About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Fox News Tea Party report tells "the story of the America that Washington forgot and apparently doesn't want to hear from"

September 01, 2009 12:39 am ET

From the August 31 edition of Fox News' Hannity:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Previously:

Fox News "hops" aboard Tea Party Express with rampant promotions, live coverage

Apparently, Fox wasn't offering Tea Party Express enough free advertising

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by phredicles (September 01, 2009 12:47 am ET)
      14 2
      I'd say the America that Washington forgot and doesn't want to hear from is the majority of us who favor single-payer health coverage.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by welterwill998306 (September 01, 2009 12:53 am ET)
      2 1
      take back america?so these people didn't want totake backamerica when bush led us into a fake war after letting 9/11 happenout of neglect for his country or whenhe past the patriot act and truley took their right toprivacy and freedomaway from them.does anybody else think that griff jenkins is a wierd nerd, the kind of nerd you don't leave alone around children. he's just creepy,like some kind of coke fueled bill nie the science guy.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Lane (September 01, 2009 1:08 am ET)
      5  
      ordinary Americans


      real people


      grassroots


      they're minors, they're small business owners, they're veterans, they're nurses, they're mothers


      Hey guys, I'm NOT a serial killer. Seriously. Don't think I'm a serial killer. Why would you think I'm a serial killer? I'm no serial killer.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 01, 2009 1:24 am ET)
        8  
        What a surprise ! That crowd watches Sean Hannity!

        I think it's very important for fringe weirdos and underachievers to convince themselves they're "normal". Nobody really thinks they're nuts.

        Hardcore alcoholics tell themselves everybody has a little cocktail with breakfast, D students convince themselves that only losers get A's, and teabaggers need to constantly be told they're "ordinary Americans" and "Real Americans". They just want their government back from the majority of "fake" Americans who reclaimed it in a legitimate election.

        Or what was left of it after the Real Americans spent several years trying to destroy it.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by foghornleghorn (September 01, 2009 10:00 am ET)
          3  
          They just want their government back from the majority of "fake" Americans who reclaimed it in a legitimate election.

          And...they want their country back from the black man in the White House. Racism drives these teabaggers. How many minorities do you see in the photograph above?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by kydem09 (September 01, 2009 10:33 am ET)
            1 6
            Ahh,,, wait long enough at this site and the race card will be played. Just because someone is white doesn't mean they're racist to oppose what a black president is proposing. The race card is played by you folks on the left in an attempt to silence anyone who opposes this president. I find it a despicable tactic.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by snoopy (September 01, 2009 11:16 am ET)
              3  
              gee, don't let the fact that the people who run these events are more and more militant fascists and racists sway you from your idea that the tea baggers haven't reduced themselves to act like a bunch of militant fascists and racists, ok? There, now you can start another pity party and order more cheese to go with your whine.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by kydem09 (September 01, 2009 11:27 am ET)
                  4
                You want to believe, because this web site and MSNBC say so, that all the folks who go to these events are militant-type folks. That couldn't be farther from the truth. Do these events attract some whackos? Sure, but the majority of the people engaging in these events have legitimate objections to what this government is trying to do. To label them all with a broad brush stroke is unfair.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by foghornleghorn (September 01, 2009 11:40 am ET)
                  4  
                  but the majority of the people engaging in these events have legitimate objections to what this government is trying to do.

                  The government is listening to the people who elected them. Got that? ELECTIONS MATTER. It's one big sour grapes whine fest for these teabaggers who can't believe they're in the minority AND that a minority is running the country.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by kydem09 (September 01, 2009 2:14 pm ET)
                      2
                    OK, so let's go back over the past 8 years and list all of the times the left whined and moaned about things Bush did.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by The_Cat (September 01, 2009 3:21 pm ET)
                      1  
                      Fair enough, but first point out that the right is whining about things that haven't even happened yet. They are projecting into the future, imagining what might happen, and getting all foamy in the mouth over it.

