Hannity, Bachmann echo Limbaugh, advance falsehood that private insurance would be illegal under House bill
October 30, 2009 9:54 pm ET
From the October 30 edition of Fox News' Hannity:


The other right-wing media mogul you should worry about
Palin's book and Obama's bow: a media week to forget
Media Matters: The Palin chronicles|
|
||
![]() |
||
Fox can now send all its people home for the week and just recycle their programming from the month of August. It doesn't get any easier than this.
As for Congress, Congress is not a bastion of intellect. However, I would at least expect a Congresswoman to do her job and read the bill. If I went to a job, didn't do any work, and then told everyone that my employer was socialist and wanted to ruin people's lives; I don't think I would be working there for long. As for Bachmann's incompetence, I wish there was a way for Congress to cut her pay for failing to do her job, which involves reading the bill so that she can make educated decisions on the issue.
I am amazed that these jokers are so cynical as to actually make things up while referencing an exact page. Even the laziest fact checker can pull up the bill and read the less than 200 words on page 92. Do they really have such a dim opinion of their audience? That Bachmann comes up with some bizarre pseudo-legalize to push this cynical charade further ... incredible.
I don't want to put ideas in Hannity's viewers' heads but I would be sorely offended at such an outright slandering of my intelligence.
* Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts.
o Variant: Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but they are not entitled to their own facts.
+ Quoted in Robert Sobel's review of Past Imperfect: History According to the Movies edited by Mark C. Carnes.
o Variant: You are entitled to your own opinion, but you are not entitled to your own facts.
+ Quoted in Timothy J. Penny, Facts Are Facts, National Review September 4, 2003.
+ Ellen Hume, Tabloids, Talk Radio and the Future of News, part 4 (TOC), 1995 cites this as something Moynihan said to a "1994 electoral opponent on WNBC in New York".
Someone should check to see if Fox is getting donations/funding from health insurance companies.
It should be (well, non-profit for sure)... but alas, it won't be. At least not from this bill anyways!
I sincerely hope that the good people of crazy bitch....er Michelle Bachmann's district vote her worthless rump out of office for good!
Maybe Orly Taitz can take the U.S. Govt to court over a bill providing the mechanisms to provide the country with healthcare??
Janet Jackson's wardrobe malfunction, or...
The fact idiots like this can continually spread lies on an FCC sanctioned television network.
Isn't there some kind of responsibility clause in the FCC charter?
We all know that prescription drug commercials end up being mostly one long disclaimer. Shouldn't the FCC rule that Fox News needs to run a permanent disclaimer somewhere on its screen?
But seriously, it turns my stomach to see such recklessness is allowed from "journalists." It makes me even sicker to know that someone who actually votes on the Capitol Hill (Bachmann) is consistently this wrong!
We all believe in free speech. This is not free speech, it is senseless, shameful, unpatriotic drivel.