Fox's Wallace parrots NewsBusters' comparison of NY Times Kennedy, Helms obits
August 30, 2009 2:56 pm ET
From the August 30 edition of Fox Broadcasting Co.'s Fox News Sunday:
Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.
















Those poor, poor conservatives just don't get any respect, do they?
I wonder though, how you felt about the Don Imus controversy. I think I might remember your comments on it, I am not sure however, perhaps you will remind me.
I could give a rats behind about Helms. He's gone. and there's no need to choose one over the other. At the end of the day, it's your reputation that you leave behind and that should be what you're remembered for and not compared to.
Fair & balanced of the Fox News sort is quite a high bar, ya know ...
Wrong again.
Man, I just can't wait ...
" Here lies a man who sold his journalistic ethics to the highest bidder "
and nothing else.
So he ends up doing the exact same thing, he is being critical about.
Then again, what did Helms ever do that was good?
Media bias? Remember the massive, positive coverage of Ronald Reagan and his life and views when he died in 2004? That belies the meme they are trying to get going.
The NYT obits told the truth - and that is not the Times' fault.
The problem with sticking up for Sen. Helms is that he didn't really accomplish anything. Rather than whine about the two obits - which is the stock-in-trade of NewsBusters - why not point out omissions of fact or actual errors?
Clay Walters couldn't do that because there weren't any?
NewsBusters claims the NYT obit of President Abraham Lincoln was much more favorable than the obit of President Jefferson Davis...
REPUBLICAN SENATOR THAT HAS ACCOMPLISHED ANYTHING THAT HELPS THE EVERYDAY PERSON----iT IS THE RESPECT YOU GET IN DEATH THAT COUNTS.