About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Kilmeade, Johnson want to know if it's time for "special debriefings," "special screenings" of Muslim officers

November 06, 2009 8:34 am ET

From the November 6 edition of Fox News' Fox & Friends:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Previously:

Carlson on Ft. Hood shooting: "Could it be that our own military is so politically correct right now...to be careful about treatment of Muslims that they would have allowed this to go by?"

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by magnolialover (November 06, 2009 8:40 am ET)
      11  
      If we use that logic.

      We can go back to McVeigh. Is it time to do special screening and interviews of Christian officers?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by dexteritas0071418 (November 06, 2009 8:47 am ET)
          6
        McVeigh was active military?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by NG_Officer (November 06, 2009 8:53 am ET)
          5  
          Gulf war vet, and enlisted (not officer)
          [http://www.hurryupharry.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/timothy_mcveigh.jpg]
          Report Abuse
          • Author by dexteritas0071418 (November 06, 2009 9:00 am ET)
              4
            I meant when he did it. I know he was in the military at one point.

            I know Tim McVeigh was a badguy, but rural white males (in general) do not think that the USA hates rural white males and that we're warring against them, whereas I think you'd find it awfully close amongst arab muslim men 18-50.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by nerzog (November 06, 2009 9:06 am ET)
              11  
              Actually, McVeigh did belong to a minority group that thinks the U.S. is at war with them... Right Wing Black Helicopter Tinfoil Hat Survivalist White Supremacist Evangelical Christian Troglodytes.

              You know... Glenn Beck's audience.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by dexteritas0071418 (November 06, 2009 9:07 am ET)
                2 2
                Then I'm all for extra screening for them!!!! hahaha
                Report Abuse
                • Author by NiceguyEddie (November 06, 2009 10:38 am ET)
                  3  
                  Tim McVeigh, WHITE, CHRISTIAN, former Military: killed 646 people.

                  Nadal Hassan, ARAB, MUSLIN, active Military: killed 13.

                  Yeah... Let's go off the deep end over HASSAN why don't we?

                  The muslims serving in the US Military are the EXACT OPPOSITE of terrorists. They have decalred their loyalty, and it is with THIS COUNTRY. And they've done so at far greater risk to their own safety, sinc ethey face harrasment from both inside their own community and from rednecks in the military.

                  Right Wingers on the other hand, have repeatedly and throughout history used their miitary training to further their own facist, political and personal ambitions, violently, after their time in the service is over. And they have also cleary declared THEIR loyalty: And it's AGAINST this country!

                  --------------------------------------------------------
                  The Right should have at least SOME SHAME in how quickly they're jumping on the biggoted bandwagon here.
                  Report Abuse
            • Author by eb (November 06, 2009 9:31 am ET)
              8  
              "but rural white males (in general) do not think that the USA hates rural white males and that we're warring against them, whereas I think you'd find it awfully close amongst arab muslim men 18-50".

              Actually if they listen to Rush and Beckhannity they will think that the US is being overtaken and turned evil by progressives and liberals who are going against their freedoms and values. Why wouldn't a Hannitybeckbauh ditto head not feel the need at some point to take arms agaists the evil scourge that is libralism and the federal government. It would be their patriotic duty...

              Painting all Muslim Arabs with a broad brush belies the fact that much of the fighting and dying in the War on Terror is happening among Muslims. Alienating all of them by assuming they all are potential enemies makes it more difficult for the many Muslims who are also sacrificiing in this struggle against extremism.

              Of course, the feel good rhetoric of a simplified world of good guys and bad guys might make our own right wing extremist feel better, but it ignores the reality on the ground and creates enemies we don't have or need to have.
              Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (November 06, 2009 9:01 am ET)
        3  
        The Trogs won't let you count McVeigh. After all, he waited until he was out of the military, and he didn't kill fellow soldiers... just civilians, including children.

        So, Right Wing Fascist Nutsacks like McVeigh can stay... but them Mooslims gotta go!
        Report Abuse
      • Author by The_Cat (November 06, 2009 10:31 am ET)
        2  
        Very true, magnolialover, which is why it's flawed logic on FOX's part. I really don't think believers, in whatever mainstream religion, are a cause for concern or alarm. If anything, likely their faith gives them additional moral strength in trying times. I happen to be an outcast myself (liberal Christian).

        What are a danger, however, are zealots. So far, I've seen nothing to indicate that Major Hasan was a zealot, but the fear mongers at FOX just can't leave it alone, can they? While I have theological differences with muslims, and most other religions than my own of course, that's only one part of my citizenship in America. Mr. Hasan is also a citizen, and one given the privilege of serving in the military.

