Monica Crowley: "The things that we did" to detainees to extract information "happens everyday at an American fraternity"
September 14, 2009 8:40 pm ET
From the September 13 edition of the CBS-syndicated McLaughlin Group:
Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.
















- fraternity guys haven't lost their freedom
- fraternity guys are still in contact with their families
- fraternity guys are not denied their most basic of human rights
- fraternity guys are not subjected to threats of bodily harm
- fraternity guy's families are not threatened with the loss of their freedoms and bodily harm
- fraternity guys do not have firearms placed to their heads and the triggers pulled
- fraternity guys are not subjected to staged executions
- fraternity guys usually subject themselves to hazing voluntarily
Excuse me Ms. Crowley, but I believe you dropped you False Equivalency crown, Long live the Queen!
but, since when do fraternity guys allegedly possess information on a potential terrorist attack?
It DOESN'T MATTER whether torture "worked" when the US did it on foreigners, although there's no reason to think it did.
The reason the US doesn't torture is that we don't want OUR OWN TROOPS to be tortured by our enemies.
If we torture, then anyone we perceive as a threat can justify torturing US military members.
If we don't torture, ideally our enemies will respond by doing the same -- NOT torturing American military members.
If the US doesn't torture, but our enemies do, then we still have the ability to point out THEIR bad acts, while they have nothing similar to point to on our side as a justification. That means we can make them look bad to their potential friends and allies, thus undermining the enemy's ability to keep fighting us.
The reason we do not torture is that "supporting the troops" means we cannot surrender the moral high ground.
When you maintain your ability to process facts and reach rational conclusions, it's clear that whether torture "works" is irrelevant.
That's a helluva way to "Support The Troops", ain't it, Easy?
In response, I'll break out my same response---Bush and Cheney were on the job when 9/11 happened. Nice work at keeping us safe.
I can't believe anybody is still working this fraternity hazing crap, or that anybody is stupid enough to be convinced that there's a comparison.
It's called "consent". It's the difference between having sex and rape. How frigging hard is that to understand ?
And see how its affected your mental state years later?
The Abu-Gahrib, Class of 2009, formally invites you to its commencement ceremonies. taaaaa,ta-ta-ta,ta,ta... Abu-U! The fighting infidels!
Is Ms. Crowley saying prisoners are underclassmen? Would that mean water-boarding is a freshman course? What is the minimum salary for a PhD. in torture? Is Sadism a major? What are the hazing rituals, for women?
No. I think it not possible. Then again, no one mocked her comment. Would that mean she is right? I still disagree.
It be it,
Ronin Kannushi.
The more important point is that, other than basing their claims on emotions, the right has not demonstrated that torture works. It is immoral and acts as a recruiting tool for those who want to do this country and its people harm.