About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Olbermann to Beck: "Glenn, 9-12ers, if you are invoking 9-11 just to oppose health care reform, go to hell"

November 03, 2009 9:31 pm ET

From the November 3 edition of MSNBC's Countdown with Keith Olbermann:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Rasta Farian (November 03, 2009 9:50 pm ET)
      12 1
      Ditto.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Jesseb37 (November 03, 2009 10:00 pm ET)
      8 1
      And expect Fox News to play this, minus the "if you are invoking 9-11 just to oppose health care reform"
      Report Abuse
      • Author by clams casino (November 03, 2009 10:08 pm ET)
        4 1
        Fox won't play any part of this. Why would they?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by DAWUSS (November 03, 2009 10:16 pm ET)
          2  
          John Gibson might - and his show is on FOX News Radio...
          Report Abuse
          • Author by clams casino (November 03, 2009 10:20 pm ET)
            5 2
            Gibson plays clips of Olbermann slamming Fox pundits? Is that some weird payback for losing his Fox show?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by teabaggers ♥ [wing]NUTS (November 03, 2009 11:06 pm ET)
              8 2
              one would think.

              gibson has nothing better to do, so he just spends all his time giving olbermann free advertisement on his radio show.

              and the great thing is that olbermann ingeniously ignores gibson's relevancy... or whats left of it. he does the same thing to that crazy wingnut, mark levin, who loves to talk about olbermann, as well.
              Report Abuse
    • Author by proudconservative (November 03, 2009 10:00 pm ET)
      3 21
      Finally, sanity arrives in the guise of that guy from espn. Thank you oh world's best person!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by soze169880 (November 04, 2009 12:28 am ET)
        11 1
        Oh, yeah, that's right, our guy didn't get himself fired from sportscasting.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (November 04, 2009 10:06 am ET)
        9 3
        You mean the guy who actually IS a journalist . . . with a degree. The guy who wrote his first book at the age of 14 and graduated from high school at 16? The guy who reported for hours non-stop from Ground Zero, knowing that he had lost friends in the towers. That guy?

        The fact that you are ridiculing Olbermann's words regarding the disrespect that Beck and his RIDICULOUS 9/12ers are showing the people who died on 9/11/01 speaks volumes about your character. I still object to your use of the term "proudconservative" to describe yourself. You are no conservative, you are simply a Fox junkie.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by jediknight65 (November 04, 2009 10:39 am ET)
        3 1
        glad to see that you finally admit that keith is sane where most others are not
        Report Abuse
    • Author by proudconservative (November 03, 2009 10:01 pm ET)
      2 14
      Finally, sanity arrives in the guise of that guy from espn. Thank you oh world's best person!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jstephens005 (November 03, 2009 11:28 pm ET)
      6 34
      Keith Olbermann is evil.

      Any IDIOT that understands the feelings this country had on 9-12-2001 knows that the 9/12 movement was about standing true to principles. Some of the principles are conservative, but some should be followed by ALL, even the progressives on MMFA.

      Here's a list, for those who don't take the time to look for yourself:

      The 9 Principles

      1. America Is Good.
      2. I believe in God and He is the Center of my Life.
      3. I must always try to be a more honest person than I was yesterday.
      4. The family is sacred. My spouse and I are the ultimate authority, not the government.
      5. If you break the law you pay the penalty. Justice is blind and no one is above it.
      6. I have a right to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness, but there is no guarantee of equal results.
      7. I work hard for what I have and I will share it with who I want to. Government cannot force me to be charitable.
      8. It is not un-American for me to disagree with authority or to share my personal opinion.
      9. The government works for me. I do not answer to them, they answer to me.

      The 12 Values

      * Honesty
      * Reverence
      * Hope
      * Thrift
      * Humility
      * Charity
      * Sincerity
      * Moderation
      * Hard Work
      * Courage
      * Personal Responsibility
      * Gratitude

      So, which of you will have the courage to stand up, and profess right here for all to see, that you do NOT believe in these qualities?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by soze169880 (November 04, 2009 12:36 am ET)
        19 1
        By the way, when Glenn Beck said
        You know, it took me about a year to start hating the 9/11 victims’ families. It took me about a year. Um, and I had such compassion for them and I really, you know, I wanted to help them, and I was behind — let’s give them money, let’s get them started, and all of this stuff. And I really didn’t — all the 3,000 victims’ families, I don’t hate all of them, I hate about, probably about ten of them. But when I see 9/11 victim family, you know, on television, or whatever, I’m just like, ‘Oh, shut up.’ I’m so sick of them. Because they’re always complaining. And we did our best for them. And again, it’s only about ten.
        ,
        which of your tenets was he espousing? I'm just curious?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by DAWUSS (November 04, 2009 12:57 am ET)
        7  
        #2 raises concerns with FoR
        Report Abuse
        • Author by scubcap647 (November 04, 2009 10:20 am ET)
          4  
          Weren't some of the founding fathers athiest or at least agnostic? That would throw a monkey wrench at #2 since Beck is always talking about the greatness of the founders with some kind of mythical reverence.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by jediknight65 (November 04, 2009 10:51 am ET)
            3  
            jefferson was a big believer in the Supreme Being....and wasn't a part of any church
            Report Abuse
          • Author by magnolialover (November 04, 2009 12:36 pm ET)
            2 1
            A lot of our Founding Fathers were deists.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by jediknight65 (November 04, 2009 1:28 pm ET)
              2 1
              ok so i forgot guys like washington and franklin and adams (i might be wrong about him)

