About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Limbaugh protests "Palin is not damaged at all" by loss of candidate she backed in NY-23

November 04, 2009 3:16 pm ET

From the November 4 edition of Premiere Radio Networks' The Rush Limbaugh Show:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by pilotshark (November 04, 2009 3:22 pm ET)
      16 1
      Limbaugh protests "Palin is not damaged at all" by loss of candidate she backed in NY-23

      well you are right about that.... i know its a first....
      she was damage went her mother or father or witch doctor drop her on her head.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by carlh (November 04, 2009 3:23 pm ET)
      1 1
      Limbaugh's world view:

      "Heads I win, tails you lose."
      "I'm rubber; you're glue: bounces off me and sticks to you."
      "Do what I say, not what I do."
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (November 04, 2009 3:24 pm ET)
      19 1
      Palin was damaged long before she quit her job.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by captfoster2 (November 04, 2009 4:34 pm ET)
        6 1
        For what it's worth...

        The drug addled gas bag would have gleefully detailed how, if the guy Palin backed had won in NY's 23rd instead, on how that proves Palin is a powerful voice who knows what she is talking about and should now be taken seriously by all for her insightful abilities!

        What a predictable oaf Jeff Christie is!
        Report Abuse
      • Author by shaggles (November 04, 2009 4:35 pm ET)
        12 1
        That was a big nail in the coffin though. She's a quitter. Why would anyone vote for her?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by moe (November 04, 2009 4:53 pm ET)
        8 1
        My thoughts exactly. She is damaged goods; basically a dumb ass.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by MidnightWriter (November 04, 2009 3:31 pm ET)
      22 1
      Right, no damage at all. In fact, she's doing so well because of it, Newsmax is considering raising the price of her book to $4.98.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (November 04, 2009 4:10 pm ET)
        13 1
        Then her book would cost exactly the same as going to see a George W Bush motivational speech.

        And the comparative value is the same, too: nil.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by The New Pilgrims (November 04, 2009 3:33 pm ET)
      17 1
      Is Limbaugh related to Saddam Hussein's former spokesman? You know, the one with a penchant for making constant down-is-up claims?

      I mean, Sarah Palin could have a full frontal lobotomy tomorrow and Limbaugh would be right on top of it. "This lobotomy in no way harms Palin," Limbaugh would say. "In fact, I have it on good authority that it has actually made her a better Presidential candidate."

      Or if there were a video of Sarah Palin molesting a busload of school kids. And you know that Limbaugh would be saying, "This is excellent news for Palin. It shows that she is human, which is more than I can say for Obama......."
      Report Abuse
      • Author by wzwriter (November 04, 2009 4:46 pm ET)
        6 1
        I mean, Sarah Palin could have a full frontal lobotomy tomorrow and Limbaugh would be right on top of it. "This lobotomy in no way harms Palin," Limbaugh would say. "In fact, I have it on good authority that it has actually made her a better Presidential candidate."

        It didn't seem to bother George W. Bush. :-)
        Report Abuse
      • Author by skycatcher (November 04, 2009 4:58 pm ET)
          1
        Actually those school bus kids had it coming...
        Report Abuse
    • Author by SLRTX (November 04, 2009 3:35 pm ET)
      12 1
      Limburger, I totally agree with you. You can't damage something that's already broken beyond all repair.

      The NJ and VA races were expected to go to the GOP. VA always goes for the party opposite the sitting president. And Corizine tripped himself up in NJ.

      But, dist 23 was a surprise, considering it's the first Dem win in about 100 years.

      Face it. People just ain't buying that "moral values" crap.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by MickD (November 04, 2009 3:43 pm ET)
        7  
        Why isn't DEMOCRATS PULL UPSET being touted in the holy MSM. Would that be against their "dis Obama first" meme?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by shaggles (November 04, 2009 4:47 pm ET)
          2
        Because Hoffman split the vote. What did they think was going to happen?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by shaggles (November 04, 2009 6:00 pm ET)
            1
          Why the thumbs down? It's true. The reps would've won that seat if it wasn't for Hoffman and his endorsers.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by SLRTX (November 04, 2009 7:07 pm ET)
          2  
          Yes. Hoffman split the vote.

