About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Coulter claims Muslims "have acclimated to ... the victim culture" in U.S., "on 9-11 they became the number one victims"

November 13, 2009 9:25 pm ET

From the November 13 edition of Fox News' Hannity:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by rugger69 (November 13, 2009 10:52 pm ET)
        15
      That is true we were told NOT TO WORRY about all the hateful speech coming out of the mosque. That they were truly the victims because somebody might retaliate against them poor innocent people.

      I say look them all up until we can figure out who is who
      Report Abuse
      • Author by jmille426471 (November 13, 2009 11:19 pm ET)
        13  
        We were not attacked by Islam, we were attacked by Atta and Zarquaoui and twenty others as well as the people who funded the attack from Afghanistan. That's why it's not right to retaliate against random innocent muslims or violate the constitional rights of all of them because of the actions of a few. Ok?

        Seriously, even a first-grader has the moral reasoning ability to understand this.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by rugger69 (November 14, 2009 9:21 am ET)
            18
          It is that idiotic logic that got us into this problem in the first place, these people are terrorist. It is was decided to handle these things as a police actions not acts of war now it is time to takes matters in our own hands and call this what it is.

          For Obama to proclaim on the campaign trail Iraq was the wrong war and Afghanistan was the correct one, well here is his moment and he won't make a decision.

          Then he made this announcement in CHINA was a coward
          Report Abuse
          • Author by mescal (November 15, 2009 2:25 am ET)
            4  
            The word is PUNCTUATION.

            Look into it, Rugger.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by rugger69 (November 15, 2009 8:35 pm ET)
                2
              All you have to worry about is the punctuation. Boy your ilk has really ruined our country if that is all you have to say

              Report Abuse
              • Author by mescal (November 16, 2009 1:56 am ET)
                1  
                At least I can say it in proper English, dildo.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by rugger69 (November 16, 2009 6:08 pm ET)
                    2
                  Another individual who will not face the facts or address the issues, the public school system has treated you fairly. I guess your a good example that government can't run the public school system so why let them run health care.

                  Speaking of public schools they keep you dumb so you would think that government is the answer to all your problems and you will keep voting for any one who will promise you free anything.

                  Solution: anyone collecting government aid looses the privilege to vote. That way people like you will not be able to vote for more free services.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by mescal (November 16, 2009 7:01 pm ET)
                    1  
                    You really are a moron, Rugger. To start with, you can't put three coherent sentences together, and yet you criticize the public schools because they DO teach others to be able to speak and write properly. Punctuation... your bizarre, Dreckian 'thinking' to the contrary... is not some sort of communist plot. You have no idea how thick and uneducated your raggedy, loony little missives make you look here.

                    Secondly, I receive NO free government services. I'm a proud Teamster, and I own my own home. I'm far from rich, but I've been employed by the same company for 20 years, and make a decent living, replete with health and retirement benefits acquired through collective bargaining.

                    But, Rugger, based on your raging, dumb-ass postings here, you appear to be just another semi-literate, tea-bagging, troglodyte bigot who is just drooling at the possibility of denying other Americans their Constitutional rights. You want to take things away from those at the BOTTOM of the social and economic ladder, and punish all those who are not white and Christian. You would cheerfully round up those who's religious and/or political views you deem suspect, and strip the poor of their most basic rights as Americans. Your natural political affinity would appear to be towards the Klan.

                    Still, in spite of your snarling, self-defeating stupidity, I do not advocate taking away YOUR right to vote, because it's just that... your right.

                    And that, Rugger, is one of the most fundamental differences between progressives and backwoods fascists like yourself.
                    Report Abuse
        • Author by oldmaninblackforest (November 14, 2009 11:11 am ET)
          1 13
          Are you out of your mind... Islam is what fued these idiots. Not to say every Muslim is out to cause us harm. BUT atta, zarquaoui certainly didn't perpetrate those acts because they were jewish or christian...

          All Muslims are NOT to blame and should not be held accountable for the acts of a few. BUT the Muslim community has a moral obligation to speak out against the Muslim extremist. Lets face it there are a lot more publicly taking the side of jihad, then of peace and harmony.