              funny thing that most of these guys save jefferson were freemasons......conspiracy theory maybe?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by scubcap647 (November 04, 2009 5:15 pm ET)
                1 1
                Wait. Let me get my tinfoil hats. That way we can block our thoughts from being read.
                Report Abuse
      • Author by convert (November 04, 2009 1:02 am ET)
           
        well the twelve values are certainly good, but the nine principles don't have much to do with what I was feeling after 9/11. I like many Americans was afraid of what might happen next. So when Beck announced that the purpose of the 9/12 project was to invoke the feelings we felt after 9/11 I think he meant it. He wanted his listeners to be afraid, he is always trying to scare people into believing his lies. Now, back to the principles. Sure compared to many countries America is good, but we have done things all throughout our history that make me cringe. I am a Christian but I don't think number two is a American principle. I mean we have the whole separation of Church and state ting going on, which I am all for, and freedom of religion. So which god is this referring to? Number four is kind off loaded. what do you mean by sacred? Is marriage inherently Christian? Also You and your spouse are definitely not the ultimate authority. If you fully believed this you would be pro choice. Also, what is the purpose of government, if not to govern? Not all laws are just or right, so I hope it is not always as black and white as that. Taxation is necessary for the good of America so number 7 is shaky, but I guess you would rather your tax dollars go to funding war rather than helping the poor. In my version of #7 its more like the government should not force me to pay for the ammunition which kills other human beings. I also find it funny then that one of the values is charity. Whole heartedly agree with 8. Again number nine not completely true you do have to answer to the government if you commit a crime.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by rkallen09 (November 04, 2009 1:03 am ET)
        25 3
        The 9 Principles

        1. America Is Good.

        - This is not a principle, it's an opinion.

        2. I believe in God and He is the Center of my Life.

        - This principle in no way makes you any more of an "American" than the average atheist.

        3. I must always try to be a more honest person than I was yesterday.

        - Honesty is subjective.

        4. The family is sacred. My spouse and I are the ultimate authority, not the government.

        - I can think of a few domestic violence laws that would strongly disagree with this particular principle.

        5. If you break the law you pay the penalty. Justice is blind and no one is above it.

        - Who are you? Batman?!

        6. I have a right to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness, but there is no guarantee of equal results.

        - This sounds like Glenn Beck nuttiness. What does that even mean and how is it a principle?

        7. I work hard for what I have and I will share it with who I want to. Government cannot force me to be charitable.

        - You should write that at the bottom of your tax return the next time you file.

        8. It is not un-American for me to disagree with authority or to share my personal opinion.

        - Were you so concerned that this right had been taken away from you that you had to make it a principle?

        9. The government works for me. I do not answer to them, they answer to me.

        - Actually, don't they answer to us. Why make a principle that is so selfish?

        The 12 Values

        * Honesty
        * Reverence
        * Hope
        * Thrift
        * Humility
        * Charity
        * Sincerity
        * Moderation
        * Hard Work
        * Courage
        * Personal Responsibility
        * Gratitude


        - Gee, with all of those values I believe you qualify for a merit badge! Be Prepared!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Brabantio (November 04, 2009 8:42 am ET)
          8 1
          - Who are you? Batman?!
          I think you're falling a bit of a trap here. He's challenging you to dispute these "principles", probably hoping that you'll dispute every single one. The idea that "justice is blind" is pretty hard to argue with. Number 8 is reasonable as well, although I wonder how many 9-12ers criticized Iraq War protesters for "undermining the troops" or whatever else.
          - Honesty is subjective.
          It's still a principle. I think Sharpe raises an interesting point about the wording of it, but otherwise the sentiment is understandable.
          - This is not a principle, it's an opinion.
          Now that made me think. At first I sort of blew off the first one, but you're right. It's not a principle. A principle is unchanged by circumstances, the question is just whether it applies to certain situations or not. But if circumstances changed, say at some point in time we became a third-world country launching random violent attacks against Mexico, then how would the "principle" still apply in any meaningful way? And if "America is good", then why all the fearmongering about socialism, Marxism, etc? We would still be America, therefore we would still be "good". The more I think about the applications of it, the stranger that "principle" becomes.
          - This principle in no way makes you any more of an "American" than the average atheist.
          Well said. I find it inappropriate (and a little stupid, honestly) for Beck to be mixing religion with his political movement.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by SLRTX (November 04, 2009 8:59 am ET)
            5 1
            And Beck's religious principles are based on seer stones as read from a hat by a well-known con man.

            So, he wants us to follow him to... just where was that exactly?

