About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Carlson on Ft. Hood shooting: "Could it be that our own military is so politically correct right now...to be careful about treatment of Muslims that they would have allowed this to go by?"

November 06, 2009 6:12 am ET

From the November 6 edition of Fox News' Fox & Friends

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Cheney2012 (November 06, 2009 6:45 am ET)
      2 14
      "Could it be that our own military is so politically correct right now...to be careful about treatment of Muslims that they would have allowed this to go by?"

      Yes, Absolutely.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Victor Colorado (November 06, 2009 7:19 am ET)
        9 1
        Then explain why the U.S. military continues to trivialize rape and sexual assault committed by members of the armed forces.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Tbone Slickens (November 06, 2009 8:25 am ET)
          1 7
          They "trivialize" rape? Let me guess. Some OpEd hit piece dutifully parroted here to smear...

          In 2006 there were 2900 reported cases almost a third were reported under an old system that did not notify commanders and or local law enforcement. That system has changed three times over the last three years so you can see they are trying to get it right. I would not classify that as trivial. Fourteen hundred of those cases were not prosecuted because they could not substantiate the case or lacked evidence.

          Army spokeswoman Maj. Cheryl Phillips said, "There is no evidence that the actual number of assaults is increasing in the Army, but there are definite indicators that the Army has created more willingness among Soldier victims to report incidents."

          In the report, the Defense Department said the military services "placed a high priority on training" and that the 2006 report demonstrates the Pentagon's "commitment to eliminating sexual assault from the military services" through education and by removing barriers that can dissuade victims from reporting the crime. - Associated Press 2007


          How many hundred of thousands of armed service personnel are there compared to the amount of reported cases? Compare that to any major city, we'll say New York city and see that over a ten year period NYC had over 3000 reported cases of forcible rape. That's not even counting sodomy laws, indecent liberties, and other offenses the military counts in their definition of rape. It only dropped below 3k for one year over that ten year period.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by magnolialover (November 06, 2009 8:30 am ET)
            4  
            So, let's see. 8.2 million people in NYC. About 1.1 million people in the Army. Who has the higher percentages?

            I'm thinking, The Army unfortunately.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Tbone Slickens (November 06, 2009 10:16 am ET)
              1 5
              The report was from the Pentagon which would cover ALL branches of the service. Also as I stated the report covers several sex crimes that are counted as opposed to NYC data on just rape.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by smarshall1432997 (November 06, 2009 10:34 am ET)
                5 1
                TBone, "ONE" rape covered up in the Military is "wrong" and "shameful" needing "NO" justifications at ALL by ANY American.

                Just shameful with how you guys and FoxNews spin your wrong-doings to protect yourselves. Just shameful.
                Report Abuse
          • Author by jjamele2880 (November 06, 2009 8:54 am ET)
            7  
            Are you serious? Do you REALLY think that you can get away with making false comparisons like that? New York City had more reported cases of rape than the army? Well, my neighborhood had FEWER reported cases of rape than the army. By your logic, I just proved that rape is rampant in the army.

            What a moron.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by open_mind (November 06, 2009 12:12 pm ET)
            1  
            Because some posters cite things without being so kind as to provide an actual link, here is the link to Tbone's report: (pdf warning) Military Sex Assault Reports Rose by 24
            Percent; Army Attributes Increase to New
            Reporting Programs, Not More Crime

            The military just started tracking these crimes. It remains to be seen whether they are really serious about addressing it.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by scubcap647 (November 06, 2009 2:12 pm ET)
            1  
            Do you even know a rape victim? One of my best friends was in the army when she was raped on base. This incedent was swept under the carpet. The excuse was basically this: since she was out at a party before the incedent, she may have been drinking too much and therefore could not properly remember the course of events. There are plenty of other cases similar to that. And many of them get covered up.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by HistoricallyCorrect (November 06, 2009 11:11 am ET)
          3  
          I know women in the military and while this is at best anecdotal. They could not tell you the number of times, that they have been cornered, grabbed, and some have trying to pull them into their rooms. There is definitely a huge problem with rape, sexual assault, and harassment.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by NiceguyEddie (November 06, 2009 8:05 am ET)
        7  
        What stupidity. There are many devout Muslims serving in all branches of the Military. This is not a question of 'political correctness.' It's a question of right and wrong. And excluding people from service on the basis of religion is not just worng, it's un-American, unNECESSARY, and just plain stipid,ignoarant and unjustified. That he was a Psychiatrist likely played more a role in all this that the fact that he was a Muslim.

        Of for that matter, that he was a Virginia Tech Grad!

        Michael Vick, Seung-Hui Cho, Nidal Hassan... By Cheney's logic maybe we should just close down my alma matta, solve ALL the world's problems.

        -----------------------------------------------------------------
        Idiot
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Tbone Slickens (November 06, 2009 8:36 am ET)
            7
          I disagree with your assessment of PC. Let's state that we don't know all the facts here and I'm sure the picture will get clearer in the coming weeks, but I think a PC mentality may have contributed to this guy not being headed off at the pass so to speak.

          One of the news shows had a guy on last night who purported to be a retired Army Ltc who served with Hasan. He claimed that there were signs Hasan was supportive of the Arkansas recruiting shooting and made statements that muslims should rise up against Americans.

