About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Beck fill-in Gray on trying terrorist suspects: "They want to put America's past on trial"

November 20, 2009 11:54 am ET

From the November 20 edition of Premiere Radio Networks' The Glenn Beck Program:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Gray also claimed, "This has never been done in the history of our country."

Previously:

Quick Fact: Scarborough falsely claimed trials of foreign terror suspects through U.S. judiciary are "unprecedented"

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Lizinbklyn (November 20, 2009 12:05 pm ET)
      6 2
      Isn't that what a T-R-I-A-L is all about, ascertaining what happened in the past?

      Translation: we all know there was on-going illegal TORTURE and Bush said it was legal, so that's the end of the story!!

      NOT THIS TIME STOOOOPID . .
      Report Abuse
      • Author by k1dork (November 20, 2009 12:15 pm ET)
        2 12
        Yeah, they should have put the TERRORISTS up in five star hotels and asked them pretty please with a cherry on top for information to save American lives.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by gs-425 (November 20, 2009 12:19 pm ET)
          2 10
          I wonder if lewislaw realized that he only confirms what these trails are really about...putting the Bush administration on trail. Not that that won't incite islamic fundamentalists the world over.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by gs-425 (November 20, 2009 12:20 pm ET)
              7
            Sorry...."trial"
            Report Abuse
          • Author by magnolialover (November 20, 2009 12:23 pm ET)
            13  
            I thought it was about bringing justice to the people who attacked us, or planned the attacks on us? I'm pretty sure the Bush administration isn't being put on trial.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by snoopy (November 20, 2009 1:07 pm ET)
              8  
              Though they should be...
              Report Abuse
            • Author by gs-425 (November 20, 2009 2:04 pm ET)
                9
              They confessed....they're designated EC. There is only one reason for this circus....it is clear. Actions speak louder than words.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by bintx (November 20, 2009 3:55 pm ET)
                4  
                Actually, they are being done for the same reason most trials are done . . . these folks broke the law and they should be tried and prosecuted by the laws of this country. If they are not, and the perpetrators are simply executed, then the "terorists" have won. A terrorist doesn't attack in order to kill large masses of people . . . they attack in order to achieve a goal. The stated goal of al Qaeda was to destroy our way of life. If these trials are not held . . . the terrorists have won.

                Is that what you want?
                Report Abuse
                • Author by christopher howard (November 20, 2009 4:09 pm ET)
                  3  
                  "Yeah, they should have put the TERRORISTS up in five star hotels and asked them pretty please with a cherry on top for information to save American lives."

                  Nothing of the sort is going to happen. Try arguing against things that happen in the real world, not in you imagination.
                  Report Abuse
          • Author by Lizinbklyn (November 20, 2009 1:59 pm ET)
            7  
            GEORGE BUSH: "The United States does not torture."

            " . . putting the Bush administration on trial."

            Break no laws, nothing to worry about and in this country, no one is above the law!! Administrations can't pick and choose what laws will be obeyed, it's not like a menu. Ref. NIXON

            I live and work in New York and New Yorkers welcome an OPEN trial in the Southern District of New York [military trials are closed], as we did the OPEN trial and conviction of the criminals of the first WTC bombing who are now incarcerated for life in our SUPERMAX prison system!

            Just FYI 'cause you sound scared, the torture/rendition abuse won't be allowed into evidence and no one here or around the world is going to change their opinions about Bush/Cheney before, during or after this trial.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by gs-425 (November 20, 2009 2:05 pm ET)
                10
              meme...meme and meme
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Lizinbklyn (November 20, 2009 2:19 pm ET)
                4  
                What, no retort, except gibberish . .

                Give it your best shot . .
                Report Abuse
                • Author by k1dork (November 20, 2009 2:57 pm ET)
                    10
                  Administrations have to make tough decisions. If they thought waterboarding or whatever they did to the poor little terrorists was necesarry to save American lives, so be it.

                  That's just me, though. Sorry, but I just don't lose any sleep over terrorists being waterboarded if it was done trying to get information to save the lives of our troops or something.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by jjamele2880 (November 20, 2009 3:03 pm ET)
                    5  
                    My guess is that you have no problem with ANY brown people being tortured, except that there aren't any tapes of it for you to drool over in your basement.

                    I'm also willing to guess that you think that if a person is arrested, that makes that person guilty. Anyone who was tortured, was also guilty, because after all, they were being tortured, and the USA never, ever does anything wrong. "The Ends Justifies the Means" works both ways, you know- how do you go about condemning people for committing atrocities if those people honestly believed that committing those atrocities advanced their causes?

