Dems win two congressional seats, Beck guest host Gray calls it a "bloodbath for Democrats"
November 04, 2009 11:17 am ET
From the November 4 broadcast of Premiere Radio Networks' The Glenn Beck Program:
Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.
Coordination must be a good thing.
as for virginia? deeds wasn't a strong candidate to begin with and everyone knew it.
thats why both races were irrelevant.
now the ny 23 was very important given the national attention it got and the number of neo con idiots that tried to make it such a big deal and embarrassed themselves by getting involved in it. and then losing it anyway.
Voters have had enough of being squeezed for failing programs and wasteful spending. It was time for some real hopenchange and they'll get it with Christie.
I will grant you that. I only voted for him because of his being a Democrat, interesting thing, however, for the last 32 years, Virginia has voted for a person of the opposite party in the White House. There was also a lower turnout of Obama voters in this election. In my school district, a bond issued passed 70-30, and a Democrat was elected as State Delegate. Ireally hate term limits. I would have been very happy to retain Tim Kaine as Governor.
i would actually like to see it be required for everyone to hold some political office at some point in their life.
or a different tack on term limits....i think the romans had a good idea on this one.....make it so that a certain period of time passes before someone could hold a particular office for a second time. the romans made it so that once a man was consul...ten years had to pass before he could run for a second term.
Just out of curiousity, pup . . .
If two off-year governors races {out of fifty} are a "referendum" on president in office for ten months,
Were 33 US Senate and 435 US House seats {one-third and 100 per cent, respectively} a "referendum" on a president in office for six years?
Additionally --
If the Dems losing two governorships -- while GAINING two House seats (one of which had been in GOP hands since the Grant Administration) is a "bloodbath for Democrats",
Was the 2006 midterm election, where Dems took back the majority in Congress for the first time in 12 years, and not a SINGLE incumbent Dem up for reelection lost their seat, a "bloodbath for Republicans"? {Before you give the FOX-approved spin/answer, keep in mind that Bubble Boy Bush himself described it as a "thumpin'".}
I breathlessly await your reply.
Tick-tock . . .
I was saying this last week . . . it's called critical thinking.
And, based upon your posts here, you aren't a conservative and you NEVER exercise ANY critical thinking at all. You simply post the spin, hyperbole and dishonesty that you glean from Fox and hate talk radio. You post it here and assume that doing so makes you a conservative.
Turn off Fox and hate talk radio and start thinking for yourself. Those folks are lying to you. Obama hasn't made a mess . . . that mess was left to him by the decidedly non-conservative and HORRIBLY incompetent administration of GWB. I wasn't an Obama supporter, but given the crap he's had to shovel since he was elected . . . I think he's doing a fairly good job . . . I don't approve of his handling of some things, particularly the handling of the crimes of the last administration and the FISA amendment, but then, he has kind of had his hands full for the past 9 months with the Bush crap.
Try reading and using you brain, puppies. You'll feel better.
Terpitudes [sic]. So our President is propagating depravity? Daily? That's your story? Obama Derangment Syndrome.
If you'd like to come back to the adults table, the first step to recovery is stop listening to Beck. He's the craziest dude ever to be paid to speak into a microphone.
Teabagger logic I'm guessing. They've become stronger because they've become weaker.
You gonna call me chicken offal again, puppies?
[Oh, and before you use big words, you should a) know how to spell them and b) know what they mean.]
That's a good sign of progress, puppy. You're starting to identify your own strawmen.
They make ignorant comments, and are called ignorant. They make racist comments and are called racist. They repeat factually wrong talking points, and have these pointed out.
Then, if they don't just disappear to do it all over again on another thread, they start whining that they're called ignorant, racist and confused simply because they criticize or disagree with Obama.
Personal responsibility isn't the wingnut strong suit.
Hallucinate much?
But whatever, if Gibbs said it was irrelevant, than by golly it was all just a meaningless exercise.
It can be irrelevant to YOU, if that makes you feel better...