About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

On Fox & Friends, Gingrich voices complaint about health reform: "This bill is bigger than two Harry Potter novels"

October 20, 2009 11:47 am ET

From the October 20 edition of Fox News' Fox & Friends:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by christopher howard (October 20, 2009 11:53 am ET)
      1  
      Damn, a comprehensive law that has a whole bunch of woids in it! Surely Newt never saw such a thing during his tenure in the House.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by pros2pros2940 (October 20, 2009 12:00 pm ET)
      1  
      Newt, as compared to the republican plan that's 2 pages ?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Boxer1979 (October 20, 2009 2:04 pm ET)
        1  
        Nope it is just two words. DIE QUICKLY!
        Report Abuse
      • Author by jmariemo (October 20, 2009 2:31 pm ET)
        1  
        The Canadian bill for universal healthcare was about a paragraph, I believe.
        So, size really doesn't matter in this case.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by carlh (October 20, 2009 12:00 pm ET)
      2  
      Reading is hard...waahh.

      If it were only 30 pages they'd complain it's too short.

      This is comprehensive overhaul and reform for a huge portion of the nation's business, economy, and actual collective health. It had better be beefy.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by bandofotters (October 20, 2009 3:05 pm ET)
        1  
        ...and writen by a bunch of people who, for the most part, have no training beyond the legal profession. The unintended consequences will be staggering especially when certain aspects of healthcare costs are being ignored like tort reform! When the government forces doctors to take on more patients the overload can't help but lead to more malpractice. Trial lawyers are seeing dollar signs as payback.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (October 20, 2009 12:01 pm ET)
      1  
      Common thread here and that is too big to read, need more time.Stall till it is forgotten. It alltranslates to " need to start over from scratch in a bipartisan participation but we won't participate " Go to he11, Mr Gingrich. There, I said it.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by rkcomments (October 20, 2009 12:06 pm ET)
      1  
      Sorry Newt, we could use flash-cards, but healthcare legislation is slightly more complicated than that.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mk3872 (October 20, 2009 12:09 pm ET)
      3  
      Is it the fault of the authors that Republicans can't read that many pages, or is it just a lack of intellectually capabality from the GOP that is to blame?

      This is proof that Republicans are not serious about governing when their complaint about a bill is that it is too many pages ...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jjava501 (October 20, 2009 12:15 pm ET)
      1  
      This should be enough evidence that the Republicans are incompetent enough not get another chance in office.

      I really think Jon Stewart knocked it on the head even so it uses ~1017 pages it is double line spaced and very easy to read in a large font.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (October 20, 2009 12:43 pm ET)
           
        True enough. I think someone said it averages about 140 words per page.

        Why do these guys have such an issue with a large document? And at the same time, keep complaining that nobody is reading it (including the people complaining about not reading it). I asked a bunch of folks at the DC tea party protest when the cries from the crowd went up of "READ THE BILL! READ THE BILL! READ THE BILL!" if they had read it. Nobody said yes, they had read it, it's not their job.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by rtwmd1230 (October 20, 2009 12:16 pm ET)
         
      "two Harry Potter novels"

      Newt's entire library.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (October 20, 2009 12:31 pm ET)
        1  
        Good Christians don't read Harry Potter...it's about witchcraft.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by jmariemo (October 20, 2009 2:40 pm ET)
          1  
          Too true. It's a banned book apparently. My question is: who is banning books these days? Really, people? The PTA of Louisianna has nothing to do?
          Report Abuse
    • Author by goesto11 (October 20, 2009 12:17 pm ET)
      2  
      Well, a lot of us liberals could reform health care with an exceedingly brief plan containing the words "single payer system."

      I think I could do that in one paragraph.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by scubcap647 (October 20, 2009 12:39 pm ET)
      3  
      Why do these people make such a big deal over the length of the bills? It's not like any congress person fully reads them anyway. They give the bill to their staff and have them create a summary of major points in the bill. The congress person then reads the summary and refers back to the actual bill if they want more detail on a specific area. All their argument says is how they aren't going to read it because it's too long for them. To be honest, that only makes them look bad for not reading it.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Indy (October 20, 2009 1:44 pm ET)
      1  
      Republicans for years were used to the lobbyists taking care of all that time consuming, messy writing and reading of legislation. I can see why this is a shock.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by goesto11 (October 20, 2009 1:49 pm ET)
        1  
        Yeah, they're used to legislation like Bush's Wall Street bailout bill.

        My God, that was longer than SIX Harry Potter title pages!

        Report Abuse
    • Author by jmariemo (October 20, 2009 2:37 pm ET)
      1  
      Newt, do you not understand who your political base is?!

      If you want their attention, you need to compare the bill's length to C.S. Lewis or Danielle Steele novels, duh (the latest book featuring Glenn Beck in some fascist and/or socialist memorabilia paired with the token American flag in a pathetic attempt at irony would work as well.)
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Civic Racecar (October 20, 2009 3:27 pm ET)
      1  
      If Newt has such a problem with reading over a thousand pages of a law, then he should've never gone into politics. Furthermore, Congresspeople are paid quite a lot of money to read these bills. If they don't want to, then maybe they should step aside and let their staffers take over their jobs because I'm sure the staffers have a much worse job with less pay.

      There are things that are much longer than this law and much worse to read. Believe me, you don't want to read the federal tax code, let alone a legal textbook on the subject because it is just as bad as the code and far worse than this law.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by canaanxing9025 (October 20, 2009 8:18 pm ET)
         
      Look who he was talking to - Brian, Steve, and Gretchen. You gotta be able to communicate with you are talking too. Brian knew all about Harry Potter.
      Report Abuse

Feed IconRSS Feeds

Get personalized rss or email alerts

Connect & Share

Facebook Twitter Digg YouTube MySpace