                    One more guess- you lose sleep over very, very little. Unless you worry about people getting justice.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by k1dork (November 20, 2009 3:41 pm ET)
                        6
                      Actually, I'm black, and I served in Iraq. Sorry, but if they thought pouring water on some terrorist was in the best interest of getting information to protect us, sorry, but so be it.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by bintx (November 20, 2009 3:57 pm ET)
                        3  
                        Thank you for your service, but if you had waterboarded someone while in Iraq, you would have, most likely, gotten worthless information AND you would have been court-martialed.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by k1dork (November 20, 2009 4:06 pm ET)
                            5
                          Thanks, bro.

                          It's not certain what kind of information would have been garnered, but I tend to like living, and think my fellow soldiers should get to do so as well.

                          If pouring water on an insurgent was what they thought was best to get info at the time to keep us safe from an ambush or something, so be it.
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by open_mind (November 20, 2009 4:10 pm ET)
                            2  
                            If pouring water on an insurgent was what they thought was best to get info at the time to keep us safe from an ambush or something, so be it.
                            So you would be okay if our enemies treated our soldiers (and presumably you and your buddies) like this? You will have to forgive me for having a higher standard.
                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by k1dork (November 20, 2009 6:16 pm ET)
                                3
                              Actually, they just cut our heads off. So, I would be much happier if they simply waterboarded us.
                              Report Abuse
                              • Author by open_mind (November 20, 2009 6:28 pm ET)
                                2  
                                That is called a false dilemma fallacy. I wasn't just talking about our current enemies either. President Bush's OLC has established that waterboarding is legal behavior. How could we prosecute any current or future enemies with war crimes for doing something we call "legal" to our own soldiers?

                                You act like waterboarding is no big deal, but that only seems to give evidence to your naivety.
                                Report Abuse
                                • Author by k1dork (November 20, 2009 8:50 pm ET)
                                    3
                                  Well, I don't think it's that big of a deal, seeing that our own special forces get it done to them IN TRAINING.

                                  I do not think it is I who is naive, my friend.
                                  Report Abuse
                          • Author by christopher howard (November 20, 2009 4:12 pm ET)
                            4  
                            Waterboarding is not "pouring water" on someone. It is torture and the United States has convicted people for doing it.
                            Report Abuse
                          • Author by open_mind (November 20, 2009 6:58 pm ET)
                            2  
                            It's not certain what kind of information would have been garnered, but I tend to like living, and think my fellow soldiers should get to do so as well.
                            Another false dilemma argument. There is no evidence you would have died if people weren't waterboarded. That is entirely speculative. That is without a doubt the flimsiest argument (among many you have made) I have seen today.
                            Report Abuse
                      • Author by jjamele2880 (November 20, 2009 5:57 pm ET)
                        1  
                        "Sorry" is very accurate.

                        So is "Un-American."

                        So is "Pathetic" and "Sick."

                        I notice how you don't respond to ANY of my questions, instead choosing to hide behind your skin tone.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by k1dork (November 20, 2009 6:19 pm ET)
                            3
                          You didn't ask any questions, bro. You simply made a whole bunch of assumptions about me.

                          I don't hide behind anything. If you hadn't ACCUSED ME OF BEING A RACIST, my skin tone would not have come up.
                          Report Abuse
                      • Author by Brabantio (November 20, 2009 8:16 pm ET)
                        1  
                        Sorry, but if they thought pouring water on some terrorist was in the best interest of getting information to protect us, sorry, but so be it.
                        I love the dual effort of sugar-coating the practice by referring to it as "pouring water", while also asserting that it was necessary to gather information. If it's just "pouring water", then why on earth would it be effective? The whole concept is that it's severe in order to get a result.
                        Report Abuse
                  • Author by bintx (November 20, 2009 3:57 pm ET)
                    2  
                    Ah, but administrations are not above the law. The Bush administration BROKE not only our own laws but international laws.

                    By using torture, the Bush administration allowed the terrorists who attacked us on 9/11 to win.
                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by open_mind (November 20, 2009 4:01 pm ET)
                    1  
                    Administrations have to make tough decisions. If they thought waterboarding or whatever they did to the poor little terrorists was necesarry to save American lives, so be it.
                    Administratios have to make tough decisions. If the President thinks putting these criminals on trial is necessary to protecting and defending the Constitution and the rule of law, then so be it.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by k1dork (November 20, 2009 4:08 pm ET)
                        4
                      And that's fine. I just think it can be problematic.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by open_mind (November 20, 2009 4:12 pm ET)
                        2  
                        Yes, upholding the Constitution and rule of law can be "problematic" at times. It doesn't excuse just chucking it out the window.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by k1dork (November 20, 2009 6:20 pm ET)
                            4
                          I don't think the Constitution says anything about how terrorists should be tried---whether in military or civilian court.
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by open_mind (November 20, 2009 6:47 pm ET)
                            2  
                            Well for one thing, legally, they are not "terrorists" yet. That is a specific crime that can only be determined by a court of law. They are believed to have committed crimes in the US and are being held in our jurisdiction. Not to mention, we have successfully tried terrorist suspects in the past without a single conservative having soiled his depends (outside of their ordinary occasional mishaps).

