Limbaugh defines tragedy and terrorism to fit his attacks on Obama White House
From the November 18 edition of Premiere Radio Networks' The Rush Limbaugh Show:
Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.
Previously:
From the June 11 edition of Limbaugh's show:
RUSH: Very predictably, ladies and gentlemen, the media, the American left is trying to score some political points as a result of this tragedy at the Holocaust Museum in Washington yesterday, and as predictable, they are trying to blame this on me, other conservatives and right-wingers. It's the traditional approach taken by the American left. The facts of the case, however, are such that if we want start assigning blame for this beyond this nutcase Jew hater, and notice that very few people actually want to do that. They want to claim this guy didn't have the ability to act on his own. He only could act if he was inspired by somebody. Well, who did he hate? He hated both Bushes. He hated neocons. He hated John McCain. He hated Republicans. He hated Jews as well. He believes in an inside job conspiracy of 9/11. This guy is a leftist, if anything. This guy's beliefs, this guy's hate stems from influence that you find on the left, not on the right. But let's listen to some of the audio sound bites from the Drive-By and the State-Run Media from yesterday afternoon through last night. Here's the first. This is a montage of cable stations talking about the incident last night.
















jeez what hypocrites... pathetic...
Your use of the childish name for Mr. Obama shows your lack of maturity, BTW. He wasn't my choice, but nothing he has done so far in his presidency justifies your childish name-calling of him.
There is nothing intrinsically wrong or right with either liberalism or conservatism AND they are not the only two political ideologies in this country. NO ONE is 100% liberal OR conservative.
Sorry, pet peeve. LOL!
Thus the truth in the humor of "I don't belong to any organized political party. I'm a Democrat".
Like, Rush knows the shooting was a jihad. And yet, he doesn't have the foggiest notion about the constitution's primary function of insuring checks and balances.
Idiot savant? Or just idiot?
And he knows it. Why do you think he's so all gung ho otherwise?
And--as we sadly know--today's brand of xenophobia and other similar reactions to anyone Muslim is also whipped up to frenzy levels by the Limbaughs of this world.
And he knows that too.
America is heading for HELL!!
Due to the standards set forth by an Obama Presidency, HELL awaits America; the reason is, America can not return to the old way of doing things in Washington, post Obama.
Thanks to Obama The cat is out the bag and exposure is everything.
Republicans, in particular, has shown themselves to all people of the world... that they have a problem with the American people and world leaders under a black President.
Have you noticed Republicans ONLY cater to the far right of their base? They no longer tolerate moderates in their Party. In affect, they can not be trusted to govern a cross section of society in their present state of mind.
How can Republicans win elections with people like Rush Limbaugh and Tea Baggers running the Party (without stealing them)?
Right now Republicans are going crazy thinking about the ultimate power (presidency) and will they ever get to enjoy it again.
On the other hand, Democrats must uphold the standards left behind by Obama. For Democrats that is the only way to do things now that an Obama Presidency has forced people to open their eyes.
Will Democrats do it and CAN Democrats do it?
I repeat;
After Obama's legacy.... America is heading for HELL.
There are people who are Republicans, and those who are registered as Republicans, and they are quite different. Those who 'are' define their lives by certain dogmatic views of the world, such as Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity, and the Fauxians. By contrast, those who are 'registered as' have fully functioning lives, and do not have to cling to eternally unchanging views to reassure themselves they have value. The latter group (RINOs in the view of the former) may be Conservative, or Centrist/Moderate and willing to accept compromise, and they will reasonably debate their views (remember, debate isn't to convince The Other Side, but those 'observing' the debate who are uncertain or uncommitted).
The first 'are' group defines everything in their lives by the line on their Voter Registration Card, with a 'certainty' that masks the fact that they are uncertain about The World and their place in it. They feel (note: this would be a better term for them than 'think') that anyone who doesn't see the 'brilliant knowledge' of their views are sub-human and dangerous because the 'other' might prove to them that they are uncertain because they are naive about how Reality works.