          Seriously, even a kindergartner has enough brains to see that...
          Report Abuse
          • Author by peace4all (November 14, 2009 12:09 pm ET)
            14  
            i will agree that your correct. by the same logic i think we need to go after those christian terrorist, you know the ones that kill doctors and blow up abortion clinics. too bad we can't tell which are the peaceful christians and which are the radicals. guess we will just have to monitor them all and maybe waterboard a few to lead us to the higher up. what do you think? sound fair to you?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (November 14, 2009 12:22 pm ET)
              9  
              Beat me to it, Peace4all. It would be much more logical to take care of domestic terrorists first before going halfway around the world to hunt down foreign terrorists. Every Christian church in the U.S. should hand over any information they have on those attending their services.

              Not to say every Christian is out to cause us harm. BUT those guys shooting up "librul" churches and doctors certainly didn't perpetrate those acts because they were Jewish or Muslim.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by mewi (November 14, 2009 1:05 pm ET)
                   
                I am all for jailing christians based on religious association. I mean, we gotta stop their activities right? Who cares if innocent people get in the way, as long as we abuse the Government to best fit our close minded world view.

                But seriously now, these people are xenophobic, racist, homophobic, against anything not christian. They lie, they extort, they distort... they are not nice people.

                Just remember, these are the people that claim to be "on the side of god". All I can say is, thank god I am an Atheist.

                ~Celeste~
                Report Abuse
              • Author by rugger69 (November 14, 2009 5:53 pm ET)
                  8
                So the christens are the one who shoot them up I see i was confused, when I read the Bible i don't recall seeing any passages about shooting up those places or killing infidels say as in the Koran?!?!?!?
                Report Abuse
                • Author by all your eyes (November 14, 2009 6:10 pm ET)
                  6  
                  Do you have any idea how hateful, intolerant, racist, and backward you are? Go back to FOX NATION.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by rugger69 (November 14, 2009 6:24 pm ET)
                      10
                    There is not one racial thin in that or hateful just truthful and you can't handle it so you revert to name calling
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by snoopy (November 14, 2009 7:27 pm ET)
                      6  
                      ...says the racist.
                      Report Abuse
                    • Author by mescal (November 15, 2009 2:29 am ET)
                      4  
                      Just what name, exactly, did All Your Eyes call you? Looks to be like it was simply a well-reasoned assessment of your posts.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (November 15, 2009 1:14 pm ET)
                        3  
                        The "name-calling" card is sort of the white flag of surrender for wingnut posters.

                        I think the strategy is, realizing they don't really have a point, they post increasingly idiotic comments.

                        Eventually, somebody points out their idiocy, they cry "name caller, you lose!" and imagine they've won.

                        Also works when called "racist" after making racist comments.
                        Report Abuse
                  • Author by rugger69 (November 15, 2009 8:40 pm ET)
                      3
                    Again NOTHING hateful, intolerant, racist or backwards about that JUST THE TRUTH and since you don't want to face it you bury your head.

                    It is amazing how many people here think we need to make other countries like us we don't
                    Report Abuse
                • Author by John Paradox (November 14, 2009 6:13 pm ET)
                  8  
                  Exodus 32:26-28 (King James Version)

                  26Then Moses stood in the gate of the camp, and said, Who is on the LORD's side? let him come unto me. And all the sons of Levi gathered themselves together unto him.

                  27And he said unto them, Thus saith the LORD God of Israel, Put every man his sword by his side, and go in and out from gate to gate throughout the camp, and slay every man his brother, and every man his companion, and every man his neighbour.

                  28And the children of Levi did according to the word of Moses: and there fell of the people that day about three thousand men.

                  Leviticus 20

                  Numbers 25:4-6 (King James Version)

                  4And the LORD said unto Moses, Take all the heads of the people, and hang them up before the LORD against the sun, that the fierce anger of the LORD may be turned away from Israel.

                  5And Moses said unto the judges of Israel, Slay ye every one his men that were joined unto Baalpeor.

                  6And, behold, one of the children of Israel came and brought unto his brethren a Midianitish woman in the sight of Moses, and in the sight of all the congregation of the children of Israel, who were weeping before the door of the tabernacle of the congregation.

                  Remember you did say when I read the Bible i don't recall seeing any passages about shooting up those places or killing infidels say as in the Koran?!?!?!?