                            The Fourteenth Amendment says:
                            ...nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
                            Have a little faith in the system.
                            Report Abuse
                • Author by Handyman (November 20, 2009 5:39 pm ET)
                  1  
                  Our country, as well as all other countries of the world are nothing but the end result of the experiences we have encountered, how we viewed them at the time they happened, and how we view them now.

                  Sometimes our actions from the past are questioned and by utilizing this philosophy we attemp to learn from our mistakes. This does not necessarily mean that the actions in question were not justified at the time, it merely means we have questions if those actions should be replicated into the future.

                  Let me give you a couple examples.

                  1. In the process of the development of our country we committed what is considered to be the greatest act of Genocide in the history of the world. We essentially killed 20 million American Native Indians so that our Immigrant Ancestors could prosper. We now realize the scope of the tragedy could have easily been averted, but we can't back up in history.

                  2. We also know that the concept of slavery was a big mistake. No one has the right to own someone, but you can't back up in history. You can only learn from it and prevent the mistake from continuing.

                  3. Germany now realizes that no nation or race of people have the right to exterminate another race of people because of their religious or ethnic beliefs.

                  Because so many past injustices were centered around what was considered to be torture it is imperative that our country be open and forthright when discussing this issue. We can not deny it happened, we can only determine if the reason it happened was justified and if we as nation want to perpetuate this practice into the future. Make no mistake - the world is watching how we handle this.
                  Report Abuse
    • Author by gs-425 (November 20, 2009 12:06 pm ET)
        10
      Another spot on statement.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by k1dork (November 20, 2009 12:13 pm ET)
      1 13
      I don't think one has to be a rightwing loony to think that these trails are a farce. I mean, the men weren't even read Miranda rights.

      How does the prosecution overcome that little hump?

      These men should be tried by the military and promptly shot. End of story.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by whillenbrand (November 20, 2009 12:33 pm ET)
        3  
        If tried by the military, you will never know the facts behind Bush/Cheney and there reinvention of the Constitution.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by whillenbrand (November 20, 2009 12:33 pm ET)
        4  
        If tried by the military, you will never know the facts behind Bush/Cheney and there reinvention of the Constitution.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by k1dork (November 20, 2009 12:40 pm ET)
            10
          Please tell me you're joking. This trial is about the terrorists, not Bush and Cheney.

          Also, I think most Americans could care less about poor little TERRORISTS not getting treated like stars by our meanies in the military.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®© (November 20, 2009 1:23 pm ET)
            5  
            You don't know what most Americans think, dork.

            You're a right-wing dittobot.
            ~
            Report Abuse
            • Author by k1dork (November 20, 2009 1:40 pm ET)
                8
              I tend to think that most Americans have common sense and most Americans are right leaning (as confirmed by recent Gallup polls).

              Are you a betting person? I'd wager that most Americans don't lose any sleep over the poor terrorists.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (November 20, 2009 2:35 pm ET)
                1  
                I tend to think that most Americans have common sense and most Americans are right leaning


                Cognitive dissonance is an uncomfortable feeling caused by holding two contradictory ideas simultaneously.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by open_mind (November 20, 2009 4:16 pm ET)
                1  
                Are you a betting person? I'd wager that most Americans don't lose any sleep over the poor terrorists.
                There was a time when most Americans didn't lose any sleep over the treatment of slaves. Did that make slavery okay?
                Report Abuse
                • Author by christopher howard (November 20, 2009 4:20 pm ET)
                  1  
                  "Also, I think most Americans could care less about poor little TERRORISTS not getting treated like stars..."

                  Yeah, because that's happened.

                  The US government has disappeared people, tortured them and held them in indefinite detention based on very little evidence. We've actually quietly released hundreds of these prisoners. Were they rehabilitated, still dangerous or were many of them never a threat to begin with?

                  Without a trial of some sort, how do you determine with any degree of certainty that you have a real terrorist and not some goat herder whose brother in law burned him for a chance at a cash reward?
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by k1dork (November 20, 2009 6:24 pm ET)
                    3
                  Wow. Maybe I should feign outrage like a liberal and call your comment racist.

                  "The terrorists are no different than black slaves."
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by k1dork (November 20, 2009 6:25 pm ET)
                    2
                  Wow. Maybe I should feign outrage like a liberal and call your comment racist.

                  "The terrorists are no different than black slaves."
                  Report Abuse
      • Author by Lizinbklyn (November 20, 2009 2:13 pm ET)
        4  
        It's not about the terrorists, it's about our country and how we handle democracy.

