About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Jonah Goldberg: Dems say opposing Obama is racism, Krugman "bangs his spoon on his high chair every week about this"

September 01, 2009 10:38 pm ET

From the September 1 edition of Fox News' Hannity:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by lookoutoftheyard2251 (September 01, 2009 11:34 pm ET)
      13  
      Not completely related, but when is Jonah Goldberg going to get a new insult to sling around? I'm referring to the "spoon against the high chair" thing. He seems quite attached to that particular quote:

      Trickle-Down Corruption, 5 May 2009
      Democrats took back Congress in 2006 and the presidency in 2008 in no small part because of their ability to bang their spoons on their high chairs about what they called the Republican "culture of corruption."

      The New N-Word, 30 June 2004
      That said, it would be very nice indeed if all the liberals banging their spoons on their high chairs about the ad took a moment to reflect on what they've let slip by without much comment.

      Anti-globalization equals anti-American, 27 August 2003
      Anti-globalization activists will pound their recycled spoons on their recycled high-chairs all day about the need for the U.N. to replace the U.S. in almost every international crisis, be it political or environmental.

      Le Chutzpah, 24 January 2003
      I'm sorry to pick on those two titans of what Don Rumsfeld calls "Old Europe," especially considering the fact that all of official Germany and France are banging their spoons on their high chairs about this (entirely accurate) description.

      Libertarians Under My Skin, 2 March 2001
      In the last couple weeks three different Lewrockwell.com-ers have banged their spoons on their high chairs about me.

      These were all found on the first page of a Google search for "Jonah Goldberg spoon high chair," and I've seen a number more of these, but I didn't want to drag this out too much.

      I don't know, is it some kind of running joke that Goldberg has, or is he just not creative enough to think of a new, subtle way to call Democrats and liberals (and, at one point, libertarians) babies?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by dmhack (September 01, 2009 11:57 pm ET)
        15  
        Keep up with the times, Jonah.
        Krugman replaced the spoon with a freakin' Nobel prize.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by christopher howard (September 02, 2009 12:07 am ET)
          8  
          Maybe Jonah is try to get the Nobel for historical revisionism.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by captfoster2 (September 02, 2009 1:58 am ET)
          7  
          Amen to that DMHACK!

          I might add that Paul Krugman has more intellect and integrity in the tip of just one pinkie finger than Jonah has in his entire body and most of the Fox Noise circus combined!
          Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (September 02, 2009 7:10 am ET)
        6  
        Excellent work... Does Goldberg know another expression? :>)
        Report Abuse
        • Author by christopher howard (September 02, 2009 7:23 am ET)
          6  
          Good question. Obviously his "bang his spoon against the high chair" expression is being used to portray his opponents as screaming babies. Normally I don't comment on someone's looks, but look at Goldberg's picture above versus a photo of Krugman and decide who more closely resembles a baby.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by IRONY 101 (September 02, 2009 7:36 am ET)
            6  
            What's funny is that learning that Goldberg uses the same, rehearsed phrase over and over again diminishes him even further...as someone who is not quite as bright as he would like you to think. You can also ask yourself: If Golberg really is smart, then what is he doing on FOX?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 02, 2009 11:55 am ET)
              1  
              Christopher, you don't even need to be commenting on looks to note Goldberg's resemblance to a baby. His political analysis is mostly infantile tantrums with a few three syllable words thrown in.

              But this high chair-spoon could just be a fetish-inspired catch phrase, like Limbaugh's "bend over and grab your ankles" or Lou Costello's "I'm a bad boy!".
              Report Abuse
      • Author by rtwmd1230 (September 02, 2009 8:51 am ET)
        4  
        "when is Jonah Goldberg going to get a new insult to sling around?"

        When his mommy writes him a new one.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Lord of Light (September 01, 2009 11:37 pm ET)
      5  
      Yeah, really, just because people were carrying signs with swastikas and grotesque photos of Obama as Hitler doesn't mean they're racist. Such nitpicking. Er, wait, that's right -- even though I saw those signs with my own eyes, Rush Limbaugh says I can't point it out, or at least Nancy Pelosi isn't allowed to mention it. Oops!

