On Fox, Breitbart bashes CNN's ACORN coverage: "The behavior of Jonathan Klein, the president of CNN, has been despicable during this"
From the September 18 edition of Fox News' America's Newsroom:
Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.
MEGYN KELLY (co-host): Joining me now is Andrew Breitbart. He's the founder of the website the video first appeared on. It's called BigGovernment.com, and the videos are still there. Andrew, good morning to you.
BREITBART: Good morning, Megyn.
KELLY: You were with us the morning that the story broke -- the morning that the first video aired on BigGovernment.com. And now in a week's time, the congressional action, the response by the Feds, has been really stunning. I mean, for years, the Democrats in Congress have not wanted to sign on to anything that would cut back funding from ACORN, and now we see these huge majorities coming out of the Senate and the House to cut down the group -- to cut off the group's funding. What's your reaction, a week into this?
BREITBART: Well, I'm grateful that the American public has realized that there's a serious problem here, and that their elected representatives are taking their concerns seriously. A new Rasmussen poll came out this morning that says America's overwhelmingly disturbed by what they've seen on these videos.
But, predictably, and why we rolled the videos out one by one by one by one, we set traps for ACORN to lie; each and every time they lied. They went to the mainstream media, continued to tell those lies. The next day, the previous day's lies were exposed. And CNN in particular has kept going back to ACORN and taking their line.
The behavior of Jonathan Klein, the president of CNN, has been despicable during this. They continue to impugn [filmmakers] James [O'Keefe] and Hannah [Giles], and they are continuing to tell falsehoods -- that they were kicked out of ACORN offices. And that's the current line that some at ACORN, including Bertha Lewis, continue to push. There are more videos to come, and some -- and in towns that they continue to say that they were kicked out of.
KELLY: It's not -- I mean, Bertha Lewis is the person behind that charge. She's the CEO of ACORN -- they call her the chief organizer -- but, essentially, that's the CEO. And she's been all over the map on responding to this, Andrew. First she came out and said, you know, this is defamatory. They threatened lawsuits against James and Hannah, against you, against Fox -- for anybody who would touch the story is going to get sued for touching the story. Then they came out and said, oh, they tried this stunt at a bunch of offices and failed. Then tape after tape we kept seeing that, well, actually, they tried it at a bunch of offices and succeeded at a bunch of offices as well. Are there more tapes to come?
BREITBART: Oh, absolutely. And I've -- they -- CNN in particular, I have spoken to their producers, who have been impugning the motivations of Hannah and James and trying to find aspects of their story that are false, when ACORN has been false. I have said to them James and Hannah will appear on your network, even for a hit job, if you show the American people -- or the small segment of their audience that still goes to that network -- if you show them those tapes and let them decide, just like Congress did, just like Al Franken did -- he voted against it.
He -- very early on, before the mainstream media started to pick up on it, what did Al Franken know about this that CNN didn't know about this? On these videos you see truth.
KELLY: Well, you know, it hasn't -- in CNN's defense, at least they've covered it. It hasn't been covered by virtually any media -- in particular, the big three. I mean, I was stunned this week --
BREITBART: Well, I will credit --
KELLY: -- when Charlie Gibson said he didn't even know about the story.
BREITBART: Yeah, I will credit Katie Couric and the CBS Evening News; on Tuesday evening they did it. And more importantly, it's already cycled through the Jon Stewart Daily Show and Jay Leno's Tonight Show. So when they're making jokes at the expense of ACORN, and ABC and NBC have refused to cover it, there is something desperately wrong with the mainstream media. And that's why we did the rollout the way that we did, because we wanted to not just expose ACORN for being corrupt, we wanted to expose that the mainstream media would treat this exactly like they treated the Van Jones story. And that's ignored until the consequences got too great for them to ignore.
Previously:
Police report filed by ACORN exposes false claims by individuals behind videos
Network news largely silent on Fox News' role in hyping, distorting ACORN story
Fox News runs with San Bernardino ACORN video without needed fact check
Beck relies heavily on Drudge protégé Andrew Breitbart in recent attacks on NEA, Jones, and ACORN


















You got THAT right!
I have a feeling that by the time this is over, there's going to be some serious backlash against the RIGHT over some aspect of these films or the filmakers. There's more to this story than what's been revealed so far. These guys aren't just concerned citizens. I don't buy that for a minute.
So you would rather put down someone that found people acting either illegally or fraudulently just because it shows up on Fox News? Are you kidding me? Do you have ANY values?
Oh and pleased do keep on the scrutiny issue - that they dont want the scrutiny...... It will just raise the ratings even higher. As Jon Stewart said: "I'm a fake journalist, and I'm embarrassed these guys scooped me. Let's get to work people."
Lets see how your backlash pans out for you... *chuckle*
You think so?
This flies in the face of the core values ACORN claims to be based on. How can you help low and middle income people by teaching them to cheat on their taxes? Get ahead by getting over?
