About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

On health care reform, Scarborough and Todd agree: "This week has been a mess for the Democrats"

October 30, 2009 2:15 pm ET

From the October 30 edition of MSNBC's Morning Joe:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (October 30, 2009 2:25 pm ET)
      4 1
      The press, or those masqueraing as such, have been a mess since Nov 4 ,2008 at about 7:59 pm PST.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mk3872 (October 30, 2009 2:27 pm ET)
        8 2
        Yup. More of the press' favorite theme:

        DEMS IN DISARRAY, DEMS IN DISARRAY!

        As far as the MSM is concerned, no open debate or opinions different than the WH or Congressional leadership is allowed.

        The press EXPECTS Republican-like automatrons like we had under Bush W.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by jeter2 (October 30, 2009 3:06 pm ET)
          3 2
          That's funny MK, cause I've heard the same press saying over & over again:

          GOP IN DISARRAY, GOP IN DISARRY!!

          Guess they [MSM] think both parties are a mess.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by all your eyes (October 30, 2009 3:23 pm ET)
            6 2
            Let's go Phillies!
            Report Abuse
            • Author by jeter2 (October 30, 2009 3:56 pm ET)
              5 5
              Well I'm gonna have to give that comment a Boo Hiss!! And you a thumbs down ;-)

              I knew I shouldn't have posted till after the Series. Ha!

              Go Yanks!!
              Report Abuse
          • Author by mk3872 (October 30, 2009 3:32 pm ET)
            6 1
            You may have missed the Dems in dissary theme that started the day after the election last year, Jeter. Simple debate and disagreement == disarray. The GOP IS in disarray, FYI.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by jeter2 (October 30, 2009 4:00 pm ET)
              1 8
              I haven't missed a thing. But I do think the GOP is coming back, united & ready to take on the Dems. Guess we'll see after the upcoming Gov races & the 2010 House races.

              The Dems are bickering & not getting along. You can call it debate, disagreement...or disarray. All in the eyes of the beholder.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by John Paradox (October 30, 2009 4:19 pm ET)
                5 1
                The GOP is shrinking its 'big tent', with their Fearless Leader(s) angering every political group except the Theocratic Neocons (redundant)
                Report Abuse
              • Author by SLRTX (October 30, 2009 4:34 pm ET)
                3 1
                Are we talking about the Republicans being united, or the conservative party being united?

                I'm confused.

                Why then do we have 2 - not 1 - consericans / repubulatives running for the 23rd district?

                Looks like they're getting all tripped up in that elusive "values" junk. Possibly enough to hand the election to a Democrat.

                http://www.watertowndailytimes.com/article/20090928/NEWS03/309289974
                Report Abuse
              • Author by mk3872 (October 30, 2009 7:58 pm ET)
                2 2
                REALLY?? To you, debating is the same as disarray??

                No wonder Republicans are all brainless Borg-like automatons.

                You should really try thinking for yourself ...
                Report Abuse
                • Author by jeter2 (October 30, 2009 8:37 pm ET)
                    1
                  No. I said YOU could call it "debate"...as in eyes of the beholder...God forbid you'd ever admit the Dems were in disarray.

                  I mean things are going so smooth...no Dem is bucking your leaders. Or bickering & not getting along. Geeze. Talk about not thinking for yourself. Try looking in the mirror.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by mk3872 (October 31, 2009 8:55 am ET)
                    1  
                    Well, we can keep going in this fun little circle, but bottom-line is that you don't get it.

                    "Bucking" leadership in the Democratic party is what Dems call debate and the idea that different members of the caucaus can have different ideas.

                    If you find that to be equivalent to being in "disarray" and a bad thing, then you expose yourself as a classic modern-day Republican where a single national political party acts & thinks exactly the same way.

                    And we saw how successful that was under Bush W ...
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by jeter2 (October 31, 2009 12:46 pm ET)
                        1
                      "Bucking" leadership in the Democratic party is what Dems call debate and the idea that different members of the caucaus can have different ideas.

                      But when Republicans do it, YOU call it disarray. Got it.

                      a classic modern-day Republican where a single national political party acts & thinks exactly the same way.

                      And Pelosi, Reed & Obama aren't twisting arms to get Dems to act in lockstep & think the same way. Got it.

                      Face it MK, you're a blind partisan who doesn't really get it at all.

                      And we saw how successful that was under Bush W ...

