About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Kurtz notes Beck "practically conceived" the 9-12 protests, asks if he is "a talk show host" or "a leader of a movement"

September 13, 2009 11:14 am ET

From the September 13 edition of CNN's Reliable Sources:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by dr. matt (September 13, 2009 11:18 am ET)
      10  
      Yes, he's a leader of a movement. To be precise, he's a leader of a cult. The followers are sad, uneducated, pathetic hicks that worship am hate radio and faux.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by pointofview (September 13, 2009 2:55 pm ET)
          10
        Harley...you sound so bitter. Just because you will lose seats in the 2010 elections is no reason to be so sad.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by funnymanpants (September 13, 2009 2:58 pm ET)
          7  
          >>Harley...you sound so bitter. Just because you will lose seats in the 2010 elections is no reason to be so sad.

          Yes, because if we know anything from the 8 years of Bush, it is how good Republicans are at predicting things like WMDs, how much a war would cost, the effects of a hurricane, etc.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by dr. matt (September 13, 2009 3:20 pm ET)
          5  
          POV, you are so bitter. Just because your perverse party can't win elections is no reason to be so sad.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by snoopy (September 13, 2009 9:46 pm ET)
          4  
          I think I'll save your post off. Then if republicans lose even more seats in the house and senate I can wave it in your face and laugh.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by magnolialover (September 14, 2009 8:17 am ET)
            1  
            Of course, if we're basing POV's thought that democrats are going to lose seats in 2010 according to polling numbers, he has nothing to stand on, since republicans are still far more disliked or unpopular with the country than democrats.

            Maybe he's using that special Karl Rove math that told Rove that republicans were also going to pick up seats in 2006.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by themidnightreview.com (September 14, 2009 11:49 am ET)
              1  
              According to text books, and every history class I have take, the ruling party generally loses seats during mid term elections...

              Conservative political analysts think they made some super discovery that Republicans may gain seats, but in all reality, they may regain control of some districts that have traditionally voted Republican, but lost in 2006.

              Here is a true test to see the commitment of the first time voters and youth voters from last year and see if they continue to vote...
              Report Abuse
            • Author by highliter (September 14, 2009 12:56 pm ET)
                1
              Right now the Dems hold a 2.8 advantage in generic congressional vote. I would hardly call that far more disliked. Which by they way that lead is down significantly over the last few months. Lets not forget that congressional gob approval is down to 28.8. With the direction of the county ding 58.8 wrong track. Im not saying the republicans are going to clean house the 2010 elections are too far off much can and will happen between now and then. But to deny the possibility with all the current polling trends is disingenuous.

              Source http://www.realclearpolitics.com/
              Report Abuse
              • Author by highliter (September 15, 2009 4:10 pm ET)
                  1
                Hmm no response on this post that the fact not supporting your post must suck.
                Report Abuse
      • Author by jwcoop715110 (September 13, 2009 4:23 pm ET)
        1  
        He's the leader of the scum vote.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by diamonds (September 14, 2009 5:15 am ET)
           
        Because somehow two million people can be regarded as a cult? Give me a counterexample if I am wrong, but a few thousand people protesting at the capital is exercising freedom, while two million people across the US including "tens of thousands" in DC is a cult? I don't make the distinction.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by epkklk851 (September 13, 2009 11:22 am ET)
      9  
      Yes, Glenn is becoming the leader of a movement. It is a movement that deeply resents loosing the last election and wants to through out a government elected by the majority of the population and they are quite proudly preaching sedition and rebellion. It is shameful and scary. And they have no proposals for anything to replace the government they want to take down beyond freedom, no taxes, guns, no abortion, no immigrants, and God.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by pointofview (September 13, 2009 2:53 pm ET)
          12
        Sounds a lot like Air America radio to me!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (September 13, 2009 2:55 pm ET)
          5 1
          Then you must be deaf.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by epkklk851 (September 13, 2009 3:36 pm ET)
          3  
          POV, I was at Glennie's little outing in the park yesterday, I saw first hand just what his audience is and what they are putting forth as ideas. One of the videos that played is available on YouTube. I found it insulting and seditious. Here is the link, I am sure you might agree, but I found it nauseating.

