About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Ingraham: "Nancy Pelosi basically did everything except sell her own body" to pass health care reform bill

November 10, 2009 12:06 pm ET

From the November 10 edition of Fox News' Fox & Friends:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

H/T Politico

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by mjh (November 10, 2009 12:13 pm ET)
      7  
      Wow, Laura -- you sound almost jealous . . .

      Report Abuse
      • Author by baddestbob (November 10, 2009 12:17 pm ET)
           
        laura, like most republicans, cannot argue the issues so she must resort to this tactic. she is jealous. nancy will pay the taxes whereas laura is still searching the tax code for a loophole!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by marco21 (November 10, 2009 12:16 pm ET)
      9  
      Stay classy, hate radio.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (November 10, 2009 12:16 pm ET)
      7  
      I know one thing for sure , i wouldent want your sorr a-- for any reason LAURA.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by rwmacdonald2091 (November 10, 2009 12:20 pm ET)
      8  
      Hey Laura, what did you sell for your gig on the three stooges in the morning?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by worrierking (November 10, 2009 12:24 pm ET)
      10  
      If she had sold her body she would still be a better person than these Fox people who've sold their souls.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by gs-425 (November 10, 2009 12:29 pm ET)
          7
        How does your God regard "souls"?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by worrierking (November 10, 2009 12:54 pm ET)
          8  
          How would I know?

          Do you know the mind of your God?

          I know he doesn't appear to have much regard for people. But that's just my opinion.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by gs-425 (November 10, 2009 2:35 pm ET)
              6
            A reference to "souls" would suggest a belief in a God. Are you a closet christian of the far right??
            Report Abuse
            • Author by robyn20094113 (November 10, 2009 4:09 pm ET)
              3  
              Soul = seat of emotion, sentiment, and aspiration: WEBSTER'S
              Report Abuse
            • Author by bintx (November 10, 2009 4:17 pm ET)
              3  
              I'm a life-long Christian of the Southern Baptist persuasion . . . the Christ I follow taught love and acceptance of all.

              What does your God teach?
              Report Abuse
        • Author by Sharpe (November 10, 2009 1:54 pm ET)
          5  
          Its not about God - its about morality. Railing on and fighting against healthcare for all Americans is inherently immoral any way you slice it. Who cares what God thinks? How about what is best for the people of this country. Fact is, FOX is doing America and Americans a tremendous disservice with their fear-mongering and attacks.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by gs-425 (November 10, 2009 2:37 pm ET)
              7
            You want the government to oversee every aspect of your life, essentially enslaving yourself to them and you want to talk about morality....please.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by John Paradox (November 10, 2009 2:40 pm ET)
              2  
              You want your particular sect of religion to oversee every aspect of your life, essentially enslaving yourself to them and you want to talk about morality....please.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by gs-425 (November 10, 2009 2:50 pm ET)
                  5
                That 'refute' might have worked if I actually where religious or even claimed I was so that's pretty much a fail.

                However you and your cohorts here openly advocate government to control everything you do even when there is only a million or so examples to the contrary.

                What, you think they'll get it right this time??
                Report Abuse
                • Author by vhw28672478 (November 10, 2009 2:58 pm ET)
                     
                  you are wrong Health care reformed is must
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by juliajayne1 (November 10, 2009 3:20 pm ET)
                  3  
                  Hmmmn, your gotcha would be swell, except you're the one who mentioned God. Is the concept of a soul only reserved in a religious idiom?

                  And who's advocating that government control everything?

                  I await your snappy reply.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by gs-425 (November 10, 2009 3:39 pm ET)
                      5
                    read the thread history again...

                    the left.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by juliajayne1 (November 10, 2009 4:54 pm ET)
                      3  
                      Well, I did read this thread. Are you talking about another thread? And even if you are, nobody is saying what you say they are. So cut the BS and address the subject at hand.

                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (November 10, 2009 5:11 pm ET)
                        3  
                        JJ, you're forgetting the rules again. If some librul suggests that a certain program might be handled better under a public administration rather than the private sector, you must explain to the wingnuts why you want the government to control every aspect of your life.

