About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Limbaugh claims war opponents "reveled" in "body count"

October 19, 2009 3:24 pm ET

From the October 19 edition of Premiere Radio Networks' The Rush Limbaugh Show:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by bintx (October 19, 2009 3:28 pm ET)
      2  
      This guy makes my stomach turn upside down. Just totally irresponsible, totally untrue and totally disgusting. He spent more time supporting GWB than he did the troops.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by dimes (October 19, 2009 3:29 pm ET)
      1  
      That body count that Rush so blithely refers to are the sons and daughters of Americans, some of whom are certainly opposed to this war.

      To even use the word 'reveled' in connection with the deaths of these American soldiers is beyond odious.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by usp (October 19, 2009 3:40 pm ET)
         
      He's sick and broken.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by fantagor (October 19, 2009 3:48 pm ET)
      2  
      Seems to me the reveling is a conservative tactic where they use the number of dead as an excuse as to why we must continue to fight in Iraq or Vietnam or some other useless for-profit war.

      Evidently, they have never heard of the phrase a "sunk-cost". That's what the war dead are. A sunk cost. So it makes no sense to send more people to die in the name of previous deaths. You cut your losses and never ever elect another war mongering Republican to occupy the Oval Office.

      Randy
      Report Abuse
    • Author by worrierking (October 19, 2009 4:15 pm ET)
      2  
      I love how easy it is for this POS to minimize the cost of war while he promotes the prosecution of these wars. But then this is from the same guy who supported the War in Vietnam but hid behind a doctor's note so that someone else could fight in his place.

      At least during the Civil War, you had to pay someone to take your place. That was a more honorable way to go that the route this pathetic creep took.

      What he and the rest of those on the right fail to explain is why H1N1 is being discussed so much. He and his listeners are without a doubt, the most ignorant people on the face of the earth.,
      Report Abuse
    • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (October 19, 2009 5:12 pm ET)
      1  
      What the hell do you knowabout war RUSH, you dodged your oppertunity to serve. You have NO MORAL AUTHORITY to lecture anyone opposing IRAQ or any other war. Ypu are just another in the long list of RIGHT WING CHICKENHAWKS.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by magnolialover (October 19, 2009 5:34 pm ET)
      1  
      Actually, no we didn't. We kept saying how the thousands that were killed in Iraq, both our soldiers, and civilians, could have been avoided if Bush didn't invade Iraq, because Saddam was no threat to anyone.
      Report Abuse

Most Popular Tags

Feed IconRSS Feeds

Get personalized rss or email alerts

Connect & Share

Facebook Twitter Digg YouTube MySpace