Olbermann on Beck: "'Oligarhy'?  Did Obama steal the letter 'C'? "

But how can you be both a Socialist and have czars?

Olbermann has done plenty of Beck criticism in the past - this is just a segment pointing out how Beck is a moron in general. Even if Beck had spelled "oligarchy" correctly on that chalkboard the sheer act of writing random words in a specific pattern to create a word that you wish to create and then trying to say that signifies some impending doom for the USA should be proof to anyone watching that Beck is an idiot.

Beck is claiming that Obama has or wants an OLIGARCHY. That's misinformation. So are all of the phrases that Beck used to spell OLIGARCHY except for O.

There is no such thing as a "czar," they are advisers. The media calls them "czars" and Beck is attempting to play on the association that many of his low information viewers have that "czar" equals "socialist."

Try doing your own research and quit listening to this high school dropout, "self-educated" COMEDIAN. He's LYING to you and LAUGHING his butt off at you for believing his lies. You are being played.

Bush had almost as many "czars" as Obama does. President Bush had over 20 such advisors.

Yep, it's called Fox News is available on every basic cable package, you have to pay more to get MSNBC.

That's all Keith does! It is his true calling. I'm sure that, as a young girl, keith engaged in these kinds of activities and was re-assured by both of his mothers that this is the correct way to conduct yourself. Growing up and later attending Syracuse university, he honed his ability to engage in one-sided conversations and un-settling diatribes. Congrats, Keith. Rude and crude is your forte.

I'm still laughing like an idiot over this! The image of TR [walking softly] sneaking up behind someone and clubbing them on the head with his big stick... Priceless. I love it!

skiploader-Teddy R. was quite found of the African phrase "walk softly but carry a big stick" as well as the more popular "speak softly" which he reworded in a speech. If you the view clip and pay attention, Beck says that the "c" is missing and the next night he was quite pleased that the left-wing bloggers were fooled. Third, Keith says that Nixon and Reagan appointed czars, one apiece, but he fails to mention the nearly 3 dozen that Obama has appointed, some of whom are revolutionaries and communists.

Let's see ya try that with phenolphthalein!

Czar is a media creation. The term is actually "adviser," and EVERY president has a team of advisers.

Why don't you read more and learn more about how our government works ON YOUR OWN instead of listening to a highly paid Entertainer? Beck calls himself a "rodeo clown," which I personally find offensive. Rodeo clowns have courage and strength. Beck is just a petty little liar who loves to rile up uninformed, intellectually incurious folks who think he is part of the NEWS media.

If you are watching Beck and believing his lies, then it would be YOU who are the sheep.

S.773 doesn't give control of the internet to the White House. That's just more fear mongering. I suggest you actually read the proposed bill (it hasn't been introduced yet, or it's not been made clear if it will or not), as it is a cyber security bill.

What special adviser or "Czar" do you think doens't have our best interests at heart? You guys keep complaining about the so called Czars, yet provide no information as to what they've done, or what they're advising on that you're so violently against. Please provide specific examples of why you have a problem with them. And remember, they don't make laws, they don't write laws, they advise the President, just like lots of other people.

He proposed not a tax, but a small increase in the licensing fees to help pay for public radio (which is not liberal as everyone would like to believe). Guess what? It's not going to shut down any stations if they continue to make the profits that they claim to make, and also, he stated that he'd like to get the funding out of Congress, ie, having the taxpayers pay for it. I would assume that this would be something that conservatives would LOVE.

Radio does not constitute free speech. It is regulated and licensed speech. The government has made no laws abridging free speech.

S.773: Cybersecurity Act of 2009.

Read it for yourself, but it details how the President and Secretary of Commerce will establish panels for SECURITY of Internet, not control. Basically, it sounds to me that they are developing a police force for securing the Internet for illegal actions. As much as it might kill you to think that there will be a police force on-line, this bill sounds like it would be required to keep federal sites secure and protection for small-to-medium businesses.

The "100% tax" on "all radio":

"Mark Lloyd, newly appointed Chief Diversity Officer of the Federal Communications Commission, has called for making private broadcasting companies pay licensing fees equal to their total operating costs to allow public broadcasting outlets to spend the same on their operations as the private companies do."

Sounds to me like he's trying to level the playing field, isn't he? Since this is just a proposal, there's nothing here saying this is a law yet, but I'll admit I am not 100% educated on this, nor am I believing this is a tax on ALL radio.

Your claim that we are all against free speech:

BASELESS. I for one am glad we have free speech, and I for one won't stand in the way of crazy talk being said. I just will not agree with it, nor will I stand out of the way if such speech violates my own freedom. I will not stand for my identity to be branded as "a sheep".

In other words, I'll stand by your right to call us "sheep", but I will protest to my dying breath against you that I fit YOUR label.