            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seer_stone_%28Latter_Day_Saints%29
            Report Abuse
            • Author by SHSZack10 (November 04, 2009 9:44 am ET)
              1 2
              You cannot honestly expect anyone to take you seriously because you post a wikipedia link, you know that right? I don't know if you realize this or not, but wiki is user-edited. That means anyone can put anything on there, and change anything that is already on there. Try again. : (
              Report Abuse
              • Author by rkallen09 (November 05, 2009 9:52 am ET)
                1 1
                First, you must refute the information SLRTX linked to before you attack the source that it came from. Your entire argument hinges on the idea that the Wikipedia entry in question is inaccurate because the source is inaccurate. Prove it.

                If you have any other history about the "Seer Stones" as they relate to Joseph Smith, then by all means provide that information here and point out where the wikipedia entry is inaccurate. We can then debate the veracity of Wikipedia as a valid source.

                Yes, Wikipedia is user-edited which means that not only can false information get in, but it can be corrected by others. You have to sift through ALOT of very good information to find a few nuggets of falsehood and outright lies.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by SLRTX (November 05, 2009 10:12 am ET)
                1 1
                SHSZack10 ---

                No knowledge of how to check the facts. I bet you watch Fox, and believe their crap. Right?

                Wikipedia is a good source - to START fact-checking. There are LINKS on their site that let you move to other sites to cross-reference the information.

                Y'know about "cross-referencing" do you?

                NEVER TAKE ANY SOURCE AT FACE-VALUE! This includes Fox, or even what I post.

                We liberals aren't afraid to have our claims double-checked.

                Are you????
                Report Abuse
        • Author by SHSZack10 (November 04, 2009 9:42 am ET)
          1 1
          In response to your views on the 6th principle:



          The right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness is a principle because, oh I don't know, its in the constitution. What is the constitution but a set of principles that our government is run by. What does it mean?
          It means that as an American, I can try just as hard to get as job as the other candidate. However, when he gets the job, its not my duty to run to the local attorney and complain about how its not fair. The constitution never guarunteed that we would all get what we wanted all the time. It does say that we can try. That is what principle number 6 means.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by rkallen09 (November 05, 2009 10:18 am ET)
            1 1
            The right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness is a principle because, oh I don't know, its in the constitution. What is the constitution but a set of principles that our government is run by?
            Principles and rights are two seperate things. A right is something that we are all gauranteed at birth regardless of what are own personal principles may be. Take freedom of speech. You are free to speak of your priniciples and I am free to speak of mine, but both of us have a right to speak.

            That is why I question both principles 6 and 8. I don't have to make something a principle that is freely our right.

            It means that as an American, I can try just as hard to get as job as the other candidate. However, when he gets the job, its not my duty to run to the local attorney and complain about how its not fair. The constitution never guarunteed that we would all get what we wanted all the time. It does say that we can try.
            You are engaging in a very deceptive argument that really proves nothing. You are trying to set up a scenario where a person who is hired, or their employer, is victimized by someone who did not get hired based on something that is "not fair." You then go on to say that the Constitution, "never gauranteed that we would all get what we wanted all the time," while ignoring what the Constitution does gaurantee, and that is protection from descrimination.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by mjh (November 04, 2009 1:14 am ET)
        18 5
        One of the 9 principles:

        7. I work hard for what I have and I will share it with who I want to. Government cannot force me to be charitable.


        One of the 12 values:

        * Charity


        TRANSLATION: I got mine, screw everybody else . . .




        Report Abuse
        • Author by SLRTX (November 04, 2009 9:01 am ET)
          6 2
          You know, "charity". That's what it's called when you make chairs, right?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by SHSZack10 (November 04, 2009 9:46 am ET)
          1 2
          Incorrect mjh. The idea behind this is that I choose when I want to give my money to charity. It doesn't say that I won't give. It says that I refuse to allow the government to choose one for me. Sorry. Try again : (
          Report Abuse
      • Author by progressive tribalist (November 04, 2009 1:28 am ET)
        16 2
        I have to question your veracity. In accordance with the, whatever you want to call it, you enumerated above, Olberman gives his patriotic opinion of Beck's linkage of healthcare reform to terrorism and you call him evil for it. You need to live by the standards Beck set for you; acknowledge Olberamn's right to his opinion, exercise some moderation in your tone with some gratitude that Keith is allowed to speak his personal opinion in questioning Beck's authority and honestly refute KO's assessment. Do so or risk being viewed as a big fake. That would be the responsible thing to do according to the 9/12 way of life.

        But sure, I can roll with some of the stuff you say you admire in that list of Beck's. For instance, families gay or straight, are sacred and government should not be in the business of telling people who they can or cannot marry. Government should not be in the business of telling women and/or couples when they can or cannot start a family because in America we do not force one's religious beliefs on another.

