About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Hill takes on Bruce's spooky story of "Obama Death Care" turning the U.S. into a Canada, Cuba, and England Frankenstein

September 01, 2009 9:36 pm ET

From the September 1 edition of Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Sean GE (September 01, 2009 9:58 pm ET)
      2  
      AWWW... why does the video cut out right before that moro... i mean commentator, says something historically stupid.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by shag11 (September 01, 2009 10:05 pm ET)
      8 1
      I don't know why any liberal appears on Faux. One can't have a rational or civil discussion with those intellectually-challenged neanderthals. They won't let you finish a sentence, they disparage any point you want to make, it's useless.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by fairliberal (September 02, 2009 7:12 pm ET)
          1
        Yeah, people like this are much more civil. Who was worse? I know it is hard for you but try to be honest.

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gRJ1oyhTZAQ
        Report Abuse
    • Author by dmhack (September 01, 2009 11:52 pm ET)
      7  
      I just finished watching Maddow interview Tom Ridge.
      Was it a love fest? Nope.
      As you might suspect, they had their differences.
      Were they shouting and talking over one another? Nope.
      It was a civil debate between two people secure enough in their own skin that they didn't need to shout to be noticed.

      Take a look at the Maddow interview and then compare it to this. The difference is stunning.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by phredicles (September 02, 2009 1:00 am ET)
        5  
        On a similar note, an article making the rounds has pointed out that conservatives and neocons actually like going on Jon Stewart's show because, while he'll challenge them, he'll also listen to them without shouting or talking over them.

        And the right-wing counterpart to Maddow or Stewart is... um.... *crickets*
        Report Abuse
      • Author by fairliberal (September 02, 2009 1:00 am ET)
          11
        You are delusional.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mescal (September 02, 2009 1:42 am ET)
          5  
          And, based on the vicious, dishonest inanities that you regularly post here, you are overpaid by the Faux News Channel.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by fairliberal (September 02, 2009 2:04 am ET)
              8
            Point out what I said that was dishonest. Put up or shut up. Did I say anything dishonest about Kennedy for example? That has been a topic of conversation lately.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by snoopy (September 02, 2009 3:32 am ET)
              7  
              Point out what I said that was dishonest.


              You are delusional.


              Did I say anything dishonest about Kennedy for example?


              And it's 1,2,3, what are we reiching 4?
              Don't ask me I don't give a damn,
              next stop is wingnutstan!
              Report Abuse
            • Author by jediknight65 (September 02, 2009 9:50 am ET)
              4  
              well saying dmhack was delusional is a good start. because he was entirely correct.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by fairliberal (September 02, 2009 7:17 pm ET)
                  1
                That's garbage, there was nothing wrong with that discussion. But I must admit I am surprised that Maddow had the nerve to talk to any individual other than Buchanan with a differing opinion. She must have noticed that the format works for Fox and thought she would try it. Did she abandon her "talk me down" segments where she typically brought on another lib to "talk her down".
                Report Abuse
        • Author by jediknight65 (September 02, 2009 9:48 am ET)
          2  
          how so? cause two people had a rational discussion where they didn't scream at each other....admitted they had differing opinions and still showed each other respect?

          as opposed to a neo con or "conservative" shouting down anyone who disagrees with them or dares to challenge them?

          i think perhaps you should look in a mirror to see who is truly delusional
          Report Abuse
          • Author by fairliberal (September 02, 2009 11:57 pm ET)
              1
            I'd say that I have seen Dr Hill appear with O'Reilly at least 25 times or so. Can you point out one occasion where they were shouting?

            Not to mention that there was no shouting or screaming in that clip. Once again another delusional lib.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by jediknight65 (September 02, 2009 9:42 am ET)
        3  
        heck even Ridge acknowledged that they differ but could have a civil discussion
        Report Abuse
    • Author by skiploader1111 (September 02, 2009 1:48 am ET)
      1  
      In which country do you want to have a serious medical condition? Cuba or USA?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by fairliberal (September 02, 2009 2:01 am ET)
          11
        Yeah what a model society , an example for all the world to envy. that is why the bodies keep washing up in South Florida as the wonderfully content Cubans try to escape the great society of Cuba. Try coming to South Florida and asking some Cubans what they think.

        I wonder if Moore would actually get treated himself in Cuba. Or Canada, or the UK. I doubt it. And for that matter , how about you?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by skiploader1111 (September 02, 2009 2:53 am ET)
          7  
          Bodies wash up in Florida because Cuba is a dirt poor communist country not because of universal health care.