          If this is true then that should have been looked into under UCMJ codes of SAEDA. I would say a case could be made that due to PC attitudes, he slid through the cracks and people gave him a pass if the flags were there.

          I'm basing this off what the news was reporting last night, so buyer beware.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by magnolialover (November 06, 2009 8:41 am ET)
            6  
            The Army is about the most non-PC place ever.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Tbone Slickens (November 06, 2009 8:57 am ET)
                6
              Depends on the type of unit and command mag, but yes some are not PC. What type of unit were you in?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by mk3872 (November 06, 2009 9:49 am ET)
                5  
                What unit was Gretchen Carlson in?
                Report Abuse
              • Author by magnolialover (November 06, 2009 10:37 am ET)
                3  
                I didn't serve, but I work for the Army. We just had a discussion with my "CO" about what happened, and the soldiers I serve with, most of them, were just talking about how we need to maybe talk to all Muslim members of the Army, to you know, sort them out.

                That's how "PC" we are around here.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Tbone Slickens (November 07, 2009 8:51 am ET)
                     
                  Thanks for your part in helping our soldiers do their job. DOA Civilians are a very important piece of the puzzle.

                  I was in combat arms for half my Army career so I know what you're saying. I also was MI for the last half and it was a VERY PC unit as far as the command went, although there were still un-PC views about in the rank and file.
                  I wasn't trying to sharp shoot you at all, as I remember you had said you worked in some capacity for the DOD.
                  Report Abuse
            • Author by markbfoot199 (November 06, 2009 9:17 am ET)
                4
              Mags, I want to make sure I understand what you mean by PC, so please explain the meaning of PC in your world.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (November 06, 2009 10:02 am ET)
                5 1
                People who complain the loudest about PC are the ones who want to be able to use racist slurs in public without being looked down upon for it.

                They're the ones who want to go back to a 1950s-style Leave It to Beaver and Father Knows Best type of America that never existed.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by magnolialover (November 06, 2009 10:38 am ET)
                3  
                Use common sense in what you say out loud is what PC means to me. As in, if you think someone might be offended by what you say, don't say it out loud.

                It's really that simple to me.

                I hear things at work that would probably offend some, which is why I labeled it "not PC". Does it offend me? No, not personally.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by markbfoot199 (November 06, 2009 11:00 am ET)
                    6
                  Great, so we need to always worry about what other people think, well sorry that is crap. That is one of the issues we have in this country, we all act like something we are not. Speak the truth and do not be afraid.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Ruby (November 06, 2009 12:17 pm ET)
                    2  
                    So, it would be much better if we all lived our lives with no regard for the feelings of others?

                    Sorry, I don't think so.

                    Refraining from saying something that you think might offend someone else is sort of like when your boyfriend/girlfriend cooks you a not-so-tasty meal but you pretend to enjoy it anyway.
                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by rms (November 06, 2009 1:41 pm ET)
                    1  
                    Of course, finding a way to say what you think without offending someone is usually not that hard to do, and "worry[ing] a bout what other people think" is not really the same as offending.

                    I agree with "Mags," I believe. To me "PC" is essentially common courtesy. It is good to be inclusive. It is good to be respectful. It is also still possible to disagree with someone without being obnoxious.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by markbfoot199 (November 06, 2009 1:54 pm ET)
                        2
                      RMS, I am offended you’re attacking me, so in the future you need to only praise me. Wow, I could really get into this PC stuff. From now on, since I hate to lose, I want a prize for just playing, and since I do not want a failing grade, just give me a “C” and pass me along. Gee, I wonder if these types of PC things could hurt us in the near future. I would think not, I mean we are not losing any educational ground to China or India. Wow, yea this PC stuff is really great.

                      Report Abuse
                    • Author by isabellakate (November 07, 2009 2:00 pm ET)
                        1
                      The guarantee of free speech is offended by political correctness. PC is a lot more than common courtesy.

                      It isn't nice when people say things that offend us, but if we care about freedom we must defend their right to say them,regardless of how badly the words hurt our feelings. Voltaire said it and so did our mothers. They were right.

                      Political Correctness demands unequal treatment for groups based on race, religion, ethnicity etc. It is undemocratic and destructive.

                      Had the Fort Hood killer shouted "Jesus is Great" during the massacre, the headlines would have shouted about the Christian terrorist. This killer shouted "Allaha Akbar",the cry of the 9/11 terrorists, but anyone who describes him as a Muslim or a terrorist when he is obviously both, is abused by PC people who think that national security depends on being nice to people who hate us. We need to wake up, and quickly.

                      Report Abuse
          • Author by jjamele2880 (November 06, 2009 8:55 am ET)
            5  
            You should start each of your posts with "buyer beware." Or "Disclaimer: What you are about to read was typed by an ignorant, bigoted moron."
            Report Abuse
          • Author by NiceguyEddie (November 06, 2009 9:11 am ET)
            4  
            You are correct about a single thing: WE DON'T KNWO ALL THE FACTS.

            Beyond that, you are violating the only thing we agree on, with the rest of your post.

            As to your and Dick2012's claims, there's THIS from msn.com:

            Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, the 39-year-old man accused of Thursday’s mass shooting at Fort Hood, Tex., started having second thoughts about his military career a few years ago after other soldiers harassed him for being a Muslim, he told relatives in Virginia.