        I do disagree with that stuff about having no guarantee to equal results. It's deplorable that a person of means, hard working as they may be, is given greater access to healthcare than a person of humble means, despite the hard work of the latter, simply because one enjoys greater privilege of wealth and therefore, can afford to pay for better healthcare. If all men are truly created equal then nobody is more entitled than anybody else to greater reward in life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness simply due to their financial inability to remain healthy.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Sharpe (November 04, 2009 2:19 am ET)
        8 1
        I believe about two of them - 5 and 8. The rest are either opinions or blatantly wrong. America is good is an opinion and no America as a country does not always make the right decision - look at slavery or jim crow laws for examples. was that good because it was certainly part of america? Again, a belief in a god or no god is up to each individual it says so right there in our first amendment. You espousers of the constitution have no idea what the bill of rights actually say - its amazing. How about just being honest as you can every day? If you don't lie there is no way to be more honest than that. Beck certainly doesnt believe in that one. The family is sacred but there are higher authorities and a family can mean many things - if a court issues a restraining order for a wife against her husband after physical abuse, can the husband continue to stalk and beat her? Families can in many shapes and sizes - if someone is brought up by two moms or two dads do they not have a family? 5 is correct and part of our constitution - equal rights and protections under the law. 6 is inherently wrong as the constitution which you people claim you love actually give people equal rights to all 3 things.

        Why would anyone not have a right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness unless they are incarcerated? 7 is ridiculous - so your telling me you don't and have never payed taxes? You dont use public transportation or highways or libraries or public schools that are payed by taxes? 8 is extremely important but i WONDER where was this principal when the right lashed out at iraqi war protestors? Wasn't that just expressing their opinion and disagreeing with authority? Why did beck rail on them? Is it just when it is disagreeing with a democrat? 9 is completely flawed - first, the government works for the majority not just for individuals. Second, we are supposed to elect the people that best represent our own agenda. We can't have every american vote on every law. And you can't just go out and break the law just because you don't agree with it. I didn't agree with most of Bush's policies but I didn't just say I dont agree with it therefore, I will stop following the law or stop paying taxes. You can disagree, you can protest and you can vote. You can't just expect the government to either do everything you want them to do or stop doing anything. It doesn't work that way.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by SHSZack10 (November 04, 2009 9:48 am ET)
             
          Number 6 is in the constitution. You don't believe in the Constitution? Interesting. I would hope that you believe in the founding values and the ultimate law in our country. Guess not. : (
          Report Abuse
      • Author by twseattle (November 04, 2009 2:39 am ET)
        6 1
        Any IDIOT? Even You?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by aBeck in 10-O-C (November 04, 2009 4:02 am ET)
        15 1
        I have watched Olbemann for years. I can say without reservation that Olbermann believes in all 12 of the values you listed. The 9 principles listed are too arbitrary for anyone to embrace blindly without qualification. And by arbitrary I mean based solely on personal wishes,feelings,or perceptions, rather than on objective facts, reasons, or principles.

        The problem with getting open minded people to engage with conservative ideals is this: Conservatives have literally hijacked the American lexicon and distorted the meanings of words. By loading them with preconceived and arbitrary ideology--- words like American, patriot, liberal, empathy, liberty, freedom, equality, values, and Constitution, to name a few, are so distorted that you can now use them as ammunition to attack sincere and good-hearted people as traitors and enemies of humanity.
        Our common language is so bifurcated that reasonable dialogue is virtually impossible. Opportunist like Sarah Palin, Beck, and Limbaugh thrive on this; and the body politic in this country has become a cauldron of noise rather than a foundry for progress.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by rtejon (November 04, 2009 6:45 am ET)
        8 1
        You really should talk to Iraqi Christians, Pakistani border residents, rural Pashtuns in Afghanistan and anyone over 30 from Panama and see for yourself how much they agree with postulate #1 in your list.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by worrierking (November 04, 2009 7:30 am ET)
        12 2
        "8. It is not un-American for me to disagree with authority or to share my personal opinion."

        Unless the person disagreeing with authority is disagreeing with people in authority that I support.

        And where the flock is Beck's humility, honesty, sincerity, moderation or courage?

        In fact, not many of your leaders on the right have shown any courage. Most have consistently promoted sending Americans to war, yet none of the TV and radio right wing talkers served their country. They've only served themselves.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by SHSZack10 (November 04, 2009 9:51 am ET)
          1 1
          You don't think it was courageous for Bush to respond to the attacks against our country? He was a leader on the right, the sumpreme leader. And defending our country is not what i would call only serving themselves.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (November 04, 2009 8:12 am ET)
        7 2
        8. It is not un-American for me to disagree with authority or to share my personal opinion.
        "Except when that authority is Republican, and then it is anti-American to even think about disagreeing with them. Because that personal opinion is Communist, Marxist, Stalinist, Socialist, and Fascist, all at the same time."

        Just thought I'd fix that for ya, Glenn.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by PurpleState (November 04, 2009 8:22 am ET)
        5 1
        Do I have to watch Glenn Beck and be a 9/12 Marcher to believe in some of these principles? Of course not.

        You know, one can be progressive and a firm believer in those 12 values that Beck preaches about, but standing behind those 9 principles are not what makes an American righteous or good.

        Standing behind them makes an American greedy.

        Go to hell.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by eb (November 04, 2009 8:35 am ET)
        7 1
        3. I must always try to be a more honest person than I was yesterday

        Beck fails this one BIG TIME!!!!
        Report Abuse
      • Author by vysotsky (November 04, 2009 8:58 am ET)
        8 1
        "Any IDIOT that understands the feelings this country had on 9-12-2001 knows that the 9/12 movement was about standing true to principles."