                      At least the stuff that Bush/Cheney are on the hook for are things they've actually done.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by kydem09 (September 01, 2009 3:34 pm ET)
                          1
                        So, those who think the tremendous spending of the Obama administration will greatly damage the country or that a public option health care plan will damage people's ability to continue getting quality health care 10 years down the road should just shut up and wait for it to happen? Wait until it's such an abominable mess that there's no way out?? Now that sounds like a plan!!! Let's all take the ostrich approach.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by The_Cat (September 01, 2009 5:29 pm ET)
                          1  
                          No, you're right, kydem09. Let's wait for another 10 years, when 70% of America can't afford to pay their health insurance premiums, and hundreds of thousands more Americans are dead from either no coverage or insufficient coverage. Then, when the situation has grown catastrophic, we can ask the health insurance companies and the pharmaceutical companies how to fix the mess they've made.
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by kydem09 (September 02, 2009 8:45 am ET)
                              1
                            No one's saying not to fix problems within the system. Those of us that oppose the reform as proposed are opposed to a government option. This country can't afford a government option and it's very likely it would in fact lead to the loss of private insurance for the nearly 80% of Americans who are happy with their coverage. There are other reforms that could be made that won't cost taxpayers a dime. Those are the things the president should be pushing. Why is he so adamant about pushing a policy that would likely bankruptcy our country? Besides, the government has never been successful at running anything. Take a look at Medicare. For all intents and purposes it's already bankrupt. Or, to use the president's own wonderful example, the US Postal Service.
                            Report Abuse
                    • Author by foghornleghorn (September 01, 2009 5:31 pm ET)
                      1  
                      OK, so let's go back over the past 8 years and list all of the times the left whined and moaned about things Bush did.

                      FALSE EQUIVALENCY ALERT!!!!!

                      Bush was given the benefit of a doubt. For at least a couple years, maybe longer. Obama has been in office for 7 MONTHS. These teabaggin' terrorists have been spewing their racist vile since Obama became the nominee.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by The_Cat (September 01, 2009 6:16 pm ET)
                        1  
                        True enough, foghornleghorn. And, just how many Democratic governors threatened to secede from the union during Bush's eight years? Texas is chock full o' nuts!
                        Report Abuse
                      • Author by kydem09 (September 02, 2009 1:33 pm ET)
                           
                        The benefit of a doubt?? Are you freakin' kidding me? Bush was vilified beginning the day after Gore conceded and it never let up except for a couple months after 9/11. Talk about revisionist history! What hypocrites all of you are.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by The_Cat (September 02, 2009 9:07 pm ET)
                             
                          From my initial research, kydem09, most of the press for the first six months of the Bush presidency was busy casting stones at the Clintons, not Bush.

                          Here's one link to a story I found. I'm really not finding much criticism of Bush until a few weeks after 9-11 when he decided to institute military tribunals to prosecute terrorists. He faced objections from both Republican and Democratic lawmakers.

                          Can you please cite one or two stories to support your claim?
                          Report Abuse
                • Author by snoopy (September 01, 2009 11:46 am ET)
                  4  
                  This site has nothing to do with it. Facts do. You know, those things where research reveals the truth? Those are called facts.
                  Report Abuse
            • Author by foghornleghorn (September 01, 2009 11:32 am ET)
              4  
              Do we have to post all the racist signs/comments by these teabaggin' terrorists once again? Can someone help me?



              Report Abuse
              • Author by foghornleghorn (September 01, 2009 11:38 am ET)
                3  
                Here's a little nugget from even BEFORE Obama started ruining the country:

                http://www.wtsp.com/news/elections/story.aspx?storyid=93388&catid=36
                Report Abuse
                • Author by snoopy (September 01, 2009 12:37 pm ET)
                  1  
                  Good one! Here's another nugget for ya.

                  I was talking the other day to a prominent Republican who asked me what I thought John McCain's strongest issues would be in the general election.

                  Lower taxes and the argument he will be better able to protect America from its enemies, I said.

                  Republicans have a pretty good track record with those two.

                  The Republican shook his head. "You're missing the most important one," he said. "Race. McCain runs against Barack Obama and the race vote is worth maybe 15 percent to McCain."

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 01, 2009 1:10 pm ET)
                    2  
                    Sure, Foghorn & Snoopy, but the undercover racists will just explain those as "lone wackos".