                      Meet the new boss...same as the old boss
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by juliajayne1 (October 31, 2009 1:25 pm ET)
                        3  
                        Now darling, it's a well known fact that trying to get Dems to do anything is akin to herding cats. It doesn't work, but that's the way we like it. We aren't in lock step on much of anything. Never have been, probably never will be.

                        Of course, now that we have a supposed majority...well if you weed out the blue and yellow dogs.....it would be nice to get something done.

                        As far as being in "disarray, that's just something the fundits (yes, not pundits, because how can you take them seriously? ;-)) like to say. Hey, the scallywags do need to take up air time! Ha!

                        So "disarray" is okay. I wish the Gop slops had more "disarray", as that would indicate a smidge of independent thinking. And no, Olympia Snowe voting for the worst possible bill (when in fact her vote wasn't needed to get it out of committee) doesn't count as independent thinking.

                        Now, where was I? Yes, debating is good. And the only reason I see anybody mentioning "disarray" in the GOP is that there are many that want to now seperate themselves from the fringe. But that'll be an uphill battle, and I don't think they have the stones to depart from the basest of "bases".

                        So I expect that the GOPs will be out in the cold for many years to come, as they find themselves further and further away from the mainstream.
                        Report Abuse
                      • Author by mk3872 (October 31, 2009 3:09 pm ET)
                        2  
                        Repubs are in disarray not because of "debate" but instead because they have co-opted and embraced the lunatic fringe of right-wing conspiracy theories and anti-govt militias.
                        Report Abuse
                      • Author by SLRTX (October 31, 2009 5:36 pm ET)
                        1  
                        Eh, both parties are in "disarray".

                        But saying, "the GOP is coming back, united & ready to take on the Dems", is a bit of a stretch.

                        I know it's a bit of "rooting for the home team" - like rooting for the Yankees.

                        Personally, I wouldn't mind voting Republican, but there are too many Republicans pushing "moral values" agendas that are distracting them from the real issues. They're wasting too much time on nonsense. So gays marry. So what? How about HC reform?

                        "Moral values" is not a valid political position. It's non-value-add.
                        Report Abuse
          • Author by Doug-Life (October 30, 2009 8:13 pm ET)
               
            both are a mess
            Report Abuse
    • Author by mk3872 (October 30, 2009 2:25 pm ET)
      9 1
      Awwwww ... poor, poor Gregory & Todd get "lectured" by the stupid WH!

      Too bad it is that the WH was only half-right: YES, the press treats everything like election-day drama.

      The other half is that EVERYTHING is bad news for Dems & Obama: healthcare is almost done, GDP grew, Nobel peace prize, etc, etc.

      It's all BAD for the Dems, they're DOOMED!

      Report Abuse
      • Author by grunt (October 30, 2009 3:57 pm ET)
        1 9
        And we still have 9.8% unemployment. We are still having six digit job losses each month. Come one. Don't act like all is well. GDP grew because of home buyer credit and cash for clunkers. Not a good thing. We need to see some private sector growth on its own. That is where the jobs will come from. Until the jobs are there, recovery is a shameful word to use. The commercial real estate crisis is just now hitting its stride. The worst may be over, but the lagging will be around for a long time.

        A higher minimum wage is a big problem right now for teenage and part-time employees. The value those employees bring does not equal the mandated wage. At least not in a down economy. Another example of good intentions bringing about bad consequences.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by bilbo_dies (October 30, 2009 4:55 pm ET)
          3 1
          A higher minimum wage is a big problem right now for teenage and part-time employees.


          What a lod of bull. People keep dragging this line of crap out and recycling it all the time. (assuming you are not being sarcastic)

          If an employer can't afford to pay minimum wage and still make a profit then he either doesn't know how to manage his business or is trying to float an unprofitable business. Paying less than minimum wage only exploits people (hey, teenagers and such) who don't have any other choices.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by christopher howard (October 30, 2009 5:55 pm ET)
            3  
            "A higher minimum wage is a big problem right now..."

            A higher minimum wage is always a big problem for the right. The economy is doing poorly; now is not the right time. The economy is doing well; we can't mess with success. When have the right ever pulled for better pay for the poor?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by grunt (October 31, 2009 12:50 pm ET)
                1
              People should earn higher wages when they bring more value to a company, or when inflation deems that there wage is not what it was previously (COL increases).
              Report Abuse
              • Author by foghornleghorn (October 31, 2009 5:02 pm ET)
                1  
                Who decides what tha "value to a company" is? Oh yeah, that's right, it's OWNERSHIP who will gladly pay $2 an hour if they could get away with it.
                Report Abuse
          • Author by grunt (October 31, 2009 12:46 pm ET)
              2
            Looking at it from an economic perspective, my argument makes complete sense. You are bringing emotional rhotoris into the debate. In my opinion, we should debate economicsnthe way we do science.

