About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

O'Reilly, pointing to ACORN, Van Jones stories, declares "Fox News and talk radio are now setting the [national] conversation"

September 18, 2009 9:26 pm ET

From the September 18th edition of Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Previously:

Highlighting the "power" of "Fox News," "conservative talk radio," which drove ACORN, Van Jones stories, O'Reilly claimed "now there is a pressure on the right wing to kinda put Obama away"

O'Reilly: "The conservative media is winning now. They're winning. They're damaging the president of the United States"

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by IRONY 101 (September 18, 2009 9:35 pm ET)
      5  
      Conversation...? Oh, is that what it's called? It sounds more like a cacophony of shrill paranoia. Maybe I'm alone in my opinion...but I don't think so.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Max Credits (September 18, 2009 9:39 pm ET)
      3  
      This story seems to be picking up steam....

      "Let me address the Fox News Network now perhaps the most current way that I can, by quoting somebody who recently used a very pithy phrase, two words," Sanchez told viewers. "It's all I need: You lie."
      Report Abuse
      • Author by smarshall1432997 (September 18, 2009 9:49 pm ET)
        4  
        CNN's Rick Sanchez was spot on today when he wrapped this up by saying, "You lie" about FoxNews Channel's sorry sobbing about the 9/12 Tea Party coverage done only by FoxNews Channel. Too funny indeed.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Max Credits (September 18, 2009 9:59 pm ET)
             
          Yeah, Sanchez nailed them to the wall. There's a growing number of news stories on it (137 and counting). Here's the NY Times:

          http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/19/business/media/19fox.html?hp
          Report Abuse
          • Author by fairliberal (September 18, 2009 11:04 pm ET)
               
            Sanchez is a hypocrite, he questions why the filmakers won't go on his show but what were his feelings about all the dems who refuse to speak to Fox? I suspect he was not to concerned or opinionated about that. Wow, could he have a bias in his reporting? He just like to ride Fox's coattails by creating controversy with Fox. Maybe then someone will tune in to his show. Hey it might work, why not. No one is watching now.

            I wonder how he felt about Bush's DUI incident ? Anyone know?
            Report Abuse
    • Author by dmhack (September 18, 2009 9:45 pm ET)
      3  
      HillBilly, you wouldn't know how to have a decent conversation. And for the record, shouting down people who disagree with you or harassing women isn't conversation.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Dem02020 (September 18, 2009 10:19 pm ET)
      2  
      O'Reilly, pointing to ACORN, Van Jones stories, declares "Fox News and talk radio are now setting the [national] conversation"

      Not true.

      I'm part of "the [national] conversation", mostly a listener really, I'm in on what's being said about important National Policy, like whether or not we'll have a Public Health Insurance plan (at affordable premiums) for uninsured Americans not already covered by Medicare, and whether or not more U.S. Troops are sent to Afghanistan (and mostly whether or not they get killed while they're there, seeing as how there's no U.S. National Security objective being served that I know of, by having so many U.S. Troops lives' risked in that place), and I'm as concerned as ever about Congressional ethics and the way our Congresspersons (and even administration officials) are being bought and sold to the highest commercial bidders...

      I'm not the most informed person in "the [national] conversation", I'm no voice at all really, just a listener...

      Up until about two weeks ago, when he resigned from his obscure job as advisor to the mostly unimportant Council on Environtmental Quality, I'd never even heard of Van Jones... and as I took the several Internet Wire minutes to find out who he was, I discovered he was nothing at all to me, and I couldn't have cared less who he was, or that he had resigned his job, or for whatever reason who cares I certainly don't.

      This thing that goes by the acronym ACORN, I likewise knew nothing about them and would never have even seen that acronym except here in these MMFA pages... and when I took the few minutes to find out who they were and what that acronym stood for, I again (just like in the case of Van Jones) discovered they were nothing to me or to anyone I know, they served no government function that I knew of, and I'm sure I found out what the acronym ACORN stood for, but I can't for the life of me recall it now because it means nothing to me I just don't care about these things because they have nothing to do with National Policy that I can discern...

      Unlike Public Health Insurance, and Afghanistan, and Congressional ethics and the unbridled bribery taking place in our Congress.

      So it's not true what bill o'reilly said, the nonsense that he and Fox News Channel are prattling on about, is not "the [national] conversation", not that I know of.

      They (Fox et al) are just talking amongst themselves, in a contrived converstation of their own design and mostly of their own participation, and they're hoping that there are enough Americans eavesdropping on their prattle and noise, to distract from actual National Policy, and perhaps create a negative enough public perception of Democrats in general and President Obama in particular, to capture as many seats in 2010 for Republicans in Congress as possible, and to perhaps also limit President Obama to one term.

      Well, that's my little turn in "the [national] conversation", at least here and now... and I still know little or nothing about Van Jones or ACORN because I couldn't care less and I don't feel the least bit ignorant for it so bother telling me about those things because I don't need to know, thank you very much just the same.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by fairliberal (September 18, 2009 10:46 pm ET)
           
        Well by your own admission you are not really part of the conversation, are you? but luckily the rest of the country is listening, Congress for example.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by MK Ultra (September 18, 2009 10:52 pm ET)
         
      If FAUX News is setting the tone of the national conversation then, we are left with no choice but to invade ourselves and spread some democracy here. God only knows we can use it!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by pete592 (September 18, 2009 11:29 pm ET)
      1  
      Me, me, me, our ratings are high, me, me, me, Fox News rules, me, me, me, I'm awesome, me, me, me...
      Report Abuse