Robertson claims sweat lodge victims sought "enlightenment" in "new-age religion" instead of Bible and paid "severe price"
October 26, 2009 8:34 pm ET
From the October 26 edition of Christian Broadcasting Network's The 700 Club:


Media Matters: The Palin chronicles
The Friday Rush: A series of conflicts
Contrary to media hype, Sarah Palin is very unpopular|
|
||
![]() |
||
Glad to see that almost four hundred years later, such enlightened thought- and the idea that God strikes down "sinners" at random times (while apparently ignoring them most of the time) is alive and well.
And Im sure jesus would love to hear about the church's laundry list of corruption - them siding with Nazi Germany or saying homosexuality is a crime or committing Christian-sanctioned mass murder in the name of God (Crusades) or child molestation and statuatory rape and then, trying to cover it up to protect them instead of trying to clean it up to protect against more possible victims. The church has actively supported killing in the past and state sponsored discrimination and inequality and this is not centuries ago. This is stuff going on today. The church also seems determined to fight scientific progress leading to intellectual regression after vehemently denying the existence of the earth revolving around the sun in the past and evolution and global warming today to name a few. Republican and religious politicians also practice nearly everything Jesus fought against - poverty over greed but they don't support social programs, tolerance over discrimination but they dont support homosexuals rights, peace over war but they are the first to go to war, forgiveness over calling out enemies but they call countries the axis of evil. Jesus had the best of intentions Im sure but they were lost in a mess of corruption and manipulation to the point that people can actually do something unconscionably immoral or evil today in the name of christianity.
However, I don't see how his particular brand of crazy is any different from the victim’s particular brand... and evidently he can't either.
This is the same thing I think to myself in regards to all religions.
Nope, it wasn't any of that. It was the hand of God reaching down and smiting the non-believers for their sacrilege.
I think Ms. Bunn makes it quite clear that the horrid conditions of the compound adversely threatened the wellbeing and life of the participants of this group. The attorney interviewed in this clip certainly cites the high temperature as a factor contributing to the suffering of the participants.
Robertson's diatribe at the end is more or less an argument of faith. I understand your concern that "the hand of God" would seem to absolve James Arthur Ray of personal responsibility for his atrocities. But if God is truly all knowing and all powerful, then everything seemingly good or seemingly bad, happens only because He implicitly or explicitly allows it to happen. Thus in this mini exercise in theodicy we must come to the conclusion that even bad things must serve a higher purpose in the end.
Robertson isn't trying to reduce the responsibility of Ray or the scientific cause of the people's physical deaths and injuries. Robertson is doing being human. He is trying to make sense of something senseless. We all do this to a certain extent. Whether you invoke a god or not will fundamentally alter your interpretation of these events.
But it is not too unreasonable to think that God was punishing these people's poor judgment. And even Richard Dawkins wouldn't argue against the fact that they paid a "severe price."