We do, the people of this country. Our National Security is stronger when we are not acting like a terrorist nation. We are stronger when we are not world-wide thugs.

      Who benefited from the torture? Nobody.
      We learned nothing.
      We lost credibility in the world.
      We put our troops that are already in danger in the field, in even more danger if they were ever to be captured.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (August 25, 2009 1:51 pm ET)
      1  
      It's called oversight dipsh!t. You may have forgotten what that means over the course of the last 8 years.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by WhatImlost (August 25, 2009 5:39 pm ET)
         
      Eric Holder defended the Gitmo terrorists and Rush thinks he's a terrorist.

      I wonder what he thought then of one of our founding fathers and former presidents John Adams, the man who defended the soilders who committed the Boston Massacre, which could be defined as state sponsered terrorism.


      Rush will never admit that "equal justice for all" means sometimes you have to defend the bad guys and anyone who has the fortitude to do something that will be that unpopular in order to uphold the ideals of the country is a better man then most.
      Report Abuse