      The birthers aren't racist at all, either. And it's just a coincidence that all of the Tea Baggers are white.

      And Jonah is 100 percent correct: Even though health industry shills are literally trying to shout politicians down at town hall meetings, the Obama administration has absolutely no right to respond strongly.

      Thanks for enlightening me about Democrats' evil plans, Jonah!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by 1st Republic 14th Star (September 01, 2009 11:40 pm ET)
      10  
      Democrats don't say that Republican office holders oppose Obama because of race. Those Republican Senators and Congressmen are very careful not to do anything that overt. Well, with a couple of exceptions, maybe.

      We do say, though, that these Republican officials are complicit in generating misguided opposition opposition to Obama's and the Democrats' plans and policies.

      The idiots who showed up at "town halls" this summer couldn't have cared less about health care reform or any other issue. They were looking for a forum and a camera so they could yell "WHERE'S THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE!" "HE'S A MUSLIM!" AND "I WANT MY COUNTRY BACK!"

      Need proof?

      Go here.

      Here.

      Here.

      Here.

      Here.

      Here.

      Jonah Goldberg is a compulsive liar who wouldn't know a fact if it was handed to him on a silver platter. Like these, for instance.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by christopher howard (September 01, 2009 11:51 pm ET)
        16  
        Of all the rightwing pundits out there -- and I include heavyweight nasties like Beck, Coulter and Savage -- Jonah Goldberg really sickens me about the most. His liberal Nazism meme is so thoroughly, historically dishonest, and is absolutely insulting to the memory of those who fought against actual fascism when it threatened the world.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by 1st Republic 14th Star (September 02, 2009 12:06 am ET)
          13  
          Good call. Recall that it was liberals who stood up to to the Nazis and the Japanese military government. It was conservatives who formed groups like America First, opposed intervention, profited from German investments, and admired the Nazis in Germany and the Fascists in Italy.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by eweston8542983 (September 02, 2009 11:17 am ET)
        4  
        I finally got to go to a town hall meeting. Saw some angry people and heard them. Their losing a bit of steam and in no way dominated the meeting. Much inthused by the word liar. Reserved for anystatement that they cannot and will not believe.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 02, 2009 11:57 am ET)
          4  
          ...the word liar. Reserved for any statement that they cannot and will not believe.

          That's about the depth of it, EW.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by jfkisgr8 (September 01, 2009 11:44 pm ET)
      5  
      This fool only has his job because of his mother, who is also insane and wrong on every issue.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by bigbee (September 01, 2009 11:54 pm ET)
      11  
      Two questions:

      1. Since I've seen exactly zero instances of mainstream Dems accusing critics of Obama as being racists, what the hell is Goldberg talking about?

      2. Since I've seen exactly zero instances of Krugman accusing critics of racism (much less every week), what the hell is Goldberg talking about?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by MickD (September 02, 2009 1:27 am ET)
        5  
        These shallow men hide behind the mantle of Fox News, where no debate or questioning goes on, despite any invective or untrue statement. They are men without any honor or integrity, they are merely weak-willed propaganda merchants who shill for a corporate master.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by eddiebear2 (September 02, 2009 8:20 am ET)
            6
          ^like MSNBC?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by 1st Republic 14th Star (September 02, 2009 8:31 am ET)
            4  
            Sure, that's an apt comparison. Fox News disseminates only Republican propaganda. MSNBC is it's mirror image, completely dominated by uninformed, ignorant liberals who have no interest in debating people on the other side of the issues.

            Why, just look at Joe Scarborough, that former liberal Democrat Congressman from the liberal Florida panhandle. He was an acolyte of liberal House Speaker Newt Gingrich and does nothing on the air but spout liberal talking points provided to him by the liberal Democrat National Committee. Yup MSNBC is EXACTLY the opposite of Fox -- all liberals and no conservatives on MSNBC.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 02, 2009 12:01 pm ET)
              2  
              Not to mention, First-Fourteenth, the mostly failed attempts to catch the liberal commentators on MSNBC in falsehoods or misinformation, vs. the volumes of Fox people documented in these things.

