About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

"Out of respect for his family," Hannity has decided not to "bring up Mary Jo Kopechne" or Kennedy's "radical socialism"

August 27, 2009 9:46 pm ET

From the August 27 edition of Fox News' Hannity:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by IRONY 101 (August 27, 2009 9:48 pm ET)
      16 3
      So you'll mention those things anyway? LOL... What a putz!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by carlileb5935 (August 27, 2009 10:45 pm ET)
        13 2
        Helluva guy.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by mari2jj2970 (August 27, 2009 11:28 pm ET)
        11 4
        Right, I guess it is for the same reason, respect for Mrs. G.W. Bush, that he never brings up the death of her x-boyfriend caused by Mrs. Bush running him down with her car when she failed to stop for a stop light. How nice of Rush to be so even handed with both of these folks. Very same situation too. You know X boy or x girlfriend.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mari2jj2970 (August 27, 2009 11:30 pm ET)
          6 2
          Hannity too!!!!
          Report Abuse
        • Author by starkcr31 (August 28, 2009 11:12 am ET)
            10
          The difference is Kennedy let the girl lay in the wreckage all night. Just because the guy died doesn't mean that wasn't an awful thing to do.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by wookie (August 28, 2009 11:16 am ET)
            7  
            Actually he tried repeated to rescue her but failed. The same reason we don't say the fire fighters kill people.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by starkcr31 (August 28, 2009 12:39 pm ET)
                7
              He didn't call anyone for help. What a great guy.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by PurpleState (August 28, 2009 3:29 pm ET)
                3  
                Please then. Tell us how the whole scene unfurled and be sure to present evidence that it was murder.
                Report Abuse
            • Author by fairliberal (August 29, 2009 12:21 pm ET)
                 
              Actually he went back to the party , discussed the situation with others and then decided to go to sleep and sober up. Think of Mary Jo, in the wheel well of the car wondering how long the air will last. I'll bet that she was certain that Ted would be back soon with help, she just needed to hang on a little longer. I guess she really didn't know him after all.

              Your fire fighters comparison is ridiculous. First off, fire fighters are sober and don't cause the fires they are fighting.
              Report Abuse
        • Author by fairliberal (August 29, 2009 12:25 pm ET)
             
          So you are calling the accident of Laura Bush, a sober 17 year old , driving carelessly the same as the actions of a 37 year old Senator who had been drinking all day long , the same?

          What a pathetic comparison.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by mari2jj2970 (August 27, 2009 11:45 pm ET)
        11 4
        Right! Then there was also the mess over Mrs. G. W. Bush's running over her x boyfriend by running a stoplight. it would be nice if Republicans in my party applied the same rule to everyone. But alas, I have NEVER heard or seen Hannity write or utter the words, Mrs. Bush killed her boyfriend by running over him. Frankly this all happened years ago and the only reason I bring it up is to illustrate the uneven way Hannity et al treat Republicans compared to Democrats. Both of these folks accidentally killed someone that they had some relationship with is my guess. I have no reason to think Mrs. Bush intended to kill her x boyfriend nor do I think that was the intention of Ted Kennedy. What I find so disgusting is the lack of even handedness of Hannity when discussing this issue.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by dolfan (August 28, 2009 6:15 am ET)
        3  
        I'm not going to say ANYTHING about how right winged crooked blah, blah, blah, he was.............ARE YOU KIDDING ME?????
        Report Abuse
    • Author by pete592 (August 27, 2009 9:50 pm ET)
      16 3
      Get over yourself, Sean. Respect is the last thing that the Kennedy family expects from an paranoid, blabbering idiot like you.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by RKAllen (August 27, 2009 9:52 pm ET)
      14 2
      The Ted Kennedy Healthcare Reform Bill

      I LOVE the sound of that!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by DAWUSS (August 27, 2009 10:14 pm ET)
      5  
      180 in 3... 2... 1...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by dr. matt (August 27, 2009 10:30 pm ET)
      15 3
      Out of respect for mankind, Insean Vannity should go find a freeway to play on.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by antihannity2009 (August 27, 2009 10:43 pm ET)
      4  
      Out of respect for Sean I won't bring up that he is a lying scumbag.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by reanna-mator (August 27, 2009 10:51 pm ET)
      13 3
      Right. In appreciation, out of respect for our species, I won't bring up Hannity's acting like a drunken baboon.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by eweston8542983 (August 27, 2009 10:58 pm ET)
        11  
        I think we need to carefully study the drunken behavior of all the great apes before we repectively decline to identify which of them is most similar to Homo Hannity.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by obamaisasocialist (August 28, 2009 8:51 am ET)
          11
        What a hate monger-calling Hannity a drunkard simply because he is Irish.
        Ted Kennedy was Irish and he was no dru------. Oh crap maybe you have a point afterall. The fact is by failing to mention the defining point of Kennedy's life, Hannity is not respecting Mary Jo and her family.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (August 28, 2009 11:56 am ET)
          7 1
          Was the defining point in your life when you discovered how well your head fit into your ass?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by rebopine (August 28, 2009 12:31 pm ET)
          3  
          Maybe "A" defining point, definitely not "The" defining point. And why do you think it's up to Sean Hannity to show respect for anyone? He's nobody!!!