        As for why he did what he did, FOX is merely speculating, which is foolish bordering on dangerous. I hold terrorists, not muslims, accountable for 9-11, and only a cheap ratings ploy or unfathomable ignorance would explain this attempt at an explanation from FOX. As an example, let's just change their argument. What if Mr. Hasan is left-handed, and that's what they had chosen to focus on? Can you hear Johnson and Kilmeade asking the question? "Is it about time for special screenings for all left-handed members of the military?" How seriously would that be taken? Well, suggesting the same for muslims is just as foolish. Truth is, no one really knows yet why he did what he did.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Sharpe (November 06, 2009 2:48 pm ET)
           
        Yea and why not hold special interviews for all army pscyhiatrists and mental health workers? I mean they are bound to hear the most horror stories and that could lead to mental instability. Maybe just screen all those who are based in fort hood or anyone of palestinian decent or any graduate of virginia tech currently in the military? How is this any different than treating Muslims differently just because he was Muslim.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by worrierking (November 06, 2009 8:43 am ET)
      7  
      Has there been a pattern of Muslim soldiers going off the deep end and murdering other soldiers?

      If so, then maybe the military should follow this nitwits's advice.

      If this is an isolated incident, Kilmeade and Johnson should just STFU.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by dexteritas0071418 (November 06, 2009 8:58 am ET)
        2 1
        2 other incidents that I can find since 2005, one involving a muslim soldier who grenaded comrades while in the field, the other went crazy at a counseling center at Camp Victory in Iraq as well. I looked around and the 2nd guy has an english name, and my experience is that if someone converts to Islam that they take a different name to reflect that, so let's assume he wasn't.

        So, 3 that we know of since 2005, 2 perps were Muslim. Not sure if 2/3 is a "pattern" or not, because there were "only" 3 incidents where someone was found to be at-fault.

        Do we REALLY think that the military DOESN'T already look harder into the background and the psyche of a practicing-Muslim soldier already? REALLY? To me, this is Fox new just pandering to the uber-right of their audience; any extra screening can be an unmentioned given to the rest of us reasonable people.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by DAWUSS (November 06, 2009 8:44 am ET)
      2  
      Either that or they just need to do a better job of brainwashing their soldiers to keep them in line.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (November 06, 2009 8:48 am ET)
      8  
      Why not debrief Evangelical Christian soldiers who may put God before loyalty to their country? Why not scrutinize ALL religious people in the military?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (November 06, 2009 8:56 am ET)
        11  
        Agreed. I saw this coming as soon as I heard this guy was a Muslim. The FoxBots will be demanding a witch hunt.

        I'm all for evicting Religious fanatics from the Military, as long as they get rid of ALL religious fanatics, including Evangelical Nutbag Christians.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by dexteritas0071418 (November 06, 2009 9:02 am ET)
          6  
          I'd 2nd that.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by eweston8542983 (November 06, 2009 10:20 am ET)
             
          Given their entrenchment in the Air Force that would possibly make that service stand down for a while. I'm a bit old for that, but I'd still be willing to step into a cockpit in the interm.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by rwmacdonald2091 (November 06, 2009 8:58 am ET)
      6  
      At 12:45 p.m., 35-year-old George Hennard of nearby Belton drove his pickup truck through a window at the Killeen Luby's and killed 24 people. Here..

      Maybe we need to screen people with pickup trucks in Killean, Texas


      Report Abuse
      • Author by dexteritas0071418 (November 06, 2009 9:04 am ET)
        2 5
        See? Guns don't kill people, people kill people!!!

        (estimated thumbs-down: 9)
        Report Abuse
        • Author by rwmacdonald2091 (November 06, 2009 9:07 am ET)
          4  
          If you read the article I linked to, you would have found out that the people were killed by the guy with a gun, after he drove into the restaurant.

          Another right wing nut who jumps to conclusions to fit his world view of things
          Report Abuse
          • Author by dexteritas0071418 (November 06, 2009 9:12 am ET)
            1 6
            You seem like a pretty angry guy...I didn't read the article, but just assumed that your headline meant that he drove in and around the place killing people. Maybe you should take a journalism class?

            But seriously, my post was tongue-in-cheek..and you decided to call me a "right-wing nut". Stuff like that will lose your candidates a lot of elections in the future...if you ever get out of your basement to rally for them.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (November 06, 2009 9:55 am ET)
              3  
              You seem like a pretty angry guy...I didn't read the article, but just assumed
              And you wonder why you get routinely thumbs-downed?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by dexteritas0071418 (November 06, 2009 10:11 am ET)
                1 2
                You attack Hannity et all because they take stuff out of context, and yet you do the same when people can see the actual extent of what i wrote just a few posts above. Epic troll fail.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by thundavolt (November 06, 2009 1:28 pm ET)
                  1  
                  Dude you assumed that's just not the basis to make any statement or position to take in an argument. It's worse over the net because you could have read the article that was linked or you can Google it in other cases.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by robrob (November 06, 2009 2:37 pm ET)
                  2  
                  "You attack Hannity et all because they take stuff out of context, and yet you do the same when people can see the actual extent of what i wrote just a few posts above."

                  Yes...