        I remember that day quite well, and the country was traumatized. Glenn Beck's 9/12 club is based on the perverse premise that America was somehow better off and more in touch with its essential goodness that day because three thousand people had been murdered as we watched on television. Think I'm being harsh? These are the first words of Beck's book, Common Sense:
        "I think I know who you are.
        "After September 11, 2001, you thought our country had changed for the better. But the months that followed proved otherwise."


        If you really do think that the country changed for the better because thousands of people were murdered, yeah, I'll proudly "stand up, and profess right here for all here to see" that I think you've got a bent moral compass, and memorizing a list of principles and values isn't going to help you.

        Let's be honest: this list of 9 principles and 12 values is a marketing gimmick, no different in function than the Colonel's 11 Herbs and Spices or the McDonald's "Two all beef patties, special sauce, lettuce, cheese, pickles, onions on a sesame seed bun..." song. Only the Ronald and the Colonel's gimmicks make more sense, and they didn't promise to make you a better person.

        Have you failed to notice that Beck's list isn't even coherent?

        2. I believe in God and He is the Center of my Life.
        So atheists are excluded from Glenn's club. Fair enough.
        4. The family is sacred. My spouse and I are the ultimate authority, not the government.
        My spouse and I are the ultimate authority? Wow. God will be upset to hear that, especially after you pledged to make Him the Center of your Life. But, fine, now God's not the ultimate authority, it's you and your spouse.
        5. If you break the law you pay the penalty. Justice is blind and no one is above it.
        Now wait just a second. I thought my spouse and I were the ultimate authority, and now you're telling me we aren't above the law? What's the point of being the ultimate authority if the law's authority turns out to be more ultimate?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by The_Cat (November 04, 2009 9:49 am ET)
        8 2
        So, jstephens005, you want the freedom to force Glenn Beck's infomercial version of theocracy on me, but you'd rather I didn't have the freedom to say 'no' to this bogus belief system? Because that's what it sounds like.

        Keith Olbermann is no more or less evil than anyone else on this planet. There happens to be a bible quote, right on point here: Romans 3:23. Perhaps you've read it?

        Glenn himself doesn't believe in personal responsibility, and neither do most of the commentators on the right. Know how I know? Because they refuse to issue retractions and corrections when they make factual errors. That goes for Mr. Beck's crap about honesty as well. Van Jones is not a convicted felon, and did not serve six months in prison as Mr. Beck claimed. That lie still stands, though, doesn't it?

        How about courage and charity? All right, then here's Sean Hannity, who agreed to be waterboarded for charity. Keith Olbermann, whom you claim is evil, got his checkbook out, ready to pay a very generous per second amount to charity for every second Hannity lasted. Sean still hasn't fulfilled his word.

        Rush Limbaugh fails almost the entire list, every day.

        Why go on?

        1. America is Good

        As has been pointed out, this is not a principle. Further, I would add that America is only as good as it's worst decision. The Patriot Act didn't make America good. Slavery didn't make America good. Invading Iraq for fun and profit didn't make America good. America's various 'wars' on it's own citizens don't make it good. Does America do good things? Of course, like tsunami relief, just as one example.

        2. I believe in God and He is the Center of my Life

        And if you are an atheist or agnostic, what then? Why do you insist on being exclusive of Americans based on what they believe? The Constitution allows them the freedom to choose not to follow a religious system, but you would deny that those who make a choice different from yours their rights? And, if you insist on religion, you edge towards theocracy and we're back to the Inquisition. That what you want?

        3. I must always try to be a more honest person than I was yesterday.

        Crap. Who are you, who is Glenn Beck to tell me what I must try to be? I don't believe in this one at all, jstephens005. By the way, neither does Glenn!

        4. The family is sacred. My spouse and I are the ultimate authority, not the government.

        That's right! Just ask David Koresh! Oops. Bad example? Define family, please. It means more than blood relatives, in my opinion, but you likely won't agree. So, am I un-American then? Even though I'm working to preserve freedom, and you are postulating fascism, where we all believe exactly the same, and any deviation is punished?

        5. If you break the law you pay the penalty. Justice is blind and no one is above the law.

        What about Bush II's signing statements, where he said 'This is the law for everyone else, but not for me'? Or Mr. Limbaugh, caught with enough oxycontin, that, had he been anyone else at all, he would've been charged with dealing, and everything he has would've been seized. Home, cars, money, all of it.

        6. I have a right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, but there is no guarantee of equal results.

        Really? So, if I want to have a drink in my pursuit of happiness, that's okay, but I lose my liberty if I'd rather have a joint instead? Doesn't sound very equal to me. What about the 45,000 Americans who die unnecessarily each year from lack of health insurance? Don't they deserve an equal chance at your trinity of ultimate rights? Because they didn't get it, and Beck is pushing hard to make sure another 45,000 die for just the same reason next year.

        7. I work hard for what I have and I will share it with who I want to. Government cannot force me to be charitable.

        Talk to the IRS. Try to get the 16th Amendment repealed. Good luck with that. I paid in taxes to fund a war of opportunity that killed thousands of Americans and tens of thousands of Iraqis, to the tune of 750 billion so far. Render unto Ceasar what is Ceaser's. Heard that line before? I refer you back to #2 on your list. What about corporate charity, ladled out in the billions of dollars? Why do I only ever hear people on the right carping about helping poor people when rich people also grunt and root at the public trough?