                        You've been posting here long enough that you should be fluent in right wing crazy.
                        Report Abuse
                      • Author by gs-425 (November 10, 2009 9:14 pm ET)
                          2
                        the subject under this thread first addressed by worrierking was on sell of one 'souls'. we are on subject....don't like it....oh well.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by mescal (November 11, 2009 2:38 am ET)
                          2  
                          The subject under this thread first addressed by the always arrogant and obnoxious Laura Ingraham was on her snide and remarkably dimwitted remark that the Speaker of the House had done everything but to "sell her body" in order to pass health care reform. You then derailed that subject by distorting what Worrierking wrote in order to make the issue one of religion rather than one of another Faux News contributor smearing a Democratic official.

                          See, we DO pay attention.

                          Don't like it... well, you can KMA!
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by gs-425 (November 11, 2009 8:09 am ET)
                              2
                            worriking opened the door with the 'souls' comment, I walked thru. You DIDN'T pay all that much attention.
                            Report Abuse
                      • Author by gs-425 (November 11, 2009 8:16 am ET)
                        1 2
                        you missed it then....try again.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by mescal (November 12, 2009 1:39 am ET)
                             
                          "worriking (sic) opened the door with the 'souls' comment, I walked thru (sic)." gs-425

                          What are you, fifteen? This isn't some godawful, cliched, network lawyer show. Your answer was a big bag of garbage. I'll say it again... the topic of this thread was the snide, mean-spirited comment by a smug, obnoxious Faux News contributor. All you did was attempt... in troll-like fashion... to derail the thread with religious humbuggery, and them immediately turned around, pointed a finger at Worrierking, and whined "Well, he started it".

                          Grow up, kid.
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by gs-425 (November 12, 2009 4:21 pm ET)
                              1
                            Listen to the room full of adolescents calling a dissenter "15 year old".

                            The time line is clear.
                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by mescal (November 13, 2009 1:49 am ET)
                                 
                              I was being kind to grant you the maturity of a 15 year old.

                              It's clear now that you're just a pest.
                              Report Abuse
                • Author by magnolialover (November 10, 2009 6:13 pm ET)
                  3  
                  Actually nobody on here, that I've ever seen or read, has advocated for the government to control everything in our lives, that's just plain false.

                  Again, they get Medicare pretty darn right. They get Tri-Care pretty darn right. What makes you think they can't do a small segment of healthcare? Remember, contrary to what people keep telling you, this isn't going to take over the ENTIRE insurance/healthcare industry, only a very small portion of it.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by gs-425 (November 10, 2009 9:21 pm ET)
                    1 2
                    Really, so you don't think that when government get control of healthcare, they're no going to tell you what you can eat, drink, smoke, if you own a pool, ride a motorcycle, own a gun, drink alcohol or any other facet of your life?

                    Same as cap and tax...how hot you heat your house, your water, how cool you keep the A/C on, what kind of bulbs you can use.

                    Every facet of your life will be justified by 'cost controls' because in one form or another, they will produce some study that says a given item is a 'public health issue'.

                    Want proof, look at education and the FEDDOT. Common practice is to withhold states share of funds unless they give into what the feds want.

                    Wake the fcuk up.
                    Report Abuse
            • Author by jediknight65 (November 10, 2009 4:18 pm ET)
              2  
              how about the one's who screech freedom and want a ban on abortions. what about that morality
              Report Abuse
            • Author by bintx (November 10, 2009 4:22 pm ET)
              4  
              Seriously? You know, the phony "conservatives" of the Republican Party want to control private reproductive decisions of women, they want to control the personal relationships of citizens, they want to be able to spy on American citizens in direct controversion of the Fouth Amendment, they want to tell all people how they are to worship, they want to control the "morality" of American citizens . . . Conservatism used to mean adherence to the Constitution . . . not anymore.

              Personally, I want the government out of my bedroom, my bathroom and my religious life. Under the previous administration, they were ALL over it.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (November 10, 2009 5:10 pm ET)
              4  
              gs-425, you are really listening too muct to that FOX PROPAGANDA.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by gs-425 (November 11, 2009 8:14 am ET)
                1 1
                And you've paid to little attention to history of the overreaching arm of governments once they control any aspect of ones life.

