Dobbs says Harry Reid is "venal, superficial, shallow, nasty" and "extraordinarily dangerous"

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All

- by Leftym0m79 (October 29, 2009 11:56 am ET)
  1
  
  Project much Dobbs, or are you describing Beck?
  
  Reply Report Abuse
- by roundhouse (October 29, 2009 12:00 pm ET)
  1
  
  Duck Fobbs. Scurvy old, America hating, racist.
  
  See how easy it is to call people names, Lou?
  
  Why don't you actually put some thought into your commentary?
  
  Reply Report Abuse
  - by all your eyes (October 29, 2009 12:05 pm ET)
    2
    
    He's thinking about how nice it will be to join Fox Business Network. I'm thinking his resignation at CNN should come any day, once they finalize the contract language with Murdoch and Dobbs' agent.
    
    Reply Report Abuse
- by ScienceBuff (October 29, 2009 12:46 pm ET)
  2
  
  No, actually Reid is milquetoast, ineffectual and somewhat spineless. I would have loved to have seen Hillary Clinton take over as Majority Leader.
  
  Reply Report Abuse
- by Dmacalypse (October 29, 2009 12:52 pm ET)
  1
  
  I am so sick of Lou Dobbs, I get a headache just thinking about what his response is going to on the daily topic. Though his radio show isn't part of CNN, I'll still hold them accountable.......there has to be limitations on "free speech". Free is in quotations becuse it's only free when it bleeds from right/far-right (can't tell the two apart) vantage point.... Some if not most would say that unconstitutional. My is argument would be that any and all reporting (dissent) should at least be based on something factual and that can not be disproved with a simple Google search. Especially, when the argument made, is founded on nothing that remotely resembles substance. "Well the Founding Fathers would......" I tired of hearing that too. That's well over 200 years ago. A lot has changed since for better or worse. As with time, things must and do change. The Constitution is our blueprint for our values and rule of law, however, we should blindly disregard any change today, on what was then. What's dangerous is these clowns whom have all of a sudden become constitutional scholars.....
  
  Reply Report Abuse
  - by John Paradox (October 29, 2009 7:31 pm ET)
    
    ...there has to be limitations on "free speech"
    
    Please don't quote the Bush Administration .
    
    * There ought to be limits to freedom.
    o News conference (May 21, 1999); also quoted in "Satirical Web Site Poses Political Test", Washington Post (November 29, 1999)
    (GWB)
    
    I know what you're saying, that lies and misrepresentations are anathema to realists and those who actually like freedom, but there is no reason to pre-censor, rather, let the Truth battle with lies, as Thomas Jefferson is quoted:
    * Truth will do well enough if left to shift for herself. She seldom has received much aid from the power of great men to whom she is rarely known & seldom welcome. She has no need of force to procure entrance into the minds of men. Error indeed has often prevailed by the assistance of power or force. Truth is the proper & sufficient antagonist to error.
    o Notes on Religion (October 1776), published in The Writings of Thomas Jefferson : 1816-1826 (1899) edited by Paul Leicester Ford, v. 2, p. 102
    
    * Our liberty depends on the freedom of the press, and that cannot be limited without being lost.
    o Letter to Dr. James Currie (28 January 1786) Lipscomb & Bergh 18:ii
    
    * Whenever the people are well informed, they can be trusted with their own government; that whenever things get so far wrong as to attract their notice, they may be relied on to set them to rights.
    o Letter to Richard Price (8 January 1789)
    
    Reply Report Abuse
- by Indy (October 29, 2009 1:05 pm ET)
  1
  
  This coming from a "rich guy" that has numerous drug advertisers helping to pay his bills. Talk about duplicitous. I hope the public is smart enough to realize that most of the 6 and 7 figure income talking heads are all pretending to be your neighbor "just looking out for you". At least Harry Reid is ultimately accountable to voters and the democratic process. Lou is accountable to his ratings and the advertising dollars he can generate.
  
  Reply Report Abuse
- by StHarding (October 29, 2009 9:11 pm ET)
  
  Why are these guys all doing their best Rush Limbaugh impersonation? Even Rush has taken to impersonating Glen Beck!
  
  Reply Report Abuse

Dobbs says Harry Reid is "venal, superficial, shallow, nasty" and
"extraordinarily dangerous"

Most Popular Tags

RSS Feeds


	Username or Email Password Forgot your password? or Create An Account Email Username (required, for posting on forums) Zip Code Click here to subscribe to Media Matters action alerts and newsletters. or Log in to an existing account

Dobbs says Harry Reid is "venal, superficial, shallow, nasty" and "extraordinarily dangerous"

Most Popular Tags

RSS Feeds

Connect & Share

Dobbs says Harry Reid is "venal, superficial, shallow, nasty" and
"extraordinarily dangerous"