        8. It is not un-American for me to disagree with authority or to share my personal opinion.

        Yes it is. At least, that was the story about protesters of the Iraq war. They were called far worse things than un-American, too. Not to mention that groups who organized to protest that fiasco were followed and harassed by government agencies. This one is pure hypocrisy on Glenn's part.

        9. The government works for me. I do not answer to them, they answer to me.

        And you'll get another chance in just about a year to vote and make your feelings known. Meanwhile, the MAJORITY of Americans, just as red-blooded as you, have chosen our current representatives. You do answer to the government, by the way. Every been pulled over for a traffic citation? Ever paid taxes, which the bible instructs you to do?

        Let's not get into the 12 'values'. I've already shown that Sean, Glenn, and Rush don't believe them, so the hypocrisy is growing tedious to enumerate. As a realist, I'm not a big believer in hope. As an iconoclast, I have little time for reverence. Of course, that's just me.

        But, for the record, I do have the courage to stand up and profess it right here for all to see, jstephens005.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (November 04, 2009 10:08 am ET)
        4 1
        No, sir/madam, YOU are the idiot. You have bought into a ratings ploy by Glenn Beck and believe it is truth. Your kind of blind loyalty to a television entertainer is frightening. You do know, of course, that Beck is laughing his a** off at your stupidity, right? This is his schtick and you're buying it. Scary.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by craig98607271 (November 04, 2009 10:29 am ET)
            10
          can't stand beck but this site worships at the feet of olbermann.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by bintx (November 04, 2009 10:36 am ET)
            6 1
            No, it doesn't. Most usually the only time Olbermann is mentioned here is when he is brought up in comparison to Fox by one of the folks who don't like him.

            On this issue, he was right on the money.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by The_Cat (November 04, 2009 10:48 am ET)
            3 1
            The only Man I worship at the feet of was Jewish carpenter, craig98607271.

            worship: reverence offered a divine being or supernatural power.

            Perhaps it was merely hyperbole, but I believe you used this word incorrectly.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by craig98607271 (November 04, 2009 4:58 pm ET)
              1 2
              you really worship at the feet of a jewish carpenter? did he mention me? oh wait you worship not at his feet literaly do you? kitty, i think you used the word incorrectly.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by The_Cat (November 04, 2009 8:40 pm ET)
                3 1
                Perhaps you are not aware of it, craigh98607271, but Jesus Christ was a carpenter's son, and a carpenter also. Did you not note that I capitalized the word 'man' above? This should have been a clue that perhaps I was not referring to just any Jewish carpenter but one in particular. The Son of God, for instance. And yes, at His feet, in His presence, unworthy as I am.

                I do not worship Keith Olbermann. It is impossible for 'this site' to worship at the feet of Mr. Olbermann because MMfA is an inanimate object.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by vysotsky (November 05, 2009 8:42 am ET)
                   
                "you really worship at the feet of a jewish carpenter? did he mention me? oh wait you worship not at his feet literaly do you? kitty, i think you used the word incorrectly."

                Psst, Craig, don't look now, but you were the one who introduced the metaphor of "worship[ing] at the feet" of Olbermann. Or at least I assumed you were using the expression as figuratively as did Cat. Are you really sure you want to criticize Cat for using that phrase in the exact same manner you did?
                Report Abuse
          • Author by SLRTX (November 04, 2009 11:25 am ET)
            3 1
            craig98607271 --

            I don't like Beck, because he's an idiot.

            So, I don't watch him.

            If you don't like this site, change the channel.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by craig98607271 (November 04, 2009 12:00 pm ET)
              1 5
              didn't say i don't like the site, just see the bias and hypocrisy pretty clearly. also i like seeing other points of view, another thing this site hates. kinda fun really.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by magnolialover (November 04, 2009 12:38 pm ET)
                4 1
                Umm, this site is about conservative bias in the media, it doesn't pretend to be anything else than a liberal site. There is no hypocrisy in that.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by craig98607271 (November 04, 2009 4:45 pm ET)
                  1 3
                  so there is no hypocricy for fox to thump the liberal MSM cuz they are conservatives?
                  Report Abuse
              • Author by SLRTX (November 04, 2009 3:24 pm ET)
                3 1
                craig98607271 --

                I don't mind "healthy" discussions.

                I have always welcomed anyone to show how any news source lies and distorts. I've even asked Fox-huggers to post links to sites like MMFA that show "liberal" or MS media bias. No takers yet. How 'bout you?

                But, if people want to whine about the views on this site... well, they don't have to come to this site, right?

                If you jump into a pool full of sharks, don't whine about all the sharks around you. Just stay out of the pool.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by craig98607271 (November 04, 2009 4:53 pm ET)
                  1 1
                  sorry dude, not a fox hugger, not even close. i have watched fox and see them for what they are, very one sided, so is msnbc. i will give fox a tiny more credit for having people from the other side to debate where msnbc rarly does.

                  by the way "honesty is subjective". man that is pathetic.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by SLRTX (November 04, 2009 8:20 pm ET)
                    2 1
                    craig98607271 --

                    Ok. Didn't mean to lump you into the group of "Fox-huggers".

