About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

O'Reilly admits Limbaugh's McNabb comment was "divisive," but says it wasn't "racist" and defends his NFL bid

October 14, 2009 8:42 pm ET

From the October 14 edition of Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by knowlies (October 14, 2009 8:50 pm ET)
      13 1
      Says the man who was shocked that African Americans could behave in a civilized manner...
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Tbone Slickens (October 15, 2009 5:44 am ET)
        1 10
        You mean Joe Biden's "clean, articulate" remark!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by fairliberal (October 15, 2009 9:41 am ET)
          1 4
          Shouldn't '"remark" be plural?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by puppienrainbows (October 15, 2009 11:18 am ET)
            1 5
            Plural is right, however, the big 'D' after his name is a get outa trouble card. The usual hypocricy.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by shaggles (October 15, 2009 11:38 am ET)
              2  
              Biden took a LOT of flack over that remark at the time from liberals. I don't recall if many cons chimed in or not. Inspite of that Obama chose him as a running mate. If he doesn't have a problem with it I'm not going to carry a grudge. I don't think O'Reilly is racist but I do think Limbaugh is.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by fairliberal (October 15, 2009 11:56 am ET)
                4
              Yes, Kennedy proved that beyond any shadow of a doubt. Not to mention acorn.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by soze169880 (October 15, 2009 12:10 pm ET)
                1  
                Yes, (talking point)proved it beyond (obsession). Not to mention (talking point). I love watching your multiple sockpuppets make out.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by bintx (October 15, 2009 12:18 pm ET)
                2  
                LOL!!!! Do you ever leave the house or do you really just sit and watch Fox 24/7? Talking points aren't truth, you know.
                Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (October 15, 2009 10:15 am ET)
          3  
          You know, ALL blatantly racist remarks are offensive. Grow up.

          And, I'll repeat, Mr. Pickens would be horribly offended by someone who posts the things you do parodying his name. He's a decent human being.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by DellDolly (October 15, 2009 11:52 am ET)
          2  
          Is this thread about Joe Biden? Nope. It's about O'Reilly and Limbaugh, and so a previous comment by O'Reilly is on-topic.

          Does anything Joe Biden has done wrong in the past give a free pass to any other wrongdoer? Nope. Two wrongs don't make a right, and it doesn't excuse your guy from blame if others have also sinned.

          So, you got nothing.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by fairliberal (October 15, 2009 11:59 am ET)
              4
            A previous comment by O'Reilly taken out of context , is not on topic.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by soze169880 (October 15, 2009 12:15 pm ET)
              3  
              But Reverend Wright, ACORN and whatever other racial scapegoat you care to play is. By the way: "I couldn't get over the fact that there was no difference between Sylvia's restaurant and any other restaurant in New York City. I mean, it was exactly the same, even though it's run by blacks, primarily black patronship. There wasn't one person in Sylvia's who was screaming, 'M-Fer, I want more iced tea.'"
              Please explain to me how the above is not expressing astonishment that black people are acting civilized. Like most of your kind, you clearly have no idea what "out of context" means.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by fairliberal (October 15, 2009 6:00 pm ET)
                  3
                Because if you listen to the entire discussion O'Reilly was clearly not being a racist, the tone of the conversation was anything but racist. Even Al Sharpton did not take the opportunity to label him a racist because of the incident. O'Reilly was having an off the cuff discussion that went on for 20 or 30 mins as I recall. You and your ilk want to focus on a few words out of hundreds and label someone a racist. Reverend Wright on the other hand spouted his racism over years and years from the pulput , acorn has shown a pattern of criminality in a number of acorn offices across the country. They even were prepared to offer advice on where it was best to smuggle under age sex slaves across the border. That is the context that acorn operates in.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by knowlies (October 15, 2009 6:27 pm ET)
                  2  
                  So, the fact that O'Reilly had preconceived notions based on race means nothing. The fact that he was surprised that Sylvias was no different than any other restaurant "even though it's run by blacks" also means nothing.
                  Whatever.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by fairliberal (October 15, 2009 8:51 pm ET)
                      3
                    O'Reilly was speaking of some white Americans who were distrustful and fearful of blacks , he even put up his Grandmother as an example saying that she never even knew a black person, or something to that effect. He was actually pointing out that there was no difference between the two races. That was the context of the conversation. You probably never listened to it. He was discussing it with a black man and describing his lunch with another black man at a black restaurant in a black neighborhood. If he is such a racist why would he even be there .