                Frankly, I'll watch Faux News and read history all day long rather than long for some ideology that has been proven time and time again to be a complete disaster.

                But hey, they might get it right this time.
                Report Abuse
            • Author by mjh (November 11, 2009 12:54 am ET)
              2  
              "You want the government to oversee every aspect of your life, essentially enslaving yourself to them and you want to talk about morality....please." -- gs-425


              So, gs . . . I take it you were all upset about Dumbya's warrantless wiretapping and suspension of the writ of habeas corpus -- right?



              Report Abuse
          • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (November 10, 2009 5:08 pm ET)
            3  
            Sharpe, amen to that.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by dexteritas0071418 (November 10, 2009 12:27 pm ET)
      6  
      She's such a screeecher, ugh.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (November 10, 2009 12:37 pm ET)
        8  
        But did you hear the hearty chuckle the comment got? Believe me, I don't have any problem at all with an off-color joke, I may have even ventured into raunchy, or downright filthy, territory myself for a cheap laugh. But it should make some sense.This is another far-right attempt at humor that just doesn't work at all, Ingraham's childish jab at calling Pelosi a prostitute that has nothing to do with the subject.

        Also, about :20 seconds in, Doocy (?) mentions federal funding for abortions as "just nuts!". Why ? I know realistically it will be excluded to calm the fetus-fetish crowd, but I never hear any of these wingnuts explain why one particular medical procedure must be excluded because of their religious objections.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by dexteritas0071418 (November 10, 2009 12:42 pm ET)
          1 5
          You're a poster on a partisan web-site, though. Reasonable conservatives need understand a lot of things, and this is a BIG one: in order to keep things like the "Faaaiiirness Doctrine" off the table, you need to speak out against spew like Ingraham and Fox News, or you'll deserve what's coming t oyou.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by liberalXtian (November 10, 2009 12:54 pm ET)
          5  
          What's nuts is opposing abortion while also opposing funding to prevent pregnancies (I am talking about methods that work, not Abstinence Only), pre-natal care for women who choose to carry to term, and health care for mother and child after delivery.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by mattcable250650 (November 10, 2009 1:08 pm ET)
            4  
            That's why we pro-choicers have long felt that anti-abortionists are just plain anti-women. Obama himself said something that suggested a recognition of that basic fact, but that some anti-abortionists took him aside and convinced him that there was some element of actual caring and concern in there. Deeply in there, I guess. Among those who are far from the leadership positions, I guess.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by bintx (November 10, 2009 4:35 pm ET)
              4  
              I'm anti-abortion because of my religious beliefs, but, as an American, I understand that our laws are made for people of ALL beliefs and that they cannot be construed to favor one over the other. I chose not to have an abortion, but I cannot force that decision on another who does not share my beliefs. It would be counter to the whole concept of our country.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Ruby (November 10, 2009 4:50 pm ET)
                4  
                Good post.

                I think that a distinction that conservatives or pro-lifers often have a difficult time making is that you need not be perfectly okay with abortion morally in order to think that it should be legal. Frankly, the idea of abortion bothers me. It just doesn't sit well with me. But I realize that people have been getting abortions for thousands and thousands of years, long before there was any such thing as an abortion clinic. And banning it or severely restricting it would not cut down on the overall number of abortions, it would just drastically increase the number of illegal abortions being performed by butchers in garages and back alleys. And that's a picture I think we can all agree is unpleasant.

                Report Abuse
                • Author by bintx (November 10, 2009 5:00 pm ET)
                  5  
                  What bugs me is the anti-choice crowd running around calling themselves "pro-life" while cheerleading the unnecessary deaths and maiming of thousands upon thousands of innocent Iraqis and our own troops AND supporting the death penalty. They are not "pro-life."
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by DellDolly (November 10, 2009 6:18 pm ET)
                  3  
                  The female Congresswomen who objected to the Stupik bill made a clear point - that almost no women plan on having an abortion if they end up having a pregnancy they don't want to carry to term.