          France and Spain have universal health care but no French and Spanish bodies are washing up on North African shores.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by christopher howard (September 02, 2009 6:57 am ET)
          7  
          "I wonder if Moore would actually get treated himself in Cuba. Or Canada, or the UK. I doubt it. And for that matter , how about you?"

          I for one was treated by the NHS in the UK and it was just like you no doubt imagined, Fairliberal. Joseph Mengele tortured me for hours while Michael Moore and Nancy Pelosi looked on and laughed. True story. /sarcasm off

          Actually I was quite impressed by the service.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by magnolialover (September 02, 2009 7:56 am ET)
            5  
            My wife, who spent a year and a half in England for school, got treated in their health system a few different times for a few things that happened to her while she was abroad, and she was more than pleased with their service, and abilities. Also, she still maintains that it was the best healthcare that she has received, ever. And, to boot, even though she wasn't a UK citizen, they charged her, get this, NOTHING for the services they provided to her.

            Now, if Fairliberal would actually ask English folks, or Canadian folks if they like their healthcare systems, the overwhelming answer is always YES. The healthcare system is so popular in England, that politicians who even think about changing it are roundly criticized, and usually drummed out of office.

            Cuba, for all of its faults and issues (mostly due to Castro, and partly due to our stupid embargo of their country) has great health care for its citizens. They are also highly educated, having better literacy rates than the US, and also having more people who are college educated.

            I, for one, would get myself treated in Cuba (if I had to), or the UK (if I had to), and definitely Canada (if I had to). I am originally from the great State of Maine, and relatives and friends of mine used to go to Canada for their health care. Why? First, the care was better, and the exchange rate used to make it a whole lot cheaper.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by fairliberal (September 02, 2009 7:24 pm ET)
                1
              Nobody said they can't handle the routine things. And the majority of Canadians and Brits that I have heard speak of their health care do not say very good things about it.

              And if Cuba does such a good job with everything, it does seem that Castro is a folk hero with the libs, why are they in such terrible shape, why do people risk their lives to get away and to our shores. I know Cubans, they paint a different picture. Do you know any?


              I, for one, would get myself treated in Cuba (if I had to), or the UK (if I had to),

              Wow , what a brave soul, you would get treated there if you had to. Well so would I, if I had to. But if it is so good , why not make it your first choice.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by fairliberal (September 02, 2009 7:18 pm ET)
            1  
            I think we were talking Cuba, oh I guess you forgot.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by dr. matt (September 02, 2009 7:50 am ET)
          4  
          Faillibrul, you would look less stupid if just kept posting about ratings, MSNBC, and ACORN. When you attempt to "think" outside the box, you're destined to look even more pathetic (as evident by your laughable attempt at a post).
          Report Abuse
    • Author by Luis81 (September 02, 2009 3:46 am ET)
      1 1
      My guess is that Hill was trying to say before he was rudely interrupted is that if a country was to start a universal healthcare program they could (and should) use Cuba,Canada,and the U.K. as examples of what can be avoided.

      Just a guess though.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by blk-in-alabam (September 02, 2009 6:47 am ET)
      2  
      Dr.Hill is not scared to go in to the witches den and face the wicked wicked wicked wicthes of the east and west at the same time.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (September 02, 2009 6:56 am ET)
      5  
      Hill made an excellent point at the end regarding access to health care...which, I have to assume, was totally lost on practically every FOX viewer.

      It is shameful that Cuba can provide universal health care to its citizens and the U.S. doesn't. Laura's reasoning seems to go something like this: Cuba is bad. Cuba has universal health care. Therefore universal health care is bad.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by christopher howard (September 02, 2009 7:14 am ET)
        3  
        Spot on, Irony.

        I don't like Bob. Bob is a jerk.

        Bob is also a fantastic artist and I am an aspiring one.

        There is absolutely nothing that I could possibly learn from Bob.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by foghornleghorn (September 02, 2009 10:43 am ET)
          1  
          Cuba so poor they can't even keep toilet paper in stock and yet they provide universal health care.

          That's an argument I'm going to file away for future use.

          (Nutjob rebuttal would likely be - "well, that's why they're poor because they're covering everyone")
          Report Abuse
          • Author by fairliberal (September 02, 2009 10:13 pm ET)
              1
            Actually Castro just has naive libs fooled on the subject.

            http://www.therealcuba.com/Page10.htm

            http://www.nowpublic.com/ouch_visiting_cuban_hospital

            http://nrd.nationalreview.com/article/?q=NjE5NWFkNWU0ZGJhMzdlNjRkMGUzYWMzNGI2NDI5MzI
            Report Abuse

Most Popular Tags

Feed IconRSS Feeds

Get personalized rss or email alerts

Connect & Share

Facebook Twitter Digg YouTube MySpace