On Countdown, Media Matters' Burns says Fox News is "no longer a news organization. This is a political organization"
From the September 29 edition of MSNBC's Countdown with Keith Olbermann:
Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.
DAVID SHUSTER (guest host): Joining us now is the president of MediaMatters.org, Eric Burns. Good evening, Eric.
BURNS: Good evening, David.
SHUSTER: So explain to me, why is it indoctrination when kids sing about President Obama, but it's patriotism when kids sing about President Bush and FEMA?
BURNS: Well, David, it's not indoctrination to anybody except Karl Rove, Josh Bolten, Roger Ailes -- the rest of the Bush administration in exile over at Fox News, because they are trying to push a political agenda. And they're trying to destroy this administration, and they'll use any means necessary to do it.And just to give you a little example of this, James O'Keefe, who is the author of one of the suspect ACORN videos that there have been a lot of questions surrounding, told Chris Wallace recently on Fox News that he was employing tactics that would, quote, "destroy his political enemies." So that's what this is about.
There's nothing abnormal about folks talking and children learning about their president and learning to be -- learning about their democracy through talking about the president. I did it when I was a kid.
SHUSTER: The videos that were posted did not blur the children's faces. Both schools have pointed out that the parents were not angered by the performances but were angered over their children's privacy being violated. Where is the right's outrage over that?
BURNS: That's a great question, especially for a movement that typically pays a lot of lip service to caring about local control, about families and about kids. And as I understand it, it wasn't just the YouTube videos where their faces weren't blurred. The initial Fox broadcasts of these videos, their faces weren't blurred either. And what -- the question I have is, did Fox go out and get waivers from each and every one of these parents to broadcast their children's image on national television? And if they did, they ought to produce those. Because frankly, it's illegal if they didn't.
SHUSTER: As far as teaching our kids about the president, is there something wrong with teaching our kids to respect the president, to sing in praise of the office of presidency in an office of the first African-American president?BURNS: Absolutely not. You know, as I said, look, I went to Catholic school in Texas. I was taught about the president and learned to respect the presidency of the United States, to be a patriotic American. My parents were taught the same thing.
This is a very normal and appropriate way to educate young children about our democracy. It's important, and it's -- it just goes to show you to what lengths the folks at Fox News will go to derail the political discussion in this country and what deplorable tactics they will do -- exploiting our nation's children. I think it's really disgusting.
SHUSTER: And is that the general theme here with the right-wing media, I mean, undermining the president by manufacturing controversies, because many of the actual Obama policies are favored by the majority of Americans?
BURNS: Absolutely. We've seen it day after day. You know, Glenn Beck is the smearer in chief over at Fox News. And we see new charts, you know, documenting some new vast conspiracy theory every day, new attacks, and it's a constant barrage.And I'll tell you, this right-wing noise machine has been ginned up. It's never been more ferocious, and their goal is simple -- as Rush Limbaugh stated at the beginning of the year -- they want Obama to fail. Roger Ailes said that this is the Alamo for conservatives and that Fox is the voice of the opposition.
So, this is no longer a news organization. This is a political organization, and their aim is to destroy a progressive policy agenda. They'd rather win in the ballot box than see any sort of real debate on health care. It's a real shame.
SHUSTER: Eric Burns, president of Media Matters for America. Eric, thanks as always. We appreciate you coming in.
BURNS: Thank you, David.
Previously:
Kid video redux: Conservatives freak out over another video of kids "praising" Obama
School kids "SHOCK VIDEO" quickly jumps from conservative blogs to Fox News
















..and it IS indoctrination. Did Bush really have kids singing his praises in schools? Because that is just as disgusting. To worship any state "official" is servile and cowardly.
If it wasn't in the context of Black History Month, I would agree. What does anyone expect during that time period, a month after the first black president is sworn in? Even if you want to argue that it was overdone, it's pretty understandable. Cut a little slack.
Do yourself a favor and learn something about the Fox Noise Channel and their collective belief on what the truth is!
How hard is that?
I remember as a kid, respecting and probably singing about and glorifying Dwight D. Eisenhower and John F Kennedy. That's what school kids have been doing in this country for a long time.
It's not indoctrination. It's teaching respect for the office and respect for the office holder.
