About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Levin stands behind "good lines" while smearing "Eric Hananakanakanakanaka" and "perverts" at "criminal" Media Matters

November 05, 2009 10:10 pm ET

From the November 5 edition of ABC Radio Networks' The Mark Levin Show:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Previously:

Media Matters' Hananoki: House Republicans rally with Mark Levin - who regularly lobs sexist attacks on their colleagues

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Boxer1979 (November 05, 2009 10:22 pm ET)
      5 2
      He was also a contributor to The Sean Hannity Show and eventually got a radio slot of his own, on WABC, following Sean Hannity's program.

      He would not achieved his so-called fame if it was not for Hannity. Hannity refers to Levin as "The Great One". WTF! LMAO!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by John Paradox (November 06, 2009 3:08 am ET)
        1  
        Perhaps (especially considering his voice) it should be 'The Grate One'.

        Or, maybe there is no Mark Levin, and it's just someone running their fingernails over Glenn Beck's chalkboard...
        Report Abuse
    • Author by jediman (November 05, 2009 10:30 pm ET)
      1  
      Mr.Levin
      You will need a soap mouth wash to clean your mouth
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Lord of Light (November 05, 2009 10:41 pm ET)
      6 2
      Because insulting a woman's appearance has so much to do with her ability and competence. Funny, but the right wing is always saying their opponents resort to personal insults rather than talking about issues. But hey, you are a perfect human specimen, so I guess you judge others so harshly, ay?

      Hey Mark, since you'll read this, how about enlightening us all on the "criminal" activities of Media Matters? Pretty serious charge there, tough guy. How about some facts to back it up?

      Keep ranting and name-calling if you think it makes you tough.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (November 05, 2009 10:43 pm ET)
      6 2
      What "crime" does Levin think MMfA has committed, other than quote accurately and document completely the lies and bullcrap that idiots like Levin spout every day?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (November 05, 2009 10:45 pm ET)
      6 2
      This little jerk is nothing more than a hate monger. He dosen't tolerate any differing opinion at all.Like most wingnuts it's their way or the highway.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by dirtylittlereligion (November 05, 2009 10:48 pm ET)
      1  
      He laughs at his own jokes like a 5 year old.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by antihannity2009 (November 05, 2009 11:15 pm ET)
      4 2
      So what does MMFA do that is so criminal Mark? Want to supply some proof while you're throwing around accusations? I guess you're no better than your buddy Hannity who makes stuff up as well. MMFA is a non-partisan organization. I've seen criticism against both sides on this site. Arguments for both sides are always welcome. Now Fox is a completely different matter but we all know about that. Criticism of the right there is treated as lies and un-American. They're only responses are "You read Media Matters too much" or "You're reading off liberal talking points".

      Thanks for saying that those who work here are "perverts" but then say that you don't know that for a fact. You owe these guys an apology.

      The next time you write a book, try not to make 99% the your sources postings on your blog. That trick is already being used by Malkin.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (November 06, 2009 2:41 am ET)
        3  
        Perverts? I guess perverts are people who quote you accurately.

        Within the past couple of days, I was called "voyeuristic" for commenting on one of the wingnuts posts, and I've been called a "troll" for mentioning another right wing zombies earlier comments.

        It's pretty clear, reality is considered deviant behavior to right wing nuts.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Cheney2012 (November 06, 2009 6:49 am ET)
        1 1
        The almost daily coordination of attacks with the White House and Democratic Party are political activities. For example, if the White House talks about on the Sunday shows MM goes on the attack. It is obvious and blatant coordination, which is against the laws MMFA has agreed to follow by taking 501c3.

        They are not allowed under a 501c3 tax status. Thereby, Media Matters is indeed a criminal enterprise.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by internet soldier (November 06, 2009 8:36 am ET)
          1  
          if the White House talks about on the Sunday shows MM goes on the attack.


          Do you think MMFA is not allowed to paraphrase the president? If so, I suggest you try your hand at lawyering, not because you'd make a good one, but for comic effect.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by Cheney2012 (November 06, 2009 6:51 am ET)
          2
        What postings on what blog? Any proof of that?

        And since you claim 99 percent, a single posting won't prove your bogus argument
        Report Abuse
    • Author by DellDolly (November 06, 2009 2:44 am ET)
      3  
      Well, we know that Levin and one of his staff are cowards - they came through after 10 PM on Thursday evening and gave every post 2 thumbs down, but failed to post a single reply to any of those posts.