                  Unless you've got a reaaaly different version from the KJV
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by LKL (November 14, 2009 6:20 pm ET)
                    6  
                    Good work - it's incredible how many people who spout the Bible seem to have no idea what's in it.
                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by rugger69 (November 14, 2009 6:28 pm ET)
                      9
                    There is nothing in there that DIRECTLY tells them to kill a group of people or individual, the Koran tells them to kill any one who doesn't follow the Koran
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by snoopy (November 14, 2009 7:29 pm ET)
                      6  
                      Apparently reading comprehension isn't one of your strong skills...
                      Report Abuse
                    • Author by John Paradox (November 14, 2009 11:04 pm ET)
                      5  
                      How about 'god' directly killing forty two children for making fun of a bald man? (Thanks to Robert A. Heinlein)

                      23And he went up from thence unto Bethel: and as he was going up by the way, there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head.

                      24And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the LORD. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.
                      2 Kings 2
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by rugger69 (November 14, 2009 11:26 pm ET)
                          7
                        Again it does not DIRECTLY say to kill the nonbelievers and or infidels as the Koran does. Stop making false points with non issue items that tells a story of a killing. Can you not tell the difference?!?!?
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by mescal (November 15, 2009 2:42 am ET)
                          4  
                          Seriously, THIS is the best you can do?

                          You do realize, don't you, that people here are getting into the habit of zestfully knocking around your little wingnut remonstrations like a cat batting around a mouse that its caught. It's becoming sport. Not to ruin anyone's fun or anything, but, if I were you, Rugger, I'd give the preview function a whirl BEFORE hitting send. It would probably save you a mountain og humiliation.
                          Report Abuse
                        • Author by jmille426471 (November 15, 2009 1:28 pm ET)
                          3  
                          Again it does not DIRECTLY say to kill the nonbelievers and or infidels as the Koran does.


                          Fail again;


                          6 “If your brother, your mother’s son, or your son or daughter, or the wife you cherish, or your friend who is as your own soul, entice you secretly, saying, ‘Let us go and serve other gods’ (whom neither you nor your fathers have known, 7 of the gods of the peoples who are around you, near you or far from you, from one end of the earth to the other end), 8 you shall not yield to him or listen to him; and your eye shall not pity him, nor shall you spare or conceal him. 9 “But you shall surely kill him; your hand shall be first against him to put him to death, and afterwards the hand of all the people. 10 “So you shall stone him to death because he has sought to seduce you from the LORD your God who brought you out from the land of Egypt, out of the house of slavery. 11


                          Deutoronomy 13:6-10

                          In the New testament, the Apostle Paul also commands us to stone members of the church if they are caught worshipping idols.

                          Report Abuse
                      • Author by Brabantio (November 15, 2009 7:15 am ET)
                        3  
                        How about 'god' directly killing forty two children for making fun of a bald man? (Thanks to Robert A. Heinlein)
                        That's one of my favorites. I did some looking around on that a while ago, and I found someone arguing that "bald head" was a slur against religious people, and also that the original text should translate into "young men", which could be anything from teenagers to younger adults. My response to this was a big, fat "so what?". No matter how you cut it, God is making it clear that anyone who mocks someone of high religious standing deserves to die.

                        I still say that story was written by that day's version of the comic book geek, having a fantasy of having super powers and using them against his tormentors. "If I was a prophet, I'd call on God and have Billy ripped to shreds by a big bear. Yeah! That would be awesome!"
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by juliajayne1 (November 15, 2009 2:46 pm ET)
                          4  
                          Oh no bears....the threatdown!
                          Report Abuse
                        • Author by rugger69 (November 15, 2009 8:53 pm ET)
                            3
                          Reach a bit deeper into you anus for more definitions to explain away the reasons why we should try the terrorist in the United States instead a military tribunal.

                          The court will be long and drawn out and appeal after appeal, where a tribunal would be swift and decisive with out all the crap of the legal system and AMERICANS CAN FINALLY ENJOY JUSTICE.
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by jmille426471 (November 15, 2009 9:02 pm ET)
                            1  
                            Here's a reason; we've already tried and convicted the first world trade center bombers. We've tried and convicted John Walker Lindh and Moussaui. In fact, we have hundreds of terrorists in our prisons who were convicted in our regular courts.