              I'm repeating myself, but wingnuts have a really tough time with the concept of a double standard.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by eweston8542983 (September 02, 2009 8:51 pm ET)
                1  
                We forgot Pat Buchanan, while no with no regular show, MSNBC always seems to have room for Pat.
                Report Abuse
      • Author by skiploader1111 (September 02, 2009 1:28 am ET)
        6  
        If a Republican on Fox News wishes something happened, all he/she has to do is say it happened. Then it is reality in millions of conservative minds.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 02, 2009 3:11 am ET)
        5  
        1. Since I've seen exactly zero instances of mainstream Dems accusing critics of Obama as being racists, what the hell is Goldberg talking about?

        There's a distinction there, Bigbee. There are some mainstream Dems pointing out that some critics of Obama are racist (I don't know if I'd use the word "accused", it's like accusing mice of liking cheese).

        Where Goldberg gets confused is the same place where so many posters at this site get confused, convincing themselves that simply disagreeing with Obama gets them accused of racism.

        It's tough to explain to people who don't see racism until somebody's screaming the N word and burning a cross.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by IRONY 101 (September 02, 2009 7:14 am ET)
          7  
          It's tough to explain to people who don't see racism until somebody's screaming the N word and burning a cross.

          Exaclty...I know the type. They don't consider themselves racists because they don't burn crosses or us the "N" word in public. But they can't stand even being around black people.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by Lord of Light (September 02, 2009 8:38 am ET)
          4  
          What those people don't understand is that racism is an attitude. Very little of it manifests in such blatant exhibitionism as cross-burning. It's mostly expressed toward minorities by belittling them or questioning them whenever they succeed. One example of racism is claiming, with absolutely zero evidence, that Donovan McNabb is only respected because the media supposedly wants a black quarterback to succeed (had nothing to do with him leading the Eagles to their most successful period in at least 20 years -- or maybe even 40; the late '70s/early '80s Eagles success wasn't sustained).

          Most of the people who don't understand racism, incidentally, are racists themselves.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by puppienrainbows (September 02, 2009 10:10 am ET)
            8
          I hope we can all rely on you, Col., to 'weed-out' those nasty racists who are able to disguise their handicap from much of society. I can help. Let's categorize them, k?
          a) The overt racist who tells racist jokes and uses racial epitaphs routinely.
          b) The closet racist who appears normal to most folks(except you, Col.)but use their racist bigotry when they vote or shop.
          c) The good natured racist who tells everyone how open they are to 'other cultures' and 'marvel at the genius of Obama' and 'support affirmative action' because the black man 'needs a helping hand' because he is unable to do it without help(this is the category you fit into, Col.).
          d) Republicans and conservatives
          Report Abuse
          • Author by foghornleghorn (September 02, 2009 10:35 am ET)
            6  
            Which one(s) are you? My guess is b and d.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by puppienrainbows (September 02, 2009 11:38 am ET)
                3
              d)
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 02, 2009 11:43 am ET)
                2  
                So we can all agree that you're d)- a conservative Republican racist, P&R, but you're probably, as Foghorn suggested, b) as well.

                Lord of Light's last sentence will explain why you may not have gotten both answers.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by puppienrainbows (September 02, 2009 11:55 am ET)
                    3
                  You've mis-represented me and what I stated. The selection d) did not include racist. You modified what I wrote. It was clearly a sarcastic response to an equally sarcastic attitude, from the left, that labels conservatives and republicans as racists, by virtue of nothing else. That's the theme of this thread and you and foghornleghorn have substantiated Jonah Goldberg's claim quite adequately. Keep digging.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 02, 2009 12:11 pm ET)
                    4  
                    ...to 'weed-out' those nasty racists ... Let's categorize them, k?

                    Pardon me, when you suggested weeding out those nasty racists by categorizing them, I assumed you were saying let's categorize the racists, since there was no other subject in your comment that the pronoun "them" could have applied to.