          You people come on here spewing out garbage all over place and thinking you're so smart, what you don't realize is that it makes you look like idiota and only reinforces my view that all conservatives are either; Extremely unintelligent, Religious zealots, Dangerously Naïve and/or Soulless, directionless pawns in the GOP Machine. So, congrats!
          Report Abuse
        • Author by reanna-mator (August 28, 2009 3:33 pm ET)
          2  
          Sorry, I'm actually not aware of Hannity's nationality. You see, I'm not a paranoid right-winger, so I don't consider it my personal duty to keep track of where everyone's ancestors were born for the purpose of making a cheap political point.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by antihannity2009 (August 27, 2009 11:04 pm ET)
      5  
      Great job on not bringing it up Sean. First class!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (August 28, 2009 11:57 am ET)
        5 1
        You picked your handle because you were hit in the head with one at a young age, didn't you?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by rebopine (August 28, 2009 12:37 pm ET)
        3  
        First, murder implied intent, so this is clearly not a case of murder.

        Second, regardless of what you are anyone else (including the Kopechne Family) thought the punishment should have been, it's undeniable that he went on be one of the most successful and well respected senators in history. Also, his great works did not just impact the state of MA, the legislation that he authored and influenced had benefits across the American landscape.

        You can choose to have selective memory and ignore everything that happened after 1980, anyone can, but it doesn't make it any less real.

        One more thing, so you think the guy was a jerk, maybe he was (Who cares?) that doesn't make him a murderer.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by PurpleState (August 28, 2009 3:23 pm ET)
        2  
        What people fail to remember is that he was never charged with murder, but that he served time for failing to report the accident. According to law, he served his time.

        Unless you can prove he willingly killed Kopechne? Go to it, gumshoe!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by dmhack (August 27, 2009 11:28 pm ET)
      12 1
      I find it absolutely amazing that the right is so stunted. If it isn't Mary Jo Kopechne, it's some phony outrage over the Wellstone memorial or Tony Snow not being afforded the same praises as Ted Kennedy. Geesh, is that all you got?

      Forty years ago, Ted Kennedy did something very stupid and a woman died. You can't erase that, but what you can do is look at how he grew over the years to eventually become a better man than he was then. I judge a man not by who he was in his youth, but by the man he became.

      The Wellstone story is just so stupid and false that it's hardly worth talking about. What I will say is that the right wing's lies and the actual event have nothing in common.

      And I think enough of Tony Snow to know that could he offer an opinion, he'd tell the right to stop dragging his name into this. Tony Snow, no matter what you thought of him politically, was a decent guy. Ted Kennedy was a political icon.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by obamaisasocialist (August 28, 2009 9:03 am ET)
        1 9
        As a man he never took resposibilty of his actions. Redemption is more then the words I am sorry. Redemption involves accepting the reponsibility for ones actions. When did Kennedy ever admit to using his position to circumvent the legal system and avoid jail. For TK to have shown growth he would have had to go to Jail
        Report Abuse
        • Author by shaggles (August 28, 2009 11:52 am ET)
          8 1
          Like Scooter Libby, right?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (August 28, 2009 11:59 am ET)
            5 1
            Or George Bush and Dick Cheney.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by rebopine (August 28, 2009 12:38 pm ET)
              5  
              Thank you Easy to Refute and Shaggles! My thoughts exactly, there's always a double-standard with these folks.

              Report Abuse
          • Author by obamaisasocialist (August 28, 2009 12:06 pm ET)
              2
            Right just like Scooter Libby. Wrong is wrong You need to stop looking at this through the prism of a political party.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by starkcr31 (August 28, 2009 12:40 pm ET)
              3
            What does that have to do with anything?
            Report Abuse
        • Author by historygeek001 (August 28, 2009 3:29 pm ET)
          3  
          Obamaisasocialist:

          First, your name shows that you don't know anything about Obama or socialism and that you're only here to whine because you're not getting your way without regard for whether you make sense or not.