          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jeYscnFpEyA
          Report Abuse
          • Author by pilotx (September 13, 2009 7:27 pm ET)
            2  
            You're brave. I wanted to go but it's sad that before I prepared to go I was gonna call to make sure D.C. was going to enforce its gun ban that day. Sad to think in our nation's capital I was contemplating going armed to defend myself. Sad. This is the most uncomfortable I have felt in this country in all of my 37 years. I'm starting to get an inkiling how my parents felt in the 50's and 60's. This was the same as when I drove to the Palin/McCain rally in Ft. Wayne,IN. It's not cool to feel like an outsider in your own country.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by epkklk851 (September 13, 2009 7:44 pm ET)
              3  
              I was scared, too. I was worried about guns, but my husband pointed out that the Capitol police would not allow it, and that helped a bit. I was also worried about punches being thrown, because I saw that at my town hall among the people who didn't get in. I played it low key for the most part. When I questioned some of them, they said they weren't going to change their minds, regardless of what I said, and why was I there if I felt the way I felt. Honestly, I wanted to see for myself what was there and how it would be spun. It is a lot of anger, resentment, fear, and very little knowledge about what is happening and why. And that, more than anything bothered me. I am worried that these people might force the government down and have nothing to replace it with. Countries are lost that way. But you should have gone, it is important for them to see that there are people who are not ready for a revolution.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by pilotx (September 13, 2009 11:33 pm ET)
                2  
                Yeah, I would really have gone but we had a Young Eagles rally and teaching kids about aviation is one of my main motivations. I went to a tea party and that was interesting. I'll make the next big righty event because like you I feel it is important to document them so we can actually have an idea of what we are talking about. I also don't feel that there will be a revolution because people forget that there are more guns in the inner city than anywhere else. Most are illegal but there nonetheless:)
                Report Abuse
                • Author by magnolialover (September 14, 2009 8:23 am ET)
                  3  
                  I went as well, I kept really low key myself, just walking around, taking in the sights and sounds. Overall, the folks there had high energy on the Jingometer (copyright Col Sanders). As in, when a speaker would mention the word Freedom, everyone would cheer really loud. When the speaker mentioned Obama, everyone would boo really loud. When the speakers mentioned socialism, everyone would boo really loud. And so on.

                  I had heard the hype about the tea party through FoxNews, and since I live in DC, I figured I needed to go out, and see it first hand (like I did on tax day this year) and see what all of the noise was about.

                  I was underwhelmed.

                  They really had no coherent message, other than the following:

                  Anything Obama supports = BAD
                  Anything republicans supprt = GOOD

                  I've also been to a few large scale lefty protests, and at least with my liberal friends, we were protesting a certain thing. Iraq war for example. There was a coherent message, and it wasn't just "hate Bush" (although there were plenty there just for that), but overall, the message was no Iraq war. Same for protests I attended about women's reproductive rights. Laser focus on a message.

                  These folks, I mean, it was no taxes, lower taxes, guns, god, abortion, health care (very little about this actually), Joe Wilson being right, and so on.

                  And as I've said before, if this is a populist movement, as we're told by certain members of FoxNews, well, it's not so popular, if you can't even pull in 100,000 for a protest in DC.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by angryofmayfair61 (September 14, 2009 3:12 pm ET)
                      2
                    Thank goodness Glenn or whoever started this. Its been fairly well documented that there were in excess of 500,000 people on Saturday. So either you werent there OR you just happy with your head in the sand.

                    You are right in the fact there are many aspects of the current administration that are frustrating. To start--
                    the deficit. Yes Bush started it-but these guys are knocking out of the park. Someone at some point is going to have to say 'ENOUGH'. What will all the unemployed and welfare recipients going to do then? Get a job maybe?
                    Report Abuse
        • Author by New Frontier (September 13, 2009 3:55 pm ET)
          5  
          Sounds a lot like Air America radio to me!

          Sounds like you fit epkklk851's description. To a tea.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by jwcoop715110 (September 13, 2009 4:25 pm ET)
          1 1
          In other words, you remain a caseless, clueless, bigoted-trash, gop-slop spewin' waste of oxygen.

          Gee, thanks for clearin' that up.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by The_Cat (September 13, 2009 11:28 am ET)
      9  
      When I am offered two choices, I often look for the third option. Glenn Beck is not the leader of a movement. He is a half-baked pied piper, pointing out rats that do not exist and leading away the intellectually challenged to the discordant sounds of alternate reality piping.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by captfoster2 (September 13, 2009 11:46 am ET)
      9  
      Hell yeah he's the leader of a movement...

      A movement specifically meant to exploit the tragedy/terror attacks of 9/11 by calling his pathetic little anti-tax tea bag group the 9/12 Project!