                    I made the mistake of reading your words in English. My bad.

                    NObody on the left has suggested that all cons/repubs are racist simply because they're cons/repubs, it's just noted that there is a lot of racism showing up on the right, and it seems to be very comfortable there.

                    Nobody has substantiated Goldberg's claim, but you're joining him in defending the racists by saying that the charges are made simply because of political ideology.

                    That's the theme of this thread, that Goldberg is FOS, and you're buying what Goldberg's selling.
                    Report Abuse
                • Author by puppienrainbows (September 02, 2009 11:59 am ET)
                    3
                  Lord of Light's last sentence cannot equally apply to you, Col., can it not?
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by puppienrainbows (September 02, 2009 12:01 pm ET)
                      3
                    .......or does an exaggerated level of self-importance prevent that?
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 02, 2009 12:16 pm ET)
                      4  
                      No, on the contrary, it looks like your exaggerated level of self-importance didn't prevent you from trying to apply that to me at all.
                      Report Abuse
                    • Author by foghornleghorn (September 02, 2009 12:21 pm ET)
                      2  
                      How many presidents other than Obama had his citizenship questioned?

                      How many other presidents were black?

                      (hint - both answers are between 0 and 0)

                      Face it, racism is a mainly a trait of the nutjob teabaggers who can't swallow the fact that the black man is in the White House. How else do explain the irrational hatred of a president who has been in office SEVEN MONTHS.

                      Cue crying town hall teabaggin' woman: "I want my country back! (from the black man)

                      Cue another crying town hall teabaggin' woman: "This isn't the America I remember" (due to the black man occupying the White House)

                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by puppienrainbows (September 02, 2009 12:39 pm ET)
                          5
                        Unbelievable! You've done it again! The woman NEVER said, "I want my country back FROM THE BLACK MAN" or "this isn't the America I remember DUE TO THE BLACK MAN OCCUPYING THE WHITEHOUSE". This is a rather poisoneous interpretation of what was said that, once again, substantiates Goldberg's assertion. Congratulations!
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by foghornleghorn (September 02, 2009 12:43 pm ET)
                          3  
                          Then tell us, oh wise pup, who/what does she want her country back from?

                          And then, please tell us why this isn't the America she remembers?

                          What has changed in the last SEVEN MONTHS?

                          (hint - the black man is in the White House)
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by puppienrainbows (September 02, 2009 1:28 pm ET)
                              4
                            Here's a hint, foghorn: SOCIALISM. The benign form of government that relegates everyone to mediocrity and creates an inept system that fosters an elitism that Orwell recognized..."All animals are created equal, some are created MORE equal". (Camelot! The Great Society!) You injected race into those statements, no one else.
                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by foghornleghorn (September 02, 2009 1:48 pm ET)
                              3  
                              She wants her country back from the socialists?

                              This isn't the America she remembers because it's now socialist?

                              So, in 7 months, Obama has turned the apple pie capitalist US into a socialist state? Wow, must have missed that. Unless you can provide some details/examples of Obama's socialist policies....

                              No sale. It's racism. Try again.
                              Report Abuse
                              • Author by puppienrainbows (September 02, 2009 2:19 pm ET)
                                  3
                                It's NOT what Obama has done, it's clearly what he intends to do. There is no mistake about it, Obama has a socialist 'history' when it comes to his plan to "fundamentally change this country". If there is any way to stop him,legally, then I'm on board. You can keep howling racism and maybe in your circles it will fly, but to most people, it's an obvious detour. A government run healthcare system, a government run auto industry, a government controlled banking system, a bloated beurocracy, a government controlled housing policy, all examples of Obama's push towards a socialist nation that will heal all of the inequities that 'evil capitalism' heaped on America.
                                Report Abuse
                                • Author by foghornleghorn (September 02, 2009 2:34 pm ET)
                                  5  
                                  I've been keeping this window open on my monitor - thanks for responding.

                                  What he INTENDS to do? That's fear, my friend. Nothing but unsubstantiated fear.