          Second, Kennedy spent the last 40 years taking responsibility for his actions. He was found innocent, remember? He also publicly asked the citizens of Massachusetts if he should resign; their response was "NO!" Your can claim anything you like, but you've already given yourself away.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by Sarah's Trusty Telepalmer (August 27, 2009 11:54 pm ET)
      9 1
      did you also make the difficult decision to snidely mention his "radical socialism"? wow, great show of restraint and respect, sean... i guess that was a little teaser of what we can expect from your future diatribes attacking a man who recently died. and you couldnt think of any other phrase to use? stay classy, fox.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by denke1010 (August 27, 2009 11:55 pm ET)
      4  
      This guy is a complete loon...Like his buddy Bill will say. Pinhead
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Vincenzo (August 28, 2009 12:16 am ET)
      8 1
      So typical. Grade school ploy.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by newzhound (August 28, 2009 12:19 am ET)
      13 1
      When John F. Kennedy was shot, President Johnson used his memory to help pass the first meaningful Civil Rights legislation in almost 100 years.

      Sen. Kennedy's life work was health care for all Americans. That goal was not exactly a secret. Unfortunately for all of us, he has passed on before it could be achieved. Now there are Great Americans who want to see that work continued - in his memory and because it is the right thing to do and because we're all going to be better off once the job is done.

      Just exactly what the heck is wrong with that?

      Have you no shame, Mr. InSannity? Have you no shame?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by robyn20094113 (August 28, 2009 12:25 am ET)
      10 2
      Hannity, you evil, sneaky bastard, you mentioned both by saying out of respect, you won't bring it up. I'm sure everyone noticed the smirk on your face as well. You think you are so cleaver. You disgust me.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by fawltylogic (August 28, 2009 12:54 am ET)
      5 1
      Since Hannity knows NOTHING about Kennedy or anything else that his bosses don't tell him to say, this was probably an easy decision to make.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by dave_82 (August 28, 2009 12:57 am ET)
      8 1
      Hannity/Palin for President! no really! That way the dems can have are assured another 4 more years.

      But this like waterboarding will never happen...
      Report Abuse
      • Author by obamaisasocialist (August 28, 2009 8:54 am ET)
        3 5
        Palin/Beck For President a truly independant ticket
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (August 28, 2009 12:00 pm ET)
          3  
          Independent of thought or reality, that is.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by PurpleState (August 28, 2009 3:16 pm ET)
          2  
          I think John Ziegler would cut you if you suggested that Beck would be a better running mate than himself. The guy's totally in the bag for Palin.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by starkcr31 (August 28, 2009 12:41 pm ET)
          4
        With how Obama is running things, a couple of bums off the street could win in 2012.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Romario (August 28, 2009 1:07 am ET)
      8 1
      What a douchbag this guy is.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by pam95650 (August 28, 2009 1:13 am ET)
      8 1
      The man has ZERO class!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by princeofwheels (August 28, 2009 1:38 am ET)
      5 1
      Methinks SeannietheSissyBoy is afraid that the Boston non-listening audience may get word of him badmouthing Kennedy so he has decide to lay-low. You know, them thar adverstisers, the Irish population etc. Seannie would never be able to walk outside again.

      Good for him..stay inside and dream of your nights with Billy Bob? Cyrus, or maybe his daughter.
      That was terrible of me. I should have never tried to make light of something like Seannie going after some underage girl even if he knows her father. I will not say that Seannie may like this child abuse ever again. It was wrong for me to mention that Seannie may have evils thoughts about an underaged girl. For this, I apologize. Seannie, I do not think you would go after a young teenager. Sorry again.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by John Paradox (August 28, 2009 1:53 am ET)
      7 1
      How 'white' of you, Sean.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mjh (August 28, 2009 3:22 am ET)
      9 1
      "Out of respect for his family," Hannity has decided not to "bring up Mary Jo Kopechne" or Kennedy's "radical socialism"



      Well, out of respect for Hammity's respect, I'M not going to bring up his associations with such avowed racists/anti-semites as Hal Turner and Andy Martin.

      OOPS!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (August 28, 2009 4:47 am ET)
      9  
      Out of respect to your family, I will not mention your total lack of morals, chorus boy.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by PurpleState (August 28, 2009 7:27 am ET)
      6  
      "If you have nothing good to say about someone, don't say it at all."