                            Is there anything else you can pull out of your anus to explain why we shouldn't give them regular trials.
                            Report Abuse
                          • Author by Brabantio (November 15, 2009 11:37 pm ET)
                            2  
                            Reach a bit deeper into you anus for more definitions to explain away the reasons why we should try the terrorist in the United States instead a military tribunal.
                            Do you have any idea why you posted this in response to a comment about a Bible story?

                            Personally, I think accountability is a good thing. Conservatives seem to gravitate towards this idea that terrorists are just plain crazy and so our actions can't ever change things (unless it's a Democrat, in which case they're "emboldening" them). Yet, recruitment levels fluctuate. There are some radicals who surely hate America no matter what, but many lower-level terrorists are influenced by circumstances. So it makes it more difficult to sell America as an evil entity if we act reasonably and responsibly by insuring that even the most hated terrorists receive their day in court.
                            Report Abuse
                • Author by Handyman (November 14, 2009 7:46 pm ET)
                  4  
                  Whoa Bubba, best stop and give your horse a little rest. All religious beliefs are guilty of some sort of persecution. I don't think we can hold the Muslims responsible for the genocide of 20 million of our Native American Indians, I believe Christian Ideology had a little something to do with that.

                  Lets try to be a little civil with each other - state your point based on fact, we do want to hear what you have to say.

                  Thanks!!!
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by Brabantio (November 15, 2009 7:54 am ET)
                  3  
                  So the christens are the one who shoot them up I see i was confused, when I read the Bible i don't recall seeing any passages about shooting up those places or killing infidels say as in the Koran?!?!?!?
                  If you took the Bible literally, you'd have justification for killing all sorts of people, including infidels. What is the basis for arguing that 99.999% of Christians can read a passage about how homosexuals should be murdered and not act on it, but the text of the Koran naturally leads Muslims to kill infidels?

                  Any religion can be interpreted or manipulated to serve violent purposes. We see that here, when abortion providers are murdered. The difference is simply the environment. If we had the same sociopolitical instability as there's been in the Middle East throughout history, then we'd be bombing the hell out of people in the name of the Lord. The Bible is chock full of such justifications, there just isn't the stimulus for many people to make that leap.
                  Report Abuse
            • Author by Doug-Life (November 14, 2009 4:05 pm ET)
                7
              do we start with rev. wright?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by pilotx (November 14, 2009 11:59 pm ET)
                6  
                Nah, we'll start with that crazy "god hates fags" dude.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by John Paradox (November 15, 2009 2:26 pm ET)
                  3  
                  Westboro Baptist Church....
                  link to webpage
                  NSFTP (Not Safe For Thinking People)

                  I see he's expanded into Anti-semitism, with this at the top of the page:
                  AN OPEN LETTER TO THE ELECT JEWS
                  The Jews Killed Christ! They Have Never Repented!
                  Only the Elect Jews Will Repent, Mourn & Be Sealed and Delivered

                  The guy's name is Fred Phelps (hmmmm, was there a "Fred" in Palin's 'buddy list' in her book?)
                  Report Abuse
          • Author by rugger69 (November 14, 2009 5:24 pm ET)
              9
            I said to round them all up and figure out who is who so we can survive as a country. Letting these animals run through out our country with out knowing who or what they are is crazy.

            Look at all the mosque and the hate speech that pours out of them yet since we as a country have been neutered by the ACLU, CAIR and other groups we can't go in and investigates them the way we should.

            This is the United Stated of America when you come to this country you live by OUR laws not yours, you learn to speak our language and assimilate into our country. We should not have to adopt Sharia to our court system.

            Don't come here and try to change OUR SYSTEM because you don't like it go back home if this country does not fit your way of life!!!!!!
            Report Abuse
            • Author by John Paradox (November 14, 2009 6:19 pm ET)
              5  
              Letting these animals run through out our country with out knowing who or what they are is crazy.

