About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Beck's obsession with reparations moves to Obama's pledge to assist Native Americans

November 11, 2009 10:08 am ET

From the November 11 broadcast of Premiere Radio Networks' The Glenn Beck Program:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Previously:

Glenn Beck: Obama agenda driven by "reparations" and desire to "settle old racial scores"

Beck:  "The health care bill is reparations.  It's the beginning of reparations."

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by MeanMrSpicyMustard (November 11, 2009 10:14 am ET)
         
      Oh good, even without his appendix, he hasn't missed a beat.

      Oh Glenn, how we missed your particular flavor of totally insane.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by dexteritas0071418 (November 11, 2009 10:17 am ET)
         
      reparations reparations reparations reparations reparations

      ::spins with lights off while splattering watter on a mirror::

      ......

      ........

      .........


      Dang nothing happened.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by NiceguyEddie (November 11, 2009 10:22 am ET)
      5  
      These people suck.

      I've now heard them, and this goes beyond just Beck, but it's the same mental illness; I've heard them...:

      Defend the internment of Japanese Amercians in WWII
      Defend Sen. McCarthy's 1950's communists witch hunts
      Accuse the US Solderis of the attrocities that the NAZI'S committed at Malmedy in WWII
      Defend the US Constituition's stance on slavery as merely an "immigration fee"

      and NOW, they're somehow acting like the Genocide of the Native American is yet one more of our countries SHINING MOMENTS.

      These idiots use out countries DARKEST MOMENTS and WORST MISTAKES and GREATEST ATTROCITIES (even those committed AGIANST us!) as PRECEDENT and JUSTIFICATION for continuing to do more of the same!

      YES, we all have competing interests and agendas. Not everyone will get everything they want. That's life. It's unfair. Get a helmet. But there are WAYS to work these things out, and they involve mutual respect and civiclized discourse.

      ----------------------------------------------------------
      NO ONE benefits from this kind of purile nonsense.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by rwk0007 (November 11, 2009 10:34 am ET)
           
        Wow, I have not heard any of those statements, except for the immigration fee thing. Can you direct me to them? Curious how someone could attempt to rationalize such things.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Diosnomeama (November 11, 2009 10:49 am ET)
             
          Here's the internment camp defense: http://michellemalkin.com/2004/08/03/in-defense-of-internment-2/. Written by the one and only Michelle Malkin.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (November 11, 2009 11:01 am ET)
          5  
          Michelle Malkin wrote a book called "In Defense of Internment: the Case for 'Racial Profiling' in World War II."

          Anne Coulter has said about McCarthy: "I know he got a bad rap because there are no monuments to Joe McCarthy. Liberals had to destroy McCarthy because he exposed the entire liberal establishment as having sheltered Soviet spies."

          Bill O'Reilly stated one night on his show: "In Malmady, as you know, U.S. forces captured S.S. forces who had their hands in the air and they were unarmed and they shot them down. You know that. That‘s on the record. Been documented." [it was the other way around and when O'Reilly was confronted with his mistake by a viewer, he DEFENDED his earlier statement.]

          Beck, in his latest book, pretty much defended the Constitution's original stance on slavery by calling the "importation fee" [for humans considered property, i.e., slaves] in Article I, Section 9, Clause 1, an "immigration fee."
          Report Abuse
          • Author by ghost of russell (November 11, 2009 11:07 am ET)
               
            Btw, if you google "Joseph Mccarthy", about 3/4 of what you'll find is wingnut revisionist history about him.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Sharpe (November 11, 2009 11:43 am ET)
              1  
              Im sorry but there is absolutely no way Mccarthy can be spun in the positive by the best of public relations or campaign people. His memory should live on as he lived a bitter, intolerant fear-monger whos contrived hate speech and distortions led to the near collapse of our most precious rights. His memory will always be attached to one of the worst eras in the history of American politics. Thank god beck is not in any sort of real leadership role.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by robyn20094113 (November 11, 2009 1:08 pm ET)
            1  
            Bintx, at some point, after being called on it, Bill O'Lielly said he meant Normandy and Fox tried to support that lie. Which just made it even worse, in more ways than one. And to think he was a history teacher. god save the children.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Sharpe (November 11, 2009 1:44 pm ET)
              1  
              No they went one step further off the ledge of journalistic standards - they actually edited Bill's transcripts so that it said a battle by Normany or something like that even though on the tape he clearly did not say that and the transcript was directly from that show. They are liars and they cant even cover up their tracks.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by bintx (November 11, 2009 2:08 pm ET)
                1  
                Exactly. I'm sure they had a devil of a time trying to convince the big old Bill head that he was wrong.
                Report Abuse
          • Author by Sharpe (November 11, 2009 1:42 pm ET)
               
