Limbaugh mocks "Pelosi's tears"; "wouldn't put it past Pelosi to want to be trying to create some violence with this"
September 18, 2009 1:46 pm ET
From the September 18 edition of Premier Radio Networks' The Rush Limbaugh Show
Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.
You want to see fake crying, see Glenn Beck
Brilliant.
Excuse me, I've got to shower. Happens every time I listen to this gasbag.
Just because someone doesn't agree with the president's policies doesn't mean that they're a murderer, racist, etc.
Agreed. But what made these people think Obama is "anti-2nd Amendment?" What statements has he made, or actions has he taken, that would support that view? Most of the rhetoric that we've seen coming from the right is not aimed at policies, it's aimed at people, especially Obama. Pelosi's point (which I agree with) is that there are people out there who are unbalanced and armed, and that hyperbolic rhetoric, especially from people in positions of responsibility, has in the past and will again, set them off.
I've seen too many assassinations and attempted assassinations in my lifetime, and I remember the rhetoric of the times. When you stoke the fires of rage the house is going to burn.
"Address Gun Violence in Cities: Obama and Biden would repeal the Tiahrt Amendment, which restricts the ability of local law enforcement to access important gun trace information, and give police officers across the mation the tools they need to solve gun crimes and fight illegal arms trade. Obama and Biden also favor commonsense measures that respect the Second Amendment rights of gun owners, while keeping guns away from children and from criminals. They support closing the gun show loophole and making guns in this country childproof. They also support making the expired federal Assault Weapons Ban permanent"
The last couple sentences should suffice to show that Obama is no 2nd Amendment champion.....
Making, or attempting to make firearms childproof would basically be a way of mandating them out of existence, since the technology would be so expensive per weapon, and of course we know that any that were manufactured before the legislation would have to be in childproof storage, hence unusable for home protection.
Finally repeal of the Tihart Amendment would leave much information about gun owners in the hands of people with no business of having said info....
And you are whining about Obama and Biden "restrict[ing] the ability of local law enforcement to access important gun trace information, and giv[ing] police officers across the mation the tools they need to solve gun crimes and fight illegal arms trade."
I guess I am not exactly sure where you actually stand on the issue.
It's "We need to do Something to take our country back"
It's "Something needs to be done why we still can"
It's talking about poisoning the Speaker of the House
It's that "The Czars are trying to destroy America" and to creates "thugocracy"
It's that "The Government is going to kill your grandma/kids"
It's claims of an "eugenics movement" in the Health Care bill
It's suggesting "our freedom" is at stake
It's "The tree of liberty needs to be watered with the blood of tyrants and patriots."
He may not say kill people but he says everything right before it.
Brilliant in its own deluded fashion.
Anytime, anyone, one either side of the line, speaks of a fear of violence, all parties have a duty to do their best to see that it does not come to violence.
The responses so far from the right is ridicule and denial and in some cases saying that the people are legitimately angry.
That's not an excuse for what we see and hear today.
So Rush "wouldn't put it past Pelosi to want to be trying to create some violence with this"? You mean like you advocating violent riots at the Democratic National Convention last year? And then cowering like the pathetic little coward you are when people called you out on it?
By the bye, when do you think your Speech Reader in Chief is planning on sending all of his destitute relatives a couple of bucks? Does anyone find that strange?...that he who is his brother's keeper, is not keeping? I thought you were the ones we were waiting for...as in the ones who approve of giving others people's money to the lazy and degenerate.
Caller: "Am I crazy? . . ."
Rush: "No, you're not crazy. It's difficult when you don't have a mind to be out of it."
Hee!