            ----------------------------------------------------------------
            So PC my left...
            Report Abuse
            • Author by markbfoot199 (November 06, 2009 9:25 am ET)
              1 7
              "He Told Relatives" Hearsay, but did he make a complaint?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by smarshall1432997 (November 06, 2009 10:42 am ET)
                3 1
                "A FEW YEARS AGO" is when he TOLD Relatives. Now we see why you people are 'distracting' this horrific act because it's origins traces back to during the Bush years of pushing people to fight in their made-up Wars. You people "DO NOT" want ANY discussions about the Wars coming to an END, just shameful.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by markbfoot199 (November 06, 2009 2:05 pm ET)
                  1 2
                  Yea, I mean really he was drafted against his will, we made him join the Army. I mean really, who would ever think that joining the Army you would have to fight. Oh wait he enlisted, and second a doctor which means he would be in the back, not the front fighting.
                  Report Abuse
            • Author by markbfoot199 (November 06, 2009 9:26 am ET)
                5
              "He Told Relatives" Hearsay, but did he make a complaint?
              Report Abuse
            • Author by markbfoot199 (November 06, 2009 9:26 am ET)
                8
              "He Told Relatives" Hearsay, but did he make a complaint?
              Report Abuse
            • Author by Tbone Slickens (November 06, 2009 9:33 am ET)
              1 7
              So it's better to not violate the only thing we agree on and take the chance of a mass murder?

              The military isn't the faculty at your beloved VT. There are laws designed for just such a scenario as I described above. I suggest you familiarize yourself with SAEDA and how it applies to a United States Army Officer.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by princeofwheels (November 06, 2009 10:04 am ET)
                7 1
                I would imagine that we should start thinning the military by eliminating/discharging;

                1. Those that dislike blacks being in the military.
                2. Those that dislike gays being in the military.
                3. Those that dislike women being in the military.
                4. Those that don't agree war but are willing to serve in other capacities.
                5. Those that disagree with the Commander-in-Chief.
                6. Those that dislike those that dislike women/blacks/gays/muslims/non-American immigrants being permitted into the military.


                And what do we have left???

                The right will use this as an anti-everything moment to shill their dislike about everything.

                Maybe it is just a murder..like McVeigh committed. (But let us not mention he was an American who was Christian. Sounds to much like a rightwinger)
                Report Abuse
                • Author by markbfoot199 (November 06, 2009 11:04 am ET)
                  1 3
                  Prince, again McVeigh was not a Christian, he even says that in interivews. So, that argument does not work here.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Tbone Slickens (November 07, 2009 8:53 am ET)
                      1
                    Nor was he serving in any capacity in the military at the time. Apples to oranges.
                    Report Abuse
          • Author by HistoricallyCorrect (November 06, 2009 11:14 am ET)
            2 1
            Right, the Army is PC, which is why Gays are welcomed with open arms!
            Report Abuse
        • Author by markbfoot199 (November 06, 2009 9:34 am ET)
          1 7
          Eddie, seems you are skipping many issues here. This individual had prasied the shooting in Arkansas, has nothing to do with where he went to school, but more of his recent teachings once he converted to Islam.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by princeofwheels (November 06, 2009 10:09 am ET)
            4  
            Who says he converted? According to Fox' interview with his cousin, he was always in the Islam faith.

            We should wait for all the FACTS.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by bintx (November 06, 2009 11:03 am ET)
            5  
            This man was born in the United States as were his parents. He did not just recently "convert to Islam." He was ALWAYS a Muslim. You just can't get anything right, can you?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by markbfoot199 (November 06, 2009 11:16 am ET)
              1 3
              You know Bi, you finally got something right, he has always been a Muslim, but until recently he was becoming more and more devoted to his faith is family says in a interview. I misquoted what I had read on some other news organizations. He was born in the U.S. but was more inclined on some documents to list himself as Palestine. I guess he did not really want to be an American, I guess with a President running around apologizing about being an American, he was not proud of his country anymore.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by foghornleghorn (November 06, 2009 1:14 pm ET)
                2  
                I guess with a President running around apologizing about being an American, he was not proud of his country anymore.

                As usual, you guessed wrong.

                Show me where/when Obama apologized for being an American?

                He "apologized" for the actions of the Bush regime. And that was a good thing. Ask anyone from another country.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by markbfoot199 (November 06, 2009 2:02 pm ET)
                    2
                  "Ask anyone from another country” Hey Fog, he should worry about what we the people of American thinks, not what others think. Oh wait, this is a PC issue. We only care what others think of us. Fog, tell me, what do you think of China, Iran, Venezuela I am sure if your upset their leaders will run right up here and say Sorry.

                  Maybe they will vote for us to stay on the island as well, I mean really this is a popularity contest correct?

                  Sure the 10% of the unemployed are real happy with this guy running all over the world saying sorry, or begging for games, playing more golf in 9 months then Bush played the whole time or even just looking cool. Really, this President really spends a lot of time out of the office and more time globe hopping. Sure the soldiers in Afghan really love how long he ponders a problem. Sure they love the Hope and Change.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by markbfoot199 (November 06, 2009 2:03 pm ET)
                    2
                  "Ask anyone from another country” Hey Fog, he should worry about what we the people of American thinks, not what others think. Oh wait, this is a PC issue. We only care what others think of us. Fog, tell me, what do you think of China, Iran, Venezuela I am sure if your upset their leaders will run right up here and say Sorry.

