Limbaugh claims that "Marxist" Obama "intends to purge all Republicans" from civil service
November 12, 2009 1:34 pm ET
From the November 12 edition of Premiere Radio Networks' The Rush Limbaugh Show:
Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.
















It sounds like what he's saying is American English, but I can't make any sense of it...
This would be a dream. Too bad its limbaugh and not obama saying it. I would just put limbaugh and beck on a death panel but purging would be fine too.
FIRING OF THE ATTORNEYS???? Is limbaugh the only one in the country that doesn;t realize that was ACTUALLY A HUGE SCANDAL. The way he said it, it was like nothing ever came of it.
All we need to do is listen to the first 20 seconds - his source of news where he is getting these undesputed facts is redstate.com
Did any of you people even read the memo?
I'll bet not.
Oh Yeah....big conspiracy theory by the right wing.
Heres the memoin case you're interested.
Obama can do no wrong!!!!!!!
Follow the messaih over the cliff you lemmings
"In no case may an agency make an appointment of the type described below without written authorization from OPM:
(A)The appointment of a current political Schedule A or Schedule C Executive Branch employee or a former political Schedule A or Schedule C Executive Branch employee who held the position within the last five years to a competitive or non-political excepted service position under title 5 of the U.S. Code.
(B)The appointment of a current Non-career SES Executive Branch employee or a former Non-career SES Executive Branch employee who held the position within the last five years to a competitive or non-political excepted service position under title 5 of the U.S. Code."
I declare -- I have NEVER seen one person who claimed to know SO MUCH of what President Obama thinks, does, or intends to do {other than Obama himself, that is} . . .
It follows if you get only one stealth democrat in the republican party, every bill would be bipartisan.
Read the darned memo before you make a bigger fool of yourself.
Where was blimpies outrage then? Oh, I know, it's all manufactured, as per usual.
1. Loyalty pledges to republican party if you wanted to attend a W rally or speech.
2. Needed to be born and bred republican if you wanted a job with the Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq. Which led to, not having the right people for the right jobs, and basically the CPA being a disaster.
3. DOJ and Goodling (as you noted above).
OK, you're wrong. Unless the political adversaries have broken the law,they are protected by the 1st Amendment like everybody else.
However, unless my history is wrong, I believe that Thomas Jefferson 'purged' the federal government of the Federalists. This 'purge'(or pragmatism, as some would say) is considered a mini revolution by many historians.
BTW: Jefferson's 'purge' gave us Marbury v. Madison.
John Adams appointed many Federalists, many were judges, and some like Marbury, was a Justice of the Peace. John Adams did this the night before he left office - hence the term midnight judges.
Madison (a supporter of Jefferson) was wrong. They were legally appointed by a sitting President.
However, John Marshall (a Federalist) argued to toss a Federalist appointee 'under the bus' to make a larger, more important precedent. John Marshall was able to convince the Supreme Court to toss out Marbury's claim, by virtue of the Judicary Act of 1789, and the Supreme Court declared it unconstitutional.
I am not so sure we agree. But you have raised many interesting points. But, I am a 5:00 A.M person, and need to go to sleep.
I do hope we can carry on this conversation tomorrow..
Ok, but by virtue of the Constitution, Marbury, and the judges were appointed. The problem I have is that Jefferson and Madison did not deliver the appointments by a sitting President; regardless of when he appointed them. I think that is where we disagree.
I have tried forever to understand Jefferson. Was he a idealist (as in his younger days)? Was he an ideologue (arguments with Hamilton)? Was Jefferson a pragmatist? I have conluded that Jefferson was a pragmatist. The Louisana Purchase is a good example.
I have come to the conclusion that Jefferson lived in his head. I think this is where we agree, Jefferson was a pragmatist. He envisoned greater things and acted on them, He didn't get stuck in ideology.
We also agree on Judicial Review. However, when all else fails the Framers gave us Amendments :)
We'd love to have fair debates here and nationally with a legitimate opposition party and with reasonable opposition posters.
It's your side, your FoxNews, your Limbaugh, who are poisoning the debate, refusing to participate in our democracy, being ideological purists, having kneejerk reactions to anything from the opposition. It's your side that has suggested interrogating all Muslim soldiers because one soldier who happened to be Muslim went insane and no one caught it. It's your side that has proposed that we keep suspected terrorists locked up forever.
And you haven't read any posts here that have suggested what you claim. None. We don't think that, nor say that. See, the problem here is your preconceived notions. Your blinders. Your partisan blindspot. Your need for validation of your own ideas is so great that you're basically delusional when it comes to evaluating your opposition.