                    But you are calling us hypocrites. And so you are saying we act in contradiction to our stated beliefs or feelings. What is so hypocritical about us or this site? You came to this site. What kind of opinions did you expect?

                    I like MMFA because they expose lies and distortions in the media. It just seems to be coming from the right lately, especially from Fox.

                    If you know of site that does the same thing as MMFA, and exposes lies and distortions from "left wing" media outlets, please direct any of us to sites. Please, by all means, feel free to make this site "fair and balanced."

                    Leaning left or right is much different than lying and distorting the facts. Fox-huggers can't tell the difference between "leaning" and "lies".

                    We wait for you to send us the links to left-wing media outlet lies and distortions.

                    Otherwise, you may want to reconsider just who's acting hypocritical.
                    Report Abuse
              • Author by vysotsky (November 05, 2009 8:45 am ET)
                1 1
                "didn't say i don't like the site, just see the bias and hypocrisy pretty clearly. also i like seeing other points of view, another thing this site hates. kinda fun really."


                This website seems to favor Olbermann over Beck. That's not hypocrisy. Bias? Sure, but then, this website is explicit in its mission statement about highlighting conservative misinformation and media bias. I congratulate you for deftly picking up on this website's explicit mission.
                Report Abuse
      • Author by jediknight65 (November 04, 2009 10:36 am ET)
        4 1
        " 5. If you break the law you pay the penalty. Justice is blind and no one is above it. "

        like how limbaugh went to prision for his drug use?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by John Paradox (November 04, 2009 12:12 pm ET)
          2 1
          Which reminds me, how much more time is "Scooter" Libby going to be in jail?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by jediknight65 (November 04, 2009 1:26 pm ET)
            2 1
            oh idk......how much time could one do when a sentence is commuted
            Report Abuse
          • Author by mjh (November 04, 2009 1:54 pm ET)
            1 1
            "Which reminds me, how much more time is "Scooter" Libby going to be in jail?"


            Oh, 'bout as much time as Nixon and Cheney.

            Oh wait . . .

            Report Abuse
        • Author by SLRTX (November 04, 2009 8:24 pm ET)
            1
          Justice may be blind, but a slick-talking liberal lawyer trumps blind justice any day of the week.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by captfoster2 (November 04, 2009 10:37 am ET)
        4 1
        jstephens005

        Just out of curiosity... when the hell did you right-wing/conservative/Republican punks corner the market on all those values and morals??

        When you spew out a list like that you prove only that you must do so to remind yourself that you must believe in all those ideals listed instead of simply believing in all those ideals listed without the constant reminder!!!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by jediknight65 (November 04, 2009 10:56 am ET)
          6 1
          david vitter, john ensign, mark sanford, newt gingrich.

          all men who were soooo honest about their affiars (save for sanford manybe) while railing against bill clinton.

          not only do they embody honesty but also the importance of family.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by jediknight65 (November 04, 2009 10:40 am ET)
        4 1
        oh wait thats right rush didn't go to prision for the oxycotin, nor did any of the doctors.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by jediknight65 (November 04, 2009 10:45 am ET)
        3 1
        "8. It is not un-American for me to disagree with authority or to share my personal opinion. "

        what about the 8 years that fox personalities and beck dumped on people who disagreed with president bush?

        what about beck demonizing people who disagree with his point of view and calling people communists and unamerican?

        Report Abuse
      • Author by jediknight65 (November 04, 2009 10:48 am ET)
        4 1
        also.....where is beck's "personal responsibility"?

        i refer of course to the man who shot up a class of legal immigrants that were taking english language courses.

        the guy said he was a fan of beck and feared the government was coming to take his guns......as proclaimed by beck days beforehand.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by SLRTX (November 04, 2009 11:27 am ET)
        1 1
        jstephens005 --

        I don't like Beck, because he's an idiot. So, I don't watch him.

        If you don't like this site, change the channel.

        Sorry to bruise your ego, but you won't be missed.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by SLRTX (November 04, 2009 3:31 pm ET)
        2 1
        jstephens005 --

        I have the courage to say I do NOT believe in those qualities.

        Now what? Next, you'll say I'm un-American?

        Denouncing someone because they don't see things your way is another one of your "qualities"?