          Why was Hoffman even running, when the GOP already HAD a candidate? Because the "conservative" party thought she was too liberal.

          I guess the voters in the 23rd district thought otherwise.

          The Conservative party platform:
          http://theamericanconservatives.org/cms/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=49&Itemid=62
          Report Abuse
      • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (November 04, 2009 5:05 pm ET)
        4 1
        Poor rush, He's in full spin mode today. NY 23 burst is little bubble.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by mjh (November 04, 2009 3:38 pm ET)
      12 1
      Limbaugh protests "Palin is not damaged at all" by loss of candidate she backed in NY-23


      . . . and yet, the Democrats losing governorships in NJ and VA -- while GAINING two house seats -- is Obama's "Waterloo", and "no question this is an anti-Obama vote."

      Welcome to Crazyworld.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by dmhack (November 04, 2009 3:52 pm ET)
      9  
      How can her reputation be damaged when those on the right are crowing that the loss is a great conservative victory?
      And how can her reputation be damaged when it's already in tatters?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (November 04, 2009 3:59 pm ET)
      7  
      Actually Palin damaged McCain, in a big way.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Sharpe (November 04, 2009 4:04 pm ET)
      7  
      Dude, obama was killed by a wildly unpopular governor not getting re-elected but pallin is not hurt at all by this. I would say I agree that she was not but I also disagreed that obama was damaged by the NJ governor race so I am consistent while you are a pathological liar and propaganda artist. Please explain how obama is facing a career ending loss (napoleon at waterloo) while pallin is completely immune. Its one or the other rush - you can't have it both ways.

      If anything, the loss in upstate NY hurt the patriot teabagging movement. They made this guy hoffman the face of their little movement in politics and he lost a district that has been going republican for 150 years. A whig held the seat before a democrat last did. That is a brutal blow politically to this movement. People are clearly as accepting of teabaggers in congress as they are of blatant racists. You may get one or two over a few decades if you run in every single election.

      Pallin described as Normal is not the word you are looking for - stupid, ignorant, moron, incompetent. Choose one of those. If he said average america that would make more sense because she is as ignorant as the average or maybe slightly below average. Her exact words were used in an SNL parody of her. She wrote her own parody script - that is how ridiculous she sounds to reasonably educated people.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by peace4all (November 04, 2009 4:15 pm ET)
      4 1
      of course palin is not damaged by the loss of her candidate. how do you damage something that's already a complete wreck?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by WhatImlost (November 04, 2009 4:16 pm ET)
      3 1
      And the admission comes out. Rush screwed the GOP.
      He failed at getting the GOP canidate off the ballot which allowed her to pick up 5% of the vote.
      Incedently the Conservative canidate lost by 4%
      Looks like they needed that 5% Rush failed to ensure they got....

      On a more serious note Rush might not want to admit to forcing the R out of the race either, assuming that everyone who voted C would have voted for her, as well as some of the people who voted D after she endorsed him Rush managed to turn what should have been a 51% 49% GOP victory into a 49% 45% 5% GOP and conservative loss

      Rush denied his party the "sweep" last night (ignoring califoria like most right wingers have been) and its nice to see him own up to it on air.....
      Report Abuse
    • Author by manofmystique (November 04, 2009 4:19 pm ET)
      7 1
      The people who listen to this repetitive nonsense have to be brain-dead and the person responsible for his 400 million dollar contract must have money to burn because all Limbaugh does for a living is talk sh!t. You could pay me 1 tenth of that money and I could be more informative and more created than this predictable de[mint]ed idiot.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (November 04, 2009 4:24 pm ET)
        8 1
        Boss Hogg has really deteriorated. Where he used to at least pretend to talk about issues, whenever I've caught his show lately, it's just this stuff- feel-good happy talk for the dittozombies, with no basis in reality.