            A handful of republicans in congress actually voted against the renewal of the civil rights legislation of 1964 passed under LBJ that banned racial segregation in schools and public places and employment. I have no idea why. I think it had something to do with the employment non-discrimination act which prohibits discrimination in employment based on sexual orientation, gender identity or disability. You would think with a dem majority in both houses we would actually be able to pass something that makes discriminatory practices for jobs illegal. Apparently not yet. Inhofe the republican from the non-existent state of the Bible is a particularly vocal opponent - coining the phrase "God, Guns and Gays" to describe his political campaign meaning he thinks the US is a christian theocracy where equality is more of a joke than a reality but violence and torture is wholeheartedly supported - just like jesus would want. Bachmann says passing this is "targeting our children" and that this is all a case of "sexual identity disorder."
            Report Abuse
        • Author by NiceguyEddie (November 11, 2009 11:15 am ET)
             
          I don't have any links at the moment, but...

          The Malmedy thing was O'Rielly, back in '06 or '07 IIRC. Olbermann took him took task pretty harshly for it at the time. (Big bsurprise.) I thought MMFA had something as well, but it's not coming up for me.

          Defending the internment of Japanese Amercians in WWII was done by MICHELLE MALKIN of all people - an ASIAN herself! (I guess only Nixon can go to China!) Again, I could have sworn MMFA had something on this, I seem to remember COMMENTING on it, but I can't seem to find it now either.

          Sen. Joe McCarthy is one of Ann Coulter's biggest personal heroes, and she's defended him, and held him up as a shining example of a "Great American" on numerous occaisions.

          ------------------------------------------------------------------
          I realize that's not exactly what you're looking for. Hopefully it helps anyway. Maybe I'll do a top-10 in my blog (with better citing) at some point. :)
          Report Abuse
          • Author by rwk0007 (November 11, 2009 11:39 am ET)
               
            Thanks to the both of you. Original works are better than bloggy links anyway.

            Report Abuse
      • Author by achorn316 (November 11, 2009 1:03 pm ET)
        2  
        In the right wing world, America is perfect and can do no wrong.

        Everything America does and has done is great and if you disagree you are with Al Qaeda.

        Its an alternate reality.. the same alternate reality where Reagan was great (he wasnt) and FDR was awful (he wasnt)
        Report Abuse
    • Author by captfoster2 (November 11, 2009 10:32 am ET)
      4  
      Being that the white Christian came to this land with the intent on 'updating' the savages by forcing their God upon them, stealing their land in the name of their God, murdering them for not accepting their God at gun point... yeah...

      I think it is rather tempting to say that we owe the Native American a bit more than a few dollars and Glenn Beck is piece of trash for going in this direction.

      Come to think of it, so is anyone else who takes Glenn's side!

      This countries history is full of violence and contradictions and until we as a nation accept and acknowledge that this nation is doomed to fail.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by RKAllen (November 11, 2009 10:38 am ET)
      4  
      One of these things is not like the other...

      Barack Obama said...
      We are going to keep on working with you to make sure the first American's get the best possible chances in life in a way that is consistent with your extraordinary traditions, and culture, and values.
      Van Jones said...
      No more broken treaties! No more broken treaties! Give them the wealth! Give them the wealth! Give them the dignity! Give them the respect!
      Glenn Beck said...
      Obviously, what he has in mind goes far beyond giving them casino licenses or free Government Health Care... The best thing we can do for the Native Americans is to get the Federal Government out of their lives once and for all, and maybe then we let these proud people stand up on their own two feet and have a chance to prosper.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by bewildered (November 11, 2009 11:05 am ET)
        2  
        Excellent analysis. I'm sure this talking point equation may very well fit with pretty much everything Beck claims.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by SMTDL (November 11, 2009 11:25 am ET)
        1  
        It shows that Beck is incapable of even repeating someone's statement accurately and can not interpret/analyze facts in an accurate way.Preposterous conclusions or I guess the ability to read minds from a distance enables him to come up with his usual conspiracy theories...Van Jones is setting agenda for the POTUS..really??..Beck is pathetic!!!
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Sharpe (November 11, 2009 11:48 am ET)
        1  
        There is a complete disconnect between reality and whatever is going on in beck's twisted, warped little mind. He lives wholly outside of our reality. The entire network does in fact. Otherwise, how can they make claims almost weekly that obama is a radical, racist, socialist or that healthcare reform is some extreme left idea that no one supports? They have to live outside of the real world or their ideas would be incongruent with the reality and they would be forced to change their ideas - this is the very definition of the psychological theory of cognitive dissonance. When reality and your own perception are completely at odds one is forced to change either one or the other. If the ideas are so wholly rooted in your essence that your very identity would suffer a severe toll from trying to change personal views than you are forced to alter reality so that you can go back to being at peace and in congruence. This theory has been long standing and is a very good description of beck's total disconnect with anything remotely within our reality.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by rwk0007 (November 11, 2009 10:40 am ET)
      4  
      Did anyone notice how sneaky what he said was?