            If someone is no more educated... no more experienced... no more skilled... brings the same value to the company... how does an increase in pay make sense? Don't use emotion. Use economic thought to argue your point. Why is the unemployment rate of teenagers at an all time high of around 56%? Employers don't see them bringing $7.55/hr worth of value/input to their job.

            Your point about profit and minimum wage is rediculous. If you raise the lowest level employees pay by 10%, you have to raise all levels of pay by a similar rate. What company in this economy can afford to do that? If the goal is higher employment, a higher wage is not the solution. again, if you can explain the conomics behind it, I will concede you may be right.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by grunt (October 31, 2009 12:48 pm ET)
              1  
              *rhetoric...*ridiculous...*economics
              Report Abuse
            • Author by foghornleghorn (October 31, 2009 5:08 pm ET)
              1  
              if you can explain the conomics behind it, I will concede you may be right.

              People who make more money (especially low-income people) tend to spend ALL of their money just to survive day to day. And this spending on goods and services is kinda good for the economy.

              Multiply a $1/hour increase in the minimum wage by the number of minimum wage workers. Let's say there are are 10 million of them. That means that there is an extra $80 million dollars entering the economy EVERY SINGLE DAY. That's $29 billion a year.

              Before this theoretical increase, this $80 million a day went toward profits/dividends/off-shore bank accounts and likely is never to be recycled through the economy.

              Got it now?
              Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (October 30, 2009 2:27 pm ET)
      4 1
      Didn't the house pass a bill? How is that a mess?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mk3872 (October 30, 2009 2:28 pm ET)
        6 1
        Because Scarborough, Todd & Gregory just told you so
        Report Abuse
      • Author by marco21 (October 30, 2009 2:30 pm ET)
        7 2
        Seriously. Looks like a good week for the Dems. HC Bill passed, Republicans whining, Joe Lieberman kissing GOP ass and being an obstructionist, President Obama's signing the hate crime law and paying respect to our fallen troops (see, GWB, that's how you do it).

        When Joe and Chuck say it's been a mess, count on 100% clean.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by juliajayne1 (October 30, 2009 5:45 pm ET)
          3  
          Yes, it has been a good week for the Dems. But the MSM is still in the bizarro world where everything is opposite. See, they just need to keep up with us regular folks who are always ahead of the curve.

          I just want to know why in hell they're on the TV and we're not? Have they ever told you anything of real import? No? Me neither. And to boot their "analysis" sucks.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by shaggles (October 30, 2009 5:47 pm ET)
        4  
        Thumbs down? Is someone saying that the House didn't pass a bill?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mk3872 (October 30, 2009 8:00 pm ET)
          3  
          Rightie trolls come through and spend their time giving you thumbs-down if you don't regurgitate the GOP talking points
          Report Abuse
    • Author by fantagor (October 30, 2009 2:35 pm ET)
      7 1
      Bush's 8 years of constant messes has the press trained to report as much, even if they have to concoct stories about messes, never mind the historic accomplishments of the last week.

      Randy
      Report Abuse
    • Author by SLRTX (October 30, 2009 3:02 pm ET)
      5 1
      Huh? Did I miss something?

      Isn't this how bills move forward - one step at a time. It seems to us like a mess, but there's more going on in the background than what we see.

      Doesn't or shouldn't Todd know this?

      I've sensed the MSM is getting gawky on their coverage - especially after treating Fox like it's a "news" source.

      I noticed Gregory remained silent. Please don't tell me he's agreeing with this crap. Interesting reaction from the guy in the upper left corner. Couldn't tell what he was reacting to. Even Buchanan looked stunned.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jjamele2880 (October 30, 2009 3:42 pm ET)
      3 1
      Seems to me that every week is a mess for the "Lets See Which One of us Tie-Less, top-shirt unbuttoned Men can be more condescending and dismissive of the only woman here" show.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by lewislaw7153 (October 30, 2009 4:39 pm ET)
      4 1
      "This week has been a mess for the Democrats"

      More O-P-I-N-I-O-N just like faux . .

      My OPINION is that the democrats have had a great week, bearing in mind that LIEberman is no longer a democrat . .

      Report Abuse