We have to ask ourselves what's different now? It can't be party because I sang about a Republican and a Democratic president in school. It's not religion or gender, because all of our presidents have been male Christians. They're from all over the nation so it's not related to geography. We've had wealthy and middle class presidents so it's not that. We've had presidents with civilian and or military backgrounds, so that can't be the reason.
What's different about this president? What would bring out the underlying rage in this country?
I'm not able to put my finger on a reason.
What makes President Obama different?
*raises hand*
He's... Hawaiian?
Somewhere, a village is missing its idiot.
And it's NOT 'indoctination.' You thinking it IS indoctrination is a better example of indoctrination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
GET A BRAIN, MORAN!
Live + Same Day Cable News Daily Ratings for September 28, 2009
P2+ Total Day
FNC – 1,362,000 viewers
CNN – 486,000 viewers
MSNBC –350,000 viewers
CNBC – 193,000 viewers
HLN – 3112,000 viewers
P2+ Prime Time
FNC – 2,515,000viewers
CNN— 595,000 viewers
MSNBC –613,000 viewers
CNBC – 203,000 viewers
HLN – 577,000viewers
Funny, you say Fox "rating" is higher than all the other "leftist" media combined, but don't list the ratings for half the networks you claim are part of the leftist media (ABC, NBC, CBS). Surely the ratings for the newscasts of the broadcast networks are available.
Don't bother explaining, we all know exactly why you didn't do it.
I do wonder if you have the stones to admit it, though.
Now does popularity in any way make one automatically credible?
And i watched Fox/Friends almost everyday...
6 years later i cant believe i didn't realized that Fox picked sides
I think this was why the Fairness Doctrine was originally put in place. So the "public airwaves" could not be bought out by a few and degraded into what we see today of Fox and on radio in the right-wingnut echo chamber.
First ammendment rights are thrown around so freely, but they only protect you from the government.
A news organization does not have any first ammendment protection from other private parties. And it certainly doesn't protect them from slander or defamation lawsuits.
Shuster and Countdown failed to inform the audience that the organization represented by Burns is a liberal group...opposed to anything conservative...and the audience should have been told that...according to principles espoused by mmfa.
Unless they only believe that tenet when it concerns a conservative?
but i guess thats the only arguement you can make because the extreamism from the right must even be getting embaressing to you. there was no foul here. the kids sang a song for black history month about the current president. have you seen the one with the little kids singing the praises of bush and fema after katrina? was that "indoctrination?
try addressing the topic maybe.
if the school had a legitimate reason to sing the song and the parents were fine with it, then who is exploiting the kids? the school or the right wing that published the kids faces on a natioal level without permission? thats the topic thats up for discussion. lets see what you can add the the conversation. i really want to see you defend fox and the rest of the right wing screamers here.
People go off topic all the time, regardless of ideology. I don't see why pointing out Shuster's failure to uphold standards is forbidden.
I don't have an issue when say, they ID someone from being the Heritage Foundation, or some other such conservative group. They've been identified, and it could be up to me to go and look at what they're doing.
Consider that MMfA has criticized print and web articles for the placement of pertinent facts late in the column, because many people won't read an entire article. Those people could, though, couldn't they? It's right in front of their eyes. Yet, that failure on their part doesn't stop MMfA from criticizing the people who hide those facts at the end of an article.
It's very clear you have never read the MMFA mission statement.
Wesley! You have been here long enough to know better.
Burns' group was identified--verbally and on the chyron as mediamatters.org. What you are asking is for the group's political affiliation to also be noted. By the way, I don't think MMFA's agenda is not "opposition to anything conservative".
I don't think MMFA's agenda is "opposition to anything conservative".
I like you little dig on the majority there little fella... bet it took you all of three months to come up with that one!
Har-dy har har
You also might listen to Stephanie Miller regularly, which would also be a plus.
You know, protect us from conservatives.
Actually... if you want to be real technical... the pure definition of what America (would be, if not for corporate money) is:
A Representative Democracy or Democratic Republic
** I suppose Constitutional instead of Representative could work as well, since they mean basically the same thing **
The American Revolutionaries (rebranded as the "Founders" by the modern right wing movement) had, as their oracle of political philosophy, Charles de Secondat, Baron de la Brede et la Montesquieu.
By his definitions, there are two types of Republics, Democratic and Aristocratic. The Democratic selects its officers by lottery (like in ancient Athens) and "everyone" is a Legislator. The Aristocratic selects its officers by election. Madison's definition of a Republic from Federalist #39 is similar, he says it is where all Officers are elected or are appointed by people who were.