                    He also has many black people on his show regularly and displays no racist attitudes what so ever. Can you point out any other behavior that would indicate he is a racist other than these comments, comments out of context? If he is a racist there should be many examples, wouldn't there?
                    Report Abuse
            • Author by knowlies (October 15, 2009 4:59 pm ET)
              1  
              Pray tell. What in his previous comment was taken out of context?

              Bonus question: Put O'Reillys "out of context" comment in the proper context.
              Report Abuse
    • Author by soze169880 (October 14, 2009 8:51 pm ET)
      2 1
      How was it divisive if you can positively say it's not racist? Was it offensive to Eagles fans? I guess the man behind the ZOMG War on Christmas!!!1! just invents persecuted groups as he needs them.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by fairliberal (October 15, 2009 9:39 am ET)
          6
        Funny how many libs can say that Rev Wright's comments were not racist, they were undeniably devisive. But Limbaugh's comments where he simply stated that some were hoping a black quaterback would do well is racist. Or that Obama is not racist for taking sides with a black man over a white cop when he admittedly doesn't have the facts.
        Who's inventing what?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (October 15, 2009 10:18 am ET)
          5  
          fairliberal, do you understand that racist remarks are racist remarks? It doesn't MATTER what a person's alleged political ideology is or isn't. Believe it or not, MOST people don't really CARE about the stupid "us v. them" game that was created by folks like Rush and your heroes on Fox. Most people live their lives quite well without ticking off a check list on everyone they know to determine whether they are "libs" or "cons."
          Report Abuse
          • Author by soze169880 (October 15, 2009 10:45 am ET)
            2 2
            fairliberal, do you understand anything that's not prepackaged and repeated ad nauseam by Beck, Hannity and Limbaugh?

            Fixed. And no, it doesn't.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by fairliberal (October 15, 2009 12:04 pm ET)
                3
              For your info, I rarely watch Beck or Hannity and I have never listened to Limbaugh's show. Beck does make some sense when I have watched him. Hannity is almost as bad as Olbermann, and Limbaugh is deliberately provocative just like some liberal hosts.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by soze169880 (October 15, 2009 12:08 pm ET)
                1  
                Beck does make some sense

