About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Limbaugh gleefully trumpets AP story on "overstated" stimulus job impact -- but errors were corrected a week ago

October 29, 2009 1:52 pm ET

From the October 29 edition of Premiere Radio Network's The Rush Limbaugh Show:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Previously:

Fox & Friends report on "overstated" stimulus job impact ignores that errors were corrected a week ago

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by marco21 (October 29, 2009 1:53 pm ET)
      3  
      We can't expect the GOP leader to actually know things. C'mon MMFA.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®© (October 29, 2009 1:56 pm ET)
      3  
      El Fathead never heard of any "errors corrected" deal.
      ~
      Report Abuse
    • Author by usp (October 29, 2009 1:59 pm ET)
      2  
      how can you tune into a radio personality that 'shouts' at you. and is the a.p. a state run organization. 10% unemployed? isn't that only here in california?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Conchobhar (October 29, 2009 2:14 pm ET)
        1  
        I've often wondered. I used to hear him during the Clinton years (from a co-worker's radio), and I don't recall him shouting as much. He was actually witty, on occasion, though always insulting. Now he sounds desperate. It's either he sees his influence slipping, or he's on the horror flick treadmill, doomed to escalate his violence (rhetorical) in order to keep his audience.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by captfoster2 (October 29, 2009 2:14 pm ET)
      4 1
      Limbaugh gleefully trumpets AP story on "overstated" stimulus job impact -- but errors were corrected a week ago

      And?????? What? As if we expect Rush to give a damn about reality? That certainly did not stop him last week claiming that Obama 'thinks' the Constitution is worthless based on an essay the president did not write!

      Then again, Rush said it, so it must be true... right??
      Report Abuse
    • Author by DellDolly (October 29, 2009 2:19 pm ET)
      4  
      This is off topic but related and relevant.

      On Politifact.com recently, they reviewed three false statements from 3 pundits, Rachel Maddow, Bill O'Reilly and Mary Matalin.

      But when you review the three false statements, you discover that Rachel was relying upon the statement of someone who said that the NY Times hadn't gotten an interview with President Bush. Her point was that Bush had blocked some access, and the facts are that he blocked access for most of his second term. He didn't block access for his full two terms, but he did block access, and Rachel was misled by another person's comments. When she was informed of that error, she made a correction and an apology on her TV show the very next night!

      O'Reilly and Matalin, when contacted, denied that their false statements were false, and they have not corrected their lies (they became lies when they were informed that they weren't true statements but failed to issue corrections) nor will they even admit that they said something that was false and provably false!

      This is just another example of how some organizations will correct themselves in order to give citizens of the USA a fair picture of the issues, and others won't. Limbaugh has nothing to crow about here.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by fairliberal (October 30, 2009 1:57 am ET)
          2
        "(they became lies when they were informed that they weren't true statements but failed to issue corrections) "

        What stupidity.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (October 30, 2009 9:35 am ET)
          1  
          Nope, not stupidity, fact.

          Have you ever been around a pathological liar? In their minds, their lies only become lies when they are caught . . . of course, when they are caught in a lie, the lie is actually the fault of the person who caught the lie, because otherwise it would have been true.

          The stupidity is that people like you continue to believe the lies even when they are shown to be lies.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by scubcap647 (October 29, 2009 3:45 pm ET)
      1  
      Facts...hmph. Who needs stinking facts when we have Rush's drugs and Glenn Becks imagination?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by donwelty (October 29, 2009 5:30 pm ET)
         
      Limbaugh: "We don't need no stinking evidence. We know they're a pack of thieves." I am personally glad to see Rush admit his philosophy on making his comments.

      Finally, Rush admits his philosophy on stating what he states--distortions, lies, inuendos, and name-calling. Evidence, facts, good taste--none of these are important.

      Report Abuse