                    The same problems with math that makes them think that a million or so fringe nuts need to "take back the country" from the rest of America can explain that a million or so people who put racist signs in their yard, or would vote only for white people, are an insignificant number.
                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by kydem09 (September 01, 2009 2:27 pm ET)
                      2
                    I never said there weren't racists out there, but there are racists on both sides. The majority (using your own number of 15% there) are not racist. I would also venture to say that those of you throwing the race card around so freely are in many respects racist yourselves.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by foghornleghorn (September 01, 2009 5:39 pm ET)
                         
                      but there are racists on both sides.

                      True, but teabaggin' racism is a wholly owned subsidiary of the nutjobs on the right behind the thin veil of outrage over Obama's "spending".

                      Report Abuse
            • Author by puppienrainbows (September 01, 2009 11:58 am ET)
                4
              You usually don't have to wait too long for the likes of snoopy to play the race card. Her and the Col. ardently attempt to cajole others into 'the race game'. I've never seeen or heard anyone so obsessed with race than Snoopy and 'extra crispy'. Closet racists? Yep!
              Report Abuse
              • Author by foghornleghorn (September 01, 2009 12:10 pm ET)
                4  
                Remember, it's usually the racists who can't recognize their own racism.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 01, 2009 12:30 pm ET)
                  1  
                  But even if they don't recognize it, they're the first to post indignant comments insisting they're not racist. I never mentioned race in this thread, and P&R is crying about my playing the race card.

                  I wonder why noticing the well-documented presence of racists on the right gets these people who are absolutely not racist at all (as they keep telling everybody) so upset and defensive.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by kydem09 (September 01, 2009 2:31 pm ET)
                      2
                    Wanna know why? Because I am someone who opposes what Obama wants to do with this country and get painted with the broad brush of racism when his race has absolutely nothing to do with my opposition. I am proud we elected a black president. I wish it wasn't this black man because I think he's dangerous to our country in many respects. I also don't agree with Beck, Limbaugh and others who say Obama is a racist. I think it's wrong to say and only hurtful to their positions to say things like that. But again, for some reason people automatically think I'm a racist because I don't like this president's policies and his vision for America.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by The_Cat (September 01, 2009 3:49 pm ET)
                      1  
                      Fair enough, kydem09. What is your strongest disagreement with the Obama administration, out of curiosity?
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by Pioneer 6 (September 01, 2009 7:56 pm ET)
                        1  
                        *crickets*

                        ...and there you have it.

                        That's almost 3 hours ago that Cat asked a simple question. Funny how we haven't seen a quick answer yet...
                        Report Abuse
                  • Author by puppienrainbows (September 01, 2009 5:59 pm ET)
                      1
                    I never said you mentioned race on this thread. I'm going by other threads where you have made a comment that insinuated I was a racist when I referred to Obama as the Boy King because of his resemblence to Tutenkhaman. Your remark was, and I quote,"Is that some new, under the radar slur.....". It goes to the same narative observed by so many people, who oppose Obama's policies, that they are racist. I poke fun of Obama because I believe many of his policies and much of his demeanor is comical, not because he is half black/half white. And don't get so upset when we on the right present a 'well documented presence of racism on the left'.
                    Report Abuse
                • Author by puppienrainbows (September 01, 2009 6:02 pm ET)
                     
                  That's why I feel especially obligated to point that out to Snoopy and Col. Harlan Sanders. It could be they don't even realize they are racists.
                  Report Abuse
              • Author by snoopy (September 01, 2009 12:18 pm ET)
                4  
                You're a closet racist? I could have guessed it. But if you really want to have a discussion about obsession with racism, we can have another spirited debate about the reichpublican right wing. Fog and I will be presenting more factual proof of y'alls hatred of skin color, feel free to bring Beck and Hannity as your "defense".
                Report Abuse
                • Author by snoopy (September 01, 2009 12:20 pm ET)
                  4  
                  P.S. love how you obsess over fog and I! It's not everyone who can say they have their very own closet racist fascist stalker!
                  Report Abuse
            • Author by RaulDuke (September 01, 2009 4:20 pm ET)
              1  
              Name one policy or proposal by President Obama that you support then. You cant do it, because it is driven by race.
              Report Abuse
      • Author by blk-in-alabam (September 01, 2009 6:43 am ET)
        3  
        He said some were miners.I would like to know how a union copper,or molly mine worker can support these people and pick-up their union pay check.The copper,molly,and steel business called thousands laid off workers back,because of stimulus spending.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by fawltylogic (September 01, 2009 1:44 am ET)
      9  
      I know the rest of the media did some minor, reluctant coverage of this Fox News' political campaign last time around, but is it too much to ask that they do something more? Is the rest of the media really OK with Fox News being a blatant party propaganda machine? Do they understand that by doing this, Fox News isn't only denigrating themselves, but drag all of the rest of the media down with them in the dirt?