                Okay, now I know you're a parody troll.
                [http://img.youtube.com/vi/P_lgTIZ22jE/0.jpg]
                Well-played, funny guy.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by fairliberal (October 15, 2009 8:53 pm ET)
                    2
                  He made pretty good sense tonight when he played a tape of another Obama official who thinks very highly of Mao . You remember him, he murdered millions .
                  Report Abuse
              • Author by bintx (October 15, 2009 12:22 pm ET)
                1  
                My statement stands . . . racism is racism. Your constant use of the term "libs" to describe ANYONE who disagrees with you or your heroes on Fox [sorry, you quote the other guys too much for me to believe you don't watch them] shows that you have no idea whatsoever what the terms "liberal" and "conservative" mean nor the political ideologies they represent. Neither are inherently good or bad and the overwhelming majority of Americans are not defined by either term . . . most of us are somewhere in the middle . . . leaning right on some issues and left on others.
                Report Abuse
          • Author by fairliberal (October 15, 2009 10:59 am ET)
              6
            Saying that some people are " rooting " for a black quaterback to do well is not racist, it is an accurate reflection of some people's wishes. They want it to happen so they can toot their own horn and show what a progressive and color blind organization they are. It is not limited to sports it happens in all walks of life in this PC world we live in. And it has been happening for quite some time. Limbaugh is being honest about it, you are not.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by soze169880 (October 15, 2009 11:06 am ET)
              4  
              Is saying the NFL resembles the Bloods and the Crips "not racist"?
              Is saying the NAACP should rehearse liquor store robberies "not racist"?
              Is not only calling the president a "Halfrican-American" and a "little black man-child" but also lying and claiming he's Arab "not racist"?
              Is saying all composite pictures of wanted criminals resemble Jesse Jackson "not racist"?
              Is claiming you're going to show footage of welfare recipients and then showing stock footage of apes in a zoo "not racist"?
              Is saying that buses should be segregated for the safety of white children "not racist"?
              Jeez, troll. You WISH the McNabb thing was the most racist thing Limbaugh ever said.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by DellDolly (October 15, 2009 11:54 am ET)
              4  
              He criticized people and assigned them motives that they didn't have regarding the skin color of an NFL quarterback - that's racist because of his assumptions about the qualifications and capabilities of McNabb. He's the one who erred here.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by The New Pilgrims (October 15, 2009 1:21 pm ET)
                2  
                Shorter fairliberal: It would be so much better if everyone would follow me in cheering against black quarterbacks.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by fairliberal (October 15, 2009 1:28 pm ET)
                    2
                  Can you point out where either Limbaugh or myself was cheering against McNabb? Stick your head back in the sand, after years of being criticized for the lack of black quarterbacks, to suggest that the league and others for that matter did not want a successful black quarterback is just naive.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by The New Pilgrims (October 15, 2009 1:37 pm ET)
                    1  
                    Shorter fairliberal: The NFL was wrong to want a successful black quarterback! I also want a successful black quarterback. This is what differentiates me from the stupid NFL!
                    Report Abuse
        • Author by soze169880 (October 15, 2009 10:36 am ET)
          2  
          Helpful tip: if your argument begins with "funny how", it's a straw man. I was also not aware anyone was talking about Jeremiah Wright, but hey, anything to indulge your fetish.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by fairliberal (October 15, 2009 1:25 pm ET)
              2
            We weren't talking about the other comments you posted either. We were specifically talking about the McNabb comments. And that was the comments i specifically commented about. Amazing how it is wrong for me to reference Wright, but it is acceptable for you to reference other comments reportedly made by Limbaugh, some of which there are no support for.

            People can and do say racially insentive things without being a racist, Don Imus , Joe Biden and Barack Obama come to mind.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by shaggles (October 15, 2009 11:44 am ET)
          1  
          He did not simply say 'some were hoping that a black quarterback would do well.' That's like saying Chris Matthews was just saying Hillary lacked experience when he said the only reason she was elected Senator was because her husband cheated on her.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by worrierking (October 14, 2009 8:52 pm ET)
      9 1
      Life ain't fair Bill. If it were you'd be down on 8th Ave. living in a cardboard box.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by soze169880 (October 14, 2009 9:04 pm ET)
        2  
        For added poetic justice, he'd live behind a Lebanese deli, and actually be forced by circumstance to use a falafel as a loofah.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by JamesCraven8209 (October 14, 2009 9:09 pm ET)
        4 1
        Or in a van down by the East River!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Sharpe (October 14, 2009 9:03 pm ET)
      10 2
      The problem for Rush is that the players stepped up and opposed this. Of course they did - Rush makes racist comments daily and even makes racist comments about football players. The players themselves obviously have a major impact on the final decision here especially when multiple players are opposing it. A lesson can be learned here for Rush - racism or racist comments will never work out to your advantage and when said on the air, will likely become detrimental in some capacity.

      Rush won;t learn this lesson Im sure but hopefully others will. The first amendment has and always had its limits and they are crystal clear - people have that right but only to the extent that it doesn't infringe on the rights of others. Obviously, football players felt that they didn't want Rush to be involved because his speech is derisive and rightly so. Thus, the players in fact felt that Rush has crossed a line.

      I for one, thought that the comments about re-segregating buses and that this is Obama's America where the white kids get beat up by the black kids was far more racist in nature than the comment about mcnabb although they certainly were both mean-spirited snipes and propping up a racial divide that people have worked so hard to knock down. But it is more likely that the summation of all his racially tinged comments over the years have only made him enemies and a lot of minorities for that matter. So Rush became rich and famous for his fear mongering and his reckless disregard for the rights and feelings of others and finally, he has to face some consequences.