                  "I didn't read the article, but just assumed"

                  Epic troll fail.
                  Report Abuse
        • Author by LKL (November 06, 2009 9:11 am ET)
          1  
          How does that make sense with this story?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by dexteritas0071418 (November 06, 2009 9:14 am ET)
              4
            I didn't even notice that he had linked it.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by rwmacdonald2091 (November 06, 2009 9:21 am ET)
              4  
              I didn't even notice that he had linked it

              Maybe because you were to busy jumping to conclusions to fit your world view.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by dexteritas0071418 (November 06, 2009 9:28 am ET)
                  5
                You seem to be the one with the constrained world-view.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (November 06, 2009 9:56 am ET)
                  3 1
                  You're the one who didn't read the article and assumed an incorrect meaning of the post.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by dexteritas0071418 (November 06, 2009 10:14 am ET)
                      4
                    You're the one who speaks at the troll convention each year, on topics like "how not to contribute to the topic at hand" and "insulting others to feel better about yourself."
                    Report Abuse
      • Author by mjh (November 06, 2009 12:39 pm ET)
           
        "Maybe we need to screen people with pickup trucks in Killean, Texas"


        That'd be 100% of the population, wouldn't it? :-)
        Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (November 06, 2009 9:26 am ET)
      3  
      Thank God the shooter wasn't also GAY!

      Or, if he was, just wait for the fallout from that...
      Report Abuse
      • Author by shrikeback (November 07, 2009 6:25 am ET)
           
        Well, if he were both an islamofascist and gay, he'd have been driven to decapitate himself instead.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (November 06, 2009 9:50 am ET)
      5 1
      I think Kilmeade was "de-briefed" as a youngster and the humiliation he suffered has shaped his entire adult life.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by wookie (November 06, 2009 10:03 am ET)
      2  
      The only message you can get here and in other shootings is to look for warning signs in nuts of all stripes. Its easier to study extreme internet postings or comments than to investigate everyone who belongs to a religion.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by New Frontier (November 06, 2009 10:34 am ET)
           
        Exactly. Time spent giving "special screenings" (whatever that means) everyone belonging to religion "X" is time spent away from people who fit certain behavior patterns or life situations for example.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by tybandit (November 06, 2009 10:55 am ET)
      2  
      How about special screenings for Fox "news" idiots?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by srichardson (November 06, 2009 11:56 am ET)
      2  
      My mouth dropped to the floor when I saw this segment this morning. I knew as I was listening to this last night that Fox would come up with some way to make it a rightwing nut issue. On Neil Boortz earlier, a caller was slamming Obama about how callously he talked about the shooting yesterday. I knew these darn people would somehow involve the President and try their darndest to make him look bad over this. They have no shame.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jj.milano4855 (November 06, 2009 12:00 pm ET)
        2
      So MM is ditsing Fox News for asking a question. Is that the point here? I guess MM position here is when you train soldiers for battle, it's not appropriate to assure the members of a squad that the Muslim members of their unit have no issues killing fellow Muslims if that happens to be their assigned mission. I would hope that if I was in that unit, the Army would have some means to assure me and my fellow soldiers that regardless of our individual beliefs, that we are a fighting unit ready to deploy. If MM has it's way, these concern and questions can never be asked or addressed. The individual soldier is then left with nothing. Had the Army asked this Major if he had a problem, they might have questioned his readiness.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by John Paradox (November 06, 2009 2:39 pm ET)
        2  
        assure the members of a squad that the Muslim members of their unit have no issues killing fellow Muslims if that happens to be their assigned mission

        Let's keep in mind a few things:
        1) "Muslim" is as misleading as the old idea of 'Communism is monolithic' that was prevalent during the Cold War
        2) if the U.S. had to battle, say Germany, would the fact that most Germans belong to one or another Christian sect mean that every Christian had to be verified as 'willing to kill other Christians'?
        3) During World War 2, Americans of Japanese descent (who are 'identifiable' unlike, say German-Americans) were rounded up and put in camps, in one of the most ridiculous 'defense' ideas ever. (Also, many Japanese-Americans fought with honor for the US)
        Report Abuse
      • Author by robrob (November 06, 2009 2:43 pm ET)
        1  
        "it's not appropriate to assure the members of a squad that the Muslim members of their unit have no issues killing fellow Muslims if that happens to be their assigned mission."

        Now you are just making things up. Since when was that an issue, especially in the FOX News comments?

        "I would hope that if I was in that unit, the Army would have some means to assure me and my fellow soldiers that regardless of our individual beliefs, that we are a fighting unit ready to deploy."

        It's called Basic Training.

        "Had the Army asked this Major if he had a problem, they might have questioned his readiness."

        Considering he was mentally ill, you could be correct. Of course, any mentally ill person might be detected by similar questioning, Muslim or not.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by thundavolt (November 06, 2009 1:22 pm ET)
      2  
      Fox his reached the point of no return. The military is so politically correct that they allow openly gay people to serve and female troops are not abused in a rampant number of cases.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by scubcap647 (November 06, 2009 2:07 pm ET)
      1  
      The Hate runs deep with these people.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by thebigsheister (November 06, 2009 5:58 pm ET)
      1  
      Although all of this is still rather preliminary, it would appear that one of the main factors that drove this man to commit this horrendous crime was a profound feeling of alienation. The fact that anybody should suggest that the solution is to further alienate people of the same religion as this man is obscene. If anything, the military should do more to prevent and punish divisive behavior within its ranks while simultaneously screening EVERY soldier for mental instability.
      Report Abuse