Karl Rove (!) says he is "worried" about Obama "centralizing power in government in Washington"
August 26, 2009 6:35 pm ET
From the August 26 edition of Fox News' Glenn Beck:


The other right-wing media mogul you should worry about
Palin's book and Obama's bow: a media week to forget
Media Matters: The Palin chronicles|
|
||
![]() |
||
I could go down the list, but I think most of you know that song already.
How do you think that looks, puppiesandrainbows(I)?
One of the unwritten rules of debate is that if you're going to be condescending, you've first got to give us some evidence that you're at least as intelligent as the rest of us. Otherwise, you come out looking comical, in a lame sort of way.
p.s. I think you meant "between a representative and a senator"--both are congressmen.
Glad to have boosted your intellect a notch there.
But to answer your question, no one can be temporarily appointed, Massachusetts is one of the few states where his successor must be chosen by special election, and the minimum waiting time is 145 days. The seat will remain vacant until then.
They are trying to change the law.
Emotionally, I agree with the change, too much at stake.
Rationally, I do not know.
They did everything to centralize power by promoting their friends, old classmates, and attempted nation building. So excuse me if I dont buy your concern you liar and snitch...
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
Whew!
You can smell the horse manure come through the screen...
So how does this work as to the Government option in Health Care, The Federal takeover of Businesses and Banks, Cash for Clunkers and Cap and Trade?
Are you all admitting, by trashing Rove and the previous administration's centralization of power, that all of the above are bad ideas?
Just curious.
Rove should have been more careful of the precedent that Bush set when grabbing as much, and consolidating executive power that he did when in the White House.