About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Ignoring Fox's own fearmongering, Fox's Dr. Marc Siegel attacks gov't, fearmongers for vaccine shortages

November 04, 2009 10:51 am ET

From the November 4 edition of Fox News' America's Newsroom:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Previously:

Hannity guest Deirdre Imus says it's "misinformation" that H1N1 vaccine is safe, wants Obama's daughters vaccinated on TV

On Hannity, Peterson says parents shouldn't give their children the vaccine for "the illegal alien disease" H1N1

Beck calls his audience "zombies," O'Reilly dismisses Beck's flu vaccine conspiracies: "That's nuts"

Citing Fox News segment, Limbaugh fearmongers that H1N1 vaccine ingredient has been linked to autism

Beck, Limbaugh fomenting fear about H1N1 vaccine

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by SLRTX (November 04, 2009 11:08 am ET)
         
      Good for Dr. Marc Siegel to point out the fear-mongering about flu vaccines. I've had many "spirited" discussions about homeopathic "remedies" lately with friends and family.

      WOW! That people would rather pay big $$ for snake oil over a FREE vaccine just shows you the depth of ignorance, fear and stupidity Americans have.

      And Republicans know how to take advantage of this ignorance, fear and stupidity! This shunning of science and knowledge reminds me of something else that happened in history. Just what was it?

      Here are some hints. See if you can recognize where this is from:

      "[The movement] was slipping in an inegalitarian direction and he would not stand by while a new elite took over the party and subverted the revolution"

      "lead to a privileged class developing – engineers, scientists, factory managers etc. ... these people were acquiring too much power"

      "Hidden enemies in the party and intellectual circles had to be identified and removed."

      "ultimately create a new society where there was no gap between urban and rural, laborers and intellectuals"



      These are the factors that drove the cultural revolution under Mao. Dare we say that there are parallels here to pandering to the uneducated, ignorant and fearful populace?

      http://depts.washington.edu/chinaciv/graph/9wenge.htm
      http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/cultural_revolution.htm
      Report Abuse
      • Author by puppienrainbows (November 04, 2009 11:29 am ET)
        1 3
        Thank you for reminding us of the dangers Obama is exposing the American people to. Obama's agenda clearly parallels Mao's paranoia with the class warfare he has created with statements that define the direction this country is headed in. Re-distribution of wealth and a nanny state, the likes of which this country has never seen, is only the beginning unless Obama is removed from office. This 'experiment' with the lives of countless millions is already proving to be a death knell to the American way of life. 2012 cannot come too soon.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by worrierking (November 04, 2009 11:39 am ET)
          1  
          "...dangers.....clearly parallels.....the likes of which..... is only the beginning.....death knell....."

          After you change out of your dripping clothes, come back and explain, constitutionally, how Obama can be removed from office.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by puppienrainbows (November 04, 2009 11:43 am ET)
            1 2
            The part where I say,"2012 cannot come too soon" should have been some sort of clue but since it breezed right over your noodle, I'll try to explain it to you. Every 4 years, we have an election that..........oh never mind, you still won't understand.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by SLRTX (November 04, 2009 11:57 am ET)
          2  
          puppienrainbows --

          We've crossed paths before. So, your responses are no surprise.

          Republicans pander to the ignorant, stupid and liars. I guess I should also include the Conservatives now that they're splitting the party into two parts - dumb and dumber.

          The "moral values" platform is just another "cultural revolution".

          So, believe what you want. Reality still happens whether you believe or not. It doesn't matter who's in office.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by John Paradox (November 04, 2009 12:30 pm ET)
            1  
            puppienrainbows --

            We've crossed paths before. So, your responses are no surprise.


            Be careful where you step. Someone should clean up after their 'puppy'
            Report Abuse
            • Author by SLRTX (November 04, 2009 3:18 pm ET)
                 
              John Paradox --

              That's why I find their "logic" doesn't pass the "smell test".
              Report Abuse
    • Author by retiredinsf (November 04, 2009 11:38 am ET)
      1 3
      Where's the beef? Here's the beef: Obama fumbled this one big time. If Bush had goofed this up as much as Obama the MSM would have had him crucified by now. My grandkids haven't yet been able to get the H1NI vaccine and if they get sick it'll be Obama's fault. Meanwhile, the prisoners in Gitmo have gotten their shots - as well as Obama's kids.

      What a bunch of HS.......


      Report Abuse
      • Author by worrierking (November 04, 2009 11:48 am ET)
        3  
        Vaccine production is determined by the companies making the vaccine, not the federal government. Should the government have taken over the manufacturers to ensure the supply of vaccine?