I like Montesquieu so much that I feel no shame in calling myself an Aristocrat.
Democracy: . government by the people; a form of government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised directly by them or by their elected agents under a free electoral system.
Democracy synonyms: democratic system, democratic state, democratic organization, representative form of government, republic, parliamentary government
Republic synonyms: state, nation, democracy
The United States IS a democracy and a republic.
Secondly, if a teacher had forced his or her students to sing songs of praise for George W. Bush, would you be okay with that? I doubt it.
Ya know this is the third day I have been on the lookout and I am getting a bit frustrated not seeing any "indoctrinated" kids.
Don't worry, I'll go again today, because I want to protect my country from this dangerous and insidious threat.
Stay tuned for tomorrows update !
as for burns, since he went to catholic school he probably had no problem with pledging allegiance to the flag "under god" and reading scripture in class, which is a problem in most public schools these days... apparently the only god you're allowed to worship in class is obama...
if burns has a problem with fox i'd love to see him confront o'reilly and company face to face, i'm sure he'd be more than welcome... catching softball questions from shuster is weak...
First, in both instances the performances were in FEBRUARY - less than a month after Obama was inaugurated. It was Black History Month, and the most monumental thing to ever happen in the history of black people had just occurred. It's not often that we have a living history lesson. Second, in at least one school's case, the lyrics to the song were sent home with the kids for review by the parents. Having a wife who teaches in a conservative district, I can guarantee you that if there were ONE parent who disagreed with the lyrics, it would've made national news immediately. As it is, it took over seven months for the story to get out, and only then because the performance was posted on YouTube. You might also want to note that the "indoctrination" meme didn't become a talking point until the president's speech at the beginning of the school year.
Regarding your senseless rant against Burns: He went to PRIVATE CATHOLIC SCHOOL, so it would be expected that he would read scripture in class. That's why PRIVATE religious schools exist - for parents who want their children to be... wait for it... INDOCTRINATED into their theological beliefs. That's also why there's no need for PUBLIC schools to read scripture - parents have an option.
And as far as confronting o'reilly, it seems that you think billo is a badass. But really, there's no reason for someone who disagrees with Fox to go on ANY Fox program to air their disagreement - the echo chamber is too tightly sealed to permit voices of dissent.
Nailed it big time!!
I wonder if we will ever see mookie von zipper ever again??
And with all due respect, it's tough to follow something that goes nowhere.
do i believe in equality in the general sense?... of course... equal work for equal pay?... in the general sense, sure... in the mandated practicality of such a notion?... have fun managing that scenario...
so 2 utopic myopians walk into a bar...
the question still remains, who defines what's equal, even if the IT guy is in the same field, same city, same experience... equal work for equal pay is a just a feelgood notion that has no chance of working in a practical matter, and not without a flurry of lawsuits to boot, even if oppressed businesses try to comply...
I really can't believe this really needs to be spelled out this much, but the idea is that everyone should be treated the same, regardless of racial/gender/sexual orientation status. If Joe gets paid 70K with his 10 years of experience and solid work record, then Jane gets 70K with her 10 years of experience and solid work record. Why should she get 53K? We're talking about what individual employers can control here.
That is not a "feelgood notion", that's equality. And any employer that can't find a way of treating employees equally should be sued.
hmm hmm hmm
barack hussein obama
health insurance for everyone
he'll make us safe and take your gun
where does it stop?... at least these creepy little kids made it safe to utter the chosen one's middle name in public again...
Let's remember that this was a Black History Month event. So if the "policy" that was mentioned goes along with the theme of equality, then there is absolutely nothing to suggest that there will be anything "next". It's fully consistent with the nature of the program, so it's not even going near anything like health care or gun rights. And what's more, even if someone were to cross that line at some point, that doesn't affect how this incident is evaluated, because the reasoning for this incident is perfectly understandable all on its own. If there is some future controversy, then that's another story, and that may be inappropriate.
i don't fault my president in this case, who i did not vote for, but unlike many bush haters, he is my president for better or worse... and teaching common respect is one thing, but worshiping the guy like a dictator now that he's in office is sick...
That is because you clearly get all your "news" from Fox News. Wake up, this idea was debunked days ago. Where have you been?