With the stories of Charlie Rangel and Tim Geithner in the news recently, maybe that is just the liberal way?
I think you're more optimistic than I am. I don't think there will be anything more than a minor backlash because I think that the people we're hearing from are wingnuts, many of whom (not all, but many) are bigoted knuckledraggers that will never forgive Obama for being President. That particular segment of the Republican party has become their base and they will continue to do anything they can to get in the news and try to prevent Obama's voice from being heard. They are beyond all logic and reason, deliberately ignore facts in favor of talking points, and are so habitually dishonest that I think they no longer know when they are lying and when they're telling the truth. It's impossible to have a conversation with anybody who thinks that Breitbert (or Hannity, or Beck, or Coulter, or O'Reilly, etc.) makes sense because they have already decided to ignore reality. They're deliberately catering to the lowest of the low.
Come on, what does more harm?
A handful of employees breaking the law (really enabling others to break the law) and SOME tax money being spent in what they feel is an "inefficent" manner...
-OR-
The number of of law abiding people that will now never be home owners. That will not be registered to vote. That will not benefit from all the various community improvements organized and funded by Acorn?
For every corrupt Acorn employee that these foxes root out, how many people in comminites accross the country will be harmed? Hundereds?
If it's more that ONE (for each) then BY DEFINITION they've done more harm than good. (Of course they also see electing Democrats as 'doing harm' and elecing Republicans as 'doing good.')
But to conservtaives, collateral damage (done by THEM) doesn't matter at all...
-----------------------------------------------------------
...if it helps them WIN.
ROFLMAO. Wow either you work for ACORN or you're clueless. Even before these tapes came out ACORN had a dozen indictments against them for fraud stemming from the General Election.
And it doesn't stop there - two prominent HOLLYWOOD democrats shot a documentary on the hundreds of fraudulent practices that both ACORN and high ranking members of the DNC engaged in during the PRIMARIES.
Enlighten yourself with the truth, Eddie Check out www.wewillnotbesilenced2008.com .
ACORN has done far more harm than good and taxpayers should NOT have to provided them with funds to them for doing so.
And the other point to remember - It is Barack Obama who USED ACORN to work on HIS behalf during the primaries...and offered them something in return for doing so. Obama is directly connected to ACORN --- which is why he has NOW chosen to throw them under the bus along with Van Jones, and a long list of people/organizations that have embarrassed him. He uses them - then loses them once they prove to "dirty" to be associated with.
ACORN have ONLY themselves to blame for their demise . If they thought Obama would stand by them...no matter what horrendous acts they engaged in.. even acts he encouraged... they were wrong.
What WHOLE thing? Just get the people or organization that is not acting legally. But like typical liberals... if it is liberal it MUST be good and keep it running no matter if 13 year old illegal immigrants are being promoted as prostitutes.
So if a few CEOs receive compensation disproportionate to their accomplishments and responsibilities, should we set limits for ALL CEO compensation?
If a corporation makes (in your opinion) too much money, even though they employee hundreds of employees and stimulate economies, should their profits be controlled?
For every tax increase imposed on evil big business, how many people across the country will be harmed through job losses?
I think your point is correct. Take the bad with the good on BOTH SIDES!!!
However the Liberal "mental illness" can only focus one narrow-minded view. Do you approve of tax breaks and incentives to big corporations to provide incentive to grow, expand AND HIRE MORE PEOPLE?
Or should YOUR VERSION of the government just control everything?
Hmm. That's kind of what's happening. On account of a couple audacious kids.
Hmm. That wouldn't have happened, if not for a couple audacious kids.
I know, I know! Let's go after the kids! :-\
And earlier DellDolly sums up the whole liberal experience by using rapier wit against someone who feels differently than he/ she with a well though out and shockingly well played "shut up". Unfortunately this is the sum total of the argument against all who disagree with ACORN or anyone like them. Well I, for one will not shut up and for that matter I will not tell anyone else to shut up. If I cannot craft an argument that is both well spoken and concise then I will go back to school and learn how, I suggest DellDolly do the same.
Wait, by that logic doesn't that mean we can now get rid of the entire Republican party? Ensign, Sanford, Craig and there were others, definitely did bad things as Republicans. Right?
Oh, and if you make the criteria that they had to do bad things officially, Scooter Libby, the whole Iran-Contra thing - that oughta be enough to do away with the wole party using their own standards as set forth in the ACORN thing.
voices be heard?
OH, The HUGE MANATEE!!!
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/09/us/09embezzle.html
ACORN is supposed to be the voice for the poor and works to increase the living wage, but time after time they have used union busting techniques on their own employees. They fight for increases in minimum wage, yet don't want to pay their own employees minimum wage.
http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2009/03/06/acorn-report-5/
http://www.rottenacorn.com/downloads/060728_badSeed.pdf
This orginization uses the poor as their shield to accumlate money and power. They need to be exposed for who they are. If you can't see beyond that because of your love for one party over another, then there is no hope for this country. Corruption will continue. I believe corruption on both sides needs to be exposed and we need to stop being pawns in this game.