        Were you angry enough back in April when the house voted down funding for pandemic flu preparedness?


        Report Abuse
        • Author by puppienrainbows (November 04, 2009 12:09 pm ET)
          2 2
          Back in the '90s, there were, if memory serves me correct, 28 facilities in this country producing a multitude of vaccines and related products. The Clintons imposed huge regulation changes that drove all of them out of business in this country. Only facilities in the UK, 4 I believe, were able to produce vaccines. As for your last sentence, it was the democrat controlled house that apparantly voted down the funding. A hearty thanks to those democrats.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by gs-425 (November 04, 2009 12:36 pm ET)
          2 2
          But the way the vaccine is to be delivered is determined by the purchaser. Had the government went with cheaper multiple dose viles instead of single dose syringes/inhalers, not to mention ordering so late into the summer, there would be plenty of vaccine to go around by now.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by DellDolly (November 04, 2009 3:08 pm ET)
            1 1
            Not true at all. They didn't order "late", nor is there a flaw in the way they ordered the doses. You're either lying or ill-informed. Multiple dose vials slow down the dosing, require that enough people be ready to immediately get the shots, and complicate things with infections and potential transmission of infections! It would have been inconceiveable for them to have ordered those kinds of doses as the only supply, but the facts are that the govt DID order a lot of those anyway! But if you have to use a new syringe every time you use the multi-dose vial, it takes longer than if you already have the syringe preloaded.

            On top of that, it wasn't because they had X number of dollars, and so they got fewer doses of the single doses than they would have if they had ordered the multiple dose vials. It's because we don't make much vaccine here in the US, and so the offshore suppliers gave their firt batches to their own countrymen. It's not the fault of the President who has been in office for 9 months that we don't have vaccine production here in the USA - that would be Bush's fault.

            And then the 'late ordering' you allege? Didn't happen.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by gs-425 (November 04, 2009 4:14 pm ET)
              1 1
              H1N1 cases where turning up in the US is late March early Arpil, The government ordered 160 million doses at the end of July. What was the government waiting for those 3-4 months??? I would call that ordering too late.

              The production of single dose syringes/inhalers is both more time consuming and expensive. The "slowing" of doses had nothing to do with my original claim and is frankly irrelevant as is the need for enough individuals to be ready as in a pandemic....everybody is ready.

              Walgreens has it....they didn't wait. Government fumble.

              Welcome to government run healthcare.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by retiredinsf (November 04, 2009 6:11 pm ET)
                  1
                Don't try to confuse DellDolly with facts gs. How silly of you.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by SLRTX (November 04, 2009 8:48 pm ET)
                   
                gs-425 said,
                "H1N1 cases where turning up in the US is late March early Arpil, The government ordered 160 million doses at the end of July. What was the government waiting for those 3-4 months??? I would call that ordering too late."

                Anyone here really know how vaccines are made? You think they are manufactured on an assembly line like cars?

                Man, everyone loves to turn this into a political win for their side so much, they're missing the facts - or just plain ignoring them.

                You'd rather spend more time putting the other side down, when a little googling turns up the facts.

                The best possible antigen must be derived from a seed virus as close to the outbreak as possible, to ensure you have the correct mutation. These little buggers mutate yearly, perhaps even several times a year. Then the antigen must be grown, and that takes time. More steps are needed, but you should be able to follow the posts below to get an idea of how this works.

                Links that explain the time line a bit clearer for some of you who don't understand the facts, but really want to know them:

                http://blog.pharmtech.com/2009/05/26/continued-steps-toward-h1n1-vaccine/
                http://www.ars.usda.gov/2009h1n1/
                http://www.vaccineplace.com/docs/H1N1productionprocess.pdf

                The real reason there's a shortage. And no, the Dems are not stockpiling it for themselves.

                http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=114156775
                Report Abuse
            • Author by SLRTX (November 04, 2009 9:07 pm ET)
                 
              DellDolly --

              See my response to gs-425.
              Report Abuse
        • Author by retiredinsf (November 04, 2009 12:43 pm ET)
          2 2
          I was hoping one of you Obama lemmings would say it's the fault of the drug companies.

