Beck comments on how "they wanted me to point out" Orszag was Senate-confirmed
August 26, 2009 5:31 pm ET
From the August 26 edition of Fox News' Glenn Beck:
Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.
Previously:
















Glen Beck is Cracking like a strong piece of frozen Glass placed on a boiling hot Pan.
I should feel sorry for Glen Beck, but in this i will give no Quarter.
For me Glen Beck's Redemption is a Total Non-Starter.
Speak truth to power.
Mr. News
He's a hypocrite, and to tell you the truth-I'd strangle him for the mental anguish he causes me every freakin' day.
He'll slip? What TV are you watching? He lies everyday! He makes stuff up! And, by the way, he couldn't produce if he had instructions.
No apology for Beck. He doesn't deserve it, and he gets paid to outright lie. Millions. Guarantee, he ain't losing sleep over his health. Like I am.
I have a feeling, whether Beck keeps his job or not, Fox News has found the line in the sand they can't cross. (It didn't take this long for lack of trying, either.) Do they now have the sense to make sure none of their bread winners go charging right across it?
The one about the president being a racist?
The one about gay marriage being about attacking churches?
The one about the president being the anti-christ?
The one about "Cash For Clunkers" being a ruse to glean all of your personal info from your computer? And make your computer another node on the nefarious gubmint network of tubes?
If he weren't such a dick, it would be different. but he's nothing more than a right-wing Howard Beale without the intelligence or compassion.
He's throwing every piece of excrement he can find into the fan but it's all blowing back on him and his idiot followers.
He is a habitual bald-faced, inciteful liar that deserve every censure.
Though questions about suspicians and rumors can be pretty slimy rhetoric to try and grab ahold of and pin down.
And also, this isn't the Russian empire, where the term "czar" actually connotes that the individual has some supreme authority above all branches of government. It is simply a term that indicates that the individual is the point policy-maker on that specific subject within the White House. Let's say that again, policy-maker on that specific subject within the White House. These individuals can't go around subjugating the authority of the other branches of government on a whim. They are simply in charge of certain areas of policy, and have no actual authority overrun the Constitution as you would like to have your paranoid (mostly on account of your hair-brained fearmongering), frightened, tinfoil-helmet-wearing audience to believe. Just as the Bush administration applied the title "czar" to a great deal of policy-makers within the White House, so has this administration, so please pull your head out of your ass and stop trying to frighten America.
It's like how they discovered that Obama was using a TELEPROMPTER! HOW DARE HE!
Bush didn't have quite as many "Czars" as Obama has, but, he had a fair few, well over 20.
Not to mention, for the most part, most, if not ALL senior staff in the White House are not vetted by Congress either. Like, say, for example, the chief of staff, widely considered the 2nd most powerful person in DC.
This whole tirade about people not being vetted by Congress is just a ruse to arouse anger again at something Obama is doing, that every President since Nixon has done.
It's called an 'election.'