                  Therefore, women are supposed to have an abortion rider? When they don't see a reason to have an abortion until they are in that situation?
                  Report Abuse
        • Author by worrierking (November 10, 2009 12:58 pm ET)
          6  
          To paraphrase Groucho, Bert Kalmar & Harry Ruby:

          If he hears anything obscene, He'll naturally repel it.
          I hate a dirty joke I do,
          Unless it's told by someone who -
          Knows how to tell it.

          The Colonel is a very moral man.

          Hooray for Colonel Sanders!
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (November 10, 2009 1:16 pm ET)
            7  
            Why, thank you, WK. If these self-described Christians were half as moral as us Godless reprobates and hateful degenerates, the world would be a much nicer place.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by juliajayne1 (November 10, 2009 1:28 pm ET)
            6  
            The tongue is the sword of Laura Ingraham, and she never lets it become rusty.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (November 10, 2009 4:24 pm ET)
        4  
        I can't listen to her . . . don't know where she's from, but that nasal twang grates on this southerner's ears.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (November 10, 2009 4:23 pm ET)
        3  
        I can't listen to her . . . don't know where she's from, but that nasal twang grates on this southerner's ears.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (November 10, 2009 4:24 pm ET)
        2  
        I can't listen to her . . . don't know where she's from, but that nasal twang grates on this southerner's ears.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (November 10, 2009 12:27 pm ET)
      1  
      Ingraham sold her personal integrity long ago. Her soul was just an extra thrown in to seal the deal.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by magnolialover (November 10, 2009 12:34 pm ET)
      5  
      I'm pretty sure, one of the main jobs of the Speaker of the House (regardless of who it is) is to "sell" and or, to get members of the House to vote for legislation that said Speaker wants to get passed.

      Speaker Pelosi, of course, did nothing irregular on this bill, and it still kills Fox and friends that it passed through the House already.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by DAWUSS (November 10, 2009 12:50 pm ET)
      9  
      Would you have preferred it if she bent over and grabbed the ankles?


      Oh, wait... Wrong program.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by SLRTX (November 10, 2009 1:02 pm ET)
      3  
      Ingram - Just because you do it on a regular basis, doesn't mean other women do it.

      Just how did you get your job again?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by juliajayne1 (November 10, 2009 1:47 pm ET)
        8  
        Never let us forget who you are PC. Sometimes I forget that you cons can convulsively make anything into a conflict.

        Knee jerks are us - the new conservative philosophy. Prickly little fellers aren't ya?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by jmille426471 (November 10, 2009 1:52 pm ET)
        7  
        The party of grown-ups shows its impeccable sense of humor once again....
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Boxer1979 (November 10, 2009 1:54 pm ET)
        6  
        Try to keep your crayon inside the lines when you color PC.

        It means stick with the topic.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by proudconservative (November 10, 2009 2:22 pm ET)
          1 9
          tightywhities,

          Off topic? Did you see the personal comments that were somehow ON topic above? Ingraham's statements were not about calling pelosi a prostitute, it was about all she had to promise to the blue dog dems to get this monstrosity passed.


          Get a grip and lighten up and try to disprove the notion that lefty's have no sense of humor.

          Speaking truth to/about progressives and a shout out to dr. joe medicine crow :>
          Report Abuse
          • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (November 10, 2009 5:19 pm ET)
            4  
            I don't see how you can be proud of yourself PC, your posts here show what a fool you are for your FAR RIGHT WING HEROS, and lacking in any common sense and reason.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by teabaggers ♥ [wing]NUTS (November 11, 2009 3:02 am ET)
            2  
            Get a grip and lighten up and try to disprove the notion that lefty's have no sense of humor.


            dont you wingnuts always claim that comedians like letterman, colbert, stewart, etc. are all EVIL liberals (who make jokes you cant take), yet we dont have a sense of humor?

