Kilmeade frets that "man-gagement ring" could signal start of "taking the initiative away from the male"
November 12, 2009 7:47 am ET
From the November 12 broadcast of Fox News' Fox & Friends:
Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.
















Remember, mag -- FOX IS the GOP channel.
And we all know how well GOP men do marriage:
Rush Limpballs
Newt Gingrich
Rudy Giuliani
Fred Thompson
'serial bigamists'?
Just sayin'
But this trio would find some conspiracy in the breakdown of the numbers such as, why is the number 1 listed under the letter B. The letter B could be used to indicate Barack is number 1).
If only they knew, then they would probably be completely against it.
I'm not being serious just speculative.
I suppose jewelry equality means engagement rings for both sexes, though I don't see it being something many men will wear, unless their boyfriends buy them one. Tastes vary, as do opinions. If you really wanted to discuss this issue, you could've talked about the etiquette of returning a ring if the engagement is called off, but I understand that is a little out of FOX's depth. Perhaps tomorrow you will host a lively debate between Poptarts and Toaster strudels? (i.e., this was a -lame- segment)
Mr. Kilmeade? You remind me of a cartoon. 'Are you nervous, pussycat?' 'Yup!' Sheesh. Read your horoscope: This is a good week to go back on your meds!