      Im glad that he is being banned from this obviously as I think punishment for Rush's stupidity, intolerance, hate speech and indifference to the plight of others has been a long time coming. I just wished that the impact would actually result in some noticeable change in Rush's rhetoric. Im sure this one didn't draw blood though.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (October 14, 2009 9:27 pm ET)
      6 1
      Hey, Bill...the NFL is free to approve or disapprove of any potential owner. You admitted Limbaugh said divisive things. That's enough for any smart NFL owner and its commissioner to want to stay as far away from as possible. The NFL is a mega-operation with global aspirations. They don't need a team owner who divides people politically and seeks controversy regardless whether you defend him or not. You media mega-stars don't understand that your BS doesn't fly everywhere. Checketts could buy Limbaugh several times over...he doesn't need Rush Limbaugh. Limbaugh was nothing but a mascot in this deal.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mikehuck1976 (October 14, 2009 9:29 pm ET)
      4  
      How was it divisive then? If it was not divisive among races, how was it so? Perhaps between fat people and those that are in shape? Perhaps between educated people and moron entertainers? Hmm...well, I am just surprised that this white guy got through his whole show without yelling "get me some m-fing Iced Tea!" I had no idea white people could behave so civilized.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (October 14, 2009 9:38 pm ET)
        7 1
        I had no idea white people could behave so civilized.

        Only those whose mamas raised them right...

        BTW, I was raised by a white lady... ;>)
        Report Abuse
    • Author by terrapin53 (October 14, 2009 9:36 pm ET)
      8  
      This coming from the guy who told me I was unpatriotic and free to leave the country if I didn't support Bush and his Iraq war?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by dnbrn (October 14, 2009 9:42 pm ET)
      1 1
      I wonder if Bill insisted on using the pre-diet picture of Rush as a subtle dig.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by pete592 (October 14, 2009 9:44 pm ET)
      5 1
      Here's an idea for Rush and his right-wing nutjob supporters...

      Pool your resources and start your own league. Hire Jim McMahon to formulate your business model. He's got experience in this sort of thing.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (October 14, 2009 9:47 pm ET)
        6 1
        I always though Bush wanted to bring Major League Baseball and NASCAR to Iraq to make them a real Western democracy.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by zamfir273114 (October 15, 2009 1:15 am ET)
      2 15
      It wasn't racist. The NFL was eager to find a decent black quarterback. It's like the Rooney Rule, where since 2003 NFL teams are required to interview black candidates for the position. Basically, affirmative action is alive and well in the NFL.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by pete592 (October 15, 2009 2:15 am ET)
        8  
        "The NFL was eager to find a decent black quarterback."
        Similar to Rush, you can't prove it. It's 100% pulled-from-your-backside speculation.

        The NFL was eager? To what end? Aside from disciplinary measures, do you have anything that even begins to prove that the league exerts any power or influence over each team's internal operations regarding player rosters and lineups? And how was it instrumental in McNabb's supposed preferential treatment?

        Unless he's got something concrete and substantial, Rush's unproven allegation of preferential treatment by the NFL due to a person's skin color IS, in my opinion, an implication of racial superiority, and therefore IS racist.

        Until I see something that proves otherwise, McNabb's career stats speak for themselves and they are a product of hard work and dedication.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (October 15, 2009 6:54 am ET)
        9  
        Teams are only required to include black coaches in job interviews. NFL teams are not required to hire black coaches. If you think professional football operates on the basis of affirmative action then I'd say your knowledge of football is about as suspect as Rush Limbaugh's. The bottom line is winning.

        When Donovan McNabb was drafted by the Eagles out of Syracuse U. I thought it was a bad pick. I thought McNabb was just an athlete and not an NFL calibre quarterback. I was wrong and the NFL scouts were right. That's why they get paid to evaluate talent. Rush Limbaugh doesn't know any more about football than the average fan. He just pretends to know everything about everyrhing...it's his schtick, but not to be taken seriously.