      This is, IMO, the absolute most outrageous political deception in many, many years. It has more far-reaching consequences than most of the major political scandals - including Watergate. And it's happening right in the open, every day on TV, and nobody says a peep about it.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by ex-punk (September 01, 2009 2:25 am ET)
        6  
        You are absolutely right about that. This is the most perfect form of brainwashing ever conceived. This is years of work and propaganda aimed at the people that are too lazy to look up facts and then get them to vote against their own best interests. By not supporting the government, which they hold a stake in, whether they agree or not, giving their money to the rich, as in health care will only harm themselves and the rest of us. Instead of creating a "Manchurian Candidate," they have created a "Manchurian Electorate." Sinclair Lewis said in the '20's that a conservative is so afraid of change that they will reject it out of fear even if it might benefit them. That is what is going on at Fox, playing on people fears.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (September 01, 2009 7:15 am ET)
        2  
        I think that with the exception of a few such as Keith Olbermann people in the media are afraid to go after FOX because they are afraid of being accused of being liberally biased. FOX has been very successful in spreading the meme of the liberal MSM and now whenever they are criticized they simply point to the attack as yet another example of the biased liberal MSM. FOX has its audience trained to believe everything itsays...and it has the MSM trained to back away.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by mk3872 (September 01, 2009 9:34 am ET)
        2  
        The MSM has been essentially castrated by the scare tactics and intimidation by the Bill O'Reilly and Roger Murdoch.

        The MSM is weak and useless and would not dare risk having one of O'Reilly's producers follow them around for an ambush interview.

        And the powers-that-be @ GE and the press do not want to go there either.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by kydem09 (September 01, 2009 10:35 am ET)
          3
        Well, the media seems to be OK with MSNBC's cheerleading efforts on behalf of Obama. GE and MSNBC are so in bed with the president, but no one at any of the other networks (except Fox) will say anything about it. MSNBC and GE are prostituting themselves to this White House.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by eweston8542983 (September 01, 2009 12:00 pm ET)
          2  
          Tell it to Morning Joe and the recent addition, a young Miss Bush.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by kydem09 (September 01, 2009 2:35 pm ET)
              1
            Actually, I'm glad you mentioned Morning Joe. I do watch his show and enjoy it very much because they have honest debate and opposing points of view. It's the only bright spot on MSNBC. Olbermann never has anyone one who opposes him. I don't like Hannity over on Fox either, but it least offers opposing views at times. As for Jenna Bush, she's going on The Today Show as an education correspondent. I don't see what she has to do with this argument at all.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by eweston8542983 (September 01, 2009 3:57 pm ET)
                 
              Joe shows up here with some frequency. He gets three hours daily.
              As I don't get cable I can't speak on who Obermann allows to come on. Somehow I doubt your correct here though. The use of the word, never, is a bit of a warning sign.
              So hiring her over how many qualified people is not sucking up to the neocons then um?
              Report Abuse
        • Author by dr. matt (September 01, 2009 12:25 pm ET)
          2  
          GE and MSNBC are so in bed with the president