      He played the president's quote, then he surmized the quote by twisting just enough to be almost beleivable and then used the quotes from his summary to have matched up perfectly with his Van Jones tape.

      The president did not say "broken treaties" or "native american rights". He didn't even say anything about reparations or putting any group over another. But Glenn Beck did say "broken treaties" in his bad summary.

      Then Van Jones used the exact same words as Beck almost as if the President was quoting Van Jones.

      Very sneaky.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by New Frontier (November 11, 2009 10:48 am ET)
        3  
        He is sneaky, and he depends upon his audience being too busy, inattentive, hearing what they want to hear, or just too plain stupid to call him on it.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Don Quixote (November 11, 2009 12:41 pm ET)
             
          I vote for "c", hearing what they want to hear, and "d" too plain stupid. An audience of prejudiced stupid people who simply need to have their preconceived notions validated is how guys like Beck, et.al., stay in business.

          Tell me what I already think I know, and I'll listen to you. Tell me otherwise, and you're a commie fascist liberal wingnut liar. This is why Beck, et.al. can say any absurdity and never have to back it up. This is why Hannity can show old video of a larger crowd and claim it's video of a recent event he sponsored. These guys know they will be caught but they also know their loyal listeners will hardly care.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by themidnightreview.com (November 11, 2009 10:42 am ET)
      4  
      Reparations? What is Glenn Beck thinking?

      He wants the federal government out of the Native American's lives. Does he want us to return all their land?

      --------------------------------------

      The Midnight Review
      Mum Is The Word
      Report Abuse
    • Author by thundavolt (November 11, 2009 10:56 am ET)
      1  
      The right wing is blatantly saying "Don't give anyone else a chance."
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Boxer1979 (November 11, 2009 11:33 am ET)
         
      Beck's obsession with reparations moves to Obama's pledge to assist Native Americans

      Oh lord now he will have people thinking Obama will do something terrible to the Native Americans. Neverminding the fact that Europeans have treated Native Americans cruely for centuries!

      Who was the last president to help out Native Americans? I believed it was Nixon. Also before then Native Americans were not given the full right to vote until 1957. The native americans deserve reprerations Just like African-Americans,and other minorities racial discriminated on for centuries.

      Reperations - is a proposal by some in the United States that some type of compensation should be provided to the descendants of enslaved people.

      Becky will you do that if you were president?????

      Report Abuse
      • Author by John Paradox (November 11, 2009 5:08 pm ET)
           
        Gee.. seems like one of our early Presidents, maybe even a Founding Father talked about how badly the Europeans treated the Native Americans.

        Oh, yeah....
        * The two principles on which our conduct towards the Indians should be founded, are justice and fear. After the injuries we have done them, they cannot love us . . . .
        o Letter to Benjamin Hawkins (13 August 1786) Lipscomb & Bergh ed. 5:390

        * There is an error into which most of the speculators on government have fallen, and which the well-known state of society of our Indians ought, before now, to have corrected. In their hypothesis of the origin of government, they suppose it to have commenced in the patriarchal or monarchical form. Our Indians are evidently in that state of nature which has passed the association of a single family... The Cherokees, the only tribe I know to be contemplating the establishment of regular laws, magistrates, and government, propose a government of representatives, elected from every town. But of all things, they least think of subjecting themselves to the will of one man.
        o Letter to Francis W. Gilmer (1816)
        Report Abuse
    • Author by fearmongerI33CK (November 11, 2009 11:53 am ET)
         
      Hey Beckster!

      How many times have many times have you said something ridiculous in the name of that same "bunch of dead people" that your now stomping on? So much for our founding fathers...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Sharpe (November 11, 2009 11:56 am ET)
      1  
      Does beck realize that gambling is illegal in this country except on Native American land and certain explicit parts of the country like Nevada. Apparently not. I believe this was the reparations we gave them for ya know, killing almost their entire population through misery, disease and brutal death and moving them completely off their own land by forcing them to march thousands of miles. But a few of them own casinos and are rich so I guess that was enough. Either way, I dont think there will be any more "freebies" to the Native Americans of anything significant so beck can rest easy knowing that when america destroys almost an entire society and culture, we just pretend it never really happened after a while. America is great at pretending its the best arent we? Especially those repugs who will never admit they were wrong even when it is kicking them in the face.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by achorn316 (November 11, 2009 12:32 pm ET)
      2  
      so now we know Beck is a bigot when it comes to black people, muslims, gays, and atheists, now we learn hes also bigoted towards native americans.

      gee Glenn.. maybe you should talk to a native american about how tough their life is.. if you can find one.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Don Quixote (November 11, 2009 1:06 pm ET)
           
        You forgot women. Basically, if you're not a white uberconservative Christian male, you're an "Other" in the Beckian worldview.