        We show the world we're not a third world country. We put people on trial before the world and we show the world our JUSTICE, which is democratic, not a dictatorship!!

        We don't have ten minute trials, convict the prisoner and then take him out back and shoot him in the head. That's what this OPEN FORUM trial is about . .

        If we take the terrorists out back and just shoot 'em aren't we just as barbaric as they are? That would be End of story!!

        Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (November 20, 2009 3:59 pm ET)
        1  
        Oh, I think it takes a loony . . . I don't think real political ideology is important.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by open_mind (November 20, 2009 4:08 pm ET)
        1  
        I don't think one has to be a rightwing loony to think that these trails are a farce. I mean, the men weren't even read Miranda rights.

        How does the prosecution overcome that little hump?
        You sound like the FBI telling the Bush Administratio they were screwing up.

        To answer the question, the lack of "Mirandizing" does not necessarily mean much. KSM has confessed on television prior to being picked up. We do not need the "information" supposedly gained by torture or coercion or even information gained while KSM was not "Mirandized" in order to prosecute KSM.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by whillenbrand (November 20, 2009 12:31 pm ET)
      5  
      You betcha' Mr. Gray! Why do you think people like you are wetting their pants over this. Bringing the trial to NY will force the truth to be known - No more Cheney secrets.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Indy (November 20, 2009 12:45 pm ET)
      7  
      Torture, oh sorry water boarding or extreme surfing school was OK because they were not military combatants. Oh but using military tribunals is OK because they are military combatants...well kind of if you tilt your head to the right just enough. More convoluted insanity hangovers from eight years of Bush sponsored cluster funk logic.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (November 20, 2009 12:50 pm ET)
      4  
      Really? I thought they wanted to put the terror suspects on trial.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (November 20, 2009 2:28 pm ET)
        3  
        That's pretty funny, that the same people who are constantly screeching about America's infallibility, the people who try to slam libruls for admitting faults and criticizing our government, are terrified of what may come out in a trial.

        I've been called an America-hater by these wingnuts, accused of "blaming America first", yet I have no fear at all that terrorism suspects are going to be able to justify their actions in the course of a trial.

        If it happens, during the process of convicting somebody for heinous acts of terrorism, that some information is revealed about crimes committed by our government / military, that's only a positive to me. It's an opportunity to correct these things, to make our country better.

        I feel sorry for bedwetters like Gray who have so little love for our country that they don't think we can survive the truth being exposed. Why do right wingers hate America so much?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Lizinbklyn (November 20, 2009 3:02 pm ET)
          3  
          RWers do appear to urinate on our laws, I agree, except of course when somebody in their family gets arrested, well then, only the best lawyer money can buy . .

          Col. Harlan, you comment reminds me of the Jack Nicholson movie, when he said . . "You people can't handle the truth"

          Appears to be true, ya know . .
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (November 20, 2009 3:07 pm ET)
            2  
            There seems to be a really fundamental misunderstanding of American values among far right nuts. Notice in these threads, when the topic is bringing suspected terrorists to justice, the rightys get all confused and think there's some coddling of convicted terrorists going on.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (November 20, 2009 3:51 pm ET)
              1  
              COL,The RIGHTYS are so cunfues about reality they dont know up from down. There's is an alternate universe.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by John Paradox (November 22, 2009 8:30 pm ET)
                   
                I admit not watching the TV series FRINGE, but do follow information/articles about it, and in it, they literally have an alternate universe... where the Twin Towers never fell (guess Gore won there /snark).
                Report Abuse
    • Author by Ruby (November 20, 2009 5:38 pm ET)
      3  
      First of all, KSM is not a traditional enemy combatant, nor are any other terrorists. This kind of thing may be unprecedented, but it is so because this kind of war is unprecedented. We are not fighting a people. The guys we're fighting do not represent a country or a government or even a single cohesive set of beliefs. They're essentially a group of outlaws. They are not a traditional military, and they are not traditional POWs, and we cannot pretend they are.

      Second of all, to paraphrase Eugene Robinson's column on the subject, in order to truly achieve victory in this struggle, we must also win the war of ideas. And in that war, the idea of justice is the key battlefield.

      The jihadist narrative purports that the West (i.e. America) has long been engaged in a war against Islam. To try KSM in a military tribunal would actually further that narrative, reinforcing the idea that we are ona crusade against the Muslim world (which is, to the dismay of some right-wingers, simply not the case).

      Putting KSM on trial in a civilian court is a way to prove that we really do practice what we preach, that we have one system of justice for everyone. We will show the jihadists that we are not afraid of them or of their ideas, we are not afraid to let a murderous monster have his day in court. We will show them that they cannot shake our ideals. We will always hold fast to the principles and the values that make us American, even as they are attacked. Justice, and the American way, will always prevail over hatred. And that is what we stand to gain.
      Report Abuse