About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

O'Reilly says there is "scant... evidence to support" claim that Fox News "favors" the GOP

October 13, 2009 9:08 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by riverdog (October 13, 2009 9:14 pm ET)
      7  
      oh bill fox news slams the dems about 20 hrs a day. this from a guy who says he is independent. he's not in the same league as hannity but come on.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Max Credits (October 13, 2009 9:15 pm ET)
      7  
      Scant. S-C-A-N-T Scant.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by princeofwheels (October 13, 2009 9:20 pm ET)
      6  
      If scant is enough to connect Jennings with NAMBLA, then scant is enough to make Fox the Armpit of the Republican Party.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (October 13, 2009 9:27 pm ET)
        3  
        How do these idiots BilldO and Crawley say this stuff with a straight face? I have to wonder if they really believe it, or if segments like this need several takes before they get one without any of them busting up in laughter.

        Crawly's comparison of Fox to the Watergate investigations is one for the delusions of adequacy hall of fame.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by princeofwheels (October 13, 2009 9:35 pm ET)
          4  
          Fox investigations?????

          Another oldie recalled;;;

          Fox investigators couldn't find Shaquille O'Neal at a jockey picnic.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by nativeofsf (October 13, 2009 9:26 pm ET)
      4  
      If you would care to foster any semblance of a supposed vague concept about professional integrity and impartiality, Mr. O'Reilly, you would have the decency to wipe-off that excess of peanut butter from your jowls and from your cheeks, as well.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by HOOX (October 13, 2009 9:27 pm ET)
      3 1
      I love hearing bill try and justify the fox news bias.It's always so complicated as to why they FAIRLY trash Obama. Neil cavouto he's a fiscal conservatives that's why he trashes Obama.Glen beck is a libertarian who represents everyman who loves his country that's why he trashes Obama.Sean hannity is a Regan conservative that's why he trashes Obama.Me I'm a traditionalist independence non ideological watchdog for the folks that's' why i trash Obama.
      But when it comes the rest of the media it becomes real simple there

      LIBERAL FAR LEFT LOONS.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by political_left-religious_right (October 14, 2009 12:20 pm ET)
        1  
        Oh, jolly. Another barely literate pops up. I counted more than thirty errors in your bizarre little screed, and that doesn't even touch the "thinking" behind it. (I'd point them all out, but one gets bored with whack-a-mole after a while.)
        Report Abuse
    • Author by lookoutoftheyard2251 (October 13, 2009 9:35 pm ET)
      1  
      I'd say there's at least 22 hrs. worth of evidence per day. (I'm being generous.)

      Not enough evidence for you? Try Outfoxed. Rather old doc now, but I think it's still rather relevant. Probably more so, considering the new on-air talent over there....
      Report Abuse
    • Author by my4cents (October 13, 2009 9:41 pm ET)
      1  
      O Reilly can say Fox News is a liberal news channel but that does not make it so. Proof, pudding kind of thing.
      All any decent employee of Fox News needs to do is look in the mirror.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Conchobhar (October 13, 2009 10:15 pm ET)
      4  
      File this one next to Bill Kristol's 2002 or 2003 statement that there was "no evidence" of animosity between Sunnis and Shiites.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Sharpe (October 13, 2009 10:18 pm ET)
      3  
      Just in case we didn't know how to spell scant. Thanks Bill! Didn't realize this was English class. Did nixon not break the law and disrespect the presidency? I thought that was why he was impeached. Not for criticizing media outlets. And nixon wasn't trying to counter lies and distortions. He was trying to save his image.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by political_left-religious_right (October 14, 2009 12:22 pm ET)
        1  
        Actually, Nixon resigned before he could be impeached. Let's do our best to keep things accurate.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by ProgLib (October 14, 2009 4:57 am ET)
      1  
      good job, bill... spell out the difficult words for your audience. if you didnt, they would be sitting there very perplexed, like they usually do.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Barry Bonds (October 14, 2009 8:58 am ET)
         
      Bill is losing his mind.

      Sad.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Rimmer (October 14, 2009 12:08 pm ET)
         
      HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! That's the funniest thing I've heard in a long time. Scant evidence indeed.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by terrapin53 (October 14, 2009 12:29 pm ET)
      1  
      I have noticed on both Monday and Tuesday O'Reilly has only discussed this subject with people who are getting Fox paychecks. Never bit the hand that feeds you.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jaydub99 (October 15, 2009 1:41 pm ET)
         
      Why do they disagree with their own boss?

      Poor Rupert, having trouble shaping the agenda.

      Report Abuse