        To make Beckianism work, you have to do an awful lot of selective erasures of the certain "nasty bits" of our history. Starting with a blank slate, you now have to rewrite new mythical narratives that put you and your kind in the center, and you have to do a whole lot of careful revisions of other parts to make sure you look good in that center.

        Then, and only then, can you truly feel like the exceptional "chosen people" that you imagine yourself to be, in relation to the "Others" who..., well, just aren't that exceptional or you know... chosen, so... uhhhhh... you know, too bad for them. Manifest Destiny and U.S. Exceptionalism and all that....
        Report Abuse
    • Author by robyn20094113 (November 11, 2009 1:38 pm ET)
      1  
      Glenn, Native Americans, everywhere, want you for their spokesperson. I'm sure!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Handyman (November 11, 2009 2:05 pm ET)
      2  
      It is estimated that between the 15th and 19th century, 20 million Native American Indians perished - greater than the current population of Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming, Alaska, Delaware, Vermont, Montana, Kansas, Rhode Island, Hawaii, New Hampshire, Maine, Idaho, and Oklahoma combined - also greater than all those that perished during World War One. Many consider it to be the most massive act of genocide in the history of our world. It wasn't until after 1820 that our immigrant population exceeded the original Native American Indian population.

      With their land seized by the Government or stolen by settlers, the slaughter of the Buffallo (which provided them with food, clothing, and shelter) and in fear of being totally annihilated, they finally declared they would "fight no more". Because of their continued unwillingness to accept our Chrisian based ideologies they were then banished forever to Reservations, where most of them remain to this day.

      One only needs to make a trip to any Indian Reservation to realize that our current system of acknowledging our Native Indian population is disfunctional.

      Mr. Beck is the "Poster Child" for the Secular Government Movement. People are getting sick and tired of so called Christians spouting their racist comments.





      Report Abuse
      • Author by robyn20094113 (November 11, 2009 2:53 pm ET)
        1  
        But Handyman, you forget, that all those that wronged the Indians, are dead. So forget it and move on. Just when you think Beck can't get any stupider he proves you wrong.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by hahaohwow (November 13, 2009 4:48 pm ET)
         
      Native Americans were only wronged by a bunch of dead people? How deep does this guy's rabbit hole actually go? My mother's family lives on a reservation, and it's no secret that generations and generations of Native Americans have been forced into poverty, poor education and... okay, you know what? I can't even get angry about the stuff Beck says anymore because anyone who can do a Google search has all of the facts and statistics right there.

      Bless you, Glenn Beck. Never change. Shine on, crazy diamond, and I hope your private health insurance fully covers the surgery you will inevitably need to forcibly remove your fingers from your eardrums.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Justice4All (November 14, 2009 10:04 am ET)
         
      It's funny to me how some people are always quoting the Constitution and pulling bits and pieces from it to justify their argument. What the government was supposed to do and how they were suppose to handle the Indians (or politically correct Native Americans) is written in the Constitution too. It's easy to overlook and forget that part of it though. Groups of individuals cry out about the states being sovereign and having rights to do this and that without the government intervening. Indian reservations are sovereign too!! But if a tribe sells any land the government gets to "hold" the money and "help" them decide how to spend it. This country is more than just 50 states. It's convenient to forget about the Native American reservations when we're talking about rights for all of this country's citizens though.

      I'm really sick of people commenting about how all the Native Americans are rich because of their casinos too. You need to do your homework before you go spouting off at the mouth. A very very small percentage of the tribes that exist make a very significant profit from a casino. The problem is the few that do are the only ones you hear about. The other 90% of the Native population is still poor.

      If you want to refer to the Constitution and use it to justify what should be occurring or what the situation should be today, try to justify the way the Indians have been overlooked and shoved aside from the day the white man got here!

      Indians weren't even granted US citizenship until 1924. That hasn't even been a solid hundred years. The atrocities that occurred aren't that "old"!! If you are not the one being discriminated against - it's much easier for you to say, "forget it and move on"...
      Report Abuse