After Fox asks if homeless American Girl doll is appropriate, Fox reporter uses doll props to criticize NIH grants
September 25, 2009 10:04 am ET
From the September 25 edition of Fox News' Fox & Friends:
Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.
Where was Fox when the government was giving millions and millions of dollars to "faith-based" programs? Where was the snark then?
Gretchen Carlson, Why can't you stand up for a Woman's Dignity?
Are you so afraid of losing your "Special Place" with Roger Ailes?
There has to be more to you Ms. Carlson than looking happy as a poor Woman Fails.
Speak truth to power.
Mr. News
its going to be a long space trip
I forget, Addicts are losers (unless it's prescription medications), Wommunz should be in the kitchen (unless they are talking in shrill voices like Bachmann, Palin or Carlson), transsexuals aren't humans (they caught the Ghey from their working mother and absent father), latinos are just illegals (it's only okay if they work as gardeners and don't ask for any rights), and smokers are just weakminded and losers (unless of course you are the smokers that own Phillip Morris and indoctrinate children to smoke).
By some scientist in a LAB?
Its a sad sad state that these folks are unable to match their never ending critism of this administration with some positive, if you were to watch this channel alone, you would be easily persuaded to think the administration has done NOTHING to help the people. Does anyone know if they reported on the Iran thing this morning?
Or maybe the fact that the government is currently seeking the idea of the general public on tax reforms, or the fact that poll after poll show that, though Obama has growing critics in the major issues facing the country (as anyone else would definitely get), he is still preferred by a significant amount of people to run things!
All this negative makes me sick and they are the MAIN reasons why people tend to dismiss what they say (even when they bring up some valid questions, rare as it may be) as just crazy nonsense, because 95% of what they do is CRAZY NONSENSE!
Brilliant question, and one I wish could be answered. Maybe we could even talk to those who approved these expenditures and find out their justification for doing so. If only there was someone, a group perhaps, that had the resources and access to get the answers to questions such as this. A group whose sole purpose was to uncover and report information so that we could all benefit. Alas, I know it's just crazy talk, but I can't help but dream, can I?
My mouse is too heavy!
The button spring makes it too hard to push!
Your link is too small, I'll miss it if I try to move my mouse there!
Your link won't tell me what I already believe is the truth, so I
know it's going to be biased without even trying to read it!
Can't you just put up a big picture link to Glenn Beck? It's easy to click on that!
The dozen or so grants that they mention look to equate to somewhere around $6 million.
I know that it's a lot of money to an individual and and it's a godsend to the researchers who are conducting this study, but in the grand scheme of wasteful spending... please it's not even close. Republicans voted to continue production of the F22 aircraft that was so bad and and troublesome, it had never flown a combat mission. This program cost $65 Billion. Each useless plane built cost $142 Million.
The end of this program came in June of this year... where was Fox and their outrage then?
$65 Billion for a plane that we never used in combat and barely used as a training plane, mostly because it required maintenance for every hour it flew. Versus $6 million in studies that will hopefully help the poor, the drug addicted, and people in general.
But I forget, Fox isn't interested in helping the least among us, they are only in it for the top 2%.