Williams asks Krauthammer "why the need to insult" Biden; Wallace not "making fun" of "General Williams"
September 27, 2009 11:06 am ET
From the September 27 edition of Fox Broadcasting Co.'s Fox News Sunday:


Media Matters: In which Glenn Beck hosts talk of tickle fights
Gone fishin': Right-wing media hook another dubious Obama conspiracy theory
Running with a bad crowd|
|
||
![]() |
||
Chris Wallace, How much longer will the World have to wait for you to Exibit some Credibility?
I have never met your Father but i wish i Had.
I would hold his face in my hands and say to him "please don't be so Sad"
Speak truth to power.
Mr. News
What did you think he was going to say?
Fox News treats Kraut as if he were a war veteran or someone who was actually RIGHT about war plans when he has had foreign policy wrong for YEARS.
He belittles Biden's qualifications and it is interesting how he also put PNAC Chairman Bill Kristol on a pedastal, whose organization advocated finding a reason (like a new Pearl Harbor) to invade Iraq.
When Chris Wallace mockingly calls Juan Williams "General Williams", he shows his true colors! It wasn't a funny joke - it was mocking Williams.
Williams was insulted by Wallace, I believe, because Wallace noticed that Williams pointed out Krauthammer's insult of Joe Biden! And Williams had to be punished for pointing out Krauthammer's insult - that couldn't be left alone.
Now, it is up to our civilian, elected leaders to decide the diplomatic, political, and moral necessity of the war. Yes, Biden is suggesting a military option, but it is based on the these criteria and (in my mind) the proper judgement that this war is unwinnable and shifting the focus to counter-terrorism and getting Bin Laden is the better option.
As most conservatives believe, there is not a problem in America that tax cuts (for the rich) can't fix and sending our soldiers into danger whenever possible makes us stronger. We have killed hundreds of bad guys, but how many Americans and non-combatants.
What's news here is Williams actually called him out on the insult. Maybe Juan is growing a spine finally!
I'd like to know where Krauthammer got the experience to make a judgement on who was right. His admiration for McCrystal seems to come solely from the fact that the General was very successful in "killing hundreds of bad guys" (how do we know how many of the killed were "bad guys," anyway?)
Wallace and Krauthammer are quick to sneer at anyone who disagrees with them- "General Williams," smirk condescend. If Williams wasn't so addicted to FOX money, he'd get his soul out of hock and walk off the set, for good.
Here's what I'd like Krauthammer and Wallace (or for that matter, McCrystal) to do: Define for me what it means to "win" in Afghanistan. The current strategy seems to be circular -- we're staying because we're not leaving and we're not leaving because we're staying. Is "winning" retribution against al Qaeda for 9-11? The overthrow of the Taliban? The stability of the Karzai government? How will we, the American people, know what and when we've "won" in Afghanistan, so that we can decide whether it's a venture we want to be involved with in the first place?
The true test of the country's resolve will be to either re-instate the draft, or not.
Who would be willing to send their own children to fight to stabilize a country in which even Alexander failed?
The situation today seems similar to the situation Kennedy faced in Vietnam. Substitute McBundy with McCrystal and Diem with Karzai.
Are we willing to sacrifice another generation to a questionable policy?