              Right-wing justification. "Muslims" aren't human, so they can be killed like the budding psychopath down the street kills the neighborhood cats.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by rugger69 (November 14, 2009 6:34 pm ET)
                  11
                When another Muslim goes off and kills more people maybe next time you will wake up. They plotted 9/11 for years before they set it off they will wait as long as they have to and until it is some one a liberal cares for or is impacted things won't change.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Ruby (November 14, 2009 7:13 pm ET)
                  7  
                  American Muslims did not plan or carry out 9/11.

                  We've got our fair share of religious fundamentalists in this country (of all creeds), but there's a big difference between religious zealouts in this country and those in Afghanistan or Pakistan or etc.

                  In the US, even if you are raised in an extremely religious household, you are still exposed to other ideas. You can go to school or watch TV or read books and newspapers and magazines. A Muslim teenager in the United States could one day say, "Hey, I think I'm going to read Mere Christianity, cuz I just wanna see what this whole Christian thing is about". Or an Evangelical Christian teenager could say, "Hmm..I'm kind of curious about Islam, I think I'll take a closer look at the Koran".

                  You think teenagers in Pakistan have that same option? I'll tell you--they don't.

                  Do you understand how lucky you are that you were born in America? In a free country? You are not forced to believe anything. You get to experience things and gather information and make your own decisions. You get to think for yourself. Do you realize that not everyone has that?

                  Children born into extremist, radical Islam in a country where information is controlled and ideas are restricted, don't have the opportunity to think for themselves. They are fed, from birth, a distorted version of reality and history that fits the message of hate. And they never know anything different. They never know real freedom.

                  If life in America was like that, I can promise you, we'd have violent, radical Christians blowing stuff up as well.

                  And the fact that you would collectively refer to the 1 million + Muslims living peacefully in this country as "animals" is so vile and disgusting, it makes me feel physically ill. It pains my heart quite deeply to know that people as ignorant and close-minded as yourself truly exist. I am so thankful that I've been fortunate enough to personally know so few of you throughout my life.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by John Paradox (November 15, 2009 2:29 pm ET)
                  1  
                  if terrorists were to destroy entirely one of America's 40,000 shopping malls per week, your chances of being there at the wrong time would be about one in one million or more. Rothschild also estimated that if terrorists hijacked and crashed one of America's 18,000 commercial flights per week that your chance of being on the crashed plane would be one in 135,000.

                  OMG you are a miserable coward

                  SOURCE LINK: http://reason.com/archives/2006/08/11/dont-be-terrorized
                  FROM:Michael Rothschild, a former business professor at the University of Wisconsin
                  Report Abuse
            • Author by LKL (November 14, 2009 6:22 pm ET)
              8  
              This is the United Stated of America when you come to this country you live by OUR laws not yours


              Why don't you take your own advice?? OUR laws require freedom of religion. If you don't like it, maybe YOU should be the one taking a hike!
              Report Abuse
              • Author by rugger69 (November 14, 2009 6:31 pm ET)
                  10
                Not when the religion incites killing people who don't follow it or allows honor killings in its name, ask the girl who's father RAN HER over with the car.

                Oh but that could not be the religion of peace!?!??
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Ruby (November 14, 2009 7:16 pm ET)
                  7  
                  Do you have any idea how much blood has been shed, how many innocent lives destroyed, in the name of the Christian God?

                  How about the Spanish Inquisition?

                  Or how about up in Massachusetts when those God-fearing Christians burned teenage girls alive?

                  Could that be a religion of peace?
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by LKL (November 14, 2009 8:52 pm ET)
                    5  
                    Excellent point.
                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by jjamele2880 (November 14, 2009 11:36 pm ET)
                    7  
                    Nitpick: the Calvinists of Massachusetts didn't burn accused witches, just hanged them (and pressed to death one.)

                    Burning would have been too "Catholic" for them.