        I guess if it keeps the old rightys from driving their Hoverrounds off a cliff, he's providing a service, but reality is going to hit hard when they eventually snap out of it.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by smarshall1432997 (November 04, 2009 4:24 pm ET)
      3 1
      Last night when watching CNN and FoxNews ALL they kept going over hour after hour was how these "wins" in NJ and VA would damage Pres. Obama even though the Voters said "NO" connection to both of these Cable Networks' Field Reporters. Former Gov. Sarah Palin's actions were just whispered about, and then quickly glossed over before moving back to analyzed the damage the "wins" would do to Pres. Obama. Hmmm, one plus one equals two. Okay, so this is where Rush got his talking points today, LOL.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by fantagor (November 04, 2009 4:40 pm ET)
      2 1
      Limbaugh is right. One cannot damage that which is already irreparably broken.

      Randy
      Report Abuse
    • Author by PurpleState (November 04, 2009 4:46 pm ET)
      3 1
      Palin wasn't damaged by this loss.

      Doug Hoffman was Palin 2.0.

      Didn't live in the district, had to be spoon-fed his lined by Dick Armey.

      Doug Hoffman was damaged by this loss.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Boxer1979 (November 04, 2009 4:55 pm ET)
      2 1
      Limbaugh protests "Palin is not damaged at all" by loss of candidate she backed in NY-23

      Sorry! She's was damaged the first time McCain announced her name.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by rtejon (November 04, 2009 4:59 pm ET)
      4 1
      I doubt if Rush consciously realizes why he's right about this: I doubt if Palin has ever felt remorse for using people.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by thebigsheister (November 04, 2009 5:12 pm ET)
      1 1
      McDonnell told her to stay as far away from him as possible and it seemed to work out for him. You don't suppose more people will follow his lead in 2010? You think if Hoffman ever ran again he would be recruiting her again? I know you don't want to offend your listeners and all but you have to realize how stupid this sounds. Palin is political poison.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Alone in Texas (November 04, 2009 5:54 pm ET)
         
      Mirror mirror on the wall, who has the biggest ego of them all?

      Any guesses?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by retiredinsf (November 04, 2009 6:32 pm ET)
      2 4
      My My! Such harsh comments from the party of the "compassionate, loving, heartfelt leftists". Where are your manners children! All of you need your mouths washed out with soap (Leftist soap of course since it's dirtier.)

      And so many grammar errors as well! Where is that troll who slammed me for a couple typos a few days ago anyway?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by shaggles (November 04, 2009 6:53 pm ET)
        1 1
        Are you sure you're on the right thread? What harsh comments are you talking about?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by retiredinsf (November 04, 2009 7:40 pm ET)
          1 4
          Oh, I don’t know. How ‘bout these for starters (grammatical errors included):

          Pilotsharpe: “she was damage went her mother or father or witch doctor drop her on her head.”

          Capfoster: “The drug addled gas bag would have gleefully detailed how……”

          Moe: “My thoughts exactly. She is damaged goods; basically a dumb ass.”

          The New Pilgrams: “Or if there were a video of Sarah Palin molesting a busload of school kids”

          Sharpe: “Pallin described as Normal is not the word you are looking for - stupid, ignorant, moron, incompetent. “

          There are more but I’m sure, as SLRTX said above,: “Face it. People just ain't buying that "moral values" crap. “
          Report Abuse
          • Author by retiredinsf (November 04, 2009 7:45 pm ET)
            1 4
            What's up with MMFA inserting junk where my colons and apostrophes are suppose to be?.........
            Report Abuse
          • Author by shaggles (November 04, 2009 10:21 pm ET)
            1  
            OK. I see a couple of jokes and a few mild insults. Nothing that makes me gasp and clutch my pearls.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by shaggles (November 04, 2009 6:55 pm ET)
          1
        Are you sure you're on the right thread? What harsh comments are you talking about?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by manofmystique (November 05, 2009 10:19 am ET)
      1 1
      This says a lot about Rush and his logic.
      There could only be one reason why Rush would consider Palin "normal" or think of her as a good political candidate for President.
      I want everyone to take a guess before I give an answer; give up?

      The reason why Rush gives Sarah Palin a vote of confidence: ANSWER: Sarah Palin is WHITE.
      I dare anyone to come up with a better reason.

      Do you remember when Palin first came on the scene? She was shield from the media. That's how bad a candidate she was.
      Do you remember what happened when she was finally allowed to speak to the Press?
      Sarah showed how unprepared and inadequate she was.
      You tell me what possible reason, other than whiteness, could Rush be impressed with Sarah Palin?
      Report Abuse