Limbaugh teases letter that "details Sen. Kennedy's offer to help the Soviet Union defeat" Reagan's nuclear deterrent
August 26, 2009 4:04 pm ET
From the August 26th edition of Premiere Radio Netwroks' Rush Limbaugh:
Related:
Sweetness & Light: "KGB Letter Details Kennedy Offer To USSR"











The other right-wing media mogul you should worry about
Palin's book and Obama's bow: a media week to forget
Media Matters: The Palin chronicles



First they lecture us about why we shouldn't trust or believe in anyone or anything associated with communism, socialism, etc.
Then they throw their weight behind something that allegedly came from the KGB.
Sean Hannity talked about how, when he was young and had no money, he had to "make deals" with dentists and doctors, and how "when I broke my arm, I never had a doctor refuse to treat me because I didn't have any money...." What Hannity DIDN'T mention was the reason no doctor would refuse to treat someone with a broken arm- because it's illegal to do so. Which is hardly the "Free Market at Work." If Hannity had the "free market" he and his ilk claim to want and claim represents "freedom," he'd have been turned away at the door and sent home to heal on his own, without sponging on the hard-working people with enough money to PAY for luxuries like Emergency Rooms.
Or is it yet another BS that the right-wing has simply pulled out of their a@@?
Interesting, considering Kennedy didn't remarry until 10 years after his divorce.
http://altnews.com.au/drop/node/129
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82/
If this document is both authentic and accurate and true, and I have seen no reason to think that it isn't, then Sen. Kennedy may well have commit treason, or at the very least tried to.
The question is whether or not the KGB created the document, making it a real KGB document, but then flat out made up everything in it. I can't see why they would lie about Sen. Kennedy, seeing as he was an ideological ally of the Soviets. Nor do I see any reason the Soviets would have in helping Republicans with such a letter, as it would clearly have given them ammunition to target any liberal politician suspected of harboring Soviet sympathies.
In all likelihood (at least in my opinion), this letter shows the lengths one man is willing to take to destroy a political opponent and gain power for himself. The letter would be akin to hearing that Ted Kennedy offered to help al-Qaida with propaganda during the height of the US-led Afghan invasion. I can understand honest political disagreement, or even legislative obstructionism, to stop actions that one believes to be wrong. Both are legitimate. But treason for what appears to be political gain is just disgusting beyond measure.
I hope for the sake of Sen. Kennedy, his family, and this country that the letter proves false, but I have seen no indication that the letter is anything but authentic and accurate.