                    People like rugger apparently think that Christians have never killed anyone in the name of their religion. Which suggests that he believes that world history can be traced back only as far as September 10, 2001.
                    Report Abuse
                • Author by LKL (November 14, 2009 8:54 pm ET)
                  8  
                  Sorry rugger, you can whine all you like, but there is no Islam exception to freedom of religion.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by soze169880 (November 14, 2009 10:18 pm ET)
                     
                  So every Muslim in America does those things?
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by mescal (November 15, 2009 2:53 am ET)
                  6  
                  Okay, you're getting uglier and crazier by the post, Rugger. Your increasing use of eliminationist rhetoric and calls to violence and oppression against a religious minority puts you squarely inside Klan territory. You're beginning to sound seriously unhinged.
                  Report Abuse
            • Author by pilotx (November 15, 2009 12:21 am ET)
              5  
              There is no official language in America. You are free to speak any language you want. Now that's what I call freedom.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by Publius39 (November 15, 2009 10:45 pm ET)
               
            Are you out of your mind... Islam is what fued these idiots. Not to say every Muslim is out to cause us harm. BUT atta, zarquaoui certainly didn't perpetrate those acts because they were jewish or christian...


            Just like Christianity fueled the murder of George Tiller. You can't pick and choose what religions are okay and which are not. If you're going to look into a religion because of its ties with terrorism, look into them all.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by worrierking (November 13, 2009 11:32 pm ET)
        11  
        Look them all up? Like in the phone book? Or look them up using the google?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (November 13, 2009 11:02 pm ET)
      5 1
      Coulter needs to get laid. there , I said it.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by worrierking (November 13, 2009 11:33 pm ET)
      8 1
      She doesn't need to wear the big crucifix to show us she's an ultra-christian. You can tell by listening to her.

      I had nuns in school who wore smaller ones.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by wolf kotenberg (November 13, 2009 11:38 pm ET)
        4 1
        a blind man knows......Remember she goes to church and the priest doesn't remember seeing this anorexic blonde with short skirts. Takes a FOX fan to believe her.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Sharpe (November 14, 2009 12:41 am ET)
      6 1
      If he were not Muslim, you guys would not be calling him a terrorist. Its as simple as that. Unfortunately, legally and if we are actually going by the dictionary here, terrorism is not definied by the background of the perpetrator but by the MOTIVES of the perpetrator. Did he have some sort of far reaching plan to promote an ideology? Did he have a terrorist organization backing his efforts? Is the terrorist community going to come out and take credit for this? Did he want to spread fear into the greater american society in order to prevent or stall the war effort?

      The MAIN question is not who is he but rather why did he do this? What was the overarching motive? Was he mentally ill and latched on to some muslim extemism that brought out the worst of his wrath or did his religious or ethnic ideology provoke him to spread fear in America by perpetrating such an attack and the fact that he was mentally unstable just help him believe that he was killing in the name of god or for a greater cause? That is the major difference between a murderer and a terrorist. But since no one knows his real motives no one can say for sure.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by DellDolly (November 14, 2009 1:13 am ET)
      7  
      Innocent Muslims in America DID become victims on 9/11, just like innocent Christians did, but innocent Muslims became even greater victims when no-nothing Christians leveled hate crimes on innocent Muslims because of 9/11.

      It's people on the right who aren't victims who pretend to be - like Rep Joe Wilson, who whined about being a victim. He wasn't. He got caught doing something really rude. Getting punished for your own behavior doesn't make you a victim, Joe - get over yourself.

      And like Ann Coulter - you're not a victim either, Ann. You've made your bed, and if you don't like it, well, too bad, so sad.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by juliajayne1 (November 14, 2009 1:35 am ET)
        5  
        Hmmmn, when Ann throws a fit, should it be called an Anntrum or a Mantrum?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by darkmass (November 14, 2009 4:28 am ET)
          3  
          Actually, JJ, while those are both appropriate, I kinda favor Coultrum.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by eweston8542983 (November 14, 2009 11:43 am ET)
          2  
          A Hissy Coult?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by jonesjax2374 (November 15, 2009 6:34 pm ET)
          1  
          HAHAHAHAH - Anntrum. Hey, from a fashion standpoint, I am happy to see her in tasteful sage mock turtleneck instead of the ubiquitous cocktail black dress. Now if we could get her to dump the damaged hair, I might take her more seriously. Kidding. But you ARE on TV, hunny. Conditioner, trim, and you're not 18 anymore. I wish also she'd wear a BIGGER UGLIER BLOODIER CRUCIFIX to magnify the chaste, godly, un-violent religion to which she allegedly belongs.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by John Paradox (November 14, 2009 11:01 pm ET)
        3  
        Not only actual Muslims, but anyone the Neocons thought were Muslims. In PMesa,AZ , a Sikh was killed because some moron thought he was a Muslim.

        http://www.nytimes.com/2001/09/19/national/19HATE.html
        Report Abuse
    • Author by mescal (November 14, 2009 2:41 am ET)
      10  
      REPUBLICANS are the ultimate victim culture.