                                  Please explain Obama's "socialist" history.

                                  Now to your socialism paranoia:

                                  Government run health care - the government will run health care just like the insurance companies are running health care. They'll pay the doctors and hospitals just like the insurance companies but they WON'T under-insure or fail to renew policies.

                                  Government run auto industry - the government is not running the auto industry.

                                  Government controlled banking system - the government is not controlling (yes, regulating) the banking system.

                                  Government controlled housing policy - the government is not controlling housing. (How is that possible, anyway?)

                                  Obama is not a socialist. His policies are not socialist. You've bought into the hate radio lies.

                                  So, if it's not socialism, then who do the crying teabaggers want their country back from?

                                  That's right. It's the black man sitting with his feet up on the desk in the Oval Office at the White House.
                                  Report Abuse
                                • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 02, 2009 4:53 pm ET)
                                  4  
                                  It's NOT what Obama has done, it's clearly what he intends to do. There is no mistake about it, Obama has a socialist 'history' when it comes to his plan to "fundamentally change this country".

                                  Wow, it's like you're time traveling all over the place in your comment, Pup.

                                  It,s nothing that's happened, it's what's going to happen, because Obama has a history of his plans for the future.

                                  Almost as bizarre as conservatives citing Orwell.
                                  Report Abuse
                                  • Author by rtwmd1230 (September 02, 2009 6:59 pm ET)
                                    3  
                                    "It's nothing that's happened, it's what's going to happen, because Obama has a history of his plans for the future."

                                    Exactly! And that's why we need to take our country back from what hasn't happen because it was planned a long time ago to happen far off in the future if we don't fight it so it doesn't get here then or now.

                                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 02, 2009 12:14 pm ET)
                    4  
                    Sure, theoretically, I could be racist, and that could be causing my lack of understanding of racism. I could be just as in the dark as you are.

                    It would be a little hard to back up, though. You're the one that's always here defending the racists, and pretending that racism isn't prevalent among Republicans, and imagining that accusations of racism are just some political play.

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by puppienrainbows (September 02, 2009 12:32 pm ET)
                        4
                      It looks as though you and I live in mirror-image worlds, Col. I'm NOT defending racism or racists at all, simply pointing out, what I see, as a double-standard. I honostly believe patronizing a particular race or skin color is just as insideous as overt racism. If you indicate to someone, by virtue of their race or skin color, that they are ill-equipped to compete in in our society without a 'boost', then you 'cripple' their ability to achieve and excel. When you indicate to our president that his policies are a-ok and that the ONLY reason you are encountering opposition is because you are half-black, then of course he will continue unabated with his agenda and resist compromise in favor of furthering this notion of racism.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by foghornleghorn (September 02, 2009 12:47 pm ET)
                        5  
                        There is no double standard. Show me an example of an overt left-wing racist. Because there's a numerous examples of teabaggin' nut job racists parading their racism at the racist tea parties.
                        Report Abuse
                      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 02, 2009 4:43 pm ET)
                        3  
                        I'll skip the first part, as it's the same ol' Rush Limbaugh "recognizing history is patronizing" crap.

                        I won't try to talk you out of that, if it makes you feel good to believe it. I'll take this bit;

                        When you indicate to our president that his policies are a-ok and that the ONLY reason you are encountering opposition is because you are half-black...

                        I don't think I've heard anybody say that the only reason Obama is facing opposition is because of his race, so that's the strawman you need to get over.

                        But you've combined your strawman with the other part (When you indicate to our president that his policies are a-ok) without being clear about who is indicating this.

                        People who support his policies, I assume? Again, nobody's saying race is the only reason people oppose Obama. I'm sure there are people with real, rational differences based on their ideology.

                        Unfortunately, we don't see much of them, as the right seems focused on Kenyan birth certificates, imaginary commies, protecting corporate profits by misinforming about health care, and terrorist fist bumps, not to mention the time spent photoshopping Obama's face onto tribal Africans' bodies and making bumper stiuckers that say "It's the White House !!"

                        So I'd suggest you get to work on some sort of point that's free of logical fallacies. But I won't hold my breath.