        And what Limbaugh said about McNabb was so gratuitous that it's hard to imagine that it wasn't racially motivated.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by puppienrainbows (October 15, 2009 11:25 am ET)
            5
          "When McNabb was drafted.....I thought it was a BAD pick"---Irony101. That, by mmfa 'regulars' definition, would make you a racist. You assumed a black quarterback was not qualified to be in the NFL. You have fallen into your own racist trap.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by IRONY 101 (October 15, 2009 11:33 am ET)
            4  
            Jeeez, what a stupid remark... I don't think Heisman Trophy winner Tim Tebow has the makings of an NFL quarterback. Does that mean I don't like white people? Being a good athletic college quarterback does not translate into success in the NFL whether you're black or white.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by puppienrainbows (October 15, 2009 4:06 pm ET)
                3
              See how EASY it is to be labeled a racist. All us 'cons' have to do is criticize Obama or Sotomeyor and we are immediately labeled racist. Where there is no intent or mention of race or skin color, a conservative is held to a different standard as the 'standard' liberal poster on the Soro's website(mmfa). You, and the three posters below are 'astonished' at being labeled a racist for comments NO different than mine or anyone elses. Like I've said before, the land of liberals is a magical kingdom.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by pete592 (October 15, 2009 4:21 pm ET)
                1  
                "labeled a racist for comments NO different than mine or anyone elses."
                Including those of Limbaugh?
                Report Abuse
          • Author by DellDolly (October 15, 2009 11:58 am ET)
            2  
            The color of McNabb's skin had nothing to do with Irony's comment.

            The color of McNabb's skin have everything to do with Limbaugh's comment. That's what makes Limbaugh's comment problematic and Irony's not.

            There's no MMFA 'regular' who doesn't understand the difference except for dum-dum's like you and your ilk.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by shaggles (October 15, 2009 12:20 pm ET)
            1  
            That is one of the most ridiculous things you've ever posted. To my knowledge no one here thinks like that and I defy you to show any evidence that they do.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by bintx (October 15, 2009 12:25 pm ET)
            1  
            Nope . . . Irony's comment was not based on race, it was based upon his perception of McNabb's abilities. As much as I like Colt McCoy, I don't think he's got the stuff for the NFL . . . so, am I being racist against Colt? I mean, Colt looks like Opie Taylor. Jordan Shipley . . . I think he's got NFL written all over him, 'course, I'm biased. I've known him since before he was born.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by IRONY 101 (October 15, 2009 12:36 pm ET)
                 
              Good luck this weekend to the Longhorns against the Sooners...and good luck to Jordan. Tell him to stay healthy... ;>)
              Report Abuse
      • Author by worrierking (October 15, 2009 7:37 am ET)
        5  
        Once again,

        And who knows more about racism than you?

        by zamfir273114 (April 09, 2007 9:19 pm ET)
        ...I want racial quotas in basketball so that there is an equal number of non-black athletes. Am I going
        to get any of those things? Didn't think so.

        by zamfir273114 (April 09, 2007 11:33 pm ET)
        People are still people. When people talk before they think, they can say stupid and derogatory
        things. To cite every incidence as "racism" is overreaching.

        by zamfir273114 (August 05, 2008 9:14 pm ET)
        Savage has a point. Every neighborhood that illegals have migrated to has gone down the tubes. My birthplace of Van Nuys, CA is like "little Mexico" now. Shootings, rapings, pillaging, drive-by's, grafiti,
        prostitution, drugs, (you know, all the things that go along with the Mexican-illegal population. Even
        the African-American neighborhoods are in awe!

        by zamfir273114 (August 05, 2008 9:27 pm ET)
        Then why is it that every one of these Mexican populated areas crime-ridden? Really, all P.C. aside,
        can you tell me why the real estate prices decrease in these areas? One more thing, why are the
        prisons filled with Mexicans? P.C. aside. See, nothing ever gets done because everybody is afraid to
        talk about these things.

        by zamfir273114 (February 15, 2008 12:38 am ET)
        I don't have to agree with someone in order to value free speech. Sure, Imus et. Al. say some nasty
        comments; however, unless you can diminish his listenership or his value, your barking up the wrong
        tree. If Hillary were black, you could resort to using Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton. Unfortunately, they
        only come running when black folk are ridiculed. Hmm, that seems a little "racist" in and of itself.

        by zamfir273114 (February 14, 2008 6:35 pm ET)
        That is Mr. Hussein's, I mean Obama's, name. Coulter only speaks what millions of American's think.
        The American people have a right to know who they are voting for. Barack Hussein Obama.

        by zamfir273114 (July 08, 2009 6:53 pm ET)
        If Kilmeade had known the P.C. police were going to take him out of context, he should have rephrased
        his statement in a more P.C/B.S. way. What he is saying might be correct though: research
        done in Sweden might have no correlation to research done in the United States because the United
        States is a much less limited gene-pool. MMFA inferred that he was somehow saying one was
        greater than the other.