      Pure and simple! Glenn Beck is scum, a user, and an exploiter!

      There is absolutely no reason, good or crummy to call his tax protesting group the 9/12 Project except to use the tragedy of 9/11 to get weak minded simpletons angry about one thing by using another!

      Only dimwits and fools cannot see that!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by PurpleState (September 13, 2009 12:07 pm ET)
      3  
      I'm not sure if this will anger people but...

      Right now, Glenn Beck is bigger than Rush Limbaugh.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by canaanxing9025 (September 13, 2009 1:54 pm ET)
        4  
        PurpleState

        REPENT! REPENT!

        Recant your heresy, or be damned to hell's fire for eternity.

        Or maybe an apology will do.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by PurpleState (September 13, 2009 2:42 pm ET)
          4  
          What is Rush going to do, come to my place and ask for an apology?

          He can barely get over his moat.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by canaanxing9025 (September 13, 2009 3:20 pm ET)
            2  
            PurpleState:

            We are talking about EL RUSHBO! What is he going to do, you ask.
            I will give you examples of his preeminence.

            There was a time when all thought that Hannity was the great one's heir apparent. Hannity was better looking,more hair, and had less personal baggage. Look what has befallen him.
            Hannity called himself an idiot on his own show, admitted it to a liberal feminazi, no less. Further, have you noticed Hannity's apperance lately - those chipmonk cheeks, and that hairline!
            Unrelated to being better looking than El Rushbo. Not a chance!
            No one dares presume to be better than Rush.

            And this Glen Beck person, true Rush must allow his acolytes to shine sometimes - but Beck must always remember he is just a reflection of HIS radiance. Otherwise, well, lets just say Glenn Beck might just go the way of Michael Savage.

            PurpleState: Beware.
            I hope you take this in the spirit is was written. It was meant for fun.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (September 13, 2009 2:56 pm ET)
        2  
        Right now, Glenn Beck is bigger than Rush Limbaugh.
        Wow, Beck must have become a real glutton.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (September 13, 2009 3:44 pm ET)
        1  
        Which, of course, is the whole purpose of Beck's schtick. He cares nothing about this nonsense . . . it's about ratings and money. It's disgusting and DANGEROUS. This many is inciting violence. Eventually, there is going to be a very, very bad incident. Beck and Fox don't care. It's about ratings and money . . . that's all.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by dmhack (September 13, 2009 12:25 pm ET)
      13  
      He's a leader of a movement of loons who scares him so much that on the day that his smattering of droolers assembled in Washington, Becky stayed in his New York City studio.

      Way to man the barricades, Becky.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by NiceguyEddie (September 13, 2009 2:16 pm ET)
      4  
      Oh, he's having a movement all right...

      -------------------------------------------------------------------
      My Blog
      Report Abuse
    • Author by joseph_b26 (September 13, 2009 3:15 pm ET)
      4  
      KISS: This Man Is A Racist

      Since Barack Obama started to consider his candidacy as president, the far right, the extreme racist, and everything stupid knew they would have the chance to use Obama's race as a weapon against him. We need to keep this simple. It dose not take much to see the kind of hatred Glen Beck is working with.

      Ana Maria Cox said Beck was taking advantage of fear. The people who follow him find a good old boys and girls network in which to relate their fears about where the country is headed. That is a bunch of bull, and at best, Cox is putting the obvious racist tones coming out Beck and his followers mouths nicely. This man is a racist; the people who follow and support him are the same, ansd the networks that present his actions as a political ideology to be debated do what Beck need for his Bull to grow.

      The networks have a huge roll is the promotion of the negative crab directed at our BLACK president. By given Beck's movement the kind of air time and analysis shown in the video, his status is mistaken for something to debate. All that is needed to define Beck and his followers is the same kind of consideration we give the KKK and skin heads: "Been there; scene that."

      Joseph
      Report Abuse
      • Author by epkklk851 (September 13, 2009 3:32 pm ET)
        5  
        While I agree with a lot of what you have said, you might want to remember Fr. Couglin, a bitter opponent of FDR and an anti-semite, too boot. You can ignore people like Beck and Couglin, or you can discuss them. But in either case, they don't go away without some outside intervention. In the case of Fr. Couglin, a new Bishop came in and put a gag on him. In the case of Beck, it will take Murdoch or someone like him to stop him. I think it is import to shine a light on cockroaches when you find them, even if it does make their presence clearly known, and maybe overstated. The more pressure there is, the sooner the fall happens and this batch of roaches gets cleaned up.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by joseph_b26 (September 13, 2009 4:01 pm ET)
          3  
          It's A Republican Thing

          Much of why Dick Chaney is able to get away with doing what he's has done is he reduces everything he does to debate status. It appears to be something all Republicans do to explain, legitimize and legalize some of the extreme bull they bring to the people. At some point, because real people are involved, we have to stop this phony direction the GOP is taking our resources and our American resolve.

