About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Olbermann names "czar-er" Dobbs "worst person" for downplaying Bush's czars

September 17, 2009 10:34 pm ET

From the September 17 edition of MSNBC's Countdown with Keith Olbermann:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by DellDolly (September 17, 2009 10:53 pm ET)
      4  
      How do you have the staff that Lou Dobbs must have and get this wrong? You'd have to be blindly partisan to suggest that Clinton's 10 czars were the most you could find when the fact is that Bush had almost 50 different czars in about 35 roles during his two terms. How do you ignore the Bush Administration's czars?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by wolf kotenberg (September 17, 2009 11:50 pm ET)
        2  
        When you got a boss like Lou handing out paychecks, you cook facts. Remember GW Bush ?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by snoopy (September 18, 2009 12:04 am ET)
        2  
        It's not to hard to sell your dignity for certain people. Suprisingly, the republicans seem to have cornered the market on those folks.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by juliajayne1 (September 18, 2009 12:15 am ET)
      7  
      I know nothing of czars. I care nothing of czars. And how come I heard nothing of czars until Obama got into office? Could it be because the propaganda machine is so busy telling us which manufactured BS stories to pay attention to?

      Righty-O mate, I think I've go it. Let's see......Look! ACORN over there.....no wait! Look over there at Van Jones signing a commie card or whatever heinous crime he committed. Look.....pay no attention to the fact that big pharma and insurance companies are spending millions to quash any health care reform. And for God's sake who cares about that Supreme Court decision that may give corporations leeway to spend big money influencing elections via their "right to free speech" as pertaining to stacking the deck yet again against the little guy.

      But those stories aren't as important as Obama's czars, right? Naw.......it's just my imagination.

      And I still don't give a damn about czars.




      Report Abuse
      • Author by congero6189599 (September 18, 2009 12:46 am ET)
        2  
        "...And for God's sake who cares about that Supreme Court decision that may give corporations leeway to spend big money influencing elections via their "right to free speech" as pertaining to stacking the deck yet again against the little guy..."
        The MSM seem to be ignoring that decision and all it's implications sort of like the way they've been silent about being wlling dupes of the Pentagon in the run-up to the Iraq war. Their silence is deafening which is why we should keep talking about every chance we get...Oh wait i forgot to say look ACORN and the poor people are coming.:-)
        Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (September 18, 2009 12:37 am ET)
      3  
      In my observation, to Lou it's personal now. He was criticized by liberals for his nationalist posturing on immigration and it's gone downhill from there. Lou's failure to mention Bush's czars while at the same time criticizing Obama is IMO just payback to liberals. It's also dishonest...
      Report Abuse
      • Author by christopher howard (September 18, 2009 6:50 am ET)
        2  
        Yeah, Dobbs hates liberals, praises Beck and canoodles with Malkin and Coulter, but he still somehow claims to be an independent.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by barryO (September 18, 2009 12:50 am ET)
         
      and olberamann has served his country how??
      Report Abuse
    • Author by barryO (September 18, 2009 1:31 am ET)
         
      oh no!! Don't cross Olbermann!!! Nice makeup Keith!!
      Report Abuse