                        Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (September 02, 2009 6:45 am ET)
      6  
      Simply opposing Barack Obama's policies does not constitute racism...and I don't think anyone is saying that it does. However, many of the personal attacks on Obama from ignorant right wingers clearly have a racial component to them. And combine that with the fact that the Republican Party is dominated by white Southerners. No racism...? Ha..! Tha's a joke.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by foghornleghorn (September 02, 2009 10:38 am ET)
        4  
        Exactly. These teabaggers can't swallow the bitter pill of the black man being in the White House.

        Name the last president that went through this much hate from the opposing party in the first 7 months in office. Name the last president that had his citizenship questioned. Name the last president to be called a fascist, communist and a socialist.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by puppienrainbows (September 02, 2009 11:45 am ET)
            3
          You just substantiated the claim by Goldberg! There cannot POSSIBLY be any other reason to oppose the policies of President Obama other than the fact he is half-black, can there? He does project a 'socialist' agenda. There IS reason to object to many of his policies. He IS inexperienced and clearly manipulated by Nancy Pelosi. But, in order to villify Obama's critics, the charge of racism delivers more 'bang-for-the-buck', doesn't it?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 02, 2009 12:18 pm ET)
            3  
            You just substantiated the claim by Goldberg!

            Once again, no, nobody is substantiating Goldberg's claim.It's a cheap trick meant to pre-empt people noticing racism,and to mollify covert racists, and you're falling for it.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by foghornleghorn (September 02, 2009 12:53 pm ET)
            2  
            He projects a socialist agenda. LIE #1

            He is inexperienced. True, but he is MORE experienced than Dubya, not to mention, he was a success in life while Dubya was an abject failure at everything he ever die. How'd that work out for the country?

            He is clearly manipulated by Nancy Pelosi. LIE #2.

            It's nothin' but sour grapes, pup. Elections matter. Obama should be given a chance. If he fails, then you can vote him out. Until then, QUIT WHINING about debunked lies.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by SMTDL (September 02, 2009 1:03 pm ET)
      3  
      Goldberg would have a little credibility if he acknowleged that some of the opposition is based on race...there has been an awful lot of obvious racial slurs, signs,comments,monkey/ape references,magic negro,uppity xxxxxx,Brown Man(Boortz),muslim,terrorists pal,etc...Even signs using the n-word...
      How can anybody fair minded not notice this has happened since the campaign.Even Obama's "Bitter" comments was a defense of those type voters based on divisive politics over possible racism.He has gone out of his way not to use racism in his defense of his policies.There is more subtle racism as well ..like the Birther Movement,socialist/communist attacks.If everything was the same and his father was from a European country would the birth certificate nonsense get spewed.Why wasn't Bush called a socialist for his Mediucare presciption bill(600 Million dollars)or Clinton when healthcare was pushed the last time.Would anybody say the Obama Agenda was about Reparations if he was white? All these are elements of a racial component of the opposition.Nobody questioned George Bush's salary,or vacation time..even though he was spending and building huge deficits!!!To deny that a significant portion(NOT ALL) of the opposition is racially motivated is delusional or at least naive. What is even more hypocritical is how quickly the President,The 1st Lady,Rev.Wright,Dr Gates and Justice Sotomayor got called racist for infinitely more benign racial comments by these same people.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 02, 2009 5:02 pm ET)
        2  
        How can anybody fair minded not notice this has happened since the campaign.

        Fair-minded people can't, SMTDL. Only the true believers can be convinced that the teabaggers' hysteria is only concerned with policy. They have den mothers like Goldberg telling them that if anybody notices the racism from right wingers, it's the same thing as saying that any opposition to Obama is race-based.

        Exhibit A is the poster above who has convinced himself that there's some sort of socialist takeover going on, in spite of reality , so his fear can't possibly have anything to do with racism.
        Report Abuse

Most Popular Tags

Feed IconRSS Feeds

Get personalized rss or email alerts

Connect & Share

Facebook Twitter Digg YouTube MySpace