                  Maybe they will vote for us to stay on the island as well, I mean really this is a popularity contest correct?

                  Sure the 10% of the unemployed are real happy with this guy running all over the world saying sorry, or begging for games, playing more golf in 9 months then Bush played the whole time or even just looking cool. Really, this President really spends a lot of time out of the office and more time globe hopping. Sure the soldiers in Afghan really love how long he ponders a problem. Sure they love the Hope and Change.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by markbfoot199 (November 06, 2009 2:03 pm ET)
                    2
                  "Ask anyone from another country” Hey Fog, he should worry about what we the people of American thinks, not what others think. Oh wait, this is a PC issue. We only care what others think of us. Fog, tell me, what do you think of China, Iran, Venezuela I am sure if your upset their leaders will run right up here and say Sorry.

                  Maybe they will vote for us to stay on the island as well, I mean really this is a popularity contest correct?

                  Sure the 10% of the unemployed are real happy with this guy running all over the world saying sorry, or begging for games, playing more golf in 9 months then Bush played the whole time or even just looking cool. Really, this President really spends a lot of time out of the office and more time globe hopping. Sure the soldiers in Afghan really love how long he ponders a problem. Sure they love the Hope and Change.
                  Report Abuse
              • Author by Tbone Slickens (November 06, 2009 7:21 pm ET)
                  3
                Not only that did you see Barry the Propeller Beanie Kid giving "Shout-Outs" and yucking it up for three minutes before finally getting around to talking to the American people about this attack?

                My pet goat meet shout out Barry...
                Report Abuse
                • Author by friedbergboy1422 (November 06, 2009 8:32 pm ET)
                  1  
                  Get back to me when Obama mocks the soldiers like Bush did at his correspondents' dinner:

                  President George Bush sparked a political firestorm yesterday after making what many judged a tasteless and ill-judged joke about the failure to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.

                  Mr Bush made the joke at a black-tie event for radio and television journalists in Washington on Wednesday night.

                  He narrated a slide show, described as the White House election year album, making hay of the administration's reputation for secrecy and strained relations with European allies. But it was the joke about the war in Iraq that drew attacks.

                  A slide showed Mr Bush in the Oval office, leaning to look under a piece of furniture. "Those weapons of mass destruction have got to be here somewhere," he told the audience, drawing applause.

                  Another slide showed him peering into another part of the office, "Nope, no weapons over there," he said, laughing. "Maybe under here," he said, as a third slide was shown.

                  He was laughing about WMDs that couldn't be found that he spent American lives searching for.

                  http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/mar/26/usa.iraq

                  I'm sorry, but Obama giving a "shout-out" in an unrelated part of a press conference is not nearly as bad as joking and mocking the reason you started a war and a reason that 1000s of troops died. Give me a break.

                  Unless you went absolutely nuts on Bush's "joke" you have no credibility here.
                  Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (November 06, 2009 8:23 am ET)
        5  
        Yea...obviosly this guy should have been waterboarded months ago, huh?.

        Are we headed for a call from the right that Muslim Americans not be allowed to serve in the military?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by John Paradox (November 06, 2009 2:13 pm ET)
          1  
          Maybe we should put them in some kind of 'camps' for our safety.

          Let's ask some of the older Japanese-Americans.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by mjh (November 06, 2009 1:56 pm ET)
        1  
        " 'Could it be that our own military is so politically correct right now...to be careful about treatment of Muslims that they would have allowed this to go by?'

        Yes, Absolutely." -- CheneySentencedIn2012


        . . . this by the one who's namesake got five deferments from the "politically correct" military.

        CheneySentencedIn2012, why do you hate the troops?

        Report Abuse
    • Author by bluestate69 (November 06, 2009 6:49 am ET)
      8  
      this was a bigoted and sick statement by carlson. under her logic, we should be profiling christians because timothy mcveigh was a christian. last i checked, you can't serve in the military if you're openly gay. is that political correctness at work?? WTF?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by opopop (November 06, 2009 8:07 am ET)
        7  
        You know, when I heard the shooter was muslim, I checked out Hannity's website, and sure enough there was a specific forum topic just for the fact the guy was a muslim. And honest to God I can't remember the last time I seen so much racist, horrible comments, even one bigot claqiming himself as a real American.
        And you know, if these "resal Americans" who "Love" their country, their white christian country of course, controlled America then I bet you, America would be the most hated, shunned country on Earth. Those comments were horrible....check them out folks
        Report Abuse
        • Author by IRONY 101 (November 06, 2009 8:26 am ET)
          6  
          If anyone ever wants to see how ugly and racist Hannity's followers are they should visit Hannity's forum. I used to look at it sometimes for the shock value but I can't even bring myself to go there anymore. It epitomizes the worst in American bigotry and stupidity...but it is only a reflection of Hannity and his encouragement of this thinking.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by eb (November 06, 2009 9:09 am ET)
            6  
            Just plan to be shocked at how these conservapundits spin this for political gain. If the military is inclusive in recruiting, it has more to do with their manpower needs than some kind of mythical quota system.