        "I just wonder if Sotomeyer looks down on other ethnicities as well, like Asian, Black or even Mestizo. Afterall, in is well-known that in many Latin American countries, many predominantly "Spanish" individuals look down on the darker "Mestizo" varieties. It's disgusting. Sotomeyer is very white looking. I hope they check this woman."
        - zamfir273114, May 30, 2009 6:06 pm ET


        "He is actually incorrect. Some of the best foods in America from other ethnicities."
        - zamfir273114 (June 18, 2009 7:24 pm ET)

        "Music wasn't very good before different ethnicities started performing either."
        - zamfir273114 (June 18, 2009 10:40 pm ET)
        Report Abuse
        • Author by retiredinsf (October 15, 2009 9:23 am ET)
            7
          Dang! Talk about obsessive! I think we may have a stalker here – couch potato leftist surfing the net while collecting welfare. mmmm. mmmm, mmmm……..
          Report Abuse
          • Author by bintx (October 15, 2009 10:19 am ET)
            4  
            What's the matter, don't like your racist words out in the light of day?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by retiredinsf (October 15, 2009 10:30 am ET)
                4
              Mmmm, mmmm, mmmm.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by soze169880 (October 15, 2009 10:38 am ET)
                4  
                You know, even if we're... what is it? "Couch potato leftist surfing the net while collecting welfare" (yay for multitasking!) at least we're not very obviously high in the middle of the work day.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by bintx (October 15, 2009 12:26 pm ET)
                1  
                Well, what does that mean? LOL!!!
                Report Abuse
              • Author by bintx (October 15, 2009 12:27 pm ET)
                1  
                Oh, and I'm a conservative, professional white woman who most likely makes a lot more money than you do.
                Report Abuse
            • Author by fairliberal (October 15, 2009 1:35 pm ET)
                2
              Which one of his comments can you point to that are racist?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by pete592 (October 15, 2009 4:43 pm ET)
                2  
                Was the implication that Zamfir was a racist? Or that Zamfir is no authority on what constitutes racism?
                Report Abuse
      • Author by benjr (October 16, 2009 10:03 am ET)
           
        Right, because before McNabb there wasn't Randall Cunninghan, Steve McNair, Daunte Culpepper, etc. He's the only one! Give me a break. By the way, the Rooney Rule applies only to coaching vacancies, and was created to address the disparity between the number of African American players in the NFL versus the number of coaches.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (October 15, 2009 9:14 am ET)
      2  
      I think Rush's mistake in making this comment was that he forgot who his audience was. He apparently thought he was speaking to his braindead radio audience, so he tossed out one of his gratuitous digs at the "Liberal Media" with racial overtones. Of course, being the self-centered fathead that he is, he failed to realize that his fellow hosts on the panel were part of that "Liberal Media".

      His Troglodyte Radio audience would have drooled and applauded, but the ESPN folks saw him for the obnoxious, worthless boor that he is.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by shaggles (October 15, 2009 12:24 pm ET)
           
        I think it was ESPN's mistake. What did they expect from Limbaugh? And if they didn't want that sort of thing why did they hire him in the first place? I mean what else did Rush have to offer?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by hnealehcn (October 15, 2009 11:06 am ET)
         
      Similar birds fly together.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jaydub99 (October 15, 2009 11:30 am ET)
         
      America doesn't punish speech? I'm going to go out on a limb and say that I remember O'Reilly defending radio stations that shut out the Dixie Chicks for speaking their minds. Where's that video?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by The New Pilgrims (October 15, 2009 1:30 pm ET)
           
        Bill Maher was canned from ABC right after 9/11 when he said that he didn't think the hijackers were cowards. Funny, I don't remember Rush Limbaugh or Bill O'Reilly defending Maher's right to free speech at the time.

        I do think we need to lighten up on the reich-wing sockpuppets here defending O'Reilly and Limbaugh, they just had lobotomies and their brains don't work so good anymore.
        Report Abuse