About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Beck purports to address things WH is "upset with," doesn't mention that he called Obama a racist

October 13, 2009 8:09 am ET

From the October 13 edition of Fox News' Fox & Friends:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Previously:

Beck: Obama is a "racist," has "exposed himself as a guy" with "a deep seated hatred for white people"

Beck falsely claims White House never takes questions from Fox News' Garrett

Right-wing media's relentless attacks supported by flagrant falsehoods

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by thundavolt (October 13, 2009 8:28 am ET)
      3  
      Even when it's not true and you know it you beat the drum or you don't correct yourself and jump to the next argument. There's no point in discussing anything with Fox; they live in their own reality.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by The_Cat (October 13, 2009 9:34 am ET)
      1  
      "Help me out, 'cause I'll stop saying the things if they're not true."

      Really? Is that the way it works in your world, Mr. Beck? You can make whatever inflammatory slanderous statement you want, and then it's up to whomever you target to first, prove it's untrue, and then inform you that they've proved it? And even after that, you won't retract your statement, but merely stop issuing it? Good to know.

      And, to you, FOX Propaganda, if the White House was really 'at war' with you, they could simply use the Bush/Cheney rules, and declare Rupert Murdoch, and all his little talking bobbleheads, enemy combatants. Or have the FCC pull your licenses. You've been called out for lying, and that is all.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by epkklk851 (October 13, 2009 10:13 am ET)
      1  
      Glenn, you're one of those people who loves throwing verbal stink bombs, you don't have to hit your mark exactly, the stench lingers just the same. You're also lying, and you wouldn't retrack your lies even if they addressed the directly. You are stil claiming that over a million people showed up to your little Teabag Party, and I was there, 60,000-75,000 is as good as it got! Now, if you would lie about this, what else are you lying about? The fact is, you just want to be the center of attention and you will do and say whatever is necessary to get there, if the White House addresses you directly you get what you want, and get to drag them into the mud, and if they ignore you, you just get uglier. So much for being a better, more honest person, which adds hypocrisy to your lying and mean-spiritedness. And who was it exactly who redeemed your soul?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by angryofmayfair61 (October 13, 2009 2:08 pm ET)
        1
      If any of you watched Becks show you would know that he lays out the facts and the sources of the details/facts. His point is, Van Jones WAS a communist, Sunstein and Holdren have made these outlandish statements. If these guys want to dispute any of the FACTS they should speak up, ALA Rush Limbaugh (today)
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mescal (October 14, 2009 2:47 am ET)
           
        Glenn Dreck scribbling lies and meaningless, convoluted, and thoroughly disjointed smears on a chalkboard is not 'laying out facts'. The problem if that you're using incorrect terminology to describe what doughboy does, angry fellow. The correct term is bullsh!t.
        Report Abuse