            I have read that gang graffiti has been seen in Iraq. White supremacist and yes the mentally ill might also be among the ranks. This has more to do with the military reflecting the conditions of our society than some kind of lefty PC affirmative action. Yet the conservpundits will bend the discussion to frame this as some kind of attack on our values. Somehow, in the mind of Hannity, Rush, and Beck, this must be the result of a plan to force islam down the throats of our military. Of course, their own political correct knee jerk response to anything is that if it is bad, it is liberal.

            Ironically, Bush's military adventures in the muslim and arab world actually gives the military a powerful need for Arabic speakers and military personnel who have that background. Counter insurgency has created the need for partnerships with Iraqi and Afganistani military and police. That is not liberal affirmative action but a real need arising from the desire to be involved in this part of the world.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by markbfoot199 (November 06, 2009 9:32 am ET)
          12
        Not all Muslim's are terrorists, but seems all terrorist are Muslim.

        In reference to McVeigh, he was not a Christian, he was quoted in the Guardian while in prison to say "Science is my Religion" and Agnostic, so good try.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by phredicles (November 06, 2009 9:51 am ET)
          4  
          Only if you stick to a VERY selective definition of "terrorism". I mean, abortion clinic bombers and shooters don't count, I guess.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by rms (November 06, 2009 9:53 am ET)
          6  
          "...seems all terrorist [sic] are Muslim."

          Adding this nonsense to your second paragraph are we to assume that McVeigh had to be Muslim - AND agnostic?

          Please consider pausing a little longer before hitting the "save" button.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by markbfoot199 (November 06, 2009 11:22 am ET)
              4
            RMS, I put the information about McVeigh is because you all here are quick to say he was Christian. Tell me this, what other religion rewards those whom kill innocent people? Buddhism, nope, Christianity, nope, Judaism, Nope, Hinduism, Nope, Muslim, Yep.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by Ruby (November 06, 2009 12:31 pm ET)
              3  
              Do you have any idea how much blood has been shed in history in the name of the Christian God? I'm not an atheist or anything--I'm a practicing Catholic, but even I can recognize the horrible crimes carried out in the name of Christianity.

              Spanish Inquisition, maybe?

              Or what about right here at home, in Massachusetts, when those God-fearing Christians burned teenaged girls alive?

              The difference, for the most part between Christians in this country and Muslims in other countries is this: in America, our Christian fundamentalists live in nice houses and drive nice cars, have food to eat and clean water to drink. They get and education, they watch television, they read newspapers. In Islamic countries, the religious fundamentalists have a much different situation, and they are conditioned from birth to hate. The know nothing else.

              Just imagine, if you had not had the good fortune to be born where you were, that could have been your life. You were lucky enough to be born in a country where you have freedom and where you are not (hopefully) brainwashed from infancy to hate.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by markbfoot199 (November 06, 2009 2:23 pm ET)
                  3
                "Just imagine, if you had not had the good fortune to be born where you were, that could have been your life. You were lucky enough to be born in a country where you have freedom and where you are not (hopefully) brainwashed from infancy to hate."

                Wow you really think little about our fellow humans in the Middle East; I guess you think they are so dumb they can never prosper to greatness.

                The core to your argument is the one that you on the left forget and that is "freedom". Thanks to our great country being founded on Freedom, we are not like other countries; we have the right to better ourselves. We as country have been around much less time then those in the Middle East and we not only caught up with them as a country but also surpassed them to become the greatest country on the Planet. Which tells me no, not lucky enough, but proud enough to know many men and women before me died so I could have that freedom. Freedom of religion, freedom to speak the truth and the freedom to know that currently we have individuals that do not believe the founding fathers were right. “Some” Muslims still believe that dying for their religion is glories, but this was a educated man that cried out to his God as he killed innocent men and women. FYI, he was born in this country or as you put it Lucky to be born here, yet still killed innocent people for his beliefs. I do not see Christians running around killing in the name of Christ in modern times.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Ruby (November 06, 2009 4:41 pm ET)
                  1  
                  I know the shooter was an American citizen and he still killed people for his beliefs, as Americans sometimes do. But I was speaking specifically to the fact that you tried to portray Islam as the only religion that has ever inspired violence or mass murder, which could not be further from the truth. And to illustrate the significant differences between religious fundamentalists in America and religious fundamentalists in Muslim countries.

                  And as far as your last paragraph, that's all kind of my point. You (and I, and all the rest of us) were incredibly lucky to be born in America, and to have always known freedom. We have no control over where we're born, and we were blessed to be born American.

                  Others are less fortunate. They never know true freedom. They are trained and conditioned from birth to hate. Children here, even if they are raised in a religious household, are exposed to other ideas. They go to school, they have friends of different religions, they watch TV or read magazines. Again, others born into another place are not so lucky. They are fed, from childhood, a distorted version of history and reality that supports the message of hate. They never know anything different.

                  You were lucky to be born an American. You could have been born somewhere else, into a different culture and into different circumstances. And you most certainly would not have become the same person.
                  Report Abuse
        • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (November 06, 2009 10:07 am ET)
          5  
          So you don't believe what Hasan says to his family, but you believe what McVeigh says to a newspaper reporter?