            nice projection, chief.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (November 10, 2009 2:29 pm ET)
          8  
          Juliajayne, JMille and Boxer, how about showing a little of that liberal compassion? Rather than point and laugh at PC, look at her posts as an opportunity to think "There but for the grace of a functioning brain, the ability to form complete coherent thoughts, a sense of humor, and not submitting to years in a failed cult that promotes complete BS as truth, go I".
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Boxer1979 (November 10, 2009 4:19 pm ET)
            4  
            Ingraham never nothing remarkable good to say about anybody who is not on the same off track view points of hers. So instead of saying what she migtht think as a good alternative to health care reform, she attacks Pelosi's looks. Obviously PC is on the same brain waves as Ingraham so she attacks Pelosi's looks too. Follow the leader says Ingraham!
            Report Abuse
      • Author by New Frontier (November 10, 2009 3:17 pm ET)
        4  
        Thanks, that's a good example of how reasoned, fact-based arguments and thoughtful discussions from conservatives are often overshadowed by the immature mentality of the wingnuts. A flaming wingnut idiot might post a picture of Pelosi's face, sit back and giggle for hours. An educated conservative would discuss facts and try to win people over.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by juliajayne1 (November 10, 2009 3:24 pm ET)
          6  
          And a derisive reference to "A shout out to Dr. Joe, Medicine Crow" no doubt has them ROTFL and LOLing all at once.

          What a knee slapper. God, those cons are hilarious!
          Report Abuse
          • Author by New Frontier (November 10, 2009 3:41 pm ET)
            3  
            It's an awesomely clever put-down, isn't it? "Dr. Joe!" Ha!! All the people whose opinions he has no respect for here (everyone besides himself) ought to feel positively humiliated and belittled.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by bintx (November 10, 2009 5:06 pm ET)
              3  
              I'm just not sure why this person is denigrating Dr. Joe Medicine Crow. He was the first member of the Crow nation to attend college and holds a Master's Degree in Anthropology from USC, holds two honorary doctorates, is a decorated hero from WWII, a Presidential Medal of Honor recipient, and a noted historian and anthropologist.
              Report Abuse
      • Author by teabaggers ♥ [wing]NUTS (November 11, 2009 2:54 am ET)
        1  
        stay classy, "proud" conservative.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Sharpe (November 10, 2009 1:50 pm ET)
      4  
      Is this a debate about healthcare or just a resort to personal attacks? I didnt realize this bill was about pelosi - i thought it was about the future of the country.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Sharpe (November 10, 2009 1:51 pm ET)
      4  
      ABORTION IS LEGAL IN THIS COUNTRY

      Therefore, why shouldnt it fall around a healthcare procedure? It involves a doctor and a patient and a medical procedure. What is nuts about that?????
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (November 10, 2009 2:33 pm ET)
        2  
        There is nothing nuts about it, Sharpe. It's just one of those things, like having "In God We Trust" on our currency, designed to placate a group of Americans, to keep them from going off their rockers, so the adults can take care of business. Maybe someday the dumbing-down will start to reverse, but for now, it's a pragmatic set of shiny keys to keep the childlike wingnuts from fussing too much.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by jmille426471 (November 10, 2009 3:00 pm ET)
          5  
          You know what Col., I suggest the opposite approach. Since the wingnuts are going to freak out about something, why not give them real things to freak out about. When the democrats want to pass a bill, they should include an amendent for something like say, like tax-cuts for abortions, free mansions for illegal immigrants or imposing a national holiday celebrating the gay culture. That way, when the wingnuts have their meltdown, we can "placate" them by removing the amendment, and still get what we want. The wingnuts can pat themselves the back for SAVING AMERICA, and we can pass a good healthcare bill.

          I think it's worth a try.....
          Report Abuse
          • Author by LKL (November 10, 2009 3:48 pm ET)
            4  
            Great suggestion!!