      Of course, if that were the case, Hannity would have nothing to say anymore...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by rwmacdonald2091 (August 28, 2009 7:30 am ET)
      6  
      Hey there Sean, when did you quit beating your wife?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by pasteve (August 28, 2009 8:22 am ET)
      8  
      Will he still say, "Ted hic! Kennedy every other time he mentions his name?

      I was not a fan of the Senator's. I feel that his tenure was too long, and perhaps he should have retired a term or three ago. Having said that, his passing also seems to be the end of an era. And while I'm not a fan of class distinction in America, but the Kennedy brothers did seem to represent the idea of the philosopher king, or the noble class raised from childhood to lead with wisdom and compassion for those they governed. What a contrast to the current concept of thinking a short sighted simpleton like Sean is a great American, or that Sarah Palin would make a great president.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by obamaisasocialist (August 28, 2009 10:38 am ET)
          7
        Sarah Palin would make a fantastic president- She got the senate to remove the death panel provisions in the house bill. You try and get the senate to do anything productive.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (August 28, 2009 12:28 pm ET)
          1  
          The Senate did nothing of the sort. They were out of session when she made that claim, and there was no such thing to be removed from the House bill in the first place.

          Are you being satirical, or stupid? You're not too good at satire, so the perceprion of stupidity is the only one coming through clearly.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by obamaisasocialist (August 28, 2009 1:01 pm ET)
              5

            Check out the LA Times article below. It details how the senate removed the death panel provisions from the house bill. I am behind Sarah Palin for president because she is the only person in the political scene that is part of a blue collar union household, which gives her a more mainstream prospective.

            www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-health-end-of-life14-2009aug14,0,4670272.story
            Report Abuse
            • Author by mary59 (August 28, 2009 1:49 pm ET)
              2  
              Seriously, what is your problem? This section, which I have read, merely provided for Medicare to pay for consultations when a doctor discusses the patients wishes for end-of-life care.

              The idea that you wouldn't want this consultation about living wills, Advanced Directives and so on is truly amazing. And the fact that Sarah Palin used the false frame "death pannel" is the most cynical kind of politics. She has no credibility. Zero.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by obamaisasocialist (August 28, 2009 3:02 pm ET)
                  1
                You don't get it Mary and probably never will. You do want to counsult your doctor, family, lawyer and maybe the church. Why would I want to consult the government or my private insurance and ask them if I should take arsenic rather than have them pay for my treatment. This intrusiveness is not the governments business. The mere fact that Obama denied it was in there before the senate took it out illustrates that even they new any rational human being would see this as an afront to LIBERTY.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by mary59 (August 29, 2009 10:58 pm ET)
                     
                  Wow, you really are thick. No, you aren't consulting "the government" about end-of-life care in that section of the bill. The government (Medicare) would have PAID for the consultation that you could have with your doctor.

                  You're the one who doesn't understand even basic concepts. Get help, please.
                  Report Abuse
            • Author by The_Cat (August 29, 2009 9:46 pm ET)
                 
              The proposed bill is in committee at the moment, and has not been offered on the floor of the House or the Senate. The Senate has not considered the proposed bill, and therefore could have removed no language from it. If you mean some language was removed from consideration by one of the Senate committees, that would be correct, obamaisasocailist.

              Sarah Palin is not part of a blue collar union household. She is a retired public servant, which is white collar. He is indeed in a union, and went back to BP in a non-management position, but he was in management, or white collar, before she got elected.

              Her perspective is not mainstream. She can see Russia from her house? She's going to fight for Alaskans by quitting halfway through her term a governor? She thinks Africa is a nation? No. Many things she might be, but mainstream is not one of them.
              Report Abuse
        • Author by PurpleState (August 28, 2009 3:13 pm ET)
          1  
          She did nothing of the sort. She fearmongered the subject into submission.

          You know, I think my Dad would make a great President too, but that doesn't mean he has what it takes to be President.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by mikehuck1976 (August 28, 2009 3:17 pm ET)
          1  
          Socialist, you need to stop getting your info from lunatics on the radio or the TV. You make yourself so like a nutjob. Or, maybe you are a nutjob.

          Explain to us which piece of legislation Palin affected. And what she had removed from it.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (August 28, 2009 8:17 pm ET)
             
          Sarah Palin would make a fantastic president- She got the senate to remove the death panel provisions in the house bill. You try and get the senate to do anything productive.


          Plain can't walk and chew gum at the same time, what makes YOU think she's qualified to be President?