          ------------------------------------------------------

          The shortage of swine-flu vaccine results not from drug- company greed or outsize demand but almost entirely from the government's decision to pander to unfounded and unscientific fear.

          http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/why_you_can_get_swine_flu_vaccine_GTHq2q7i8HeBQzyG4tQYLJ
          Report Abuse
          • Author by 3amnoise (November 04, 2009 1:14 pm ET)
               
            hmm, unfounded and unscientific fear. Oh, like when your best buds klannity, beck, and limballs were taking fox and the rest of you viewers for a little fear mongering ride a couple week ago. Yeah, I'm sure then obama was evil because he recommend that Americans get the vaccine, but NOW...the three stooges are saying the vaccine is GOOOOOOD and NOW you want it so bad, and obama is evil for "pandering" to fear mongers (also strangely among those...those same three stooges).

            beck say vaccine bad - "IT BAAAD! VACCINE BAAAD!"
            beck say vaccine good - "IT GOOOOD! VACCINE GOOOOD!"

            Hmm. I know there must be a connection here, I guess I'm just not seeing it. Maybe I should get beckinstien to invent me up a conspiracy.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by DellDolly (November 04, 2009 3:14 pm ET)
            1  
            There are concerns about the adjuvant. Those concerns are probably baseless, but because those kinds of people get too much credibility, their opinions do get heard too often.

            Hmmmm. Sorta like how FoxNews gets too much credibility.

            And it's the Bush Administration who allowed those kinds of false fears to prosper and spread, not Obama.

            It is not the fault of the Obama Administration. That's been the charge.

            But on top of that, where did someone "blame" the drug companies? I see where someone said that it wasn't Obama's fault. That doesn't mean that it's the drug companies fault.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by SLRTX (November 04, 2009 3:16 pm ET)
            1  
            retiredinsf --

            Not sure where you were going with your post, but the article continues to discuss the fear of thimerasol's debunked link to autism. And I agree, that link is bogus.

            This dosing conspiracy (that's what it sounds like) is a difficult argument to accept, considering the real problem is vaccine yields. Low yields mean low numbers of vaccine available - no matter how you package it.

            http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=114156775

            And, if this was something Obama's people, or Hillary caused, you'd think other countries would not have this same problem.

            It's a production problem. It's not a political one - except the CDC probably painted a rosier picture on availability earlier this year.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by puppienrainbows (November 04, 2009 11:50 am ET)
        2 2
        As a matter of fact, there was a shortage of flu vaccine during GW's first term and John Kerry Heinz used it to flog Bush with the campaign statement," This president(GW) has turned his back on the wellness of America". We ALL know that Obama will be insulated from the same sort of criticism, even though it is well deserved. The buck sure doesn't stop on Obama's desk!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by John Paradox (November 04, 2009 12:32 pm ET)
             
          [http://members.cox.net/ditto-busters/NEXT%20WINDOW.jpg]
          Report Abuse
        • Author by DellDolly (November 04, 2009 3:16 pm ET)
          1  
          Yes, President Bush had turned his back.

          Looks like now there is going to be vaccine production in the USA again - a ruling allowing it was passed earlier this year.

          It was the Bush Administration that fought reasonable science throughout their 8 years.

          If Obama eventually falls down on the job, then yeah, he should be criticized. He hasn't yet done that. Bush clearly did.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by SLRTX (November 04, 2009 5:57 pm ET)
           
        retiredinsf --

        The real problem is vaccine yields. Low yields mean low numbers of vaccine available.

        http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=114156775

        And, if this was something Obama's people or Hillary caused, you'd think other countries would not have this same problem, but they do.

        It's a production problem. It's not a political one - except the CDC probably painted a rosier picture on availability earlier this year.

        < preceding copied from my post to you below >

        In closing, Bush did a good enough job re-directing our military resources away from Afghanistan and to Iraq for bogus reasons. More lives have been lost in Iraq, than have yet died of H1N1.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Sharpe (November 04, 2009 1:18 pm ET)
      1  
      When did government buy a pharmaceutical company? Thats right. They dont have much control over big pharma without any healthcare reform. Blame the manufacturers who produce vaccines, not the government who is figuring out the best way to distribute them. If this was a distribution problem, absolutely I would blame the government but its clearly just a shortage in which the blame goes to the producers.

      What does fearmongering or spreading fear have to do with an administration failing? I dont get that connection at all. First, he says they are fear-mongering and over-reacting (somehow that lead to a shortage) and then, we need this vaccine. FOX is actually the one spreading the fear of vaccines not the US government. Beck was talking about it killing people that no one knows if its killing people. The radical right has spread smears and conspiracies that the vaccine is the way the government is killing people as well. The FDA is just making sure it is safe like we do with every drug that comes into this country in the present. I think the FDA is of great importance/
      Report Abuse

Most Popular Tags

Feed IconRSS Feeds

Get personalized rss or email alerts

Connect & Share

Facebook Twitter Digg YouTube MySpace