      I mean, has there ever been a bigger group of privileged, narcissistic whiners in all human history?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by soze169880 (November 14, 2009 9:10 am ET)
           
        Seriously. This was one night after Hannity's big "Sarah Palin died for your sins" special.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (November 14, 2009 12:25 pm ET)
        6  
        That's why Annie-Christ is so upset. Whining victimhood is what fuels the far right, and the perceived competition from other groups for that #1 victim spot really irks wingnuts.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by juliajayne1 (November 14, 2009 4:05 pm ET)
          5  
          For anybody that's interested, Thom Hartman is going to have Ann on his show, November 18th, first hour. They'll be discussing this very subject.

          And I wonder if he'll ask her why she says Mooze-lem.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by Boxer1979 (November 14, 2009 10:06 am ET)
      4  
      Coulter claims Muslims "have acclimated to ... the victim culture" in U.S., "on 9-11 they became the number one victims"

      The victim game? Everyone in this country who is not a Christian Movement Conservative should be a victim. Since ya'll ridicule them if they are not one of ya'll anyway.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by fantagor (November 14, 2009 4:55 pm ET)
      3  
      What astounds me about Ann Coulter is that the giant cross around her neck doesn't burn a hole through her chest. Mustn't be a bless article, thus vampire safe.

      Randy
      Report Abuse
      • Author by John Paradox (November 14, 2009 6:17 pm ET)
        2  
        Could be that a simple 'cross' doesn't affect vampires (I remember one Chistopher Lee as Dracula movie where crossing two candlesticks worked!!!), but a 'crucifix' (including the body, not just the cross) may be needed.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Handyman (November 14, 2009 8:11 pm ET)
        7
      Come on Ladies and Gentlemen, time to quit making personal attacks - let's get a little more professional what do you say.

      I would sure appreciate it,

      Thanks!!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by juliajayne1 (November 15, 2009 10:36 am ET)
        3  
        Hey guy, we're talking about Ann Coulter, bomb thower, and now person beyond irrelevance because of it. She deserves ONLY contempt.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Handyman (November 15, 2009 3:03 pm ET)
          2  
          I understand the contempt part believe me, I just don't see where us making personal demeaning posts and then slapping ourselves on the back for doing it is helping MM or anyone else.

          I don't know about other members that read these posts, but I do it to increase my knowledge base for the battles we face in the very near future with the Conservative Movement. If we don't stay focused on why they are doing it, instead of who is doing it, we may lose that battle.

          I am sorry if I stepped on anyones toes, that was not my intention. I am very concerned about our country and I am trying my best to get educated enough to play an acitve role in shaping it's future.

          That's all I ask of you also - give it your best shot, post your best argument, give MM and everyone else something we can use in defense of our progressive stance.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by juliajayne1 (November 15, 2009 3:12 pm ET)
            3  
            If you hang around long enough, you'll see that we have all sorts of comments, and commenters on this board. It runs the gamut. Sometimes we like to have fun, sometimes we're irreverent, sometimes thoughtful and thought provoking. Sometimes silly. And sometimes both profound and profane.

            Anyway...welcome. I've seen some of your comments and you're okay with me. ;-0
            Report Abuse
          • Author by John Paradox (November 15, 2009 3:56 pm ET)
            2  
            A few years back, when most 'flame wars' were either on e-mail or more obscure methods (e.g. IRC), I worked in concert with a friend in dealing with various people. We used different techniques, I would use data (like my posting quotes and links here)and more 'objective' posts, while he used 'emotional appeal'.
            That is a very effective way of handling someone who is immune to actual debate, since they use a completely emotional style. Other readers will look at the factual posts and either accept the information or do their own research, while the emotional posts will 'disorient' the flamer, often making them even more irrational.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by Publius39 (November 15, 2009 10:43 pm ET)
         
      Annie talks about other groups being the victim all the time, I think that she's really projecting something on everyone else that she really needs to deal with.
      Report Abuse