          Hey, Mr BFoot, your bigotry is showing. Good try? You don't even rate that.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by markbfoot199 (November 06, 2009 2:31 pm ET)
              2
            Easy, guess you do not understand what "Hearsay" means. McVeigh is on the record and reported by an individual. No, if Mr. Hasan is on record with a complaint, then yes I would believe him. Right now we know his family is just trying to protect him. (good family should protect their own) Bigotry,(term below) good try but not holding water. You love to protect folks like this, but I am sure you were the first to protect McVeigh also.

            Bigotry - stubborn and complete intolerance of any creed, belief, or opinion that differs from one's own.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by princeofwheels (November 06, 2009 10:11 am ET)
          4  
          Now you take a terrorist by his words from prison but won't take words by non-criminal Muslims as truth.

          MArk, loves the words SEEMS..
          Isn't that the Republicans definition of FACTS.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (November 06, 2009 11:00 am ET)
          3  
          Wrong . . . but then you usually are. You stated an incorrect hypothesis. Most terrorists are NO Muslim. Your perception, framed by the terroristic tactics of the last administration*, is that "all terrorists are Muslim." That's not true.

          McVeigh was raised a Catholic . . . just because, in prison, he stated that science was his religion doesn't mean that he wasn't Christian.

          *terrorism, act of terrorism, terrorist act (the calculated use of violence (or the threat of violence) against civilians in order to attain goals that are political or religious or ideological in nature; this is done through intimidation or coercion or instilling fear)
          Report Abuse
          • Author by markbfoot199 (November 06, 2009 2:36 pm ET)
              3
            Bi, excellent work, now would you please show the crowd the other non-Muslim terrorist since McVeigh? (This is were all lefties cry out Bush!) hahahahahhah

            Bi, one must accept Christ as their savior to be a Christian; you are not born into Christianity. You may attend a church but does not make you a Christian. In your thinking if a straight guy walks into a Gay bar, that now make him Gay.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Ruby (November 06, 2009 4:56 pm ET)
              2  
              please show the crowd the other non-Muslim terrorist since McVeigh

              Eric Robert Rudolph and the Army of God--attacked abortion clinics, a gay and lesbian night club and the 1996 Olympics in Atlanta. Rudolph was a former explosives expert for the Army.

              Theodore Kaczynski (sp?), better known as the unabomber.

              Jim Adkisson, who opened fire in a Unitarian church in an attempt to, quote, "kill liberals"

              Of course we all know James von Brunn and Scott Roeder (see "anti-abortion violence" on wikipedia for more similar examples)

              Will that suffice?

              Report Abuse
        • Author by HistoricallyCorrect (November 06, 2009 11:16 am ET)
          2  
          Religious

          Throughout his childhood, he and his father were Roman Catholics and often attended daily Mass. In a recorded interview with Time magazine[14] McVeigh professed his belief in "a God", although he said he had "sort of lost touch with" Catholicism and "I never really picked it up, however I do maintain core beliefs." The Guardian reported that McVeigh wrote a letter to them claiming to be an agnostic.[15] McVeigh at one time said that he believed the universe was guided by natural law, energized by some universal higher power that showed each person right from wrong if they paid attention to what was going on inside them. He had also said, "Science is my religion."[16]
          Report Abuse
        • Author by mjh (November 06, 2009 2:17 pm ET)
          1  
          "Not all Muslim's are terrorists, but seems all terrorist are Muslim." -- markfootinmouth



          Members of the IRA may beg to differ.


          "In reference to McVeigh, he was not a Christian, he was quoted in the Guardian while in prison to say "Science is my Religion" and Agnostic, so good try." -- markfootinmouth


          McVeigh WAS, however, a white male . . . perhaps it's time for closer screening of THAT group -- I mean, is the military so PC as to allow them in without closer scrutiny??


          Report Abuse
          • Author by markbfoot199 (November 06, 2009 2:43 pm ET)
              3
            Oh, you all are so funny, and such a hoot. I love coming in here and giving out a statment and watch you all go to town. What I really miss is being call all the names, but sure you keep it to yourself.

            You are right the IRA was a bunch of white, hokey, crackers who hated those that killed babies. Well, you sure got me there, wow, I will run home and slap myself for thinking Muslims were the only ones killing in the name of religion. I am so glad I have a bunch of lefties to help me out today.

            Report Abuse
        • Author by bluestate69 (November 07, 2009 6:03 am ET)
             