          And Palin didn't have the Senate remove death panels BECAUSE THERE WERE NO DEATH PANELS IN THE FIRST PLACE!

          I'm sure you'll want to ask Plain about her own endorsement of "end of life" counseling back in 2008!

          On April 16th 2008, then Gov. Sarah Palin endorsed some of the same end of life counseling she now decries as a form of euthanasia. In a proclamation announcing “Healthcare Decisions Day,” Palin urged public facilities to provide better information about advance directives, and made it clear that it is critical for seniors to be informed of such options.Sarah Palin endorsed some of the same end of life counseling she now decries as a form of euthanasia...
          Report Abuse
    • Author by rdirkse (August 28, 2009 9:04 am ET)
      5  
      Do people still watch this clown?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by starkcr31 (August 28, 2009 12:42 pm ET)
          6
        A lot more than watch any of your liberal heroes like Olbermann or Maddow.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by John Paradox (August 28, 2009 2:00 pm ET)
          2  
          Or Pee Wee Herman?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by mikehuck1976 (August 28, 2009 3:18 pm ET)
          3  
          But not as many was watch Jon and Kate. So they must be the best place for true information. Right, Stark?
          Report Abuse
      • Author by The_Cat (August 29, 2009 9:48 pm ET)
        1  
        Yes, and hopefully just like in the case of Glenn Beck, they will cease to ADVERTISE that fact.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by o rly (August 28, 2009 10:06 am ET)
      5  
      Would that a lot more senators had Kennedy's "radical socialism", instead of being fawning lickspittles to their corporate masters.

      You stay classy, Sean.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Jurgan (August 28, 2009 10:23 am ET)
      4  
      So this is sort of like when they say "I'm not comparing him to Hitler, but..."
      Report Abuse
    • Author by captfoster2 (August 28, 2009 10:42 am ET)
      6  
      "Out of respect for his family," Hannity has decided not to "bring up Mary Jo Kopechne" or Kennedy's "radical socialism"

      By of course... "bring(ing) up Mary Jo Kopechne" AND Kennedy's "radical socialism"
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jbraskin4786 (August 28, 2009 11:14 am ET)
      4  
      How kind on you, Sean.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by HistoricallyCorrect (August 28, 2009 11:23 am ET)
      3  
      Sean Hannity gave Christopher Hitchens hell for daring to call Reverend Jerry Falwell a charlatan, a con-artist and wishing that there was a hell for him to go to. AREN'T YOU HURTING HIS FAMILY SEAN?!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by SMTDL (August 28, 2009 11:29 am ET)
      7  
      Hannity is too stupid to realize radicalism works both ways.The right stays in the past.Think of it..we would have no Social Security,Medicare,Medicaid,Civil Rights legislation,Voting Rights Laws,ADA,Family Medical Leave,etc...no FDA to monitor product safety,No EPA to control health impacts of pollution...
      All you hear from them is Communism, nazism,socialism,fascism;tired old overused scare labels that have no real basis for any current issues.....Does anybody really believe the US would be any of those things with our form of Government.Of course having elements of socialism in our capitalistic society is nothing new...Public schools,fire depts., police depts.,Military,highways,etc. It is radical to cling to this "Real America","Give me back my country as in the constitution"..ok..here it is..paternalistic,white supremecist,chauvinistic society where only white men can vote!!!!!Carrying loaded guns to public political meetings ..how civilzed!!!Indeed we see a lot of radical stuff these days but its mainly from Hannity's "right" America.Did the founders condone being"strapped " when they met publicly to discuss the social/political issues of the day???Might have made sense in 1700's but now????
      Elections are the voice of the people ..the American people spokein 2006 and 2008 that the radical conservative agenda is the way they wanted the country to go!! Hannity& Co..Grow up.... stop acting like spoiled children who can't get their way!!!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (August 28, 2009 11:47 am ET)
      4  
      HA! Good one. 'Out of respect for his family I won't call him a murdering socialist bastard who did his best to destroy this country.'
      Report Abuse
    • Author by latanza (August 28, 2009 2:33 pm ET)
      1  
      The only reason he didn't bring it up is because everyonelse was too tasteful and he doesn't have the audience to lead, he just leads-off of...........
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Marge (August 29, 2009 2:12 am ET)
      1  
      I wonder if Hannity has ever mentioned Margie Schoedinger or Robin Lowman in connection with George W. Bush...I don't think so..but then that's a different story. And they don't want the public to know how much of a common critter Bush is.
      Report Abuse