          Joseph
          Report Abuse
          • Author by jwcoop715110 (September 13, 2009 4:29 pm ET)
            3  
            Face it. Gops act under the basic bogus premise that the msm is liberal so they just get to make stuff up.

            There's nothing complicated about it.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by mightymo (September 13, 2009 6:00 pm ET)
      2  
      You have to also look at Fox as the engine behind this, with Beck as point man.

      FoxBaggers Party, Advisor Beck at your service.
      We need to redefine Fox and Beck to be responsible for this movement. And repeat it enough times that it sticks to them.

      I know I'm fumbling around...it's like watching Beck and no longer seeing a wingnut commentator, but seeing the leader of the TeaBaggers, and Fox media as just a conduit for the TeaBag Party. Period!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by albertsenj (September 13, 2009 8:11 pm ET)
      1  
      Shouldn't they be repeating the advice their leader (Bush 43) actually gave the nation after the attack: "go shopping"?

      Of course, with the sponsors fleeing Beck's show, it might be difficult to find a store to send them to.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Waldorf (September 13, 2009 9:16 pm ET)
         
      The problem with Glenn Beck is he is an ENTERTAINER who is dangerously mixing entertainment with news media, sensationalizing it, and smearing what little respect mainstream journalism has left with his rhetorical newscasting. Not only that, he has single-handedly created a subculture that revels in hypocrisy and embraces civic irresponsibility.

      One only need to look at the ridiculous positions of the "Tea Partiers", most of whom were rebel-yelling for more money to throw into Israel, Iraq, and Afghanistan and endorsing the growth of American government in the lives of the individual through the Patriot Act and subsequent domestic anti-terror statutes, to see the kind of destructive force that Beck has created. What is most revolting, yes I haven't even gotten to the worst part yet, is that Beck misrepresents the past by glorifying it in a wave of "conservative values". The problem is that taxes on all American's (particularly the wealthy) during the times Beck uses for reference were much higher and the middle class (now an increasingly smaller constituency of what it was then) was much larger because of the "socialist" policies of FDR and Truman.

      What Beck has done is not propagate a conservative cause, he has endorsed and propagated a system of anarchy, ignorance, and disrespect to the values of Civic responsibility.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by CassavaLeaf (September 14, 2009 4:24 am ET)
         
      "Bring it back to Beck, is he a talk show host, is he a movement leader?"

      - Is this guy serious?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by themidnightreview.com (September 14, 2009 11:45 am ET)
      2  
      I would like to compile data on the people who actually believe Glenn Beck and people like him.

      I want to know income level, education level, family size, location, political affiliation. I would like to understand the demographic.

      The right may say that their tea parties are representative of the entire nation, but if you have thousands of people show up at a rally, and 80% of those people who show up are registered republicans, then statistically, I do not see how they can be viewed as representative of the whole. It would be like playing cards with a stacked deck.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by jwcoop715110 (September 14, 2009 3:36 pm ET)
        2  
        Of course this entire 9/12 nonsense is contrived by Beck and promoted by clusterfox. They promoted the hell out of it like they promoted the hell out of those tea-bagger trash rallies.

        They're not covering it, they're creating it.

        There's 20 percent of the country who are ignorant, ill-informed, racist, gun-show trash. They'd hate Obama if he was white, but the fact that he's black sends him totally off the rails.

        That's not the entire gop base, but it's most of it. They sure as hell can't win an election without them.

        They're the legacy of Nixon's Southern Strategy. Face it, the gops made a deal with the Devil and now they're stuck with the scum vote for their base.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by diamonds (September 15, 2009 1:52 am ET)
            1
          Do you have any evidence of this? There is absolutely none to be found. Race has absolutely nothing to do with it for at least 95% of the people. Show me that more than one in twenty opponents are affected by race. If you think one in twenty is a high bar, look at how many blacks voted for Obama and tell me that isn't also racism, e.g. racial discrimination/reverse racism.
          Report Abuse