          Does Becky know you are plagiarizing his rants?
          Report Abuse
    • Author by anti_fascist_freedom_fighter (September 01, 2009 2:00 am ET)
      3  
      How clever, oh my, I'll bet nobody would notice how this phoney "grass-roots" movement started! Unless, of course, you notice that the "Teaparty express" repainted McCain's "Fascist Express" bus and then borrowed McaAin's e-mail list to send an e-mail to all the white republican fascists who again show up, and again say the same stupid things they did at the McCain/Palin rallies. And surprise, surprise, these "tea-partiers" get free food, drink, and most importantly, fee press from the republican party co-chair, Hannity, on the republican party television station, Faux. Teh bus shows up with some gay ass-hat with stupid glasses and a microphone to impersonate a reporter, and he pretends that Faux just discovered a breaking story about the very things Sean Hannity says on the air the day before! How do you spell propaganda?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by marco21 (September 01, 2009 2:03 am ET)
      5  
      Thank god someone showed up to flagstaff where no one OBVIOUSLY was prompted by a "news" channel to show up and rally. Thank god NOBODY barfed up TALKING POINTS we've heard since JANUARY.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by teabaggers ♥ [wing]NUTS (September 01, 2009 3:11 am ET)
      6  
      that last part is very telling...

      "do all of you watch sean hannity?"


      and these are supposed to be people that are criticizing republicans and democrats equally, right? thats what one of the teabaggers said. no person that watches sean hannity would criticize republicans, seeing as how hannity has never bashed a conservative in his life.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by HowSwedeitis (September 01, 2009 4:43 am ET)
      3  
      ...a couple thousand? More like a few hundred...

      Our country back?? Yeah! Our country back from the people who were democratically elected to run it...

      -HSII
      Report Abuse
    • Author by LORISNJ (September 01, 2009 7:39 am ET)
      2  
      "We want to take back our country" - Impeach Obama!

      Just how do you intend on taking back the country? Rally's (even if thousands show up, some driving 8 hours) that still doesn't override the millions more that voted for Obama. What are these people trying to accomplish? The minority party's will over the majority? That doesn't sound like a democracy to me - that sounds a lot like tyranny to me.

      In this country we have elections and those that lose don't get to make the decisions, don't get to keep power, and they don't get their way. Someone needs to explain this to them. If we didn't storm the White House when Bush was selected, they have no room to complain about the current administration.

      You will all just have to live in a country that will try to help all Americans have a better life, you included; instead of an administration that works against your best interest. Sorry Tea Party Baggers, you will just have to suffer with a better America like the rest of us!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by christopher howard (September 01, 2009 7:44 am ET)
      2  
      Wow, Fair & Balanced as usual, Fox.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by New Frontier (September 01, 2009 9:10 am ET)
      2  
      Bottom line: The Black Librul non-citizen Muslim ACORN Rev. Wright-Bill Ayers won, he's in the White House, Palin lost, and we're a bunch of whiny sore losers who can't accept it, and we're being whipped-up and validated by Hannity, Beck and Fox News and a slew of lies.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mk3872 (September 01, 2009 9:37 am ET)
      2  
      Fox HAS to cover, advocate and embed themselves with the Tea Parties like this. They don't have a choice.

      They have pandered so much to this crowd that it is now their fan base.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by The_Cat (September 01, 2009 10:33 am ET)
      3  
      What you have here is a spontaneous outpouring of disinformed and overexposed Tea Party goers, just out waving the placards like any normal day, when in a cleansing burst of synchronicity a TV correspondent happened by. Uh-huh. It's not news, FOX and Hannity, it's p-r-o-p-a-g-a-n-d-a.

      I like the woman that drove eight hours to this one because it was closest. My math says she lives about 400 miles away. If this density of tea parties is an average, you could cover the entire U.S. with just 6 tea party events.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 01, 2009 12:40 pm ET)
        2  
        Not necessarily, Cat. Being a hardcore wingnut, and most likely a Hannity fan, she may have lived much closer. Combine the basic disorientation, insistence on only making right turns, and the usual slow pace at which conservatives move forward, and it's possible it took her eight hours to drive 10 or 20 miles.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by terrapin53 (September 01, 2009 2:15 pm ET)
      4  
      Population of Flagstaff is 60,000. According to the Flagstaff paper around 1,000 people showed up, not a few thousand. Count all of northern AZ and even more people didn't show up for this pathetic attempt of a protest. When in Vegas with a metro population of 1.6 million, the Vegas paper says several hundred showed up. Doesn't sound like they are having a very good start. Maybe on the 12th I will go down to DC and see what kind of nutters are out there.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 01, 2009 3:32 pm ET)
        1  
        Yeah, I'd like to go if they have any in Southern California. Probably a good opportunity to take the video camera and get some good Wingnuts Gone Wild footage.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by manofmystique (September 02, 2009 10:56 am ET)
      1  
      As a white male this probable fact and the truth of what you wrote here disturbs me greatly! Ed Schultz, on his radio program, finally said what really needed to be said "The true bottom line in all of this complete opposition to anything President Obama tries to accomplish, is that the conservative base and the GOP that caters to them simply cannot tolerate and accept that a Black man is the President of our Nation"!