          hey markbfoot, mcveigh being a christian wasn't my main point, but i'll take your word for it. just substitute "eric rudolph" for mcveigh. thanks for playing.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by manofmystique (November 06, 2009 8:08 am ET)
      7  
      Fox News employs witches on their programs; not real journalists.
      Most of the females, as well as the males, take a cynical approach to everything they "report". When it comes to opinion logic and common sense does not factor in.
      Carlson is more concerned about "political correct[ness]" than the reasons that lead this man to go over the edge. I guess Carlson feels it is alright to antagonize and insult muslims or people of different faith, as long as they are in the United States Armey. Otherwise, why bring up the issue.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by magnolialover (November 06, 2009 8:28 am ET)
      7  
      Wow, just wow. So we can say FoxNews hates our military now?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (November 06, 2009 8:32 am ET)
        7  
        Shocking, isn't it? I feel so bad for our brave troops who are fighting for our FREEDOMS only to have FOX criticize them for political purposes. FOX is un-American...and Gretchen Carlson should be forced to apologize.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (November 06, 2009 8:34 am ET)
          4  
          Hey, I work with the Army, on an Army base, with many fine soldiers, and these guys are all stunned about this shooting this morning. Many of them have friends on Ft. Hood, and luckily, none of their friends were involved in this shooting. I mean, it's such a big deal here, that we're getting a brief from SECARM this afternoon via video conference about what is going on out there.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by drempala (November 06, 2009 8:29 am ET)
      5  
      Wow. Turning an issue of stress on soldiers into an attempt to derogate liberals and Muslims. Stay classy, Fox News!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by drempala (November 06, 2009 8:29 am ET)
      5  
      Wow. Turning an issue of stress on soldiers into an attempt to derogate liberals and Muslims. Stay classy, Fox News!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by magnolialover (November 06, 2009 8:32 am ET)
      6  
      If we go back a short while, to the tragic VT shootings a couple of years ago, when that was all over, and the news stories were running, we had several conservative talk show hosts, Boortz I remember specifically, talk about how could the students who got shot let this happen. It was because of a wussification of American society he claimed.

      Well, this deranged maniac just shot up a bunch of well trained, and deploying soldiers, many whom have probably seen combat before. How are the conservatives going to spin this one?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by isabellakate (November 06, 2009 9:23 am ET)
        4
      It is not unreasonable to ask why a military officer who objected publicly to US involvement in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars and sympathized with suicide bombers, was not subjected to rigorous psychological screening to determine his fitness for duty.








      Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (November 06, 2009 10:42 am ET)
           
        Now this, I can agree with.

        If this guy was a psychiatrist, as it says he was, I know a psychiatrist, and she says that some of the most messed up people she knows, are, yes, psychiatrists. When she got into the profession post med school, her mentor told her that the first thing she needs to do, is find a therapist, and start going, because you have to deal with your own inner thoughts/demons, before dealing with someone else's.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by bluestate69 (November 07, 2009 6:12 am ET)
           
        how far would you go with this "screening"? does it stop with the military, or should people be rounded up and screened to see if they are sufficiently supportive of the war efforts. i know military officers,who were weary of the war effort when they came home. does that make them suspect in your opinion?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by mk3872 (November 06, 2009 9:51 am ET)
      3  
      So, based on this theory, we should also not allow white trash like Timothy McVeigh ever into the military either, isn't that right?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by isabellakate (November 06, 2009 10:35 am ET)
        1 4
        Why do you mention McVeigh's color? It is just as racist to describe McVeigh as "white" trash as it would be to describe a black American murderer as "black" trash, which I assume you would not think of doing. Trash is trash regardless of color or creed.

        Come to think of it, "white trash" assumes that all other trash is....not white. Unacceptable on any view.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Brabantio (November 06, 2009 6:12 pm ET)
          1  
          "White trash" is a phrase unto itself. It doesn't lend itself to adoption from other races.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by mk3872 (November 06, 2009 7:39 pm ET)
             
          Are you always this touchy?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by isabellakate (November 07, 2009 2:21 pm ET)
               
            Not touchy.Personally I couldn't care less but racial insults are either forbidden for everyone or for no-one. Politically correct zealots who are quick to abuse anyone who says anything that might offend minorities often use derogatory words when referring to white people. That's PC. It's wrong because it creates different conditions of existence for different races.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by manofmystique (November 06, 2009 9:55 am ET)
      4  
      Fox News employs witches on their programs; not real journalists.
      Most of the females, as well as the males, take a cynical approach to everything they "report". When it comes to opinion logic and common sense does not factor in.
      Carlson is more concerned about "political correct[ness]" than the reasons that led this man to go over the edge. I guess Carlson feels it is alright to antagonize and insult muslims or people of different faith, as long as they are in the United States Armey. Otherwise, why bring up the issue.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by SoloPocono (November 06, 2009 10:23 am ET)
      5  
      I was *stuck*, literally, in dialysis yesterday, watching Fake Nooz when the shootings occurred. I thought Shep Smith handled it as fair as he could, (for Fox), but the CREEP that was on after him? The FIRST thing he asked a person on the phone, someone who knew the shooter, was "How did he feel about Obama?" He drowned out someone telling him that the guy had apparently been Muslim all his life, saying he was a fairly recent "convert" and implying that SOMEHOW it was the "changes" in this country since Obama took office, (???), may somehow be responsible for this "conversion".
      I think the nurses though were more concerned about their "Hero", Glenn Beck, when his show didn't come on-and we got into a BIT of an argument-I made a remark I'm afraid they didn't like. They seemed almost LOST without their "leader" coming on and telling them how they should feel--and view this tragedy. They didn't like it when I pointed this out to them.
      I didn't wait for my regular ride-I called a taxi.
      So much for "fair and balanced"............
      By the way-before I get bashed for trashing medical personnel- I was a healthcare professional-an RN/Paramedic for over 25yrs. Political ideology has NO PLACE in medical facilities!!
      The nurses refuse to change the channel when I'm there, and constantly deride me for my "Progressive/Communist" views-because I chose to blog or read while their "Hero's" show is on-and 98% of the time refuse to engage in an argument with them. (they're NOT interested in civil discussion). If I didn't have glaucoma- I'd go to a different facility, but I have no choice at this time.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by markbfoot199 (November 06, 2009 11:25 am ET)
          6
        "Political ideology has NO PLACE in medical facilities!!" I guess you do not like the recent Health Care bill then.