Just amazing when you think of how FoxNews Channel kept their "power" even with a majority of Democrats in both Houses and as President. Wow, no wonder why Republicans "LOVE" FoxNews Channel. LOL
The part you miss... more than just Republicans watch Fox. Why? Because the present news that others just ignore.
As Jon Stewart said: "I'm a fake journalist, and I'm embarrassed these guys scooped me. Let's get to work people."
THATS why people are watching Fox. But your head is so wrapped wround the axle that Fox News is BAAAAD. Better wake up!
All the posts on this site focus on the people reporting the information, not the people or the organizations that performed the acts. Typical.
Oh, ACORN has no accountability in these incidents that have led to their own demise? Poor ACORN was a victim of evil Fox?? If ever there was an irresponsible and unethical organization run amuck, it's ACORN. Thankfully, as the Koolaid begins to wear off, we'll see these thugs and crooks for what they really are, and we'll see that interloper currently infesting the White House for who he really is: someone unworthy of the presidency.
This isn't about left or right it is about corruption that must be addressed. Not doing so and blaming Fox or Republicans is absurd. Really think about what you are saying. Look at NBC ABC and CBS. Look closely at what they chose NOT to cover. Then, ask yourself if this was a republican organization what would you want them to cover? Ask yourself if the media is doing its job correctly. Ask if they are hiding this then what else could they be hiding?
De-Nial ain't just a river in Egypt as the saying goes.
The fact that FOX aired the video without vetting it and without question is one more piece of proof that they are not a news organization at all. FOX 'News'? The title itself is false advertising. FOX Propaganda, however, is exactly right. (Right. Get it? I felt compelled to point this out, due your staggering lack of intellect, Mr. Breitbart.)
Proof?
Likewise the story behind the two who shot this video. Either they checked out the story told, for instance about not going to any ACORN offices where they were turned away, and decided that even though they were lying it was okay to run the clip, or, they didn't check it out because they were too interested in smearing ACORN.
Remember Dan Rather? His story was factually accurate. George Bush failed to meet his service requirements with TANG, and was therefore a deserter. Now, he had documents later proven to be faked, and he lost his job over that, partly for not making sure his source and the documents were in fact what they purported to be. There have already been enough holes poked in this story to suggest that either FOX Propaganda didn't want to know, or didn't care.
How do you call a network who chooses to report a story a propaganda network while other networks selectively keep silent on the story are not branded as propagandists?
ACORN isn't being smeared, it is being exposed for what it really is. If they are such a positive asset to society who conducts themselves ethically, why can't they submit to an audit that is not done by in-house colluders?
If you can somehow convince the world that the employees were coerced against their will, you may have a valid point. Maybe Giles had a small pistol out of camera range pointed at the subjects.
Your same logic then renders every police sting illegal.
The film makers went to other offices and were turned down? Okay, where's the proof? Oh, an ACORN PR flack says so? Of course, whatever they say must be assumed to be true, for some reason that escapes me even though ACORN claimed they were turned down at locations the filmakers later revealed damning footage from.
The person in the video claimed she killed her husband. Her husband and ex-husband are alive.
When has ANY news outlet EVER shown complete raw footage from their ENG? They didn't do a 60 Minutes style hack job where different questions are inserted in front of answers to manipulate outcome. These two showed plenty of camera-rolling footage that allowed the ACORN people to hang themselves.
And stop it with the cry baby rants about Fox propaganda. You are showing your own staggering void of intellect.
I would love to hear SOMETHING, ANYTHING that is unbiased and which would shed light upon the underlying issues of this little media circus. I'm not seeing anything on this comments section except the same old tiresome liberal whining, which is getting so old. Just because you mobilize a bunch of like-minded people to spread as much one-sided opinion as far and wide as possible does not make it factual or truthful.
I will predict right now they will not sue...but I can dream. Would all you Liberal enablers of folks that endorse child sex trading please go to ACORN's web site and demand they sue Fox. Please.
And what's with all the complaints about using hidden cameras? Do we forget history that quickly? Hidden camera reports have been a staple in TV news for years. CBS's "60 Minutes" has used them to uncover waste and fraud in the government, ABC's "Primetime Live" used them to reveal health problems in the food industry and abuse in nursing homes and "Dateline NBC" recently used them to accost sexual predators. Local news stations use them all the time.
This is such a lame argument.
The more you justify such corruption in your minds and statements, the more you profess your ignorance, bias and irrelevance. It’s so laughable – you reinforce our contentions of indignity and blatant stupidity by your outright flagrant prejudice and misjudgments! My fellow Rightful Conservatives; we must kick them while they are down, pound them till they bleed, break their legs and bones till they can not get up, hold their heads under water till they breathe no more.
Do any of you have any shame or decency?? Don't any of you give a damn about what ACORN is doing?? Are you so insane with hate for republicans that you would prefer to see 2 young people that exposed this criminal behavior prosecuted instead of thos that advocate child rape??
You people are disguting....