About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

After O'Reilly asks, "Is Obama a socialist?" Cavuto says, "This is not capitalist"

November 02, 2009 8:55 pm ET

From the November 2 edition of Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®© (November 02, 2009 9:25 pm ET)
      2  
      Q: Are we not men?
      A: We are DEVO!
      ~
      Report Abuse
    • Author by usp (November 02, 2009 9:33 pm ET)
      1  
      OT but i'd like to know what's wrong with vacuto's head? i mean physically.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by LIBERTY OR DEATH (November 02, 2009 9:39 pm ET)
         
      This is not capitalist I agree with Cavuto
      Report Abuse
      • Author by all your eyes (November 02, 2009 10:40 pm ET)
           
        Please elaborate.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (November 03, 2009 9:49 am ET)
             
          LOD can't elaborate, because LOD doesn't know what's socialist about Obama's policies. He just heard that term being thrown around a lot, and it sounds "scary".
          Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (November 02, 2009 9:41 pm ET)
      1  
      Let's hear it for labels without BRAINS!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Civic Racecar (November 02, 2009 10:44 pm ET)
      1  
      Well, he said it wasn't capitalist. Considering the options left (socialist, communist, and fascist), I think he just contradicted himself.

      I'm not going to throw labels around regarding Cavuto's intelligence level, but it's not high and it's not moderate. Hmmm....I wonder what is left?

      BillO, the "bigger is better" idea isn't strictly Pelosi, Obama, and Reid. Many Republicans saw to it that the government increased in size, just as Democrats. Homeland Security? Dept of Veteran's Affairs? You can't really blame the current administration for increasing government involvement when Bush and Reagan did the same thing. As for the number of Czars, Bush > Obama.
      Report Abuse