      That group refuses to accept this reality and led by the Hannity, Limbaugh, Beck and all their bigoted confederates, they will never cease to use any means possible to remove the Obamas from the White House! One of Hannity's website forum MODERATORS wrote "The Obamas are forever POLLUTING the White House"!
      Reply Favorite Flag as abusive Posted 04:16 AM on 07/31/2009
      - Digeeedad I'm a Fan of Digeeedad permalink
      A person would have to either be intentionally ignoring the signs, or perhaps of a mindset in agreement with the "Birthers" and now the "Deathers" etc etc etc not to see as you suggest a pattern or connected dots in the growing intensity of right wing conservative attacks and hatred of the Obamas. The intensity of that hatred cannot simply be attributed to disagreements with Obama's programs and policies.

      The frightening thing for me is that there has been an incremental progression in Limbaugh's, Hannity's and Beck's and others attacks on President Obama. Initially they and their followers were attacking him on policies and now even GOP politicians are co-signing charges of non-citizenship, racism, Marxist ideologies and seemingly whatever it takes to fan the flames of hate, towards the removal of Obama. They seem intent on not being able to tolerate his being in the White House for even ONE term of office!

      Their rallying cries have gone from "Obama's policies and agenda must be stopped and he must fail" to simply "Obama must be stopped"! This should disturb and frighten every sensible American, as President Obama is being portrayed as the "evil black boogeyman intent on destroying our nation"! It most definitely appears that Limbaugh, Hannity, Beck, and their associates actually WANT to see race and culture wars in our nation as they fan the flames of hatred, intolerance, racisim and fear through their non-stop and ever increasing propaganda!
      Reply Favorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:25 AM on 07/31/2009
      - Digeeedad I'm a Fan of Digeeedad permalink
      Hannity's radio talk show callers are now consistently parroting a common sentiment.. "We want our country back Sean"!

      What they most obviously mean is that just as was expected of children in past eras, they want minorities or non-whites to go back to the "children (and minorities) should be seen but not heard" rules. AND... also just as certainly "there should NEVER be a Black man in the White House or a Latina on the Supreme Court... for gosh sakes"!

      Well that's NOT going to be the case EVER AGAIN and many are in a complete panic filled frenzy!

      These are dangerous and volatile times and for Limbaugh, Hannity, Beck, and many GOP legislators to be adding fuel to the potential fires is bordering on treasonous and seditious behavior!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Myrna A. Howell (September 04, 2009 12:33 am ET)
         
      It seems to me issues aren't really part of the discussions in these comments. I don't know where our country is headed and won't be around long enough to get too concerned, but my grandchildren will and so will their children. I'd like to think that if they work hard they'll be okay. With the current situation and philosophy it may be that I am wrong. What I'd like to know is where in our constitution does it say everyone is entitled to own a home? Where in our constitution does it say we are entitled to health insurance? (notice I said insurance, not health care) Where in our constitution does it say that what I've worked so hard for should be shared with those who have not worked as hard? (You know the wonderful tale of Robin Hood--rob the 'rich' to pay the 'poor'--perhaps it means the haves and the have nots. Whatever, what I earn I think should be mine to do with as I choose--buy a home, pay for my own health insurance, choose the food I will eat, and so on. Why not fix the agencies we have in place already instead of creating more monstrosities that won't work? The government (republican or democratic)--doesn't run well--the departments pay more in operating expenses than they do in benefits--check it out. Everyone needs to get off the racist train--the word is becoming meaningless as it is applied to everything anyone does or doesn't agree with.
      Report Abuse