        The right to disagree is, well, American.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by jediknight65 (November 05, 2009 10:25 am ET)
             
          perhaps i would agree to those principles if they were not spoken from a hypocritical clown. ie glenn beck
          Report Abuse
    • Author by LIBERTY OR DEATH (November 03, 2009 11:35 pm ET)
      2 27
      Bath tub boy talking about something he knows about lousy ratings.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by soze169880 (November 04, 2009 12:37 am ET)
        15 1
        Monosyllabic troll talking in what I assume is a human language but could be anything.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mescal (November 04, 2009 1:37 am ET)
          13 2
          Why do those right wingers hate punctuation marks?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by worrierking (November 04, 2009 7:34 am ET)
            12 1
            WHAT DO YOU MEAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

            Don't wingnuts OFTEn use excessive punctuation?????????????
            Report Abuse
          • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (November 04, 2009 8:18 am ET)
            9 2
            Why do those right wingers hate punctuation marks?
            Because they can convey nuance, and no right-winger is going to post that sissy stuff.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by NG_Officer (November 04, 2009 8:57 am ET)
            7 1
            because punctuation marks were created by marxist, socialist liberal weenies, right?
            Report Abuse
          • Author by NG_Officer (November 04, 2009 8:58 am ET)
            5 1
            because punctuation marks were created by marxist, socialist liberal weenies, right?
            Report Abuse
      • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (November 04, 2009 8:19 am ET)
        9 1
        Bath tub boy talking about something he knows about lousy ratings.
        I see your two remaining brain cells, when once again offered the options of LIBERTY OR DEATH, chose DEATH.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (November 04, 2009 10:11 am ET)
        4 1
        Good lord . . . a ratings troll. Get a life.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by jediknight65 (November 04, 2009 10:37 am ET)
        2 1
        better than john gibson, who i believe is the only one to call him that.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by daniel.h.rotter (November 04, 2009 1:00 am ET)
      1  
      Glenn already jumped the shark when he fantasized on his radio show about murdering Michael Moore.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by mjh (November 04, 2009 1:17 am ET)
      18 1
      Olbermann to Beck: "Glenn, 9-12ers, if you are invoking 9-11 just to oppose health care reform, go to hell"


      Thank you, Keith -- you took the words right out of my mouth . . .

      Report Abuse
    • Author by daniel.h.rotter (November 04, 2009 2:12 am ET)
      1  
      "4. The family is sacred. My spouse and I..."

      So a person and his/her spouse is now a "family?"
      Report Abuse
    • Author by PhuckPHOX (November 04, 2009 3:24 am ET)
      1  
      Couldn't have said it better myself, Mr. Olbermann. Could not have said it better myself.

      I think it's despicable that Beck is resorting to things like comparing healthcare reform to 9/11 and saying the President's trip to Dover, Delaware was nothing more than a photo-op, just to damage Obama's reputation.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by christopher howard (November 04, 2009 6:40 am ET)
      11 1
      Well said, Keith.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by liberalXtian (November 04, 2009 8:24 am ET)
      6 1
      A better and fitting afterlife would be for this man to find he has to share heaven with Ted Kennedy.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by coachofliberalidiots (November 04, 2009 11:27 am ET)
        6
      Keith Olberman is simply an idiot who needs coaching. Don't hate the man. He is a failure. He has failed at every news, media or communications outlet he has ever worked for. He has a "degree" from a satellite "ivy" school. He is exactly what liberals love, and idiot with a microphone.

      A reckoning is coming next fall. 2010 will be the demise of the liberal agenda once again for 20-25 years until they can brainwash a new generation through the educational system. But like always they will get jobs and look at their pay stubs and look at what an obese, diabetic and sick government does with the results of all their hard work. Then they will once again flush the ideology of Karl Marx, Stalin, and Mao down the political toilet.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by jediknight65 (November 05, 2009 10:32 am ET)
        2  
        nice try. especially since he showed his degree on air....

        and as for an idiot with a microphone, well ill refer you to beck, limbaugh, hannity, savage, levin, larson, ingrahm.

        the only reckoning that is coming is the one that will forever ensure neo cons will never get power again
        Report Abuse
        • Author by captfoster2 (November 05, 2009 3:47 pm ET)
          2  
          the only reckoning that is coming is the one that will forever ensure neo cons will never get power again

          We can only hope that this countries citizens can and will continue to realize that right-wing corporate controlled ideology is the single most un-American, un-ethical concept to ever exist in this nation!!
          Report Abuse
      • Author by SLRTX (November 05, 2009 11:49 am ET)
        1  
        coachofliberalidiots --

        He may be a failure, but he tends to speak the truth. This can be independently verified. Can't say that about Fox.

        I'd rather listen to a failure with integrity, than a successful con-artist.

        No matter who speaks, we should always independently verify the message. If there's a pattern of lies and distortions, we should reject that source.

        That's the patriotic thing to do. That's the American thing to do.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by bvb720 (November 05, 2009 2:11 am ET)
        4
      Who in the real World listen or watch Keith Olbermann? He is "THE WORST PERSON ON TELEVISION". And his ratings show it, even in prime time.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by jediknight65 (November 05, 2009 10:37 am ET)
        1  
        really? second highest rated program in total audience in his time slot, and he is the worst?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by SLRTX (November 05, 2009 11:43 am ET)
        1  
        bvb720 --

        Ratings are used to set advertising rates. It is not an indication of whether a media outlet tells the truth or lies and distorts.

        It is a fact that Fox lies and distorts. This has been independently verified numerous times. So, if Fox has higher ratings, it's more of a reflection on the intelligence of the viewers.

        Swallow what Fox shoves down your throat, but I'd prefer to check all claims.

        When I check Fox's claims, they loose big time.

        But, feel free to offer independently verified examples of the "left-wing" media or MSM lies and distortions. Unlike the Fox-huggers, I'm always open to learning new things.
        Report Abuse