Will ignores "evidence" of racism to claim that noting racial element in attacks on Obama amounts to "liberal McCarthyism"
September 20, 2009 12:01 pm ET
From the September 20 edition of ABC's This Week:


Media Matters: The Palin chronicles
The Friday Rush: A series of conflicts
Contrary to media hype, Sarah Palin is very unpopular|
|
||
![]() |
||
Somebody send this idiot some Photos
Maybe you should get out more George or at least do some research.
For years liberals have been criticized for not doing enough to criticize leftist extremist. Anti war protesters were accused of lacking decorum and thus patriotism. The hypocracy of someone like Beck complaining that Obama associated in the past with leftist (such as Ayers) while at the same time celebrating the teabagger anger defies all logic. No suprise there.
I guess right wing anger should be understood up until the shots are fired. Right wing anger by definition is virtuous.
Well, Republicans "loved" this and eased in to become these people's political voice on the Hill. These people's anger led to people carrying guns, name calling, and on and on. When the Media asked if these people's 'race baiting' anger could lead to violence as Speaker Pelosi quoted, these same Republicans don't see the connection. Republicans must muddy the water on this issue so their party is "NOT" blamed. Once again, the Republicans become political wizards in moving the blame of 'wrong doings' back to the Democrats. Next... LOL
I'm so tired of the low quality of debate in our country when fools like Will can say the most moronic things and go unchallenged.
I know I don't think of all the greatest rebuttals but the Left seems to be completely devoid of ANY good rebuttals.
The illegals getting health insurance is probably one of the easiest to tackle, followed by the death panels.