      That's being a weenie, Levin.

      So, apparently you can't pronounce the name, and your inability to be able to remember how to pronounce a name caused such a level of frustration that you had to make fun of a person's name? Really? This guy was born with that name, yet you think it's something to attack him about? That's what wimpy bullies do in 6th grade. Why would you behave that way as an adult, Levin?

      And "perverts" here? You think being gay is being perverted? Me thinks you doth protest too much.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by ProgLib (November 06, 2009 4:23 am ET)
      2  
      first, this guy cant comprehend the sexism in his own jokes, and then he claims because he also makes fun of male congressman, as well, that somehow it is more fair, i suppose. what planet do these buffoons live on? by the way, where is the lack of substance from media matters' criticism? if you werent such an idiot, youd say that there is plenty substance and you have nothing to counter with. oh, and i love the last part... "I think most of the people working at Media Matters are perverts. Do I know this for a fact? No." then why do you say it??? figure something out first before you make ridiculous claims.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by ProgLib (November 06, 2009 4:26 am ET)
           
        if you werent such an idiot, youd say that there is plenty substance and you have nothing to counter with.


        correction: if you werent such an idiot, you would point out the supposed lack of substance instead of having nothing to counter with.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by bluestate69 (November 06, 2009 6:13 am ET)
      1  
      levin resorts to baseless smears because his entire political philosophy is based on smearing other people.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Cheney2012 (November 06, 2009 6:53 am ET)
          4
        You are an idiot. There is never an attack on Levin that challenges any of his substance. It is impossible for you people to win that argument, so we never hear it.

        All of his funny lines are true by the way.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by ProgLib (November 06, 2009 9:21 pm ET)
             
          There is never an attack on Levin that challenges any of his substance.


          thats because levin doesnt possess any substance.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by bluestate69 (November 07, 2009 6:38 am ET)
             
          i guess i should call you an idiot too, but that's not my style. besides, i think the cheney2012 makes that point in itself.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by mikelartist (November 06, 2009 7:31 am ET)
      2  
      It's simple psychology. Low self esteem makes people lash out at others. He feels threatened. That is why he pads his resume. His work for the Reagan administration consisted of him being nothing more than a step and fetch it in the cloak rooms. He emptied ash trays and fetched drinks. He absolutely hates Obama. The hatred is palpable. Why? Obama is an actual Constitutional Scholar, an actual lawyer, he actually taught Constitutional law. Levin? Not so much.

      What has Levin done?
      Associate Director of Presidential Personnel
      Deputy Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary Education
      Deputy Solicitor of the U.S. Department of the Interior
      and finally
      Chief of Staff to Attorney General Edwin Meese
      Remember that BUFFOON Meese? He was constantly embarrassing himself with his cave man approach to law.

      This makes Levin a Constitutional Scholar?

      LEVIN has been deputy this and deputy that his whole life.
      HE IS THE BARNEY FIFE OF THE CONSERVATIVE MOVEMENT
      Angy, nervous and desperate for attention and self importance at any cost.

      His psychological make up is so suspect it makes me cringe to think of his "pet cause".... dogs. Dogs are so faithful and subservient, they are ripe targets of abusive people with issues. Levin seems to fit the profile of a person that champions his cause in public but violates every tenet of that cause behind close doors. For the sake of innocent dogs... I hope I am wrong here.

      I don't think I am alone in my suspicions.

      Hey Levin, Mr "Constitutional Scholar".... why didn't you correct your orange pal Boehner yesterday when he pulled out his prop Constitution he "keeps in his pocket"... Then proceeds reads the preamble to the Declaration of Independence

      HAA HAA HAA Clueless fools. All of them

      It truly is laughable when these wingnuts claim they are protecting the Constitution and they don't even know what is in it.

      Here's a clue: Start with the preamble.... there isn't one in the Constitution.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Jasperrip (November 06, 2009 10:24 am ET)
      1 1
      Someone said that MMFA is a non-partisan organization, then why is it that all that is on this site is Beck, Levin, Hannity and everyone else that has an opposing view to MMFA/democrat party.

      And for the record, I don't agree with what Lavin was saying and think that he should have a his mouth washed out with soap.
      Report Abuse