        Why should they turn the channel just for you, seems just because one person does not like the channel and others do, they should cater to you.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (November 06, 2009 11:37 am ET)
          1  
          I think the writer was speaking of ideological propaganda.

          A medical facility should take into consideration the feelings of ALL of its patients. When I was in PT a few years ago, the television in my room was tuned to Fox. I asked that I be able to change the channels . . . I received a remote control. Most people I know don't watch cable opinion networks 24/7.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by marco21 (November 06, 2009 10:27 am ET)
      4  
      Right, Gretchen. If we had more ethnic slurs and sexism, this would have never happened.

      Until all the facts are in, just try to report the facts we know. I know that's not the Fox News way, but try.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by lede39571545 (November 06, 2009 10:34 am ET)
      2  
      Could it be that you are so bigoted that you feel you must make such hateful statements on national TV while, of course, pandering to the right-wing nuts?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by bintx (November 06, 2009 10:54 am ET)
      2  
      If this man had been Patrick Mulrooney, good Irish Catholic, who had the SAME objections to Iraq, was in the SAME position as this guy, and had the SAME mental issues . . . nobody would be talking about the fact that he was a good Irish Catholic.

      The guy broke, he went nuts, he shot and killed people. He should be punished. His religious beliefs are irrelevant. There are wacked out Christians, Jews, Muslims, Hindus, atheists . . . mental illness doesn't discriminate.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by markbfoot199 (November 06, 2009 11:29 am ET)
          6
        Bi, Trust Me MMFA would be the first to bring it up here, much like yourself.

        Remember he did yell out "Allahu Akbar!" This was calculated killing, as you read more and more about his actions prior to the killings.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (November 06, 2009 11:42 am ET)
          1  
          That doesn't make him a terrorist.

          As I said, his religious beliefs are irrelevant . . . he was mentally ill . . . mentally ill people often plan their horrific crimes. Patrick Mulrooney, good Irish Catholic, could have done the same thing . . . you'd just be calling him a mass murderer.

          You are a bigot and a not very bright bigot, based on your posts. Carry on, though. You're not making much headway with them.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by MeanMrSpicyMustard (November 06, 2009 11:33 am ET)
      1  
      This is the same terrifying sort of rhetoric that preceded the relocation of the Japanese during World War II. Scary stuff.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by isabellakate (November 07, 2009 3:35 pm ET)
           
        Relating the facts of an event cannot be construed as "terrifying rhetoric". The killer intended to die. He gave away his possessions then opened fire on unarmed people, shouting praise to Allah as he did so. He IS a terrorist. He IS a Muslim. We can't make an assumption that one caused the other but only fools would fail to inquire.

        It is easy after a war to snigger about steps taken to prevent damage at home while the military was fighting abroad. Germans were interned during WWI but not WW2. Both Germans and Japanese served in the US military in both wars.

        However, during WW2 a group of young Americans of German extraction were captured on Long Island before they could carry out their terrorist plot. We also don't know what would have happened had some Japanese not been interned.

        We need to wake up to the fact that there are huge numbers of young men involved worldwide in Islamic youth groups which preach jihad and death to Americans. They claim to have millions of members. We know that some of them reside in the United States because some have been charged with terrorist offenses. Heads in the sand won't win this war where the enemy has infiltrated every level of all non-Muslim countries,often as citizens.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by Boxer1979 (November 06, 2009 12:49 pm ET)
      3  
      Carlson on Ft. Hood shooting: "Could it be that our own military is so politically correct right now...to be careful about treatment of Muslims that they would have allowed this to go by?"

      Right. Just like this country has allowed Fox Snooze to lie since the late 1990's. Should we be careful about Fox Snooze's treatment and allow it to continue?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by thundavolt (November 06, 2009 1:17 pm ET)
      1  
      After some of the things tat were said yesterday the hate is going to be out in the open from now on. There is no more head room for code bigotry statements. They have reached the ceiling of keeping their hate undercover and since every time they pull some stunt that is supposed to cause a set back something goes horribly wrong the frustration has pushed them all into Beck mode. Old forms of hate are all coming back o the surface. Expect to see some of the worst type of retaliation in the weeks to come. Watch how hard they will fight the war of Christmas. This is going to be very acceptable if it is left un checked.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by buildingrome (November 06, 2009 2:31 pm ET)
      1  
      I really wish someone would do a thorough investigation on fox news. Everyone who works for them, who they're involved with financially, who their friends are etc. I bet we would find some really interesting stuff. That's the only way I see to beat them at this sleazy game they are playing..
      Report Abuse
      • Author by princeofwheels (November 07, 2009 12:59 am ET)
        1  
        Maybe a nice protest march in front of the Fox News HQ building.

        Of course, Fox would call it a left-wing directed protest filled with ACORN and SEIU radical, socialists Obama loving members. Which would be saying they aren't real Americans like the teabaggers. And what would be funny if MSNBC, ABC, NBC and CBS are encouraged people to show up and those outlets giving it wall-to-wall coverage. One can only dream.
        Report Abuse