            How about forced Koran readings in schools too?
            Report Abuse
          • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (November 10, 2009 5:01 pm ET)
            2  
            You make sense, JMille. Maybe I'm too reasonable in accepting the Dems pattern of starting from a position of compromise with the crazies. As gullible as most rightys are, proposing ideas equally as crazy as theirs and letting them believe they've won might be a better way of improving our country while letting the wingnuts get on with their naps.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by LKL (November 12, 2009 11:44 am ET)
              1  
              And, on a more serious note, JMille's basic idea makes sense if we ever want to shift the dialogue back from moving ever rightward. I mean, can you imagine what the tea-baggers et al would say if you tried to implement Social Security now, or tried to make education public? I can't imagine such efforts being successful in today's political climate - at least not without a huge bloody fight and endless compromises by the progressive side.
              Report Abuse
        • Author by worrierking (November 10, 2009 3:59 pm ET)
          4  
          Some of the more radical wingnuts are up in arms over the gubmint's plan to move "In God We Trust" to the edge of the new dollar coins.

          It's only a matter of time before they remove it entirely. And then where will we be as a nation?

          I'll tell you, right in the hands of Beelzebub, to spend eternity in the fiery pit.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (November 10, 2009 5:06 pm ET)
            2  
            I saw that, King, and the best part our old friend Sarah of the Arctic is using it as one of her new crazy conspiracy theories. Has she found out yet that it was proposed, and rejected, before Barack Hussein took office?
            Report Abuse
    • Author by jmille426471 (November 10, 2009 1:56 pm ET)
      4  
      "Laura Ingraham has done everything but sell her own body to cash in on the ignorance of wingnuts."

      There, fixed it.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by manofmystique (November 10, 2009 2:45 pm ET)
      3  
      These people are sick in the head; they have abondoned all levels of professional responsibility. What Ingraham said is downright low and childish. Not that it will do any good, but she needs to be reminded that she is a woman and millions of people are watching her.
      This is another problem with labeling people conservatives and liberals. It is hard to come together for a greater good. You are always counterproductive and at odds with each other due to some silly destructed idiology.
      Something as simple as healthcare Reform for all of American citizens has divided people to the point of hate, mostly by hypocrites on the "right", such as Laura Ingraham.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (November 10, 2009 7:39 pm ET)
        2  
        manofmystique, well said these WINGNUT talking heads are DIVIDERS,not UNITERS.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by jediknight65 (November 10, 2009 4:42 pm ET)
      3  
      here is what i don't understand.....

      why is it that so many of these pro life people scream about government intrusion in their lives but have absolutly no problem with a nation wide ban on abortion by their government. THATS GOVERNMENT INTRUSION IN SOMEONES LIFE!

      also another thing. pro choice......isn't choice something that all neo cons and republicans are for? ya know how they keep saying they should have choices and such. i mean just because someone is pro choice doesnt mean automatically they will CHOOSE abortion. it means they have the choice to do so and are willing to consider it.

      for all any of us know they may choose to keep a child no matter what.

      i think if you want a ban on abortions then stop yelling about government intrusion in your life. cause you cant have it both ways. your just a hypocrite then.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by teabaggers ♥ [wing]NUTS (November 11, 2009 2:52 am ET)
        1  
        why is it that so many of these pro life people scream about government intrusion in their lives but have absolutly no problem with a nation wide ban on abortion by their government. THATS GOVERNMENT INTRUSION IN SOMEONES LIFE!


        very well put, jedi... couldnt have said it better myself. i will never understand those people with their pro-life crap wanting to tell women what to do and not do with their own body, but god for bid the government takes control of a crappy health care system.

        also, another good point ive heard... the teabaggers support the military (as we all do, of course) which is a government run entity. thats all well and good, but no, not our healthcare and financial system that is in ruins. granted, they arent doing a great job with the financial crisis, but that has been a problem for years.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Truth Crusader (November 10, 2009 4:52 pm ET)
      3  
      And this bitch DOES call herself a journalist!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by blk-in-alabam (November 10, 2009 6:48 pm ET)
      2  
      What did Laura Ingraham do to get where she is?What does she do to stay there.O'Reilly thied to dunp her guest hosting his show.Bernie Goldberg wanted to throw her under the bus on his show,but O'Reilly stopped him.What kind of dirt does she have on O'Reilly.Laura Ingraham lives for and on dirt.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by teabaggers ♥ [wing]NUTS (November 11, 2009 2:43 am ET)
      2  
      laura ingraham could use a facelift... or two.

      just saying.
      Report Abuse